What detectives could solve Death's design?
>>220050449Columbo
>>220050449Problem is that solving it doesn't really fix the problem. You cheat Death, that mf just goes harder the next attempt.That said, I submit Mulder and Scully to answer your question. Matter of fact, the movie started development as an X-Files episode.
>>220050449>>220050817Monk would beat death every time low dif.
Looks like a Blue Rose case to me.
>>220050449the new movie kind of revealed that you don't solve it and beat it, you just postpone it and push it off on your family because death's a bitch and gets whats his eventually. that said, the protagonists 'solve' it every single movie so idk what the point of the thread is
>>220050493Goddamnit.Beat me to it.
This actually bring up a good point: why does death cover it's tracks in the first movie? Like it literally hides the water it uses to kill that one dude in the bathroom as if it's concerned about being caught. Stange stuff.
>>220050449>>220052933>the new movie kind of revealed that you don't solve it and beat it, you just postpone itEvery movie after the first did that. There was never an actual way to win. You don't get to live by solving anything.That's why FD is such a boring horror franchise. You know exactly what's going to happen before the movie is even made. You know there's no point to anything the characters do because they'll die anyway. It's like Nu-Saw with all the cheating impossible traps but even worse.