>Rush Hour 4 Delayed Due to Low Offers for Stars>Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker will not be accepting the initial $8 million each offer for them to appear in the upcoming Rush Hour 4.https://film-book.com/rush-hour-4-jackie-chan-and-chris-tucker-refuse-low-pay-for-upcoming-sequel/
A measly $8,000,000?
>>220052590>keeping ratnerThis whole thing is just a reward for the jew for directing melania huh
>>220052656He used to fuck her too.
>>220052590What has Tucker done of any recent relevance that makes him a choosing beggar?
And people why movies cost a trillion dollar to make and look dogshit
no problemjust make the next rush hour with these two
>>220052590I bet these retards still think A Listers a re still a thing and that they make 20 mil a film still. Fucking boomers.
where juntao at
Wasn't there already a rush hour 4 or something
>>220052590Jackie is a senior citizen. This is a bad idea.
Can't they just take a random china man? The audience won't be able to tell the difference
>>220052590Jackie is older than Harrison Ford was in Indy 4 and he was already too old for that shit.
>>220052590They were both getting paid 10 plus million for the old movies so I can see why they want more now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPxRIXXPmpY
>>220053059The film has zero chance if they are not in it.
>>220052590There's no way this can even happen, Jackie Chan can barely walk anymore
it would be a stupid movie. 2 men, one is 60 and the other is 80 and they're shooting and jumping out of exploding trucks and shitwe don't need this one
I'M NO PUNK BITCH
>>220052590Man who you think you're hiring Chelsea Clinton?
>>220052913He doesn't need to do anything when he is literally rush hour retard. Learn how this works
>>220053067WHY Y'ALL SO QUIET?
>>220053076nah they stopped at 3
>yo jackie, my main man, i guess we ain't gonna be in Rush Hour 4
>>220053191There is no Indy 4
theyre too old.anyway
OH WHEN YOU WALK BY EVERY NIGHT
>>220052590>uncslopGood riddance.
3 sucked and I don't want to watch geriatric action stars anymore.
>>220053136https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxPUdPxvFOg
>>220052590Magabros... the anti woke renaissance is slipping...
>>220052590Rush Hour 4 insider here:They're getting low pay offers because they are only in it briefly, the scripts, as I have seen them, are more about a passing of the torch to their kids who will carry the franchise forward. Chan and Tucker are only in the first 15 minutes and beifly in the epilogue.We are in negotiations to get Awkwafina to play Chan's daughter, and Michala Cole to play Tucker's.
>>220053699Jackie and Chris both got paid about $20 million each for Rush Hour 3 in 2007, which would be like getting paid about $32 million today for RH4.
>>220057438>Chan and Tucker are only in the first 15 minutesWho the fuck would go watch the movie knowing this?
>>220058486presumably those first 15 minutes would be heavily featured in the trailer
>>220057438But Rock doesn't look African Afriican?
>>220053034Sorry they need actually a talented actor who can do the stunts like Jackie and another to actually look threatening unlike the midget on the right.
>>220054087It's also not a hot franchiseThese fuckers are stuck 20 years ago
>>220054881Bingo.>>220052913CT was paid 25 million for RH3. He has no reason to go lower.
How much money do actors need?
WHY YALL DONT WANNA PAY MY NIGGAZ & CHIGGAZ
>>220052640>>220059227The films have made over a billion dollars and the the last one made over $300M and there is no movie without them. They would be retards not to fight them on pay. Or would you rather the mega corps make another $300m off them by paying them pennies?
>>220054451Maybe they're captains now and training the new class
>>220053059More that they don't actually want to/need to do it. Chan openly hates those movies. So the studio needs to offer more to make them think it's worth their while.
>>220059283>Or would you rather the mega corps make another $300m off them by paying them pennies?That doesn't affect the viewer in any way>>220059320>Chan openly hates those moviesSo why did he agree to do it well before even discussing salaries?
>>220052913tucker is effectively retired and been so for more than a decade he doesn't need to do anything if they seriously want his back to give some legitimacy to their stupid idea of making another rush hour movie than he can demand anything he wants and Jackie Chan is 72 he doesn't have to do anything either.
>>220054881>He doesn't need to do anything when he is literally rush hour>>220059223>CT was paid 25 million for RH3. He has no reason to go lower.maybe because he hasnt done shit since and is broke
>>220059283People on this website have never had a job in their life. All they hear is a "big" number and think "greedy bitches". Their brains literally never think that the people hiring them will make 100x what they pay the actors. Imagine making $1,000 a week but your work brings in over 100k. People would flip their shit.
>>220059227it's not about how much they need, it's about how much they can get.
>>220059375>maybe because he hasnt done shit since and is brokeProbably. But again, he has no reason to go lower. To be desu I'm with the other guy I don't want to see these old dudes and the cameras switch angles to hide the stunt doubles.
>>220059332>That doesn't affect the viewer in any wayit also doesn't affect you when actors get paid a lot and yet you're here seething about it
>>220057438>>220058486>>220058577Rush Hour 4 insider here again:It was very much a conscious decision not to have Rock and Tucker as the main stars from the start. For this and the subsequent Paramount limited series it is setting up (not sure if thats been mentioned yet, but if not, CONGRATS /tv/ exclusive leak!) we needed to open up the audience to Gen Z too.Don't worry though you're going to love the new characters, we had fun with them, especially Lee and Carters' kids, Celeste and Noire, who are a 180 role reversal of their parents. We're hoping it will be packed with cameos too, refeencing other great action films (dependent on if we get commitments from the actors) Including Divito and Swartznegger doing a Twins bit, I really hope we get them for that its super funny and a certain politician and genius businessman who has made cameos in other films before, who is a really big fan (you know the guy...)You can probably guess we're proud of what we've put together. Hoping it will mark a return of the buddy action comedy movie genre. It won't take too much to get Chan and Tucker to sign, so keep an eye out!
>>220059413No I'm not. I dgaf about that either
>>220059203unlike the midget on the left*, I meant to say
>>220052590Jackie looking old like Pat.
Just get Kai Cenat and Ray to play Chris Tucker's and Jackie Chan's sons and call it a day. Global pursuit is literally a audition for Rush Hour 4 and the biggest streamer in the world would generate main stream hype.
Imagine not accepting 8 million to be mostly CGI'd into a movie.No way Jackie is doing any real martial arts in this.
>>220059396i love how hollywood lives by this while also pretending to be one big family. this would create hundreds of jobs for people who do need the money.
>>220057438>Awkwafina>Michala ColeI thought they're woke, would they really want to involve themselves with a brett ratner project though? I know the 60+ year old stars wouldn't care as long as they got paid a ton but there's much more to lose than to gain for these newcomers.
>>220059364>Jackie Chan is 72Tucker should just push him around in a wheelchair, what the hell is he gonna do?
>>220057438> Awkwafina> Michala ColeBuddy Cop female films don't sell at all. It would be retarded to tank the franchise right when it came back. They need to make it about their sons and passing down legacy.
>>220059404>he has no reason to go lowerhe hasnt worked in years. its been so long since hes done anything nobody even remembers him. he is broke. the dude has zero bargaining power. this is like going up to a homeless person and offering them a job and them refusing because the pay is too low
You now remember the Rush Hour tv show with the nog from NuGyver
>>220059641he obviously does have bargaining power, dummy, because they want to do a project that won't be viable without him. if the homeless guy starts making demands you can just get a different one but you can't replace the franchise star in a franchise nostalgia project.
>>220059283So get a percentage
>>220059379But they dont know how much it will make
>>220059415based if trueI love Awkwafina
>>220052590Yawn...more TDS bullshit. Trump used an executive order to get production rolling on this so they are going to do it whether they like it or not.
>>220059823>he obviously does have bargaining poweryeah, thats why the movie isnt getting made! lol imagine bargaining with an elderly washed up out of work actor that is only known for doing one dated movie from 30yrs ago. both of these dudes are totally irrelevant in 2026. no reason to even make this movie because not one damn person is going to 'rush' out to see it. not everything from years ago has nostalgia tied to it and rush hour definitely is not something people have any nostalgia for
>>220052590Low Pay? Is that a Chinese actress?
>>220052590>50 MILLION DOLLARS?!
>>220060982>yeah, thats why the movie isnt getting made! loldo you understand what a negotiation is?>no reason to even make this movie because not one damn person is going to 'rush' out to see it>rush hour definitely is not something people have any nostalgia forthey already offered them $8 million each, which means they have market research that says otherwise. these people have access to data on how the old movies are doing on streaming etc. their assessment is worth way more than what you can pull out of your ass.
>>220052590>8 MILLION>WHO DO YOU THINK YOU GOT CHELSEA CLINTON?
>>220052590They're fucking geriatric now stop making these 20 years too late sequels you fucking hacks
>>220061941>their assessment is worth way more than what you can pull out of your ass.what was even the last nostalgia related movie that was a hit? just about every movie today flops because nobody cares about movies at all anymore. eddie murphy just recently made coming to america 2 and it flopped. probably working on what beverly hills cop 8 or 9. adam sandler recently made a sequel. i hope they do eventually make this movie just so it can flop. honestly nobody involved cares at this point, so this is going to be absolute slop
>>220062071Dumb and Dumber sequel was so awful. Using old men versions of their characters makes me want to smash the screen. There's never been a good movie that did this.
>>220057438>>220059415if they hadn't already done this to bill and ted i wouldn't have believed you, but these hacks are completely out of ideas and need to ruin every single franchise that's ever been released. if they don't sign on they'll just say they died and show their graves which would be hilarious.
>>220062170>eddie murphy just recently made coming to america 2 and it flopped.I truly believe it would have flopped in 2002, 2008, 2015, etc. No one wanted to see more of that shit back then either. People overestimate the potential of comedy sequels.
>>220057004This is still one of the biggest audience laughs moments I've experienced in person, and she's a cutie
>>220052590Jackie Chan is 72 years old. What's the point if he can't do the stunts anymore?
No one wants another Rush Hour, hell, did anyone want 3?
>>220056910Yes there is.
>>220059415Low effort
>>220062239if your speaking of the 2014 one then you're incorrect and have poor taste
>>220062170>what was even the last nostalgia related movie that was a hit?super mario galaxy this year. also scream 7. minecraft, sonic, the jurassic world slop. top gun maverick made 1.5 billion.>eddie murphy just recently made coming to america 2 and it flopped>adam sandler recently made a sequelthose both debuted on streaming and did well there, happy gilmore 2 in particular.
>>220057438>>220059415chat is this real
>>220052590Jackie Chan is over 70 now and hasn't been a box office draw in decades.Chris Tucker is a literally who comedian outside of the Rush Hour franchise.$8 million each is a more than generous offer. Who fucking even cares about a Rush Hour sequel in 2026? The last one came out almost 20 years ago, and even that underperformed compared to the first 2.
>>220059415>Rock and TuckerAlso just get Chris Tucker's kid to be Chris Tucker's kid. Also didn't this shit already get a garbage TV show attempt?
>>220062933David Ellison is a billionaire and what they're asking for is pennies compared to his net worth or what he paid for Paramount/WB. Also this movie doesn't happen without them. I say get your bag.
>>220059223>CT was paid 25 million for RH3. He has no reason to go lower.Rush Hour 3 was almost 20 years ago when people still cared about Chris Tucker.And it was a financial disappointment on top of that.
>>220053699That's not how business works. As a collaborative feature, it behooves the studio to pay stars a proportion of expected revenue. The movie industry is very different than it was in 2007, which is why RH3 released btw. That movie made $250m against a $150 budget, justify why Jack and Chris are worth $30M EACH when the movie might make half of what the third entry made with the modern theater environment.
8M and complaining. Hahaha. Wow. I would scratch the whole project out of principal.
>>220063107exactly. some people are pretty brain-dead on here. it isn't going to do anything near the originals.
>>220059415haha, this is such a stupid post. at least come up with something original and at least likely.
>>220063054he's a billionaire, not a retard.You decline a $8 million offer to star in a legacy sequel of this old ass franchise?Fine, no more movie then. fuck those greedy cunts.
>>220059477Jackie still performing martial arts in his chinese films
>>220063283It's not the actors who are greedy cunts, it's the kike billionaire.
>this is the filmography of a guy who thinks $8 million is not enough to star in a sequel nobody asked forlmao
>>220059839>So get a percentageStudios guard percentages with percentages with a death grip. They almost never agree to percentages unless they think it's cheaper than paying them a salary.
>>220063054>this movie doesn't happen without them.I'd hazard to guess most people on this site don't want this movie to happen. Audience interest in the concept was already waning 20 years ago. Chan is old enough to play Uncle in a Jackie Chan Adventures reboot. Tucker is only marginally better. Either you're going to have very tired old men doing silly stunts as CG characters, or they're background players in yet another Next Generation reboot.These geezer revivals have been a very mixed bag both critically and commercially.
>>220063428the actors are still getting paid even if the movie bombs.producing the sequel of a movie after 20 years is a huge risk.
>>220063107It's not just the theatrical market. Home video was a huge component back then, too. Rush Hour 3 did over $40 million in DVD sales and another $80 million in rentals just in the U.S. alone. Worldwide, it probably generated just as much through its second window as it did theatrically. Does anyone think the streaming rights to Rush Hour 4 are going to be worth that much? The home video sales aren't going to touch that.
>>220063195>>220063283yeah thinking like a 5yo is probably why you're not the one in charge of multimillion investments
>>220063565who tf would even be lining up for this?
>>220052590Who wants to see Rush Hour: old guy edition?
>>220064299It will probably be their kids and they act as sort of mentors that bail them out. The joke there is, at the actors' age, their actual kids would by now be middle aged, so it would have to be about their grandkids.
>>220063556>Audience interest in the concept was already waning 20 years ago.People always say this, but time makes the heart grow fonder. They'll advertise on the nostalgia from the previous movies and reel these suckers right back in as they always do for legacy sequels.
>>220057438
>>220057438>passing of the torch to their kidsThis is so dumb. The whole point of the RH franchise was those two actors. If they're not going to be the main characters, then who cares? Start a new comedic, buddy cop storyline, ffs.
I can see why Jackie Chan might be offended because of his "brand" or "prestige", but I dont know about anything of note Chris Tucker was in besides Silver Linings Playbook and that film is more than a decade old. 8 million is an insanely high offer for him.
>>220059823>he obviously does have bargaining powerhow do people figure chris tucker has bargaining power in 2026? the dudes stock is in the basement. without the possibility of rush hour 4 he has no other upcoming projects. he has no money left>>220062749>super mario galaxythats not a sequel. and the rest didnt really set the world on firethis concept for a movie isnt even original. just take two totally different people and pair them together... WOW! just make a movie without these two already. this was just a ripoff of lethal weapon anyway. might as well try to do another one of those movies as well
Chris tucker will be fatter in the next one
>>220057004Nonce
>>220067401>how do people figure chris tucker has bargaining power in 2026? the dudes stock is in the basement.he has bargaining power for this project because they need him for this project to even exist. i don't know why this is such a difficult concept for you tards to get through your head. if it was some other movie the studio could just say "ok we'll get a different nigger" but here they can't, they can only scrap the whole thing, hence he has leverage.
>>220057438Rush Hour 4 insider here:Chris Tucker is refusing to wear the ballgag for a crucial scene where a trans woman (studio is looking at Hunter Schaffer but nothing concrete) pounds his black ass while Jackie Chan fights off guerrilla mercenaries aligned with Russia to save him. Studio says anything above 8 mil will necessitate at least one shot of anal penetration, will likely lead to compromise where Tucker gets to slap Schaffer’s nutsack after entry to retain dominance.
>>220067910>he has bargaining power for this project because they need him for this project to even exist.ok, but he has no other upcoming jobs or sources of income! he needs work and without this he has nothing. how hard is that to understand? he has no star power left. like another anon pointed out rush movies made lots of money on the home video market. thats all gone now. people arent going to the movies much anymore either. nobody is going to go see this movie its been too many years since the last one. they might as well scrap the whole thing because they arent going to make millions on this like the other ones. who do you think is in the driver seat... chris tucker or the movie studio??
>>220059823>he obviously does have bargaining power>>220067910>he has bargaining power for this project because they need him for this project to even exist.Realistically, how much money do you think this movie will make? It's an important question because it determines what they can even offer him.
>>220062170>probably working on what beverly hills cop 8 or 9.That came out last year
>>220052590kike movie, good get these kikes to pay
>>220057074gook lover
Has there ever been a action movie sequel like this where the protagonists are now a million years older and the movie turned out to be actually good? All the sequels I've watched are pure shit. Yes, I'm looking at you Arnold.
>>220059415Were you inspired b this /tv/ post by any chancehttps://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/216131140/#q216132376
>>220065952There is no other negro and chink actor that anyone wants to see in a comedic, buddy cop storyline
>>220062239Blade Runner 2049Top Gun Maverick
>>220052913hes the costar of the franchiselately he was in the affleck/damon movie about michael jordan and nike
>>220062398barely broke even so I guess not
Reboot the franchise and make Jackie Chan's character black.
>>220052640what is this? a salary for ants??
>>220069141the other factor in his salary offer would be his career the past 20yrs... something he didnt have>>220069370>Has there ever been a action movie sequel like this where the protagonists are now a million years older and the movie turned out to be actually good?no... and im sure in the past people tried to make a good one. everybody involved in this is just doing it for the money. thats it. this isnt going to revive anybodys career they all are going into it hoping for one last big payday
>>220052590Rush hour movies were directed by brett ratner who is a rapist jew that lives in Israel who knew epsteinRush hour 3 had roman polanski who is a rapist pedophile jewChris tucker knew epstein and ghislaine
>>220052640$8 million is a joke when you were getting paid $20 million in like 2004
>>220071447>$8 million is a joke when you were getting paid $20 million in like 2004how much would you pay julia roberts to star in a movie in 2026?
>>220062398One specific person wanted another Rush Hour and that's the reason it got greenlit
>>220068463>ok, but he has no other upcoming jobs or sources of income!that's a good reason to milk this one.>who do you think is in the driver seat... chris tucker or the movie studio??the movie studio, which we already know thinks he's worth at least $8 million, and might therefore be persuaded to move some numbers around and give him a couple more. this is called negotiation and it happens every day.>he has no star power left.so what, he can't cast magic missile? nobody cares about made-up shit. they want to make the movie + they need him to make the movie = he has leverage to negotiate, within reason. the rest is you flailing your arms.
>>220071677the same as she was paid for pretty woman. pretty woman 2: hag maxing, co-staring clavicular as a gigolo
>>220071928>within reason.This is what every other anon has been trying to get through your thick skull for the entire thread.
Well. probably would have sucked anyways
>>220069370I'm trying to think of things like that and it's not a long list in general. Terminator, Indiana Jones, Ghostbusters (kind of), Beverly Hills Cop, Bad Boys, Rocky, Rambo, Die Hard (kind of). Not exactly great company.
>>220054451>Lee and Carter have one last case just days away from retirement.
>>220057438>AwkwafinaI know it's bait, but I don't care. Can we *please* stop trying to make this talentless bitch a movie star?
>>220072342All she does is voice work it's already been over.
>>220072199now you're just lying. nobody knows if the sum he's demanding is or is not "within reason" because we don't know what it is. what you have been arguing this whole time is that he has no power to negotiate at all, which is obviously wrong and retarded.>>220069141the movie's budget is reportedly $100 million. they can definitely offer him more than 8.
>>220052640A) Its insultingB) (more so for Jackie) Its not worth all the physical effort required for such a lowball offerI'm pretty sure Jakcie is the main one here saying no to the money.
>>220053034>2 of the 4 horsemen of shitty movies
>>220057438>passing of the torch instead of just making a new buddy cop franchise >comedy movie staring women>action movie staring womenThey should demand $50 million each just to prevent this dumpster fire from being made
>>220058486the trick is to not let you know like with Cranston in Godzilla
>>220072307most of those sequels were all made within 10yrs of the original. rush hour was made in 98 and the last one in 2007. most of the movies you mentioned are iconic with stars everyone remembers. rush hour isnt any of that. rush hour 4 will just be two washed up elderly guys in the real world trying to pretend they are hip & cool
>>220052913He got slapped at the Oscars
>>220063471Why did you cut out his best movie?
>>220072723>nobody knows if the sum he's demanding is or is not "within reason" because we don't know what it is.We know it's not within reason because the studio shot it down, retard.>>220072723>the movie's budget is reportedly $100 million. they can definitely offer him more than 8.It's not just about the budget, it's about expected returns, retard.Just because someone approaches an actor for a movie idea it doesn't mean they're desperate to get that idea on screen. Movie deals fall through the cracks all the time. If they can pull together $100M for a movie starring retirees then they can definitely do it for a movie with actors half his age who appeal to a larger demographic. But go on, keep simping
>>220052590I thought ching chong chan was was retired and falling apart a decade ago.
>>220052640>$8m>-15 - 20% agency fee- federal and state taxLike $3m left. Hardly worth it if you’re at their level
>>220072342Karren, you need to stop drinking so much, I'm telling you this for your own good. Also, if you lost 10 stone, lowered your standards, and bathed on a regular basis you might have more luck attracting men. Don't rage about people prettier than you, that won't help your situation out at all, just work on your own short comings. Awkwafina will always be prettier than you, thats why she is one of the most bankable movie stars and you're just a wine aunt.Sort yourself out, its not too late.
>>220073105no that was Kevin Hart
>>220074078At what level?
>>220052590Lo pei lol
>>220073660>We know it's not within reason because the studio shot it down, retard.no, that's not what happened. the studio made an initial lowball offer the actors rejected. now there will be a back-and-forth until they meet in the middle. the movie isn't cancelled or whatever fanfiction you wrote in your head; salary negotiations are a normal thing that happens on every movie.>It's not just about the budget, it's about expected returns, retard.no, actually, how much money you can pay actors depends on the budget. that's what the word "budget" means, the amount of money you have to spend, and being somebody's monetary investment it is straightforwardly indicative of expected returns. the reason people make investments is because they expect returns.>If they can pull together $100M for a movie starring retirees then they can definitely do it for a movie with actors half his age who appeal to a larger demographic.except the saudis that are bankrolling this are not investing in some other movie with some other actors, they are investing in this movie with these actors, and if the actors aren't there and the movie is unviable that money doesn't magically get reassigned to a new project by the same studio, it simply stays in saudi pockets. hence the leverage.>But go on, keep simpingsimping for whom, chris tucker? he's not even making any of these decisions. when the article says "chris tucker rejected the offer" what that actually means is that a 140iq jew from caa thinks his client can get more. he is probably right. i would certainly trust his judgement over yours.
