[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why does nobody trust "critics" any more?
>>
>>220058573
chomo
>>
>>220058573
jews
>>
>>220058573
Here’s an interesting question: what kind of person other than a critic would willingly go to see a biopic about Michael Jackson?

The answer to that is why the score is so different.
>>
>>220058573
You think the seal clapping audience is a metric of any kind?
>>
>>220058573
Critics have standards and are somehow knowledgeable about their favorite media, pleb audience just love slop.
Also, fuck RT, are you a 45yo boomer??! this corrup shit has been irrelevant fore more than a decade
>>
>>220058685
>what kind of person other than a critic would willingly go to see a biopic about Michael Jackson?
Everyone.
>>
>>220058573
Critic sounds like a jewish job.
>>
The Human Nature scene alone was worth the price of admission.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RGL9YTxsE78
>>
>>220058573
Film critic intellectuals are a bunch of gaywads
>>220058746
>Critics have standards and are somehow knowledgeable about their favorite media
Bullshit
>>
These people and their medias (websites, newspapers, industries they own) have lost all credibility for most people.

I think people are sick to their stomach dealing with this ilk.
>>
>>220059250
The most retarded post I will read today and it's only 6:30am
Film critics do not own any newspapers, websites or tv stations.
Why don't you try to engage with the review instead of looking at a bunch of numbers for any film
>>
File: HGwilKfaAAA4rM2.jpg (78 KB, 680x680)
78 KB JPG
Why do they try so hard to cancel him with false allegations?
>>
>>220060388
The critics? Who's talking about the critics?
>>
>>220058746

critics are massive fags, zero relational experience to the actual audience
>>
>>220060415
The people have spoken.
>>
File: 1777063065804667.png (142 KB, 487x378)
142 KB PNG
One of the greatest psyops in media is that critics, regardless of them being for movies, videogames have any standards whatsoever. People are waking up but a large amount of normalfag cattle (mainly redditors) still see the word 'critic' and genuinely assume they're knowledgeable about the subject on hand
>>
I find it so crazy that people will worship and idolize a pedophile just because he made some catchy songs and did some cool dance moves
>>
>>220060726
Jew
>>
File: jacks2.jpg (8 KB, 300x235)
8 KB JPG
>>220060809
Yes, Wacko was a jew and a child molesting one at that.
>>
Im a critic and I gave it lower score cause of the following reasons
1. It felt incomplete the movie just stops in the late 80s making the ending seem off and unsatisfying
2. Michael is portrayed as a perfect being who does no wrong, as a result he felt one dimensional
3. Other characters relevance is near nonexistent, is really only Michael and his dad at best
>>
>>220060707
>normalfag cattle (mainly redditors)
Those aren't normalfags. Those are nerds who get bullied by the normalfags. Normalfags aren't terminally online. That's what makes them NORMAL.
>>
>>220060809
Yes he was produced by jewish music producers and they both profited and both molested kids
>>
I trust critics
>>
>>220061172
>jewish music producers and they both profited and both molested kids
But enough of your personal fantasies.
>>
File: 1777214988997.png (44 KB, 480x162)
44 KB PNG
>>220058573
>>
>>220060415
97% now with 5000+ ratings, should update the image.
>>
File: Untitled.png (108 KB, 742x237)
108 KB PNG
>>220061418
I was going to post that one too, more importantly in contrast to this one

I guess my question is, was this really one of the finest documentaries ever made? What did it do that was so compelling that it enamored critics?
>>
>>220058746
Ghostbusters 2016 was the first strike, last jedi the second, and captain marvel the third, after that they became complete irrelevant. Hell, in 2016 I went to watch 7 disney movies with fresh ratings and only liked 2 of them.
>>
>>220058573
Why were they ever trusted? Some random fuck says their opinion and its special just because?
>>
>>220058573
I dont trust anyone. Critics and the general public are equally stupid
>>
>>220060415
You have a pedophile president, of course a talented pedo would be defended by ameriburgers.
>>
>>220058573
But the critics are right about this one. It’s terrible.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.