>>220059857Did you mean 'in'?Those difficult two letter words..
>>220059885No, not unless OP meant to ask if they're going to go back in time and make a new Michael Jackson movie in the 1990s. If the subject matter is what happened during the 90's, then it would be "on" the 90's.tl;dr You're retarded.
>>220060096But I want them to go back in time though.
>>220059885no. that would mean that the movie is being made during the 1990's, which is impossible without a time machine. op was right and you are indian.
wrf is this
>>220059857they were going to but the terms of the 1993 settlement prohibiting the kid etc being presented in a movie so they had to scrap last third of the movie
>pic of Michael showing affection to a kid>"that means he sexually abused him!!!1!!"
>>220059857He's 100% a pedo. That picture is the extra final nail in the coffin
>>220060371How?
>>220060401I don't have the energy to explain it all to you, but the nude pictures of little boys in bikinis doesn't help mjs case.
>>220060436Mj had nude photos of kids when the police raided his house
SAAR please be being to talking about my /pol/ subjectings on the television & film board
>>220060472Lol
>>220060436You don't have to explain it all, just why that picture in particular is the "final nail."
>>220060436>nude boys>in bikinisYou can't even keep up with your own fantasy.
>>220060535He literally had a photo of a boy with bikini bottoms pulled down in his bedroom, pedo apologist.
>>220059857did michael pay the trolls toll?
He earned them kids
Daily reminder:>Never found guilty>Never convicted
>>220061412Correct.
>>220059857Has anyone here seen the film? Is it any good?
>>220061482Yeah, it's very good. Critics are only mad because it's not about him diddling kids.
>>220061501Is it more Bohemian Rhapsody or Rocket Man?
>>220061412>Daily reminder:>Never found guilty>Never convictedA "Not Guilty" verdict aint exoneration.Fucking OJ was found not guilty and that dude totally butchered his ex and her fuck boy.
>>220061574>found not guilty literally multiple timesNO BUT HE RAPE KIDS LIKE EPSTEIN WHO WAS FOUND GUILTY TWICE EVEN WITH SATAN CONNECTIONS
>those black patches of skinThat's an actually fucking insane amount of vitiligo if real, worst I've ever seen. Seriously, if you google vitiligo it's black people with patches of white skin, this fucker has black patches on his white skin. And he is originally black. I am not going to comment about the child on his lap.
>>220059857What was his relationship life anyways? Any actress/model he was rumoured with in tabloids and such? I always believed his handlers castrated him when he was a teen to preserve his voice thereby rendering him sexless. Therefore any pedo allegations felt baseless.
>>220063366>some white women hee hee shamoneHe has no biological children. Honestly, the more you think about it all just makes it seem like he really, genuinely hated niggers. Deeply. He was abused by his father who made fun of his big nose so he carved it up. Mental trauma. He hated kikes, too.
