[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 71Hmv9MwvhS.jpg (152 KB, 900x1406)
152 KB JPG
>no involvement whatsoever from the directors of the first movie
This sequel isn't good
>>
The first one was a pleasant surprise in 2008
>>
>>220062453
it was big in china too. it was clearly a passion project.
>>
>Antz
>Shrek
>Shrek 2
>Shark Tale
>Madagascar
>Over the Hedge
>Flushed Away (with Aardman)
>Shrek the Third
>Bee Movie
>Kung Fu Panda
>Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa
>Monsters vs Aliens
>How to Train Your Dragon
>Shrek Forever After
>Megamind
>Kung Fu Panda 2

Personally, I think Panda 2 is more boring than all the CGI DreamWorks movies that came out before
>>
DreamWorks' original plan in its early years was to make both traditional animation movies (such as Prince of Egypt and Road to El Dorado) and CGI movies (such as Antz and Shrek). As we all know, that plan didn't last. They quickly switched to only making CGI movies
>>
>>220062984
The huge failure of that Sinbad movie in 2003 played a big role in that decision



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.