Not good, not bad. Slow build up but good action scenes at the end.
It's kinohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwpV2c6ladQ
>>220069734Cyborg 2, now there is an extremely bad movie, even if it does have Angelina Jolie at her absolute peak
>>220069734Saw this movie as a kid and it scared the shit out of me. I thought the future was going to be like that.
>>220069734The sequel was better because angelina is naked in it
>>220069734The movie isn’t that great, but it is fun to watch knowing that it was made using repurposed sets, props and costumes from Cannon’s cancelled He-Man sequel and a Spider-Man movie.
I like Van Damme a lot more than Seagal, because Van Damme is a harmless fool while Seagal seems like a real cunt. That said, Cyborg was disappointing. The action scenes are few and far between (as is often the case in B-movies), and the crucifixion of Van Damme is laughably pretentious. I'm not sure what they were aiming at with the religious symbolism, but it didn't work.
>>220069992>>220069932OP here. I will watch Cyborg 2 and 3 next. I hope they're good.
did she exercise watching Arnold?is she acting terribly,or is she mimicking perfectly what a cyborg is?i can't decide.
