>gobekli tepe Yup, he's getting raped by Flint Dibble
>>220083916Should be, for making slop.>but muh ancient advanced civilizationsWhere's the evidence, where are the artifacts, nigger.
Don't care if what he says is real or not, it's entertaining.
>>220083916
>>220083916>Can't quibble with the dibble!
>>220084160>>220084306you jews get really mad whenever someone says jewish history isn't the oldest history even though that is obvious
The one who demands a rematch always happens to be the loser
>>220085050It's prehistory, first of all. And fuck the jews, secondly, but they are not the concern of my post.Simply put, many ancient cultures existed on various levels of thecnologicla advancement from paleolithic to neolithic, but they were not any more advanced than any classical ancient civilizations (Hindus valley, Mesopotamian ones, Egypt, take your pick). If you think otherwise then show evidence. Unless by "more advanced" you mean they had certain technological innovations sooner then we used to think (like possibly controlling and manipulating fire earlier in hominid line, or oldest wheels found in Europe and so on). But that is not some Atlantis lost advanced civilization tier shit, that's just pushing back the timeline for more mundane technology.
>>220085050Do you really think Flint Dibble of all people is a zionist?
>>220083916As an actual archeologist, I must confess that the G man won and The Dibbmeister got swirlied and locker stuffed.
>>220083916Threat to democracy.
>>220083916>gobekli tepe too advanced for me, somebody who doesn't work with tools, therefore ancient advanced civilizations and maybe aliens lmaoThis is the type of logic here.
>>220083916I suspected but had no actual framework for my belief that Big Academia is wrong and that blond haired supermen had an advanced globe-spanning civilization on Earth in the distant past. They also, very clearly, mastered ESP and telekinesis and probably had video games and entertainment featuring futanari elves with balls. There are no male elves, they are all futanari and they are ashamed of their sex drives and procreation habits and they blush a lot and try to conceal their large penises with foreskin and balls as well. This was all kept from us but the collective genetic memory of humans can't keep it repressed forever and I'm glad it's all coming out now and that someone understands.
>>220084160>Where's the evidence, where are the artifactsThe fingerprints of the gods book is like 30 years old. All the evidence he has found is in that.
>>220086869I did my thesis on this topic but was censored. You're absolutely correct. You've probably also figured out that Greenland was part of this former civilization and that's why everyone's been fighting over it.
>you haven't excavated every square inch of the sahara desert therefor I can be right in my claimsHe really thinks this is some kind of checkmate.
>>220083916>bro, how could have people like 5000 years ago figured out how to stack rocks on top of each other? >must have been aliens, or atlantis
>>220087012>there's a snake motif here and a snake motif in some other placeglobe spanning civilization!!
>>220086962>>220087012>>220087031Very suspicious times on these posts. Yep. I think we're being raided bros.
>>220087031>snakes are found in both placesmaybe they were brought there? by... someone...?
>>220087048quickly, retreat to your special place ... the dry ass
>>220085050>you jews get really mad whenever someone says jewish history isn't the oldest history even though that is obviousHoly shit I didn't even realize they have manipulated archaeology to explain they are the founders of civilization>The earliest signs of a process leading to sedentary culture can be seen in the Levant to as early as 12,000 BC, when the Natufian culture became sedentary; it evolved into an agricultural society by 10,000 BChttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization
>>220087072You know it's telling that you have no firm ground to stand on because you immediately resort to mockery, right? These threads are almost always earnest and educated people trying to discuss Hancock's theories for a short period of time before you cretins crawl out of the woodwork to ruin everything. I'm genuinely curious as to why the mere possibility of an ancient apocalypse causes you to become so irate and hostile? Not an untoward word has been said about your champion Dibble by Graham and yet one could fill many reams of paper with the wicked bile you lot have spewed about Hancock in lieu of actual argumentation.
>>220087147Anon you’re posting in third world hours.
>>220087147>You know it's telling that you have no firm ground to stand oni am baffled that someone can say this unironicallygrahams primary argument is that "we havent looked everywhere" as to why there is literally 0 evidence for "atlantis" or whatever the fuck he is calling it nowits just a grift for contrarian retards who desperately want to feel smart, so they reject anything the "mainstream" is telling them, since theyre too smart for that
He relies on natural formations looking weird, while not giving us tools and other man made objects to back it up. If there were ancient advanced civilizations from before/during last Ice Age, then where is the material culture/artifacts for it.
>>220084283>>220083916its just a bunch of rocks, i dont get it? its not like its wakanda, why couldnt people do this 20 000 years ago supposedly?
>>220087557It's not only that but there's a bunch of similar sites all over the area but they latched onto this one like it's a singular occurrence.
>>220087557To me the question is why they bothered doing it at all. Seems like a waste of manpower in an age where it was much needed, to build monuments. But then, people built opulent palaces and temples in later periods, so I guess it's not always pragmatic. But yeah, if Hancock wants to proof his shit he needs to find iron tools from the last ice age.
>>220087102every single time
>Gobekli Tepe>Gunung Padang>Bimini Road>Olmec Heads>Younger Dry Ass>Spring Equinox>True North>Ayahuasca>Big Archeology>Flint DibbleWow. Thank you Graham Hancock for your incredible """"""insights""""""
>>220087469That's not his primary argument. See, you have let your mockery eat away at your brain and erode your ability to accurately assess the opposition. Graham is making a stunningly intelligent and original argument about the striking similarities across cultures separated by vast distances. The existence of a precursor or seed people is inferred from the existence of analogous myths and symbolism in different civilizations. It's a genius level abstraction of, say, the line of reasoning that led to the discovery of Proto Indo Europeans. The people opposed to Hancock's insights are therefore opposed to already existing archaeological and linguistic discoveries and thus are in a grave error unless they can explain the differences.
>>220087612Every single time
>>220087693>about the striking similarities across cultures separated by vast distances.Such as? I mean, now that you mentioned Indo Europeans, then yeah, they can be good example on how culture, religion, tradition and language can spread over vast distances. But that didn't require some very advanced technology.
>>220087738>Indo Europeans are a good example of how we can infer the existence of a progenitor people from shared cultural traits.>But this CAN'T be the case when Hancock conjectures the existence of an even earlier civilization that transferred monumental engineering>because... because it just can't!!!
>>220083916>>220084283>>220087557>>220084306>>220085050>>220086378>>220086869>>220087012>>220087147>>220087638Actual archaeologists don't give a fuck about any of these sites btw>t. PhD in Archaeology
>>220087793Your PhD most likely comes from a mainstream Western institution and is literally worth less than toilet paper.
>>220087785It's not that it can't, and archeologists generally see certain different centers of civilizations arising in different places and different times across the globe (Hindus, Mesopotamia, Yangtze, Mesoamerica) , but timing is wrong. It's not during or even before the last ice age, like Hancock would say.
>>220083916every time I see a thumbnail with this guy posted I just assume it's ellen degeneress
>pre historical civilizations don't exist!<proofThe Chinese found those and from research science, who ever made these are more than 5000 years old- longer than the recorded Chinese history and myth record They don't know anything about the civilization but you don't see the Chinese archaeologists saying pre historical high advance civilizations don't exist when they literally dug up the evidence
>>220087847Those are date to like 1400 BC, which is Bronze Age in ancient China, apparently. And they are made out of bronze. So it's not out of ordinary. Now if you found something like that near those weird geological formations that Hancock uses, and date it to ice age, then you would have an argument.
>>220087793>>t. PhD in ArchaeologyMy deepest condolences
>>220087847> who ever made these are more than 5000 years old- longerWhy are you lying? This shit ain't a prehistoric mystery, it's not even prehistoric. Egypt shits on your Chingchong bullshit.
>>220087102The broader meaning of the "levant" includes turkey and egypt so this is a dumb nothingburger. It's not like they're saying it's da JOOOOOS. There are no semites around at this point anyway.
>>220087601>waste of manpower in an age where it was much neededBut that's the lie of modernity, it turns out both the primitive hunter gatherers and early agriculturalists had a shit ton of excess time. Times of immense plenty (with no real ability to save it up other than to eat and be merry), and some regular hard times (droughts, planting times for agricucks). There was no Shekelstein clocking you in each day and begging for a PTO day to care for your sick grandmother.
>>220088191>not like they're saying it's da JOOOOOSI wonder who could be behind this post.dont you JIDF fucks have brown children to kill and childrens penises to bite off
>>220084306neckbeard niggle got btfo'd the fuck out
>>220088301If anything you're JIDF, trying to tie a hunter gatherer people to being jews because they lived in the vague region inhabited by jews for a few hundred years 10 000 years later. Is it magic soil theory Mr Goldsteinburger? Does that region turn you into a jew? Can't really be so, since they do their best to exterminate people who have lived there longer.
>>220088261There is too much wishful thinking in this. I see a lot 4chan anons repeating this, probably because they hate being wagies. Even 100 year ago my great grandparents, peasants, had a lot of work to do, because taking care of animals, household chores before modern tech took time. It was just offset by the fact that there were less distractions, and no ways to save it up, as you say.But you had to make your own clothes, tools and alike, or at least bring to somebody with a know how for more specialized things, like smithing. I am just saying that those stone monuments were not the most rational uses of time, but then again, people are not rational and waste time on shit today, so I guess it's no surprise they built monuments back then too, and it had some value to them, spiritual, cultural, I would imagine.
>>220088102Yeah those Egyptians with blonde and red hair but nooo shhh nothing weird going on here.
>>220088361>Even 100 year ago my great grandparents, peasants, had a lot of work to do,What do you think modernity is you fucking retard? Life 100 or even 1000 years ago has nothing in common with the first agriculturalists or hunter gatherers. That's the entire point. Hell, the first cities become the birthplace of the Shekelsteins, the first fucking thing people write down isn't words, it's accounting. How many bushels of wheat, how much beer. Oy vey, you are underdelivering goyim. Back to the fields with you, my ooga booga god only I can talk to says I must have 50% of what you make. > those stone monuments were not the most rational uses of timeArt and spirituality don't require reason, but I don't think it's particularly hard to find a reason to unite hundreds of neighbouring tribes to come together to build monument sites, both from a perspective of "to rule our environment we need gods/spirits on our side, therefore we create this ritual site" (trying to engineer prosperity), but practically, a site like Stonehenge required thousands of people working collectively, which would both decrease tensions and unite people over generations, as well as offer a signal to nomads and invaders that the area is united enough to make a fuck off structure just because. Everything needs some nickel and dime motivation these days like you can't even build a staircase in the woods because it'd make a trail better, you'd have to apply to daddy government, or you're so cucked you can't even imagine impacting your environment in the first place and just expect someone else to do it. Why did they spend the time to make nice symmetric flakes when an ugly one cuts just as well? Was that a rational use of their time? Not according to the Shekelsteins. Pride of ownership and making is a modern mystery in the cheap plastic shit from China era.
>>220088372>those EgyptiansIt's an artifact from China you double nigger. Can't defend your lies, so you start your niggerbabble about the next piece of insanity you have stored.
>>220088513>What do you think modernity is you fucking retard?There is not much modernity among semi literate or illiterate peasants, anon. It's a buzzword. My point is that peasants toiled a lot, more than anons assume. Because taking care of household, animals, agriculture back then took time. Both among rural peasants a century ago and thousands of years ago as well. More among them, because they had even poorer tools if you go back to neolithic. Wooden ards vs plows, stone tools vs more durable metal and so on.
>>220083916His Netflix specials really opened up my eyes to the way he was being censored and his views suppressed.
>>220083916I can create a more bulletproof theory than Hancock. Ancient ayys created all the civilizations and then, using their sci fi tier tech, removed all the evidence.Is this theory any useful? Maybe for a scifi/fantasy novel or show. He should dig up evidence for it or shut up. But talking gets him fame and money, so he won't stop.
>>220088538I'm pointing out the other civilization you're clinging to sits on dubious evidence. But please, write nigger another time like you're a zoomer who just went on /pol/ for the first time.
>>220088824>He should dig up evidence for it or shut up.big archaeology wont let himthey keepin a brutha down
>>220088860Jokes aside, they are indeed keeping people away from digging shit up, but that's the case for good reasons.It's because amateurs fuck up the dig sites, not to mention there is black archeology going (even among "Big Archeology" for that matter, I have known such the people from my study days) of digging shit up and selling it. Also, some archeologists I spoke to hope that future tech would allow them to make better discoveries, so they are leaving some sites untouched for that purpose.
>>220087693im pretty sure this was written by an LLM and that youre trolling
They carved out 800 to 1,500 tonne limestone blocks like this one by pounding them with harder stone, then moved them nearly a km up hill using manpower and basic tools broThey also carved polished statues from solid diorite, likely harder than granite, using those same basic techniques bro.And 12k years ago at Gobekli Tepe they carved out pillars from solid limestone bedrock and shaped them, rather than hunting and gatheringDon't forget estimatd 90m high statue carved from granite block in Egpyt
Dibble won. Bigly.
>>220089095you are right that is suspicious that ancient people would drag big stones aroundtherefore i too must conclude, that aliens levitating those stones uphill is a more plausible explanation
>>220089095So what, it's all wood and stone and bone that they worked with. It's not "advanced" civilization material.Wake me up when they find steel tools dating to 15k BC.
>>220089275Steel would turn into dust or mold into the soil after certain thounands of years.
>>220085319Yes
>>220089365It can last long under right conditions, and other metals, like gold, can last much longer. So basically, when Hancock shows you some rocks, he needs to find gold artifacts and rock carvings made by that advanced civilization.Because right now all he has is some weird looking rock formations.
Oy Veeeeey
>THIS is the shills championlol, lmao.
>>220089439Yeah, this is Flint's side of retardation, but the thing is, him defending modern understanding is mostly more pro western/pro white even if he doesn't realize it. Because much of modern (aka actually advanced) human civilization is built on European achievements, which were quite late and recent and not from some supposed ancient civilization that predates this. That's assuming if you even care about "who invented what first" type of dick waving.
>haha this guy is a stereotypical redditor>therefore atlantis is realcant argue with that logic
>>220089425Also, besides gold, probably glass, ceramics.
>>220089439Yeah he's right here. The Ancient Aliens guy was a germoid saying that the Hannunakis were blonde blue eyed space nazis bringing civilization to humans. Giorgio Tsoukalos just omitted that bit but from the shows. Those pseudo archeologists almost always default to "le white pipo/white aliens dun it"
>>220087847china is the number one producer of archaeological forgeries in the world by a significant margin. there's more fakes that come out of china than legitimate archaeological discoveries. this hilarious one is the sword of goujian which is blatantly a forgery that they claim is 2500 years old and suffered no corrosion despite being found under water because the wooden scabbard somehow protected it. total horse shit. to give context finding this sword would be like westerners finding thor's hammer, there's no evidence the king goujian who allegedly used this sword was real. to make it even more ridiculous the chinese claimed to have found the spear of fuchai as well which belonged to king goujian's arch nemesis that also somehow was preserved in the same
>>220089425You don't know shit. We have found highly precise stone vases, not the ones made by hand, but much older ones that are perfectly symmetrical, and 100% not made by handhttps://youtu.be/YqGoaWPzxd0
>>220089760>Ancient EgyptBut Hancock talks about an ancient civilization that predates Egypt. So where are the artifacts of that civilization?
>>220089740China has the right idea. Rather fake archaeology than gay archaeology
>China has the right idea
>>220083916Why do Hancock's theories make people seethe so much? If he's wrong, a simple counterargument explaining why would suffice. Only if he's onto something would a decades-long personal attack on him be necessary.
>>220089787If you knew anything, you would know that both of those things exist in Egypt. The much of the older stuff in Egypt is of higher, mind blowing quality
>>220089848>both of those thingsWhat things? I am talking about sites that Hancock claims to be from ancient civilizations, but they have only natural formations or at best some shaped stone structure remnants, but no other artifacts like pottery, jewelery, tools and so on. Much less metals.
>>220089889And I'm talking about facts. Not what Hancock says. They have found later dated vases that are hand made. But more important, they have found acient pottery that are perfectly symmetrical in Egypt. https://youtu.be/YqGoaWPzxd0
>>220087785There are "projenitor people", there's shared cultural myths, motifs etc. found the world over. That's not got anything to do with unknown ancient civilisations. Pre-civilisation humans had all the language, culture and intelligence post-civ ones did, they just didn''t stick in one place forever because being nomadic just makes more sense until you start farming your food instead of hunting and foraging it.
>>220089995Ok, but I was initially talking about Hancock's claims about ancient ice age civilizations...
>>220090051OK but you gotta start with small red pills
>We have existed for 300k years and we spent 290k of them doing nothing yes>Trust the science
>there was a super advanced civilization that taught everyone construction and agriculture and stuff>no they did not leave behind a single trace that they existed>well actually some of these rocks broke kind of straight so it was probably an atlantean monument
>>220089095Reminder Baalbek is iron age, and downhill from the quarry.
>>220092170Its under the ocean in the middle of the atlantic
>>220092329and you know this how?
>>220092170>they taught how to lift and carve stone (poorly in many cases)>but not actually useful shit like metallurgy or the wheel
>>220090226A more interesting question is why it took so long for humans to read what they call "behavioral modernity". Although, perhaps evidence such things preserved poorly. But then, next question is why it took so long to reach agriculture.
>>220084306>is an archaeologist>first name is flintyou literally can make this shit up
>>220092374I seen it
>>220092440>why it took so long to reach agriculture.because there was an ice age until 10k BC you fucking retard
>>220090226There were likely tons of failed civilization startups we’ll never discover, due to them not building anything semi-permanent. Failing to transition from migratory hunter-gatherer to a sedentary model would mean everyone involved starved to death, as breaking from seasonal migration would mean after your attempt to create a food source failed, you’d be weeks/months of travel away from the food source you would have survived upon previously.
>>220092440Humans as we currently exist are like 95% all the people that came before us. Take the next generation and raise them like chimps and it’ll take another 2 hundy thou to learn to talk again.
>>220083916>there was an ancient ice age civilization that was superior to rome>they were retarded enough to build everything out of ice so when the ice age ended everything meltedguess they weren't that advanced, then
>>220092606>the feral kid living with wolves was a jeetIs there anything they can’t ruin?
>>220083916>>220084306Gobble D dibble?
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXtMIzD-Y-bMHRoGKM7yD2phvUV59_CvbHere just watch this instead, laugh and learn
There was probably a lost civilization during the ice age but I don't think it would have been very advanced. The whole sealevel rise due to Meltwater Pulse 1b would have definitely destroyed simple fishing villages made out of wood and stone.
>>220089439>Pointing out how one nation of 10 million managed to have a functioning domestically invented airforce may be racist towards nations of 50+million who have never invented things of their ownis the same as>this group managed to domesticate X animal and build X site, whereas the surrounding ones have no evidence of similar capabilitiesthese retards are basically advocating for covering up who did what in the span of human history to shield the retards who did not happen to be kangs.
>>220093368>reddit incarnateno thanks
>oh you haven't searched under every grain of sand in the Sahara Desert? That means i win
>>220089787>So where are the artifacts of that civilization?Antarctica you retard.You have clearly not read his findings. Let me guess, your dick is mutilated.Your skin is brown, you are a le 56% dickless burger mutt.
>>220093695GENTLEMEN, I LOVE WAR
>>220093725Your dick may be uncircumcised but that is because you live in New Dehli
>>220087557>its just a bunch of rocks, i dont get it?Gobekli Tepe is surprising because it just kinda appears out of the blue without a long slow process of humans getting to that technological point, as they were literal cavemen during that time and the prevailing theory had been that humanity consisted of small family groups of dumbasses randomly wandering after game animals and just living day to day.>>220087570>It's not only that but there's a bunch of similar sites all over the area but they latched onto this one like it's a singular occurrence.No, the fact that there are multiple sites like this when everybody believed humans were just small family groups of dumbasses, makes it all the more surprising.
>>220083916oh man this guy makes the system rageEverything is says is 10000% correct by the way, thus the system trying to constantly shut him downeverything you THINK you know is a lieYou were brainwashed by birth by a very massive systemto conform and consume
>>220089407Solutreans.
>>220094706>americans are retards and think that people were ooga booga cavemen>gets surprised that people werent ooga booga cavemenI wish I was as easily impressed as amerisharts
>>220094771Thank god you can pay 10 dollars a month for Netflix so we can find out The Truth
>>220094706>No, the fact that there are multiple sites like this when everybody believed humans were just small family groups of dumbasses, makes it all the more surprising.Wrong. By singling out one site and making it seem like it's some outlier that the archeologists "haven't taken into account" people like Hancock are being disingenuous and acting in bad faith. That site and all the related sites have been taken into account by archeology. Hancock and his ilk are portraying it as some secret knowledge you're not supposed to know about. It's typical Danikenesque bullshit.
>>220089407every single time
>>220084283>these are hunter gathererslol
>>220087793>PhD in archeology>is on 4chan at 2PM on a Mondayyup, checks out. Does the manager at work ever make fun of you? Like when you go into the freezer to get more burger patties, does he ever say>Holy shit those look ancient!when he sees you with them? I would.
>>220087638>Bimmy Road
>>220083916>Yup, he's getting raped by Flint Dibbletutsi liar
>>220096361>hunt rocks>gather them together
>>220095647>That site and all the related sites have been taken into account by archeology.[citation needed]They literally said "there is nothing new we can learn from Gobleki Tepe" and halted excavations. The site was discovered in the 1950s, yet they only uncovered 10% of it.Meanwhile anywhere else they find an ancient Roman coin they dig up the whole area in weeks.
>>220097538I heard that they uncovered only 0.0001% of it and there's a mob of people dressed in black walking around the perimeter of the site beating people up if they ask any questions.
>>220097765>no counterargumentYup, that's what I thought.
>>220092563Anatomically modern humans existed before that, anon. So question is why, when they were still living in Africa to begin with, they didn't have certain traits, not just agriculture for that matter, but lack of art, burials and some other things, why it took so long.
>>220094706>small family groups of dumbasses randomly wandering after game animalsThey likely were more handy than many modern urbanites in making tools and knew how to hunt, so not such dumbasses. So if they were handy then we can assume they started to manipulate larger boulders for x reasons, not just shaping small ones into tools.
>>220094799R1b and R1a are associated with Indo Europeans, so I assume that related R1 component in native Americans could be from Ancient North Eurasians or whatever is that group that one part split into Native Americans and another that remained in Eurasia and then later spread around more. Now the African isolate is the one that I can't explain.
>>220083916OBSESSED
>>220083916This show will teach you a lot about confirmation bias
>>220098435What do you know about the Basque rh- connection? Some theories that they descended from atlantic refugees.
>>220098702Atlantis stupid speech to text software.
>>220098702Basque have a lot of this Y haplo, which would indicate Indo European origin, but as I understand their mtDNA is archaic native hunter or early European farmer, so what happened there in the mountains was probably rape in late Neolithic/Copper age.
>no proof, just conjecture and theorycrafting
>>220084306>Jaimie, pull up Flint Dibble's sleeves.
>>220100110Seems more like sensationalism and making up shit for money and fame.
>>220097538>They literally said "there is nothing new we can learn from Gobleki Tepe" and halted excavations.who is "they"? I'm pretty sure excavation is still ongoing. It's only small because uh it's a world fucking heritage site and they don't want to fucking bulldoze the place to get the dirt up faster
>>220087601the hypothesis is basically, it was a religious thing.it goes something like, there are periods when these hunter-gatherers (relating to herd migrations or whatever, I'm not a scientist) didn't have anything useful to do. so they all got together in the same place to celebrate their traditions or whatever, the reason doesn't matter. maybe it was like a "ting", where the norse would get together to sort out disagreements between each other. could be a billion reasons, the specific reasons don't matter.so anyway, they get together there every so often. and eventually, they decide to fancy up the place. and then over centuries, they end up slowly building these large structures.as the place gets more cultivated, they start growing crops there, maybe by accident; the shit plants were culled, and the useful plants cultivated. maybe they use them to brew beer or something.then after a while of that, they maybe have some hermit/priest-class dudes who decide to live there permanently, to maintain the place.then the crops become increasingly domesticated, they start to be able to sustain lots of people living there full time.so eventually, you get one of the first settled civilizations.that's just something some guy told me, but it sounds plausible.whatever the case, they probably didn't all randomly decide to get together and build this shit overnight. they probably built it incidental to something else they were doing in the place, but then the incidental buildings became increasingly useful over time.
>>220100844The entire wider region is littered with similar sites. There's nothing unique about it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta%C5%9F_Tepelerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karahan_Tepe
>>220094706>cavemen couldn't pile rocks togetherwait until their motherfucker hears about birds and the shit they get up to
>>220100922ye those cultures were probably all doing this shit all the time since it worked out for them
>>220100844Even to this day the site still sits at an intersection of migratory antelope and migratory birds, and the area was forested until the site was abandoned. So birds, eggs, deer, vegetation, etc. so a group of hunter gatherers suddenly had more food than they needed, giving them free time. Eventually the food would move on so they’d move on as well. So the site would be irregularly occupied since even before the oldest parts were built. Someone would have the brilliant idea to mark the site, or find a permanent landmark, so they’d know an easy season was ahead of them, and that would be the start of the compound. Then at the end of the sites usage, any of a thousand things could’ve happened to indicate the site wasn’t usable anymore. They bury it and never go back.
What will be the DryAss, the Bikini Road and the Globkeki Teepee of our Imminent Apocalypse?
