>>220101580
Pedophile filmmaker known for raping boys makes thinly veiled fetish movie about his fetishes, as an "adaptation" of dumbass edgelord porn a retard made in prison who got eternally btfo and shit himself when he thought the guards threw away his fanfic.
In other words Europeans are once again proven to be child molesters

>>220101580
It's a very gay homosexual Marxist's adaption of a classic novel

>>220101658
Nah its about elites being subhuman degenerates. Passolini was proven right.

>watch movie expecting to hate it because of extreme tryhard degeneracy
>instead hate it because it’s a boring slog that can’t even manage to upset me
Same goes for Martyrs

>>220101580
its basically just if coomers had unlimited wealth and power. the guy who made it was openly gay as well which is relevant. they're almost always hyperdeviants who desperately want to believe normal people are too. So it's kind of like the film equivalent of me going "hey anon this is you!" then smearing shit all over my face and cutting my dick off

>>220101689
1. No it wasn't, and 2. when something is an adaption you don't say the director of it was proven anything, you say that of the author.

>>220101658
He was shot in killed by a 17 year old boy he was molesting

>>220101706
It was an excoriation and allegory of Fascism specifically in Pasolini, it's not even a sexy film and is not meant to be for "coomers", like the novel

>>220101724
It was a very loose adaptation of sades book and pasolini put a lot of his opinions etc in it. You are the retard.

>>220101689
Go back to criterioncollection cuck

>>220101580
it's a shitty shock flick
meant to disgust you and through that acquire some faux artistic value
it had to be done in the exploration of cinema as an art form but it proved itself to be the wrong way.

>>220101755
Go back to www.israelfuckinrocksomgilovejewcocks.com

>>220101753
>It was a very loose adaptation of sades book
Nobody said otherwise, that is in fact the reason you're wrong.
>and pasolini put a lot of his opinions etc in it
Correct. He repurposed what you thought his point was, which was actually Sade's, into being an allegory for Fascism.
>You are the retard.
Calm down pseud, it's not a personal attack. Just listen and learn for next time you want to larp

We fascists are the true anarchists

>>220101746
>le heckin fascism
its about power

>"Every power has its forms of ritual. Power is always a codifier and ritual. Without wanting to, I found myself representing in this film both the proper middle-class life with its parlors, its tea, its double-breasted blazers, and the Nazi ceremony in all of its macabre solemnity, gloomy and wretched, because power is ritual and a codifier."

plus again he was a megafag so its mostly just wank material. "oooooh i got all these young naked boys here for...uhh..my film...about the evils of fascism! yeah thats it!" ya fucking rube

>>220101802
You could have just said that you want to discuss the movie.

File: file.png (163 KB, 850x400)

163 KB PNG

>>220101830

>>220101743
Sounds like someone who's work we should totally watch and give a fuck about and lend credence to and give cultural weight to then. Fucking faggot. Kill yourself.

>>220101890
>>le heckin fascism
>its about power
No, it was specifically Fascism. Passolini was a Marxist. Fun fact, the Jesus he cast for The Gospel According to Matthew was just some Marxist he knew giving speeches on the streets
>plus again he was a megafag so its mostly just wank material.
It was actually different from Sade in presenting the sexuality as creepy and almost clinical, rather than lewd. Sade was writing actual porn, Passolini was portraying abuse

>>220101961
Pedophile mad as fuck.

>Schlorp schlorp

Did they ever do a Marquis de Sade movie?

>>220101961
Why are you mad at me?

>>220102547
I mean just the final act of him deranged as ever locked up trying to freak the other prisoners... could be kino

>>220101743
>just making shit up
Pasolini was murdered on 2 November 1975 at a beach in Ostia.[70] Almost unrecognizable, Pasolini was savagely beaten, and run over several times with his own car. Multiple bones were broken and his testicles were crushed by what appeared to have been a metal bar.[6][71] An autopsy revealed that his body had been partially burned with petrol after his death. The crime was long viewed as a Mafia-style revenge killing, one that was extremely unlikely to have been carried out by only one person. Pasolini was buried at the cemetery of Casarsa della Delizia.

Giuseppe "Pino" Pelosi (1958–2017), then 17 years old, was caught driving Pasolini's car and confessed to the murder. He was convicted and sentenced to nine years in prison in 1976,[6] initially with "unknown others", but that phrase was later removed from the verdict.[64][72] Twenty-nine years later, on 7 May 2005, Pelosi retracted his confession, which he said had been made under the threat of violence to his family.[73] He claimed that three people "with a southern accent" had committed the murder, while insulting Pasolini as a "dirty communist."[74]

Other evidence uncovered in 2005 suggested that Pasolini had been murdered by an extortionist. Testimony by his friend Sergio Citti indicated that some of the rolls of film from Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom had been stolen, and that Pasolini planned to meet with and negotiate its return from the thieves on 2 November 1975 following a visit to Stockholm, Sweden.[75][76][77][78] Citti's investigation uncovered additional evidence, including a bloody wooden stick and an eyewitness who said he saw a group of men pull Pasolini from the car.[64][72] The Rome police reopened the murder as a cold case after Pelosi's retraction, but the investigative magistrates responsible for the investigation found that the new elements were insufficient to justify a continued inquiry.

>>220101580
I don't think any of this happened in the Italian Social Republic.

>>220102711
Were you there? No? Then stfu

>>220102629
The final scene would be him getting gangbanged and castrated and dressed up as venus while some dumbass christkike choir music is playing in the background.

>>220102025
Quite literally wasn't explicitly about fascism (which wasn't that bad actually) as stated by himself in his own quote, but far be it from me to convince a homoleftist with facts

>>220101580
>make what is basically a soft core fetish film
>call it “a critique of fascism”
European cinema everyone

>>220102649
Based

>>220103209
Nobody but you could possibly conceive of why you think I'm one of your boogeymen leftists, and yes, it was very much about Fascism. You can tell by how they were Fascists!
Do you think he was forced to adapt it that way? It was a deliberate choice, retard.
You think I'm a leftist attacking Fascism instead because the only way your brain works is culture war slop. Hopefully you can fix that, but I doubt it

>>220102547
It's stop motion. Literally called Marquis

>>220102547
Quills