[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Flintstones (1994)
What went wrong?
>>
>>220128428
Terrible casting
>>
>>220128467
Wtf the casting was one of the things that went right
>>
>>220128467
Only for Betty (and even then she got the personality down). Everyone else was great.
>>
>>220128428
Its basically a great movie so i dont know. I remember being moody at the time, the atmosphere probably tasted different or someyhing. Or maybe a feeling like ‘i knew it was going to be live action but its not enough of a cartoon, we have The Dinosaurs at home
>>
>>220128467
Except the B52s
>>
>>220128428
>What went wrong?
It was a live action Flintstones
>>
>>220128428
live action cartoons are always a mistake
>>
>>220128467
Only Betty sucked, and that's mostly because of Rosie's looks; acting and the laugh were generally on point.
>>
>>220128428
It was already too hot and dusty in that time and people were trying to watch digital quicksilver to cool off
>>
I watched a bunch of the Flintstones and I don't remember what a single episode was about
>>
>>220128687
>>220128701
the flintstones is literally just a cartoon honeymooners, the premise of converting it back is fine
>>
>>220128428
>1994

At the time the entire pop culture landscape was catering to Bart-like kids with grossout humor, metal and "violence". This was slowly but surely also morphing into postmodern cynicism.

Flintstones were not a good fit for that. It's a very dadcore material, there are no cool kids for the younger audience to insert and the jokes are just dadcore jokes between the adults.
It's a very creative movie but it lacked that.

You can compare it to The Addams Family which came out three years earlier and did have younger characters as cast members and grossout humor so that was a better match for a wider audience.
>>
>>220128659
*Especially the B52s.
>>
>>220128779
Same. I could list a ton of reoccurring things in it, but I don't think I could actually isolate it to individual episodes.
>>
>>220128810
>Flintstones
>Addams Family
>Lost In Space
>My Favorite Martian
>Dennis The Menace
>Space Jam
>Casper
>Beverly Hillbillies
They really milked boomer nostalgia at this time, basically like the 80s/90s reboots of today.
>>
>>220128428
>yesterday senile father barges in my room asking me if i can find him a live action flintstones tshirt
>as soon as i get home from work this thread is on the front page
>>
>>220128955
How much did the shirt cost?
>>
>>220128779
They went to the fuckin lodge and argued on the lawn and Fred was lazy at work and came home and sat on the couch and wilma came in like ‘Fred here’s your cavemanwhich!’ or some shit and a small dinosaur popped put of an appliance and said ‘eh its a living!’
>>
>>220128973
i cant find it. he said he got it from mcdonalds when they were promoting the movie. i showed him images from search engines but he said none are the right one
>>
>>220128937
idk if space jam really counts, looney tunes was (is?) still a living property, and at least 50% of the star power came from the NBA anyway
>>
>>220128937
Its a 30 year cycle of nostalgia sales isnt it?
>>
File: 1767229458071825.webm (985 KB, 640x636)
985 KB
985 KB WEBM
>>
I just realized that Fred is basically Homer.
>>
>>220129019
I remember my sister saying in retrospect how retarded the fashion of the early 20s with crop tops and low-hanging jeans was
Nowadays that shit is coming right back
Not complaining about every teen showing tummy though
>>
>>220129039
yes, the simpsons is also basically just a riff on the honeymooners
>>
>>220129049
ozempic caused this
>>
>>220129049
Early 2000s*
>>
>>220128428
Being right in their target demographic at the time, I thought it was great. Though it helped that I really liked dinosaurs, John Goodman, and Rick Moranis. Then, I have a second layer of nostalgia for it, because I lost my virginity in my 20s at a girl’s place while we were watching it.

I would give it to Wilma so fucking hard.
>>
>>220129026
Imagine the odors radiating from her stinky shit encrusted asshole and pussy. You could probably smell her a mile away
>>
File: 1761262027608030.jpg (117 KB, 1032x1024)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
I rewatched it recently.
Pretty good still.
The props and sets were great.
>>
File: IMG_3206.jpg (5 KB, 221x228)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>220129292
>$2.99

All boomers must hang. I don’t care if that means your papa and nana, who are just the sweetest things, they have to go.
>>
>>220129807
The average hourly wage in the US was 89c at the time though.
>>
>>220129018
Yeah space jam doesn't count because looney tunes was still hot then(because of tiny toons) and michael jordan was massive
>>
Weird. I had a dream last night about Halle Barry in her costume from this movie (or was it Viva Rock Vegas?) and she was swinging on a vine like George of the Jungle.
>>
>>220128955
Hello son. Move out.
>>
File: 81LX0fBSHL.jpg (298 KB, 997x1496)
298 KB
298 KB JPG
>>220128937
Addams Family and Dennis were great. Casper was badly written but should've been a trilogy. Universal is making Archie next, I *WISH* it was animated.
>>
>>220128937
Don't forget The Little Rascals, Dragnet, Brady Bunch, and George of the Jungle.
>>
>>220128508
>Only for Betty (and even then she got the personality down)
This. If you close your eyes it sounds perfect. It's just that Hollywood was intent on pushing Rosie on the public.
>>
>>220132043
>Casper was badly written but should've been a trilogy.

I recall liking Casper, but I honestly don't know how much of that is residual Pizza Hut puppet comfiness and "Oh wow, Ray from Ghostbusters is in this!"
>>
>>220128428
>What went wrong?
Nothing. This movie is great.
>>
>>220132043
based Juggie keeping his eyes on the prize
>>
File: stonebook.jpg (528 KB, 1193x1500)
528 KB
528 KB JPG
4K Stonebook. Heh.
>>
>>220128508
>>220128748
1994 Rosie O'Donnell wasn't eye candy, but she wasn't that ugly either.
All things considered it was an ok casting, while everyone else was spot on.
>>
>>220132043
I have long suspected that Oda based Usopp on Jughead, but I have never seen any confirmation of that.
>>
>>220134995
the long nose is a nod to Pinocchio. plausibly the way he draws it is based on archie, but i'd kinda guess it's more like it's based on some other mangaka's style who was inspired by jughead
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ujqcr25-WCk
It was pretty good but I never understood why they only cast black people



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.