Why did Darth Bane establish the rule of two?>you don’t get to bring friends
It`s a stupid concept of "the force is weaker the more people use it".Truth is, sith are stupid jobbers who betray everyone and anything to "become more powerful".Bane just genocided them cause he was the most greedy
>>220148291because the sith kept killing each other, it's that simple. on the other hand it seems having an empire with lots of sith and soldiers seemed to last a lot longer then sheevs run
>>220148291>Cartoon Darth BaneEU Darth Bane is an actual, fleshed-out, arguably well-written (for SW anyway) character. The cartoon one was a quickly added cameo and a tiny part of Yoda's plot in a single episode I would rather pretend doesn't exist.
>>220148291He's a big guy.
>>220148291Sith are backstabbers by nature so he thought only two at a time had better chances to succeed.
>>220148291Because several times in history the sith were on the verge of taking over the galaxy and only lost because of infighting. If there's only a master and an apprentice they won't start a civil war.
>>220150106>. If there's only a master and an apprentice they won't start a civil war.Malak shooting Revan's star boat, then Revan destroys Malak's Sith army
>>220148291the flight plan only listed one of you.
>>220148291Bane?
>>220148291>OT had two dark wizard villains >hmm this must mean they were following some kind of rule that limited the number of dark wizards to two at all timesThis is just how lucas' brain works
If I pull off those parasites will you die??
>>220148818>sheevs runHe just had terrible luck to face off against "All the Jedi" chosen one.
>>220151805It would be extremely painful
>>220148818They weren't killing eachother in banes trilogy. They turned into a brotherhood were at a stalemate with the jedi, this was actually tempting the jedi to the darkside. Bane thought the sith being non psychopath brothers in arms made him seethe so he killed a whole planet of force users.
>>220148291I read the Darth Bane trilogyVery entertaining and also makes you angry because D*sney would never allow a sexy sith girl like Zannah in the new movies
>>220150106>If there's only a master and an apprentice they won't start a civil warInstead one will just kill the other which happens in literally every star wars trilogy
>>220148291The problem was that unless the Lord at the top was several orders of magnitude below every other Sith, the others would inevitably backstab him by sheer weight of numbers rather than duel them for the position.With that being the case, every generation would get weaker and weaker unless a complete freak emerged to ‘tard wrangle everyone, meanwhile the Jedi only got stronger when the Sith were around to sharpen iron with iron.
>>220152691You're a big sith
>>220152853For (rule of) two
>>220148291Considering they are always training one or more replacements it really should be "the rule of two and a half" or "the rule of two plus". I imagine most would have one or two candidates for new apprentice for when either the master is killed or the old apprentice is killed, and I would think they were dipping the candidates toes in Sith training and the ways of the dark side of the force.
>>220148291To explain why Georgie did in the movies.Tortanic (that is SWTOR) does it better, with more sith around. Rule of two is silly, all it takes for two guys to die and your order goes into shitter, and dies, until some jedincel find a sith holocron and goes cray cray and falls to the dark side, which might take thousands of years.
How do you pronounce his name? Sort of like 'vein' or like 'vane' as in Vanessa?
>>220152743I'll never understand Disney throwing out the EU.
>>220148318The sequel trilogy embraced that concept though.
