>>220153668
Wonka was an asshole, wasn't he

Apparently it's that way in the book. Who would have thought that it wouldn't translate to screen that well? (aside from the makers of the original film, of course)

File: 1661060383234721.gif (3.28 MB, 570x321)

3.28 MB GIF

>>220153779
Even the book wasn't as mean, Mike's dad stuffs him in his pocket but they don't squish him like in the movie

>>220153668
>visit willy wonkas chocolate factory
>leave a deformed mutant with no recourse because (((wonka))) owns the most profitable factory in town

>>220153668
pure kino

>>220154354
Original was better

Cause boomers hate the proceeding generations that came after them

Didn't Burton say he hates kids? I remember him saying children are the most revolting thing on the planet.

>>220154400
He's said similar things in the past

because its a terrible movie which needs that shock factor to have something going for it

File: 1772811232838945.png (2.17 MB, 1547x7330)

2.17 MB PNG

>>220153668

for me, it's '71 veruca and '03 violet

Why did they never adapt Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator?

>WHAT'S THE DAMAGE THIS YEAR
there was one good thing about this movie

>>220155249
Dahl hated the first adaptation and didn't want the sequel adapted because of it. The Dahl estate had control over the series until Netflix bought them which was still pretty recent.

>>220153668
I wanted to see this as a kid but didnt ask anyone to take me for some reason

>>220155467
You didn't miss anything

>>220155467
i saw it as a kid and it fucked me up sexually for the rest of my life, you're better off having missed it

>>220153668
>Why was the remake so much harsher on the kids?
It's a work of fiction.

>>220153668
Luke 17:2 KJV
It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

Burtons version is more book accurate. Even down to the songs.

>>220156613
They still added the Wonka backstory and made the punishments harsher for no reason