>Casually throws away hundreds of millions of dollarsOops
>>220229091Hate white women my fellow white men. Don't start a family.
>>220229091>fuck my grandchildren!why are boomers so evil?
>>220229091it's for the vibes though
>>220229091She did it for the lulz
She self-actualized, that's the most important thing.
>>220229091It was her property, she could do whatever she wanted with it.
>>220229128she was before boomers
>>220229091she should've lost the money investing into AI, then people would cheer at her bold business acumen
Based. Fuck every human that was born after me, they're lazy sacks of shit that only eat avocado toast
>>220229091>>220229128>>220229140>>220229178I have no defense for the boomers at all but honestly you have to imagine a little bit that they pissed all this money away simply because they had the actual ability to back then, and no one can predict the future. Things were looking way up until 9/11 basically.But yes boomers are retarded, sadly.
>>220230678No it wasn't. It was inofficially given to her as a gift by her fiance. There were no papers or witnesses that said she's the owner of it. She would have no claim over it. She would never be able to sell it. The descendants of her fiance's family would get it.
>>220230948Since when do you have to notarize gifts?
>>220230948If someone gives a gift to you, never reclaims the object and that person is even dead. I think it's yours. Also, how do you know she didn't registered it after he died?
>>220229091i just wish i had an accurate treasure to all of the whoopsie daises laying at the bottom of the ocean
>>220231077*treasure map
>>220230678The issue is not the legality of what she did, but the ethics. The fact that she had the diamond for decades and could have sold it to provide a comfortable life for her family, but instead chose to keep it in memory of a very brief fling she had with some homeless guy while her husband likely worked hard to provide for her and her children, makes her a bitch.>>220230948You don't need a deed to a necklace, it's not a house. Bill Paxton was planning to just fish it out of the water and then sell it.
>>220231157>while her husband likely worked hard to provide for her and her childrenShe worked as an actress so she also provided for her two children. Maybe she wanted her children to become hard working people, not being rich since they were little.
>>220231077You'd just get raped by the taxman as soon as you brought a single shekel back to the surface. The mafi- I mean the government has to have their taste.
>>220229091Woman moment
>>220230972That was a royalty relic, literally.Oh well, I guess once shit goes to private hands you should consider them lost forever.
>>220229091typical boomer cunt
>>220231799French royalty is history, they have no official standing with the French government.
>>220231252>Maybe she wanted her children to become hard working people, not being rich since they were littleThis is a uniquely Boomer mindset and one that was most definitely instilled in them by early kikery. Every culture throughout history yearned to create a life of leisure for their children - they didn't see it as, "weakening" them, they saw it as the ultimate expression of being blessed/validated for their ambitions. Peasants who got a little money throughout the 1500s would buy titles that would shred their old names, seeing the drudgery of labor as disgusting. The Greeks believed the height of culture was to have passive incomes earned through slaves, allowing them to spend their days discussing philosophy at the agora and fucking their teenage wife.So what exactly do you think happened with the Baby Boomers - an explosion of free-floating wealth in America - where they suddenly and inexplicably realized that wealth should be given to the State instead of their offspring?
>>220230972>>220231799The gifts only need to be notarized when they are of obviously spectacular worth that literally everyone has agreed upon for whatever reason, but that's the proof of their worth. At least assets are easy to deal with and understand in this way.
>>220229091It's not actually her property, and if it became known that she possessed it, her fiancee's wealthy family would sue her for possession of it.It literally has no value to her beyond sentimental. The guy she tosses it in front of (to make a point about what's really of value) literally runs an operation to recover shit from the bottom of the ocean, and now knows EXACTLY where it's lying, to within a few meters. If he wants it he can go get it, in fact now he can claim it as wreck salvage and not have to deal with the Richington's claims on it.
You guys realized they would have just dropped a sub right there and canvased the ocean floor for it and found it in like 3 days max
>>220230678It belongs in a museum!
>>220232136by the time they deploy a sub, their ship will have drifted atop the moving ocean and the necklace may have been quickly carried far away by underwater ocean currentslook at how large scale search and rescue efforts are done for med-large sized ships, even when searching in strict quadrants with spread out coverage, it's incredibly hard to find a single specific item in such massive homogenous bodies of water
test
>>220232663Congratulations! You got the job.
>>220229091
>>220232577>look at how large scale search and rescue efforts are done for med-large sized shipsokay it might've been small-med merchant vessels lost in storms I was thinking of here, not freighters or large military vessels
