[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: DEH.png (118 KB, 500x332)
118 KB PNG
>reveal spell
>revelio
>repair spell
>reparo
>>
Abracadabra just means "I create the word (of god)" Rowling just put some Vs in it.
>>
>>220242372
Remember it’s TEH
NOT DEH
>>
>childrens series
>adult child
>>
>>220242372
>expel arms spell
>expelliarmus
>>
>>220242372
>Deh!
>Deh!
>>
it's comin up
it's comin up
it's comin up
it's deh
>>
File: 1731381231947823.jpg (647 KB, 1032x1815)
647 KB JPG
>>220242372
What else did you possibly expect? There's no way you thought you'd find any trace of originality or imagination within the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>
>>220242985
>ayn rand
>god-tier
>>
>>220242372
>dehlio
>>
File: 1719714508028102.png (239 KB, 700x1211)
239 KB PNG
>>220242372
Whats the death spell?
>>
>>220244468
¡Muerto!
>>
>>220244468
A vara quebrada
>>
>>220242985
You can tell Atlas Shrugged was written by a woman, because all anyone does in that book is sit around in different rooms and talk to other people.
>>
>sorcery to summon a snake
>serpentsorcia
>>
File: 1776133667196101.jpg (35 KB, 686x386)
35 KB JPG
REVELIO PER CAPITANUM!!!
>>
>spell to relieve constipation
>evacuatobowelio
Will Rowling hire me?
>>
>>220245322
This plays into the hands of Slytherin, come on.
>>
Why was Voldemort a fetus in globet of fire?
>>
>>220245533
commentary on abortion
>>
>>220242372
>OP makes thread
>optus stilla faggito
>>
>>220244468
A bra cadaver
As in, a dead troon.
>>
>>220242985
atlas shrugged being at the top makes the bait too obvious
>>
>>220242372
Isn't it just Latin
>>
ACCIO AUNT PETUNIA'S SOCKS
>>
>>220248016
Yes avada kedrava is latin for abracadabra
>>
>>220248664
Ok, one spell uses an Aramaic expression for inspiration and Latinifies it.
>>
>>220245322
ITS PINNED TO MY SCROTUM



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.