>Sudden disasters will destroy the world unless there is a forced transition to a centralized world government run by scientists.????????????
>>220247117You don’t like Star Trek?
WE ARE THE PRIESTSOF THE TEMPLEOF SYRINX
>>220247197I do, but in the same way I like North Korea.I have a perverse fascination with ideologies that have mass murder as their end.
We need a one world government based in Tel Aviv goyim
>>220247117why shouldn't the most intelligent people be in charge of everything instead of the psychos like IRL? what would be the catch?
>>220247401Knowing a lot about air pressure, or whatever, doesn't transfer to knowledge about how a society should operate.
>>220247401why do you assume "scientists" are the most intelligent people? what brings you to that conclusion? do you think bankers, investors, despots, politicians, military leaders etc. are unintelligent? why does intellect contradict psychopathy in your worldview? infantile
>>220247117Imagine focusing on this and not appreciating 10/10 cozy disaster kino. Id go so far as to say one of the coziest movies that exists
I don't remember that happening
>>220247537It's the subtext of the movie.
>>220247197No.
>>220247401Intelligence, whilst useful, is not the font of virtue.Would you rather be ruled by a 130IQ hedonist despot or a 120IQ benevolent steward?
>>220247117you have a problem with trusting the science, chud?
>>220247988They don’t correlate that way.
>>220247401scientific government is a catastrophic idea because it makes for very competent but ultimately doomed government that have no sense of their values and will enact accidental totalitarianisms for whatever insane fads they fancy
>>220247940I often find myself wondering what a right-wing Star Trek would look like. I was banned for asking once.
>>220248055They don't correlate very much at all.
>>220248087You don't have to wonder very much, it's just gothic era Warhammer 40k
>>220248108High IQ inversely correlates to debauchery. That’s why the highest IQ fetish is sitting in a chair watching other people having sex with your wife and jerking off to it
Yes Ivan we know this is another pol raid thread. Back into the nazi/environmentalist/income agitation cycle I see.
>>220248158That's still perverse, you'll note. Smart people have more elaborate moral failings, but moral failings all the same.The fact that their logistical abilities are greater doesn't impugn on the fact that virtue and decisiveness are vastly more important requirement in a leader.
>>220248158>sitting in a chair watching other people having sex with your wifeI can't claim to understand this. My IQ isn't high enough. Even the language they use is high-IQ.>Cuckquean is a 16th-century term for a woman whose husband or partner is unfaithful, serving as the female counterpart to a cuckold. It is a compound formed by combining cuckold (a man with an unfaithful wife) and quean (an old term for a woman, often meaning a disreputable woman), with early usage recorded around the 1540s-1560s.
>>220248240Cuckqueaning is weird to me because it makes the guy seem incompetent for being unable to handle both women simultaneously
