Deep or sneed?
>>220260488I wouldn't call it deep, but it's a beautiful film. One of my all-time favorites, in fact.
>>220260488>>220260641Were the drawn out graphic sex scenes and abortion scene really necessary? Would have been great without those.Bach's Air rendition is kino in this film.
>>220260488Deep
>>220260488Fantastic movie. Reminds me of a time I'm glad I got out of.
>>220260991I thought the sleazy elements were appropriate given that the film centered around 2 libertines who were lost and somewhat alienated in a foreign city.
>>220260488Read the Bardo Thodol later! https://www.leary.ru/download/leary/Timothy%20Leary%20-%20The%20Tibetan%20Book%20Of%20The%20Dead.pdf>>220261015 Timothy o Leary translation is cool and extra interesting
>>220260488Great first 15 minutes, the rest sucks. Probably not even in the top half of Noe's filmography.
>>220261538Weird that you'd think that because it's actually his best film
>>220260488It's slop
>>220262395Name a film that's come out recently that's not slop.
It's so unrealistic for Jap police to use a gun so easily like in this movie. Something like that has propbably literally never happened in the last 50 years.
>>220262613dust bunny
>>220260488you'd think with so much on the line he would lock in and quickly accomplish the not-so-difficult task of flushing one bag of drugs. He basically already won by making it to the toilet and he still managed to fumble it.
