[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 56456465.png (674 KB, 632x605)
674 KB PNG
>$150 million budget
>$488k box office
what went wrong?
>>
>>220261024
No marketing and he's a charisma vacuum
>>
lol
look at him
>>
>>220261024
Seems like there's a bigger chance than ever for movies that cost too much to lose a lot of money. This also had no marketing as far as I know. Even if it did, who wants to see discount Captain playing super discount TE Lawrence?
>>
>>220261024
>Kangz n shiet
Nah but on a real who's going to the cinema to watch Anthony Mackie read a Saudi script in the desert
>>
>>220261024
we wuz arabs n shiet
>>
File: anthony beggie.png (701 KB, 797x512)
701 KB PNG
>>220261024
> ScarJo, please! PLEASE! Let me try and hit that....
>>
File: kangs2.jpg (39 KB, 800x450)
39 KB JPG
>>220261024
>>
>>220261024
>make a movie about a period of history no one gives a shit about
>about historical persons no one cares about
>cast the shittiest actor you can as the lead
>throw in Ben Kingsley because he'll do anything
>give it a completely forgettable, generic, direct-to-video movie name
>>
>>220261024
I have fatigue of this guy. If you'll call a black man, call a likeable one. It feels like Hollywood only casts around twenty people nowadays.
>>
>>220261024
I hear his role isn't even big and they just cast him for publicity. Perhaps the movie would have done better without him. At least it would certainly have been cheaper.
>>
>>220262119
"YOU NEED TO DO BETTER SENATOR"
>>
>>220262131
>cast the shittiest actor you can as the lead
That would've been Timothee Chalamet. Thankfully they avoided that mistake.
>>
>>220261024
WE WUZZZ...
eh,I dont know waht this is suposed to be,so whatever
>>
The budget wasn't used on the movie it was to build the infrastructure for a film industry in Saudi Arabia.
>>
>>220262128
HEY HEY PEOPLE
>>
>>220261024
>foreign country wants to challenge Hollywood
>"should we try to make a movie that appeals to a broader demographic like the Koreans and Americans do?"
>"No! Lets make a movie about our niche boring history"
They always fall for this trap
>>
>>220262131
this shit was supposed to be based on real history? the trailer was so vague i assumed it was some random horseshit that borrows historical aesthetics like 13th warrior. i don't think a single character was named
>>
>>220262509
You just wait bro the kids these days can't wait to get engrossed in the brand new Saudidrama I'm sure
>>
no one wants to watch that nigger
he's part of the reason why MCU is dying
>>
File: Aiysha Hart.jpg (673 KB, 1440x1438)
673 KB JPG
>>220262131
>cast the shittiest actor you can as the lead

My understanding is that he's the co-star and this chick is the actual star of the movie.
>>
>>220262718
So they made the main character a brown woman? They were trying real hard to make this movie fail
>>
>>220262742

It's a movie made in Saudi Arabia, by Saudi Arabians about (fictionalized) Saudi Arabian history, so it's hardly surprising that the star of the movie would be a Saudi Arabian chick.

>Set in seventh-century Arabia, amongst the constant feuding between tribes, the ruthless Emperor Kisra wishes to make Princess Hind his concubine. However, she refuses and instead, with the help of a legendary bandit, looks to confront the Emperor, culminating in the Battle of Ze Qar.[7]
>>
>>220261024
should have gotten a blue eyed blond guy to play the hero
>>
>>220261024
apprenently they dumped this movie for 3 years before finally releasing it
maybe they were hopping for another George Flyod scenario acitvating white guilt movie gowers
>>
>>220262885
>let's have a woman, a bongoloud and a black african in the lead roles of our historical epic
holy shit! saudis are more cucked than netflix
>>
>>220262925
>>220263007

Anthony Mackie isn't the problem here:

>Damon Wise of Deadline Hollywood writes that "extraordinary images" were captured by the director and cinematographer, but that the film ultimately turns into "a stodgy, sprawling, feminist, pre-Islamic Gandhi."[21]

Made sense to cast Mackie, as you'd want an American actor to get the American audience and as fewer Whites go to theaters nowadays because of all the Blacks who are going, a Black-American actor made sense also.
>>
>>220263158
>Anthony Mackie isn't the problem here:
he and his name is on the cover so that makes it a problem here
>>
>>220263158
Even the blacks dont like him
>>
>>220261024
Imagine that they hired Michael B. Jordan for the role for 10 mill more.
>>
>>220261024
The perpetrators of 9/11 and modern day slavers trying to go mainstream by buying movie and game studios, golf tournaments, etc. But whites have a strong aversion to the Arab. Its a racial hatred.
>>
no marvel planket to defend his shitty acting
>>
>>220262119
this is specially funny since marvel comics always have their characters fuck like bunnies between them and speacially black widow.
>>
>>220261024
Why would you ever put a black man on the cover to sell your movie? It doesn't work.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.