>>220307512
>defines the aesthetic of an entire country's animated male leads for 2 generations
How the fuck did he do it?

File: does-reinhard-really-lack(...).jpg (48 KB, 640x480)

48 KB JPG

>>220307649
I can only be grateful

>>220307512
more like faggot aesthetic amirite

File: when youre right, youre right.jpg (163 KB, 1200x896)

163 KB JPG

>>220308049

>>220308058
is he popular outside of 4chan?
he was just randomly chosen

>>220307649
He pretty

>>220308223
in a faggy way because japs hate manly men

I don't get how you can write a book about a guy lusting overa boy he never interacts with him. At least the movie has pretty cinematography and eye candy (if you're gay lol) but the plot is rather thin. I imagine the novel expands on the debates the main character had with his friends on beauty and art, but there's barely no dialogue outside of that. So while it works as a movie because visuals and mood come first, is the book worth reading? Or is it boring? I loved the movie but I'm not sure if the novel would be interesting to me.

File: a real american.jpg (36 KB, 640x432)

36 KB JPG

>>220308247
>in a faggy way because japs hate manly men

There is nothing more masculine than sexually dominating feminine men. FACT!!!

File: trvke.gif (1.34 MB, 498x374)

1.34 MB GIF

>>220308338

>>220308338
>feminine men
that job is already mostly complete, turning masculine men into feminine men is the real measure.

>>220308049
he was a puss annihilator IRL

>>220308432
So am I and I don't look gay

>>220307512
Bottom pic looks like Nick Fuentes?

>>220308338
The Grecoroman civilization understood this

>>220308745
Nobody will remember you for your genre-defining good looks tho