[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: old good, new bad.png (9 KB, 970x713)
9 KB PNG
>>
name anything new that's actually good
i dare you
>>
>>220321485
>Tár
>Bone Tomahawk
>Red Rooms

Not merely good, but all-time great.
>>
>>220321449
You remind me of a guy that's good at fucking OP.

Fucking and sucking.
>>
>>220321485
The Pitt
>>
>>220321641
I don't think there's anything wrong with sucking on your foid's nipples a little.
>>
>>220321704
Not that kind of sucking.
>>
feel like lots of people here just wants to be young again and hate everything new just because they're not young anymore
others are probably just being contrarians because it gets them most attention that they don't get in real life
>>
>>220321742
Too late. You were lazy setting conditions.
>>
>>220321822
Yeah, but it's also that they hate people younger than them. That's why they love posting demoralization slop.
>>
>>220321449
You would need to debunk it first, and you fail all the times
>>
>>220321449
Cope lmao
>>
When was the last time the reverse was true?
>>
>>220321594
No you have nothing?
thought so


>>220321822
>>220321822
No it's because all new movies are objectively bad, redditard with zero good movies
>>
>>220322467
chink phones
>>
>>220322505
>being ignorant is winning the argument
Yeah, I thought so. Accepting your concession. You may die now.
>>
>>220321822
Good points but new stuff get compared to more than a hundred years of older movies, hard to stand out
>>
>>220321449
nostalgia is the main driver of taste
>>
>>220322505
I wouldn't use an absolute but that's the general trend, yeah. Project Hail Mary was good and on equal reddit standing as Jack Sparrow.
>>
>>220322457
Haven't failed once. Know that a for a fact. Your willinglessness to engage doesn't prove me wrong.
>>
>>220322560
You are the only mad and ignorant one, here, as you just proven.
If you just wanted some attention you tried the wrong approach.
>>
>>220322658
I've posted three greats. You have nothing.
>>
>>220322629
Not an argument
The best get compared with the best, and found lacking. Also they would be bad even on their own
>>220322630
recency bias
>>220322633
>Project Hail Mary was good
No it isn't, no matter how much you try to meme it
>>
>>220321594
>Bone Tomahawk
>all-time great
Not bad by any means but come on
>>
>>220321449
i'm more of a
>good good, bad bad
guy myself, but you can make up your own mind :)
>>
File: 1749029739369788.png (8 KB, 133x84)
8 KB PNG
>>220322718
>No it isn't
imdb says otherwise
>>
>>220322718
Wasn't talking to you sperg
>>
>>220322657
You being objectively wrong makes you wrong
>>220322696
Take the L three times, loser with no movies

You are here every day getting mad that people have no respect for your bad movie kek
No different from a snydertard
>>
>>220321449
stop making your new shit suck so fucking much than, Chaim noseburgh
>>
>>220322745
Imdb isn't an argument and it means less than nothing
>>220322760
You weren't talking at all, just making gay noises
>>
>>220322798
shut up chud
>>
>>220322819
your subjective taste isn't an argument either
>>
>>220322781
Oh, I recognize that posting style. You're one extremely mentally ill person, my guy.
>>
>>220322733
You don't understand what makes a classic.
>>
But it's so real though. You watch stuff like Pride and Prejudice 1995, or Master and Commander, and they were just making kino on a different level. REAL kino, not slop, or slopkino (like Nolan). There is a noticeable difference and if you go from watching mostly new stuff to the older stuff you'll even feel healthier in your soul
>>
>>220321449
It will never die because there will never be anything good coming out of Hollywood ever again.
>>
>>220322828
>subjective
If opinions are subjective then why making theis thread and getting mad when everyone normal reject your spurely subjective opinion?
>>220322855
>I recognize the grating feeeling of people disagreeing with me, which is bad
kek
>>220322880
He doesn't understand movies. He's just here for the negative attention
>>
>>220321449
happens to be a fact
>>
>>220322939
I watch all kinds of film and anime, so I can assure you that's not true.
>>
File: 1773764434534441.gif (305 KB, 365x360)
305 KB GIF
>>220322992
have an apu
>>
>>220322880
Enlighten me
>>
>>220322992
>kek
I remember you being exposed in a thread the other day. You've posted the same dumb images hundreds of times on here.
>>
>>220323026
>and anime
Opinion discarded
>>
File: wellhatted.png (82 KB, 365x113)
82 KB PNG
>>220321449
KWAB imagine being born too late
>>
>>220323067
It's broadly a matter of niche, of uniqueness within that niche, of level of craft, of thematic richness, and of casting. Bone Tomahawk is a certified future classic. You can take that to the bank.
>>
File: 1766458965106573.mp4 (2.92 MB, 1920x1080)
2.92 MB
2.92 MB MP4
>>220321594
>Bone Tomahawk
>2015
>>220321704
someone in another thread told me that is homosexual because men have nipples. Sorry bro.
>>
>>220323087
>>220323118
>look at me!
>I'm ignorant!
>>220323148
>2015
Doesn't it count as modern? I mean, I don't even know. If it needs to be more recent, we can go with Reflection in a Dead Diamond instead.
>>
>>220323033
>melty
>>220323070
>I saw things, thinks posted, and I dreamt of btfoing
What images did "I" post? all the posts in the thread are yours.
Are you already having a stroke?
>>
>>220323118
Imagine your knees cracking out of place every time you stand up to visit the bathroom for another 3 hours and having to use dude wipes after the toxic boomer sludge that sloshed out of your loose ancient bowels
>>
>>220323242
>What images did "I" post?
Want me to look it up? Will be embarrassing for you.
>>
>>220323142
>trust me bro.
kek

is this another "BvS will be universally acclaimed in 5 years" future fact?
>>
>>220321449
It's needed more
>>
>>220323254
You don't even remember why you even came here. For the rest of the thread you will just get mad and throw kiddie insults around
>>220323280
>>220323254
also stop posting twice, loser
>>
>>220323254
Zoomers talk about this happening when they turn 25 because they have never exercised once unless they're one of the body dysmorphia victims who blasts tren as a teen.
>>
>>220321594
>>Tár
lol lmao even
>>
>>220323229
Modern sure but 11 years ago isn't very recent. Movies suck now.
>>
>>220323280
I had an anon once bumping 3 of my threads to limit because he suspected me of shilling. I kept baiting him for year or so until someone told him that there is no reason to shill for a year old show. now he doesn't reply anymore. I wonder if it's the same guy. the show was Common Side Effects
>>
>>220321449
its true tho
sowwy
>>
>>220321449
old SOUL kino, new SOULLESS slop
>>
>>220321822
See, you're already redditing within the first two words. You can't make a point without being a faggot, because you are a faggot.
>>
>>220323280
Sure, go on
>>
this thread is a real conglomerate of depressed nostalgia fags
>>
but its true. the only way it dies is if good movies get made again
>>
>>220321449
Star wars sequels good prequels bad
>>
>>220323497
no it's a loser getting angry because he was born after the end of the age of movies
>>
File: anon.png (248 KB, 1824x538)
248 KB PNG
>>220323415
No idea. You can probably find out, though.
>>220323471
Have it your way.
>>
>>220321449
I realized everything new sucked when I started listening to music 20 years ago. I was listening to black sabbath and everyone was listening to gay nu metal from mtv. Nothing has changed.
>>
>>220321822
people have been telling me that since I was 16 and that was 14 years ago. Everything I’ve enjoyed in the ensuing years has been things produced before that time with very few exceptions and only up to 2015ish. So you can keep saying it but if new stuff isn’t activating the neurons I ain’t going to enjoy it
>>
>>220323533
all star wars is fucking garbage
>>
>>220323557
decent satire
>>
op got raped in a previous thread and xirs lashing out with yet another spiteful trannyish gay thread
>>
>>220323497
I don't have nostalgia because everything was already shit when I was born. But I mostly like old stuff. Our society has been engineered into a decline for decades. Our money goes to shithead that's why people don't have time or incentive to create shit. There's no venues or opportunities for creativity. Look at Nippon it's a stark contrast.
>>
>>220323598
>satire
No, I'm being sincere.
>>
File: 1766687536099318.webm (996 KB, 958x540)
996 KB
996 KB WEBM
>>220321449
I just got into Japanese womens wrasslin and that too is past its prime all the good ones are retiring or already retired. Life is SHIT. JK im not depressed.
>>
>>220323548
So in another post people laughed at your stupid argument (like how it's happening here) and you did what?What did you do that counts as "exposing" or "btfoing"?
>>
>>220321449
To be fair, there are good new movies, and there are far more good old movies.
The belief that “old good, new bad” is at least healthier than the opposite, because while huge amounts of money are spent promoting the latest movies, old movies slowly fade into obscurity no matter what.
>>
>>220323626
You literally can't have nostagia for old movies because you can rewatch them whenever you want.
>>
>>220321594
>Reddit Tomahawk
>Dude the guy gets cut in half wow so scaaaaary I'm going insaaaane
>>
>>220323747
>"people"
>"your"
What interesting framing techniques. The essence of this exposé is really simple: Anyone who wants to know can look up posts associated with those images of yours. It takes a couple of minutes at most to get a good read on who or what you are as a person.
>>
Old bad, new bad, everything bad.
>>
>>220321449
Literally nothing. Old good, new bad is a factual statement.
>>
>>220323842
Anyone who wants to know already laughed at you and your opinion in the thread so far

You aren't setting up any grand argument
>>
>>220324014
Come on, anon. Are you not called to be a child of joy?
>>220324037
It makes no sense. There is reasonable conversation about decline of the average, but none of the people holding on to OP sentiment would win a court case.
>>
>>220324301
Im called little shit or fucking piece of shit or fag a lot
>>
>character uses an old outdated tech
>gets his hands on a new tech that greatly suprasses his old one
>ditches it in favor of the old one because "it has soul" or whatever
this shit is the most infuriating, especially if it's about military stuff. it never works like this in real life.
>>
>>220324301
You could prove that the CIA is a lot more involved in making tv and movies and music than they were pre 2016 and they were very involved already.
>can't prove something subjective in court!!!
yeah but you could prove they make no money anymore which is an indicator of quality
>>
>>220324415
I bought a new phone case because my old one discolored from clear to kind of murky brown. The new one had sharp edges from the injection molding. So I went back to the old one. I'm an old soul.
>>
>>220321594
Bone Tomahawk is almost 20 years old.
>>
>>220324428
>yeah but you could prove they make no money anymore
That's clearly not the case either. Theaters struggled during and after Covid. Now, that that's finally blown over, numbers are going up again.
>>
>>220324487
no lol
no
>>
>>220321704
You haven't lived until you've had your gf alternate licking your nipples and calling you a faggot while jerking you off.
>>
>>220321485
I-I cant
>>
>>220324514
You're wrong. That's all there is to say here.
>>
File: 1769656418475861.gif (876 KB, 392x498)
876 KB GIF
>>220324562
No, I'm not. I am right! I am ze winner!
>>
>>220324553
haven't lived until you've died Im afraid.
>>
>>220324487
>Theaters struggled during and after Covid. Now they don't even exist and almost every movie is direct to streaming and still flops and there's a lot of mystery behind the numbers they get.
>>
>>220324055
you seem unhinged, the other guy calm and rational
nta btw
>>
>>220324553
Bitch would lose it trying that on my salty-haired bosom.
>>220324601
The numbers, Mason.
>>220324698
Wrong.
>>
>>220321449
But it's true. Even low tier Scifi channel D movies were produced with higher quality than a modern triple A.
Compare fucking Tremors to any movie from 2025. Better production, better practical effects, better costume design, better acting, literally every on every single level it shits on the garbage we have today.

This is what happens when entertainment becomes an industry. It's all a big cost cutting circlejerk, and the more they can get you to lower your standards, the more money they can make from you.
>>
File: 1666497204791335.jpg (285 KB, 708x1064)
285 KB JPG
>>220321449
>cancerous sentiment that needs to die
What a retarded notion.
New is bad untill something newer comes out that is even worse and the new thing is old and good.
Thats how it's always been and always will be.
>>
>>220324673
Then you're never going to live, billy bitch boi.
>>
>>220324790
>Compare fucking Tremors to any movie from 2025. Better production, better practical effects, better costume design, better acting, literally every on every single level it shits on the garbage we have today.
Clearly delusional, anon.
>>
>>220321449
yeah so why all there is in current decade is remakes/reboots/sequels/reshashes of old movies?
>>
File: WAZZZZUUUUUUUUUUP.jpg (80 KB, 1280x720)
80 KB JPG
>>220321449
keep crying about it on 4chan. That will get your job back for sure, faggot
>>
>>220323797
Bone Tomahawk is not fucking r*ddit. It has one of the best chuds in film.
>Not a boast, but a fact.
>>
A big part of it is the switch from film to digital imo. There's something fundamentally artificial feeling about film.
>>
>>220324874
That's not all there is. Why is there a lot of it? For the sad reason that you have to market it to a people so occupied with their smart phone gadget, that introducing something new to them without it rocking their fried neurons comes close to a death sentence.
>>
>>220324969
*about digital
I meant
>>
>>220321449
Watch any show from before 2010 and tell me television has gotten better because of streaming. Old shows had believable characters who spoke like real people. They ran for a decade because the ratings were that good. And the ratings were that good because audiences kept coming back for more. No tenth season episode of a sitcom is going to be as funny as one from the second season, but it’s much better than the 8 hour movie model we have now.
>>
>>220321449
There hasn't been a truer statement on this board
>>
>>220324983
This is something that sounds clever in your head but has nothing to do with anything, dumb midwit
The reboots and sequels have nothing to do with uhhh muh smart phones and uhhhh zoomers yeah, it's entirely due to a talent drain in the arts which every discipline from novels to music to movies is feeling. Hollywood can't come up with good ideas themselves anymore, their writers are all shit-eating pozzed zombie faggots and nepo Jews. So they just rehash familiar IPs hoping name recognition puts asses in seats
>>
>>220325013
>Watch any show from before 2010
The television quality revolution happened around the first season of True Detective.
>>
>>220324983
nonsense. see pluribus, parasite, severance, the studio. if the issue was the cellphone none of this would exist. but yeah, those are like 20% in the world of poor memberberries
>>
>>220325057
>it's entirely due to a talent drain in the arts
Why is this happening
>>
>>220325063
What's your point? Those are Apple burning money, anon.
>>
>>220325187
1. Enshittification due to the arts increasingly becoming commodified like everything else in the modern world which eventually churns out more poptarts meant for mass appeal than real substance and gets worse with each new generation that was raised on the shitslop of the last
2. General decrease in attention span, time alone with your thoughts, and IQ
3. Mongrelization of the West which is both spiritual and of course literal
>>
>>220325194
at least they care about good new content
>>
>>220321449
there hasnt been a good movie in at least 20 years. like hte last actual comedy is tropic thunder. the last action movie worth a damn is like the matrix or some shit. its just shit all the way down since chinese money flooded market for a decade or so and now thats shut off and its just pure slop.
>>
>>220325258
This is something that sounds clever in your head but has nothing to do with anything, dumb midwit.
>>
>>220325298
Holy seethe, that line is going to be knocking around in your head all year huh
>>
>>220324834
lived
>>220324740
sorry gramps movies are dead. cable tv is dead.
>>
>>220324790
>>220324844
Tremors mogs
>>
>>220325268
Yes. Bless them for it.
>>220325288
You know how obvious it is when someone has no idea about the thing they're talking about? Didn't you learn that at school?
>>220325322
No, I'm genetically immune to the word "midwit."
Your mindless regurgitation of /pol/crap begged to have your own line thrown back at you, though.
>>
>>220325423
/pol/ aren't usually socialists critical of capitalism actually, midwit
But you're right, it almost sounded /pol/-esque, if you're a midwit who can only read things on the surface and present a semblance of intelligence rather than actually ever thinking
>>
>>220325298
anon got raging made because he wants to believe he lives in a good society that makes good film.otherwise.
>>
>>220321449
Old is classic, tried and true. New can sometimes be good, but the majority of everything is bad, so most of the time new is bad. There's plenty of old that is bad, it's just never or rarely talked about or revisited.
>>
>>220325466
Guess I imagined the "Socialist" part of "National Socialist" then, huh.
>midwit
>midwit
Uh oh. Are you sure this isn't a word you're afraid might apply to you?
>>
>>220325535
>Guess I imagined the "Socialist" part of "National Socialist"
Holy midwit moment. Just stop
>>
>>220321449
Not a stange sentiment to have when 90% of the new is just shitty rehashes, remakes and revivals of old but completely missing what made old good.
>>
>>220325488
We don't live in a good society, but there are good movies being made.
>>220325607
see
>Are you sure "midwit" isn't a word you're afraid might apply to you?
>>
>>220321449
First step is making something new that is good, i.e isn't a vehicle for gay LA sentiments
>>
I didn't read the thread, but what are some good films and TV shows from the last 5 years that contain no feminism or LGHDTV+ crap in them?
>>
>>220325734
Just google if Nazis were actually socialists midwit, you're so embarrassing lol
Hilarious you actually thought that was an epic gotcha
>>
>>220325187
Look at the last names of people in charge of every single production. There's no diversity. There's no Americans.
>>
>>220325734
I live in a good society but the people who make movies are a small group of nepo babies and they haven't made anything good ever.
>>
>>220321449
Okay zoomer.
>>
>>220321594
Lmao zoom zoom
>>
>>220325867
>>220325891
You talking about those kino Mazda ads?
>>
>>220321449

We're in a cultural dark age and have been for about 20 years. Hollywood is creatively bankrupt and run by deranged and debauched champagne socialists who are too removed from reality to be capable of making meaningful statements about the human condition.
>>
>>220325803
>midwit
As stated earlier, I don't mind that insult. Doubt you share that benefit. And as far as the off-topic /pol/shit goes, and without wanting to hit you over the head with a horseshoe, it's clear you're a total amateur.
>>
>>220326037
>Oh yeah well Nazis WERE socialists bruh it's like, in the name dude
Lmao midwit
>>
>>220326013
It's a movie making meaningful statements about the trivialities of the homosexual condition for sure.
>>
>>220321822
There is some truth to the wanting to like older stuff from when we were younger. I think underground rock music for example is in a pretty good place right now and better than it was 10 years ago. I still think good movies get made now here and there but TV as a whole feels like it's a pretty awful place now.
>>
im watching broken arrow right now. shit is so cash
>>
File: 1760526837396.jpg (1021 KB, 800x2300)
1021 KB JPG
>>220321449
>old bad, new good
>>
Instead of being of denial that things are still good, zoomers should actually take this time to reflect and actually make stuff that's good
>>
>>220326254
Imagine how ugly that fucking cartoonist must be to have a self insert that is better looking than they are but still so deformed
>>
>>220326269
They have no ability to make anything good. You have to be in the club or have members of the club preside over you. It's impossible to make anything good. They will not let you. You can make good music of course but it's totally pointless.
>>
>>220326311
And by they I mean mi6/cia and the usual guys
>>
>>220321449
auld straight ~ nu gay
>>
>>220324844
>didn't name a single movie
>>
>>220325187
human genome degradation
>>
>>220326667
Tremors mindbroke that lil bitch. Kevin Bacon never loses.
>>
>>220326720
Nah that's you
>>
>>220326746
I mean, nah y'all?
>>
>>220321449
Truthful sentiment that makes you seethe
>>
>>220321449
Old = lots of horrible shit and some great shit
new = everything is shit
>>
>>220321822
that would usually be true but now its only a small part of the equation. young kids dont even like the stuff of their generation, thats why the 80s and Y2K trends are so popular
>>
Thread summed up so far:
>tons of (quasi) admissions of complete ignorance
>schizoid boogeymen like intelligence agencies
>complete failure to grasp current day media ecosystem and how Covid wasn't a regular happening
>poor social theory that's fully detached from lived reality, overstating the significance of old trends while presenting them as new
>>220326667
There was an Avatar film in 2025.
>>
theres like 3 true kinos a year at most for the last 10 years, pre 2010 it was like 5-10 a year
>>
>>220327015
Not even close to 3
There's one if you're lucky and I'm not super picky
>>
>>220321822
>ESL
not read
>>
>>220326981
t. ben shapiro
>>
>Star Wars is dead
>Marvel is dead
Let's see, what's new and popular?
>Minecraft movie
>>
>>220326981
You lost.
>>
>>220327145
Who?
>>
>>220327185
You lost.
>>
>>220327198
Lost what?
>>
>>220327168
>>220327198
That I know. Question is who won?
>>
Asking seriously: Do any of you talk to boomers regularly? Do said boomers seem as though they grew up on a healthy media diet or are they basically drooling, memberberries-chasing (except for historical events) philistines?
>>
>>220327213
KWAB
>>
>>220327168
My virginity to your mom?
>>
>>220327241
Why does winning matter in a universe that makes no sense? If fact, there are neither winners nor losers. Only animals, trapped in a cosmic zoo.
>>
>>220327248
Boomers don't care about anything anymore. They watch slop. They grew up on garbage.
>>
>>220327258
I still don't know what you are talking about.
>>
>>220322630
nah this is what zoomers are desperate to prove but fact is things were better n the past, that doesn't mean 50s movies are the best though but cerainly 70s to 2010 are the best movies with exceptions before the 70s
>>
>>220327310
>>220327271
>>220327241
>>220327213
>>220327185
Settle down. You lost.
>>
>>220327038
No Other Choice was a true kino last year and I'm confident I can come up with 1 every year
>>
>>220327038
>>220327419
Caught Stealin
>>
>2005
A History of Violence
The Descent
Good Night and Good Luck
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
The Proposition
Batman Begins
Revenge of the Sith
Munich
Sin City
V For Vendetta
Syriana
Lord of War
Jarhead
Hitchhiker's Guide

>2006
The Departed
Casino Royale
Little Miss Sunshine
Lucky Number Slevin
Thank You For Smoking
Letters From Iwo Jima
The Illusionist
The Last King of Scotland
The Prestige
Pan's Labyrinth
Inside Man
A Scanner Darkly
CLICK
The Devil Wears Prada
Children of Men
Blood Diamond
300

>2007
No Country For Old Men
Zodiac
There Will Be Blood
Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
3:10 to Yuma
Hot Fuzz
American Gangster
Gone Baby Gone
Superbad
The Mist
Michael Clayton
Into the Wild
Atonement
Sunshine
Eastern Promises
Fracture
1408
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead
Charlie Wilson's War
We Own the Night
Walk Hard
Breach

You could do that for any year from like the early to mid 50s up to around the mid 2010s and it would be stacked with great movies. Try doing that with any year from the 2020s. I wish more than anything they made them now like they used to. I don't want to be an old fogie stuck in the past, but Hollywood obviously can't do what it used to.
>>
>>220325528
>New can sometimes be good, but the majority of everything is bad, so most of the time new is bad. There's plenty of old that is bad, it's just never or rarely talked about or revisited.
This is good point that gets overlooked. We don't remember the tons of slop from decades ago, but surely there was a lot of it, while getting bombarded by new slop.
Still, it does seem like there are fewer good films these days.
>>
>>220327698
So much trash.
>>
>>220326981
>overstating the significance of old trends while presenting them as new
what trends would those be?
>>
>>220327015
This is roughly what it seems like. 1-2 good movies a year for a long time, then pre2010, sometimes 5+.
>>
>>220327698
God movies used to be great.
Any anons who haven't seen The Proposition, should watch it.
>>
>>220322825
being a chud is not a bad thing
t.chud parent in prime of his life
>>
>>220322939
but even directors like Nolan made their best movies 15 years or more ago, its the same with almost every good director that still around. Coens a good example
>>
File: visionary.webm (3.71 MB, 1280x720)
3.71 MB
3.71 MB WEBM
>>220321449
old bad > good new
>>
>>220327822
Commodification, as if that wasn't true from day one. Spiritual mongrelization, as if that's not been the status quo for at least decades. There were recent pushes making the situation in entertainment worse, like the woke era/DEI and Covid, although the consequences of those are waning and have been for years now. There hasn't been a critical mass to tear down the medium. That's the reason the "hater" arguments don't stick.
>>
>>220321594
>>Bone Tomahawk
This shit is such a meme. People only talk about it because of the dude getting cut in half at the end of the fucking movie but the rest of it is just frankly absurd. In fact, even that part is absurd and I'm sick of seeing people act like it's not. It's so over the top it becomes ridiculous and Kurt Russell's acting doesn't help
>>
>>220321594
This definitely one of those
>they hated him because he spoke the truth
posts. Rock on dude
>>
File: 1770997015234646.jpg (29 KB, 540x545)
29 KB JPG
>>220321594
Doesn't count I haven't seen any of these.
>>
>>220327448
L'Étranger
>>
>>220321449
>>220321822
>>220323026
>>220323497
Bone Tomehawk is almost 11 years old now. Looks like even you don't fully disagree.

new stuff is so shit that even zoomer faggots can sense it despite never living in it. That is how bad degenerates have ruined media with their social corrosion.You deserve to be banned, because disagreeing with that fact is so disingenuous, I think you're just a subversive cunt.
>>
>>220328470
>Bone Tomahawk is almost 11 years old now. Looks like even you don't fully disagree.
see >>220323229
>>
>>220328777
excellent post reminds me of this documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La_8ws3Pn-I
>>
>>220321449
Old 1960s shows are better than any show today. Im 26 years old and have been watching The Fugitive, i'm on the 14th episode and i'm amazed at how good it has been so far.
>>
>>220328777
Re-read the reply chain, starting at the suggestion that /pol/ does not tend to practice criticism of capitalism. Neither you nor the other midwit(!) appears to be capable of basic reading comprehension.
>>
>>220321449
Shalom
>>
>>220329156
Correct, it doesn't. /pol/ is right wing, socialist critiques of capitalism are left wing. You didn't know this and went even further by claiming Nazis are "socialists". I'm not even going to insult you by saying you don't even rise to the level of a midwit anymore, because it's not true. You are the textbook definition of a midwit. All your words are in coherent order and you're capable of resembling sentience, similar to chat bots, but you're just incapable of actually thinking or knowing anything. It takes an actually sentient person like me to see through the arrogant empty talk and illogical nonsequiturs
>>
>>220329156
>Neither you nor the other midwit(!) appears to be capable of basic reading comprehension
Dunning Kruger irony btw because your response to him isn't even relevant. He's responding to your claim that Nazis were socialists, has nothing to do with /pol/
It's time to log off
>>
>>220321449
Hard to do when there's so much new shit that's genuinely terrible.
>>
>>220328122
>Commodification, as if that wasn't true from day one
Free market capitalism is a hungry hungry hippo that gets bigger and hungrier the longer it has time to grow. There is a big difference between when Jane Austen was selling her novels for money, vs the purely profitized commodification that followed the industrial revolution and has been eating everything good in the world ever since. From turning arts into lowest common denominator pandering, to opening the borders and eroding the social fabric of the nations. So no, it hasn't been "true from day one", whatever that even means. It's something that gets worse every generation
>>
>>220321449
Yes you can't prove it wrong, curious
>>
>>220324301
>It makes no sense. There is reasonable conversation about decline of the average, but none of the people holding on to OP sentiment would win a court case.

lmao, yeah let's take this to court. great analogy faggot. gtfo you clown
>>
>>220329126
the major difference is dialogue
new stuff wouldn't be so bad if the dialogue wasn't pure crap
>>
>>220325913
It's just the latest thing the razor wits on here run into the ground
>>
>>220325867
There are plenty of zoomers there are retrofags, hell they are the loudest retrofags. They like to always let you know how
>no media made after the 90s is good
>>
>>220321449
>we don't like our reputation being out of our control
>>
>>220330403
>>no media made after the 90s is good
It's more like 2010ish but yes, unironically
>>
It's a sentiment for losers whose peak of life enjoyment was in childhood and adolescence. Most people see their lives as steadily getting better as they hit new milestones and self actualize as human beings. But most /tv/ posters haven't even held hands with a girl. Of course they're desperate to return to childhood.
>>
>>220330519
Post doesn't even make sense cringe tryhard, but go ahead and tell us how you fuck a fat 6 and literally have sex or whatever it is that you want to get off your chest to feel big. Just get right to it, because whatever you're babbling about is just embarrassing
>>
>>220330519
Nice psychoanalyzing. Now go look at the top 10 movies from any year in the 90s and compare them to the top 10 from any of the last ten years and tell me things haven't literally, actually gotten worse. Go look at the top 10 music albums, whatever you name it. Go look at videos and pictures of normal life. Look at the statistics for what normal people's lives were like. How many got married then versus now. How many owned houses. Whatever metric you want.
Culture and our world has been going in the wrong direction. Your juvenile psychoanalysis is of no relevance to that fact.
>>
>>220321449
it's accurate tho
stupid braindead zoomer
>>
>>220330627
>>220330403
>>
>>220330621
You rekt that fag.
>>
>>220321449
Dust hasn't settled yet
>>
>>220330621
>>220330519
Hmmm both of your posts are interesting but I don't know who should I agree with.
>>
>>220330791
Well my post contains objective metrics you can check to decide for yourself. Are the movies today or from the 90s better? Are more people married with families today or back then? Is society nicer today or was it nicer in the past?
Don't make me hold your hand through this any more than I already have
>>
File: 7845789347895.jpg (73 KB, 949x480)
73 KB JPG
>>220330917
>Is society nicer today or was it nicer in the past?
Society might be a little nicer just because I get the chance to have a nice chat with a refined gentleman like yourself.
>>
>>220330964
Thank you. I agree that internet is one big advantage we have now.
>>
>>220322718
>/tv/ says project hail mary is reddit and gay
so it's actually good, i'll be checking it out for sure now
>>
>>220327698
You could even do it for the 2010s. Post 2020 is when things have gone to complete shit.
>>
>>220331234
It was already declining in the 2010s but yeah 2020s are when they became irremediable.
>>
>>220330964
>Society might be a little nicer just because I get the chance to have a nice chat with a refined gentleman like yourself.
based and frenpilled, fren
>>
File: tats talkin bout you.png (622 KB, 1440x1080)
622 KB PNG
>>220321594
>>
File: file.png (56 KB, 840x750)
56 KB PNG
>>220330608
Your post is laced with self hate. Improve your life dude. You'll feel better, trust me.
>>220330621
>Now go look at the top 10 movies from any year in the 90s and compare them to the top 10 from any of the last ten years and tell me things haven't literally, actually gotten worse.
So the west is falling because of your own subjective bias towards 90s movies? Not very convincing, anon.
>>220330917
> Is society nicer today or was it nicer in the past?
You tell me dumbo, pic related. Unless homicide is an indicator of niceness in your dumb-dumb brain?
>>
>>220321449
So that brings us to the question -- what are truly very good films from the past five years or so?
I like Anatomy of a Fall.
Sharp Corner is decent.
Never Look Away is fantastic, although a bit older. I don't watch a lot of new stuff and rarely any new major release.
>>
>>220330964
m’lady

*tips trilby so hard it dents*

Careful anon, keep talking like that and you’ll undo his entire “society is collapsing” thesis in one smug pepost. If we can shitpost politely about homicide statistics and 90s kino at 5AM, maybe civilization isn’t DOA after all.

That said, this is /tv/. Civility will last exactly three posts before someone brings up capeshit or calls Kurosawa overrated.

Stay refined, gentleman.
>>
>>220331738
nta, and not sure how much homicide rates have to do with the subject, but the US rate is far too high. most (or basically all?) other Western countries' rates are a lot lower. Of course these are mostly occurring in poor areas of large cities (guess who??), and there are probably some other complications that make this stat not very relevant to most people's experience of "niceness" in the US. idk
>>
File: file.png (411 KB, 2160x2160)
411 KB PNG
>>220331846
>not sure how much homicide rates have to do with the subject,
Nothing. But that other weirdo was bringing up marriage rates and other weird subjects.
>>220331846
>most (or basically all?) other Western countries' rates are a lot lower.
It was still worse in the 90s. Pic related.
>>
>>220331738
>Your post is laced with self hate. Improve your life dude. You'll feel better, trust me.
R E T A R D, you are literally the person who made this about your personal life for no reason, trying to alpha dog the whole thread anonymously, and it's not because you're feeling as secure in yourself as you're pretending
It's only in your own lack of a life that you think anybody cares that you Have Sex. It's really not a big deal, and has nothing to do with this thread. You are not impressive
>>
>>220332117
Wonder what the US rate would be if you subtracted crime in poor areas. Maybe more in line with these, but then if you did the same with these stats it'd be lower too.
>>
>>220329474
>>220329519
Your initial thesis as to why the decline of talent in the arts was nothing special and didn't contain DNA exclusive to a card-carrying socialist, so your response to me calling it /pol/crap was already nonsensical, pointing out how that can't be because there are no socialists criticizing capitalism on /pol/, which I then humored. You should definitely take an IQ test already to confront your IQ-related fears, anon.
>>220329675
Jane Austen died almost a hundred years before film was ever a thing.
>>
>>220321449
>the movie doesn’t know what it wants to be

>posting images from your ip has been blocked
Just imagine a fat basedjak
>>
>>220330519
counterargument: childhood is the only thing left that’s fair. bullies isolate themselves. spergs do bizarre fucking shit. and nice kids have fun with each other… because authority figures haven’t yet gained full control over your lives yet.

adulthood on the other hand is all about how many jews do you know.
>>
Pretending everything new is the best thing ever every single year only for it to fizzle out in a week sounds like it'd get really exhausting after awhile. I see this with video games too even though the numbers show younger people mostly play stuff that's 10-20 years old at this point.
>>
>>220321449
Make new things that aren't shit. Problem solved.
>>
>>220331234
Things have been in steep decline since the mid 90s. Even the 00s were largely nothing but foul smelling feces.
>>
>>220332611
Holy cow nah you’re just retarded, sorry. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but it’s literally just undeniable that you are functionally retarded. Whatev
>>
>>220332915
Whatev indeed. Let us know the test result when you're done. I feel like laughing a little more.
>>
>>220332853
>Pretending everything new is the best thing ever every single year only for it to fizzle out in a week sounds
Literally One Battle After Another, all the popular things made nowadays are fotm.
>>
>>220333040
>all the popular things made nowadays are fotm
No way that has anything to do with universal smartphone access and algorithm brainrot. Know what's the good thing? You can watch good movies independent of any of that.
>>
>>220333101
>No way that has anything to do with universal smartphone access and algorithm brainrot.
Why are you putting words in my mouth? Of course it has a lot to do with the internet and social media
>>
>>220321449
Never been debunked
>>
>>220333160
Old was new at some point meaning that you get old=bad which contradicts the original post making the statement null. Of course if you add a "this only applies for stuff made after 00" condition to the claim, it can make sense. Have I debunked it?
>>
>>220333160
Never been proven.
>>
File: Grace Kelly2.jpg (98 KB, 1300x1300)
98 KB JPG
>>220327248
They had movies of any level, including good movies (unlike now). Actors and writing were objectively immensely better.
And more than everything else, they were loved by people making movies, movies were made for them and bad movies were allowed to be considered bad
>>
>OLD GOOD NEW BAD

this but unironically
>>
>>220321449
It's more like white good, brown bad.
>>
>>220321594
Bone Tomahawk is one of the most degenerate pieces of shit ever made.
>>
File: a needful end for op.png (446 KB, 565x699)
446 KB PNG
>>220321449
>cancerous sentiment that needs to d-ACK

OK, saar.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.