>NOT guilty>on all countsHEEE HEEEEE
>>220415595spacey also got not guilty
>>220415595>cp was found at neverland ranchheeeheeee
>>220415595when i was a kid i thought he did it cause of all the parodies and comedy skits making fun of him but now i dont know anymore
Jimmy Saville was not only not guilty, he was never even accused until after his death. Why do chuds defend MJ but not a white Anglo Saxon?
>>220415609nudism isn't technically cp. europe has many nudism areas. its common. obviously thats not why he had them, but still, get the facts right.
>>220415623If a non-celebrity adult man owned such content, had sleepovers with young boys, and was accused of sexual abuse by several, nobody would be defending him. But, because he's famous, people do
>"Sleeping with children is a beautiful thing. I sleep with children all the time" -Michael JacksonHe admitted to sleeping in bed with boys, and nude boy books and photos were found in a safe next to his bed. Put two and two together.https://youtu.be/MMrOZte3hvo?is=6FRKqOoZduZ8GPKI
michael was goofy and rich enough that people mistake his autism for pedophilia because they also wanted to profit from the bad press, that's all it ever was
>>220415696This.I don't think there ever was anything sexual about it, the man was just overcompensating for having an abusive dad.
>>220415633no, AMERICANS do. get it right. just like they defended amanda knox and put her on JRE after she murdered a british student with her african bf because she was jealous.
>>220415595He had two books of naked boys in his bedroom in a locked box, written by pedophiles for pedophiles.Adult porn everywhere in his house where he kept children around. His maid saw him shower with a boy. He was alone with young boys in his room constantly, sought out children his entire life. He has been accused by many different boys with graphic descriptions of how he abused them.He was a child rapist. Watch leaving neverland and if you believe those guys are lying after adding everything together you're absolutely delusional and probably a pedophile yourself just trying to excuse obvious pedophile behavior.
>>220415720>the man was just overcompensating for having an abusive dadas many pedos do
>>220415760>He had two books of naked boys in his bedroom in a locked box, written by pedophiles for pedophiles.source? names of books? imbd numbers?>>220415760>Adult porn everywhere in his house where he kept children around.proof?>>220415760>His maid saw him shower with a boy.source?>>220415760>He was a child rapist.evidence?>>220415760>Watch this show made by people trying to ruin himok now i get it
>>220415781FBI raid oh also mj himself confirming ithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMrOZte3hvo
>>220415781Here they show a picture from one of the books found in his bedroom on television:https://www.reddit.com/r/LeavingNeverlandHBO/comments/17v2qbc/michael_jacksons_seized_pedophile_books_shown_on/Here's information about the books:https://www.reddit.com/r/LeavingNeverlandHBO/comments/1kgr72x/books_found_on_michael_jacksons_property_during/?share_id=-1ymxvtjdRWxEnSCiH2j3Stop defending the pedo.
>>220415818>boys will be boyshttps://openlibrary.org/works/OL7398536W/Boys_will_be_boys%21a book from 1966 that you can freely buy anywhere. not exactly the hardcore paedophilia you're making it out to be.i'm not saying he wasnt gay. i'm not saying he wasnt attracted to boys. i'm saying there is no evidence he molested anybody and is therefore not guilty of any crime.
>>220415908Did you watch the video I linked where you see a prepubescent boy spreading his legs for a pedophile photographer making a book for pedophiles that Michael Jackson owned and hid in his bedroom where he brought children?He just happened to own those books while also seeking out children to hang out with alone in his room and several of those boys then went on to describe how he abused them.
>>220415908The book was made by a pedophile specifically for the purpose of pedophiles having access to softcore porn of boys that is legal. It's celebrated among groups such as NAMBLA.
>>220415966up until 2021 there was no age of consent in france. a 50yo man could fuck a 4yo kid and if he could prove they "consented" it wasnt a crime.i reject your assertion that the book was paedophillic. you cant call a book from 1966 unlawful based on todays laws and ideologies. in 1966, that book was legal. in 2026, that book is still legal. he committed no crime in owning that book.not everything fits into your tiny worldview. you cant judge history on todays standards.
>>220415667He was just a retard, anon.
>>220415760>>220415818>>220415908Considering this alleged evidence, how the fuck did he get away with it? Was the judge an MJ fan?
>>220416144the books are considered "art" and can be bought anywhere. looking at a nude kid isn't a crime. if it was, every parent would be in jail.
>>220416219The two books in question are made by people who are both convicted pedophiles. The books are made for pedophiles by pedophiles under the guise of "art". Why do you think MJ had them in a locked box in his bedroom?Are you also a collector of these books?
>Both books were made by two known pedophiles, Martin Swithinbank and Ronald Drew, under the pseudonyms Georges St. Martin and Ronald C. Nelson. Martin Swithinbank was a NAMBLA officer who was jailed for 10 years for sodo*mizing young children and deported upon release.>Co-author Ronald Drew was fired from his teaching position for sexually abusing a student. Self-described pedophiles such as Hajo Ortil, K. Egermeier, J.Le Doare, J. Simonot, among others, contributed photographs to the book. In short, books made by pedos for a similar audience.It's just art amiright.
>>220416269so the crimes of the people that made the books should be attributed to michael now because he owned the books? that means you're liable for every crime committed by apple or microsoft because you own one of their products. you fucking smooth brain.>Are you also a collector of these books?jesus wept the level of intelligence on this website has plummeted in recent years. can't even have a fucking logical debate anymore.
>>220415609a child taking a bath is not cp
>>220416344why did he own thoose books in first place
>>220415620That's revisionism. People knew Jimmy was guilty for years, it was just shoved under the rug because he was pally with the royals. My mum used to change the channel when he was on because she knew he was a dirty man and a lot of other people felt the same.
>>220415633This is the most salient point. People only give him the benefit of the doubt because he's a cultural icon.
>>220416377because he was gay and attracted to boys, probably. NOT A CRIME. not proof he molested anybody.let me ask you a question. lets say MJ raped one of your kids. you tell the cops, they arrest him, it goes to court. then he says "hey i'll pay you 10 million to forget i raped your kid". do you accept the 10 million?let me tell you that no parent on this planet that suspects their kid has been raped by a 50yo man will accept that money. NOT ONE. so the fact that ALL of the "victims" took the money should ring alarm bells in your tiny little head.
A HEE HEESHAMONA!HHHOHHHMMM, AHH!
>>220416419>"hey i'll pay you 10 million to forget i raped your kid". do you accept the 10 million?yes
>>220416453you aint a parent
>>220416344You just hyper focus on 1 thing at a time out of context. Take it all in please, it's so fucking obvious when you do. He sought out children and played with them alone in his room. Several of them have in detail told how he abused them. He had these books of naked boys hidden in his room, books that are popular among pedophiles, photographs in the books taken by convicted child rapists. His maid saw him be inappropriate with children, showering naked with a boy. Police reported they found pornography in his house, which should make people question the whole "he was just an innocent manchild"-act.
This lil nigger had the chance to fuck prime Brooke Shields and he didn't, he deserved to die for that.
>>220415595
>>220416489i just need more proof than an art book from 1966 and several out of court settlements with alleged victims.i never said he wasnt very very creepy. nor would i have let my child anywhere near him.
>>220416489(Different anon)I believe in certain hardline issues. Touching children is one. I can't respect somebody who has ambiguity around that. Yes, I understand 12 year olds got married in 1809. But it simply IS NOT the law now, and is unacceptable.BUT. I have been a part of workplace investigations where average people made up COMPLETE fucking lies. Falsified documents. Manipulated timeclock punches. Forged signatures. It's jaw dropping in brazenness. It happens every day. I'm just saying. Nobody did a toxicology on the kids and found THC or alcohol in their systems? No physical evidence of assault? No detailed descriptions of sex acts? You don't think that shit would be headline news for centuries? And nothing?I have to PARTIALLY believe in the outcast underdog and say it's possible Michael didn't do it.
>>220416489Why are all the accusers rando kids with greedy parents, welfare parent, the fucking maid and so on?Why do Macaulay Culkin and Corey Feldman, who don't need the money, say that nothing ever happened?
People say that MJ was so close to children because he wanted to reclaim his lost childhood, but I've never heard of someone in arrested development collecting baby paraphernalia
>>220416641
>>220416641It's so painfully obvious why he didn't. Because they would be taken more seriously by people like you. MJ was not an idiot, he was highly intelligent, he found his targets like any predator.
>>220416663He also had plenty of adult porn, doesn't exactly scream innocent and childlike to me.
>>220416641Did some of his employees claim he was a pedophile?
>>220415609Interesting that he was never charged then, huh? Seems pretty open and shut, doesn't it?
>>220415667>He was sleeping in the same bed as a boy.>HE MUST HAVE BEEN HAVING HOT PASSIONATE SEX WITH THEM!!Why does your mind always go there? Is it because you were raped as a child? When dads sleep in the same bed as their children, do you automatically assume he's fucking them? I mean you probably do because that's what your dad did, but normal people don't. Maybe someone should have a look at your hard drive, thou doth protest too much.
>>220416846Almost as if having massive amounts of money and influence can affect the justice system.
>>220416874Yes, there's absolutely no difference between a father sleeping with his own child and a skull-faced junkie cuddling with some sickly kid he was pining after
>>220416874He just happened to seek out young boys constantly so he could hang out with them alone in his room all day while collecting photographs of naked children. And then several of those kids just all decided to lie that he abused them, what a crazy coincidence.Or maybe he was just a child rapist like everything points towards.
>>220416874Would you allow your little brother or your son to share a bed with an adult man? Answer you fag. Of course you wouldn't.
>>220417066>everything points towards.not gonna stand up in court, sorry.
>>220415595Nooooo, he's guilty because... I just KNOW he is, ok?
>>220415595shamone!
>>220415595Deconey status?
