Greatest downgrade in film history
whats the 2nd
>>220436568if you're only attractive because 80% of your face is covered in hair then you were never actually attractive.
>>220436568left is what she looks like after we fuck. right is how she looked 3 minutes earlier.
Chuck > Sneedsimple as that
>>220436568
>>220436568Ally Sneedy
>>220436930You can easily make out all important features of her face in both pictures.The reason why she's more attractive on the left is because it expresses her personality. The right just turns her into a somewhat pretty but ultimately bland (and therefore interchangable) young girl of her time.
>>220436568>falls for the extroverted sports Chad instead of the self-insert for nerds>changes her appearance to be more feminineThis movie was the death of tomboyfags
>>220436568She's ugly either way
>broo I prefer girls who cover half their face with hair Gaycoded
>>220436568Not surprising that America spawned so many troons when they couldn't comprehend women dressing in non-feminine clothing.
>>220437572The dude in that movie had a massive cock
>>220436568In both versions the makeup holds her back.She is incredibly beautiful as-is, many such cases.
back in the 80s they had standards
>>220436568she had bad dandruff on the left
>>220437060came to post this
>>220438137The older I get, the more I notice that most "ugly" girls, simply don't know how to dress and apply makeup.
>left>simps and bpdemon fodder>right>bimbomaxxing chads
>>220437383>only men have hair
>>220436568If she had a pixie cut on the right it would be a good makeover and more symbolic of her desire to be more social and show her face without losing the tomboy appeal
>>220437685real or fake?