>this is considered "the most beautiful woman to ever live"Did Hollywood EVER have good taste or has it always been a complete fucking psyop?
>>220483496Grace Kelly and Cybil Shepherd mog, buy American.
>>220483496LMAOOOOOOOO even average astroturfed zoomer girls like zendaya, sydney or jenna ortega are more good looking than this
>>220483496Let us know whom you consider the most beautiful. >inb4 some pornbrained opinion
>>220483496qt
>>220483584>are more good looking than thisbrown opinion discarded
Hollywood beauty peaked in the 20s
>>220483496No. There have been few occasions where Hollywood came even close to celebrating someone 8/10 and upwards.
>>220483584not really
>>220483496ha ha ha
>>220483496that's just a bad pic
Jennifer Connelly is the most beautiful woman ever.
>>220483703Americans ruined body standards with their goyslop intake
>>220483703skinny women like her unironically have better boobs when naked, you can see there's some substance to them there with the curve so they're not completely flat and I bet they were perky af when let free
I vote for the drive through blonde tiktok girl, you know the one
Really funny topic. The same as with the "old good - new bad" bullshit, except here it's even easier to spot how full of shit these people are.
>this is considered "the most beautiful woman to ever liveYes
>>220483703kino
No one else could make a Nun look this good.
Pic rel are peak.
>>220483586Sydney Sweeney
>>220483496saar
>those eyes>that smile>that face
>>220483496That's just a bad picture, everyone has them. She is stunning in any movie she appears in.>>220483586Prime Monica Belluci is probably as perfect as it gets.
>>220483496>>220483733her modern version was more much better than her and she was never at the top of any list
>>220483972Not even the best zoomer actress. Anya Taylor Joy mogs her.
>>220484069>Anya Taylor JoyNot a zoomer.
>>220483607He's right.t. white nigga
>>2204840821996 is not a zoomer anymore? I thought 1995 was the maximum cutoff.
No lies detected
Wino mogs
>>220484064'ove me some lily
>>2204841141997 are earliest zoomers.
>>220483496>>this is considered "the most beautiful woman to ever live"correct>>220484124stylegracefemininity just wow
There's almost no shot you didn't have a single girl more attractive than Audrey Hepburn going to school with you. She mid.
>>220483961No offense to Audrey, but my girl Ingrid would like a word.
>>2204842147/10 on a good day.
>>220484214if you posted this thinking they're even in the same universe then there's really no point in even replying seriously her eyes aren't even even...
>>220484064I love Lily.
Not only are boomers pathetic coomers, they also have no standards.>>220484214>>220484254
she's a 10
>>220484230Offensive and incorrect
>>220484335Maybe if you're a -5.
>>220484350he was being generous
>>220484350>almost naked>blushing>still looks like the dorky girl next doorNot hating btw, but let's not be silly here, okay?
yeah
>>220483961For me, it's Encarnacioooo-hoooooon.
>>220484350looks like the retarded neighbor your parents try to hook you up with out of pity
audrey hepburn hedy lamarrvivien leigh simple as
>>220484514mid off
>>220483970Based fellow Nastassja and Romy enjoyer
>>220484350:)
>>220484579looks slav (subhuman)
>>220484850Polish & German, actually.
>>220483496That's just a bad picture
>>220483496she was famously Sean Connery's anal toy
>>220483496She was cute, but they always overhype to sell tickets
>>220483496>or has it always been a complete fucking psyop?Always has been
>>220483961>>220484214Come on now
>>220485752Why do they cast beautiful women as nuns?
>>220483496Still looks cute though.
>>220483584>>>zendayalol, no.
>>220483733She looks like she he chick from warehouse 13
>>220485876It is intriguing to the viewer that a beautiful woman would give her away her beauty for a greater purpose.Also some male viewers will imagine corrupting her.
>>220486010Also some female viewers I guess
>>220484350Goddamn. To think some fat Jewish producer got to give her that fat circumcised hog.Probably made her swallow his nasty cum too.
>>220486150hot
>>220483496>>220483828Meh, Jenny is cuter!
>>220483496for me its Jean Arthur or Loretta
>>220486534GWYNETH
for me, it's Jessica Biel
>>220486534I get that these are old photos, but something about her face just says grandma even though she's not a grandma at that time. strange
>>220487319Literally the only reason to watch Chuck & Larry, but it's enough.
>>220483496Psyslop, forever and ever
>>220484064post the updated pic
>>220483496she was the perfect woman.
>brown hair>brown eyesShe's pretty but far from the most gorgeous
>>220487574brown eyes>light blue eyes
>>220487565I love the middle pic.
>>220483496body count?
>>220487610found the jew
>>220487574>>220487610her eyes weren't brown
https://youtu.be/k3t1d4YpMScwill such cuteness ever be seen again…
>>220487740cute granny
>>220487740explain >>220483828
Green, blue and brown eyes are all equally lovely as long as they are big and expressive and catch the light well. Simple as.
>>220487740you can see in this frame her eyes are slightly green, 1950s vs 1980s camera...
>>220487475lovely
>>220483496>this is considered "the most beautiful woman to ever live"that's not Grace Kelly
>>220488087What an exceedingly boring opinion
>>220488126>DUURRR OBJECTIVE BEAUTY NOT REAL IF IT'S NOT MY QUIRK CHUNGUS MEMEPICK IT'S BORING AND PLEBEAN KILL YOURSELF
>>220488087Grace was a dime a dozen
>>220488087that's not jcon
>>220488126>opinion no Grace Kelly is generally considered the most beautiful woman of the last century
>>220483496Cope, incel.>>220483584>>220483805>l-l-lolSeethe, incel.
>>220488184>jewish>even coming close to gorgeousLOLLMAO
>>220488194>no Grace Kelly is generally considered the most beautiful woman of the last centuryshe's... fine, attractive sure, but most beautiful of last century? Hell nah
>>220488087I could be brownI could be blueI could be VIOLET SKY
>>220488252She's not jewish!
>>220488194>>220488291now compare that to a random photo of Audrey at some event...
>>220483703yep, confirmed psyop. they literally wanted men to become gay
>>220488291I didn't make the rules
>>220488169>immediate seethingBeauty is not a mathematical formula you autistic twit. For me a woman with prominent, striking features is much more attractive than the ones that are totally symmetrical when you do that stupid shit drawing lines everywhere. You might as well go jerk off to an actual Barbie doll if you like shit like that.Also, brunettes>>>all.
>>220488343sure, but you did make that claim up
>>220483970>Rodent Stewart
>>220484064Too bad she got anorexic and bogged, we have butters now
>>220488291>>220488381>these bitches are easily trashed
>>220483496YeahAlso, Roman Holiday is the best romance movie I've ever watched imho
>>220483496Audrey Hepburn is cuter than any bogged Zoomer or shitty post-AIDS millennial ever
>>220488622well yeah, she's white
>>220483496There's only one right answer
>>220488783unlike you btw
>>220488622She was admittedly way too thin, but her face and charm were off the charts.
>>220488205You lust after grave pussy, you gremlin.
>>220489150seething
>>220489375calm down then, don't frown, it's alright to be brown
>>220488194There are subjective opinions about physical beauty. Audrey Hepburn. Grace Kelly. Jennifer Connelly. But are there any objective ways to measure how "iconic" a woman might be? Movie sales, general awareness, influence on beauty and fashion trends, etc? Cause I'm thinking that we can argue about which one of these leading ladies was most beautiful, but we haven't seen posted yet the most iconic woman of the 20th Century by far, and you all know exactly who I mean.
>>220489752Monroe, Taylor, Hepburn and Kelly are the only options really.
>>220489783My point was that with love and respect to those other lovely ladies, Monroe blows them out of the water when it comes to the question of who is the most iconic.
>>220488182She was also a whore
>>220483661I find it odd how well 1920s beauty trends seem to still appeal to people nowadays over stuff from the like 30s-1965
>>220489752>Audrey Hepburnmid>Grace Kellybland>Jennifer Connellyupper mid
>>220489857most of them are
>this threadYou zoomers sure have bad taste in women
>>220490077Unlike the boomers and LARPers who are out here gravelusting 4/10s.
>>220490077Hollywood types never really do it for meI like Christina Hendricks though cause of her giant tits
>>220490077Are you referring to the old school starlets this thread has mostly been about, millennial sex symbols like Jennifer Connelly and Jessica Biel, or a disparaging references to Anya Taylor-Joy and Zendaya? Who are you referring to as zoomers?
>>220484415The reason why I watched Nacho Libre. She looks like poor man's Penelope Cruz.
>>220488583Audrey and Gregory Peck have exceptional chemistry and it's a fun movie. But it loses points as a romance because it's based on deception, like he doesn't let her know that he knows she's a princess.
>>220490210The third of course.
>>220490212Yeah, and she likes poopies.
>>220483703You posted the wrong picture. That's an Alien from Area 51.
>>220490334>But it loses points as a romance because it's based on deceptionBoth were deceiving each other
