Beatles bros, how much of the band's history do we think will these films cover?
>>220503388Beatles suck.Elvis rules!
>>220503425FPBPPenny lane is okay though
>>220503388This shit is twenty years too late. Maybe it would've worked ten years ago, but doing it now as movies instead of some straight to streaming thing is insane.
>>220503529Vriska that's your subconscious placing a mask on something you cannot evolutionarily handle. Some goddess, can't answer prayers of the devout without taking a percentage. Does it burn fak8r?
>>220503388They all look like Beatles other than the one they were cast as
>>220503478Beatles haters always pick the most random songs as the one they claim is ‘not that bad’
>>220503388Enough musician biopics
this movie is gonna flop so badly because younger people don't give a a fuck about the Beatles, and you're gonna have boomers seething endlessly about how a movie about a pedo was a huge success yet some band that was even beter than him flopped.
Harris is goated
>>220503388>John's movie covers everything from Hamburg to the height of Beatlemania >Post credits scene is him meeting Yoko at her art exhibit >Ringo's movie starts with John's "Bigger than Jesus" comment, leading to their comeback with Sgt. Pepper,and starts showing the resentment building between John, Paul, and George>Post credits scene is George getting a call that Brian Epstein died>George's movie opens with Brian's funeral (that none of them attend), the India trip, the drama with Apple Corps and Paul attempting to take control of the band, ends with a performance of Hey Jude>Post credit scene is George announcing he's leaving the band>Paul's movie starts with the Get Back sessions, George returning to the band, John descending into his heroin addiction, Ringo's alcoholism, Billy Preston appearing, getting scammed by Allen Klein, the rooftop performance, and ends with the Beatles breaking up>Post credits scene is John getting shot