>A man haunted by the childhood trauma of his mother’s murder, which his incarcerated father blamed on a boogeyman under the bed, comes to the terrifying realization that the creature may be real.https://deadline.com/2026/04/ankle-snatcher-ben-leonberg-to-direct-sony-horror-film-1236865255/
Can Ankle Snatcher beat the Bye Bye Man?
>>220511883Nice. Good for him (unironically)
>>220511883Hollywood completely ignored Good Boy for some reason, not even an Oscar mention or anything, I wonder why since it was the only interesting movie that year
hearing fags go on about how great that dumb dog movie was made me never want to watch it
>>220512829
>>220512829Go off king!
>>220512829I was gonna watch it, but then I heard the ending is just about the guy dying anyway. I wanted to watch a movie of some chad dog killing a monster.
>Good boySounds cool. Horror movie told from the perspective of a Dog who tries to protect the owners.But....>Description of the movie mentions the owner is sick>Horror movies these days are all trying to be "too deep for you"So I'm guessing the monster isn't real, or it's left ambiguous hinting that it's not real and the monster is actually the owners sickness showing through the dogs eyes.Or some dumb fucking too deep for you bullshit like that.
>>220513081To fully spoil everything, yeah, it's a bit ambiguous, but it seems more like yes, there was an actual evil presence, but the evil presence is also symbolic of the owner's sickness. It's nor super deep, but mostly just a dog acting like a dog. Not understanding why and being scared by his owner's sour demeanor towards him (owner is agitated because of cancer), still trying to defend himself and his owner from an evil presence, but ultimately being unable to do anything because he's just a dog and both the illness and evil presence are nothing he can do anything about. In the end, it's up to the viewer how to interpret what they're seeing (there is what appears to be the ghost of another dog, but this too could be interpreted as a representation of the dog sensing him through smelling his old bandana), but there's enough outright spookiness that I'd personally classify it as something more like Hereditary, where there is both a symbolic interpretation of the evil, and the actual supernatural. All that said, it's an enjoyable movie that's further elevated by how much effort and passion was required to make it
>>220511883jew
Sounds interesting enough. The monster under the bed is a very classic fear, but it seems hard to stretch it into a feature length movie. Could be very one-note
>>220513738You might want to get some brain pills anon coz you're a retard. Its not ambiguous, the "monster" is the guys cancer so its not supernatural at all. Its boring, pretentious and badly acted. The best way to describe this shit is deceptive. This guy saw other shit non-horror films like babadook and threw a dog into the mix because, hey, everyone likes dogs. I felt swindled when leaving the cinema. Couldve been good if it had been a movie from a brave dogs pov against an actual supernatural force with some actual imagination. The most cynical film ive ever seen.
CAST HIM
