Who do you want to see in this movie?
>>220524233Bette Davis
potatoface from last of us
>>220524233And as we know all the previous all-women remakes worked out so well. Who the hell is green lightning these projects?
>>220524233Because Ghostbusters 2016 made a billion dollars at the box office?
CGI Carrie Fisher for me, please
Did anyone actually watch the Expendables movies at all? How is there like 4 of these fucking movies?
>>220524445Becuase hollywood is still trying to make everything for women.Yes, women are mindless consumers but only for the shit they like and that it was conceived as aimed to them. Like devil in prada.
the entire cast of dead or alive, except the asian everybody pretends is attractive from 2fast2furious
The film ends when one of them tries to throw a grenade, it lands three feet away and kills them all.
>>220524233Naomi Watts
>>220524233Do the people making movies, even understand what make them work?
>>220524233Hmmmm, lemme guess Ronda Rousey and Gina Carano in this film too then? Daisy Ridley would have to be in it too though. I might actually watch it if all three were in it.
>>220524613I watched the first one whenever it came out.
>>220524233Athletic women that can do stunts. There’s literally no reason female action movies can’t work
Well, dream cast despite some of them being dead:Cynthia Rothrock Cynthia KhanChang Pei PeiAngela MaoJoyce GodenziGina CaranoMichelle YeohKara HuiMoon LeeAnita Mui
>>220524233The expensives. They divorce rape their enemes.
>>220524445>Who the hell is green lightning these projects?The women they hired who haven't earned anything in their lives. They'll destroy franchise after franchise and never see consequences from it.
RipleySarah ConnorXenaBuffyThe BrideDana Scully Morticia Adams Katniss
Hunter SchaferZendayaIdris Elba
>>220524233I'm going to wait in line to see this in the theater
>>220524445Cartel money laundering
>>220524233I just want to say that with all this supposed DEI bullshit there still hasn't been a single openly gay action star. Not one. John Travolta is still technically in the closet. Despite having lived with his lover for more than a decade, he has never once admitted publicly to being gay, and publicly denied it for decades. I'm not saying gays should take over action, I'm just saying how the fuck does the gayest industry on earth have ZERO gay action stars?
>>220524613its self funded
>Ctrl+F: Lawless.>No matches
>>220524233why even make movies like this knowing it'll just flop? isn't that incredibly demoralizing for the whole team?
>>220524233I’m putting a team together including Ellen Page.
>>220524233https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gtGb3Lwnih4
>>220524233We don't have any good female action stars, so nobody. Unless they manage to dig up some stellar literal whos
>>220525401And me.
>>220524839Jeeja Yanin (from chocolate) was pretty good even though she seems to be retired and is now a mom
Brienne of Tarth ladyWarwick Davis' daughterMichelle Yeoh with an Irishman filterEddie Murphy in dragGina CaranoPom Klementieffthe buff dyke from the Kristen Stewart movieBruce Willis' daughtersJada Smith
more like the notgonnawatchits hohoho
all four of the female ghostbusters from that remake playing the same characters
>>220524780>Do the people making movies, even understand what make them work?You check all the diversity boxes, then the studio gets an interest-free 99-year loan from a bank affiliated with BlackRock.
Would be fun pre-woke sorta like Charlies Angels was fun, but it will be shit.
>>220524803Females do indeed wear groin protectors during Tae Kwon Do sparring.
>>220524233My girl Milla
& yet still they won't cast Rhea Ripley
>>220525217Daniel Craig
>>220525295Kevin Sorbo's The Sovereign as the villain
>>220525401wtf
Women are powerful.
>>220524613They're big in the third world
>>220525909nah
>>220525891I love mixed wrestling, Central Europeans make the best mixed wrestling content, Fight Pulse, Dirty Wrestling Pit, good stuff
>>220525958what third world are you an expert on?
>>220524233I'd rather eat shit
The Expendables fucking sucked which was a letdown because I liked Rambo 4 and thought it would be the same thing
>>220524233>woman protagonist >gay best friend>supportive parents/family >relaxing creative /teaching job>she's trying to decide which of the two hot guys she's gonna end up with>one is kind and supportive, the other is a bit rough around the edge or brash but secretly kind and supportive as well This is the kind of movie 99% of women want to see. Just hire whatever heartthrobs are in rn and you're golden. Nobody wants to see all girl Expendables, most women are repulsed by guys like Stallone, Schwarzenegger, Statham, Dwayne Johnson, etc. >>220524996
>>220525530she was already in the expendables,
>>220525544sad she had that one 10/10 martial arts movie and everything else she did was kinda assI guess I should add Zhang Ziyi too
>>220524233Pam Grier maybe 15 years ago would have been fine but now she's way too old.Coffy was an action film and she has good screen presence
>>220524233it must be very self aware, lines like "you think dudes are jerkin off to this shit?!" is box office gold
>>220526538This Girl is Bad Ass was fine (not as good as chocolate) and she was fine in Triple Threat even if she wasn't the starThis films need a good director and some one who will take time to make sure the action scenes look good.
>>220524233Amy Johnston was fine in that Scott Adkins movie.
>>220524233Rhea Ripley
Wow more jewish slop & subversion attempts. What a surprise from this wonderful group of “people” who put so much good into the world!
>>220524233
>>220524233Automatic bomb. Oceans 9 all over again. Women are such slow parisites, do this 10 Years ago. How dumb and stupid are you?
>>220526538I wanted to like this a lot more, but imitating bruce lee did nothing to add impact to her hits, they were all love taps
>>220525909>Expend4bles (also known as The Expendables 4)>Budget $100 million>Box office $51 millionVery big.
>>220524445Jews make these for propaganda purposes, primarily birth rate suppression of whites
>>220525891>Excuse me, ma'am, advertising says these sessions include face-sitting
>>220526214she should reprise her role doesn't matter if it doesn't make sense
>>220524233Yes Madam was kinojust bring back Rothrock and Yeoh. >they are oldsure but they can still get kicked through a sugar glass just fine
>>220524613They feel like movies you watch while stuck on an airplane, if that makes any sense.
Holywood, it's not hard, here it's free:>Late 1990s.>During the height of geopolitical tension, a nefarious ultra rich vilain, DR NAZZINGER, try to tip the world toward chaos.>The EXPENDABELLES team manage to book tickets to one of his famous show where he's supposed to make a rare appearance.>It's a lingerie show.>All Expendabelles have almost SUPERMODEL BODIES except one that have tits too big and another that is too fit (ass too round, thights too defined).>The leaner Belle is infiltrating as a model but she get caught! She have to FIGHT IN LINGERIE and high heels.>Another Belle was in the public, she also have to FIGHT IN A NIGHTGOWN and heels.>They also have a CUTE MOUSEY still hot girl helping them with hackin and tech shit.>The vilain escape but they manage the adress of the super secret lair on some island.>Two Belle get in the island posing as one of these bimbos rich people have on Yacht.>One Belle infiltrates wearing shiny black leather tech suit (with heels).>She FIGHTS IN LEATHER a bit but get captured and tied up.>The other girls must save her and have and FIGHT IN BIKINIS (and heels).>They all manage to defeat the vilain.
>>220524640So Dead or Alive (2006) but lame and gay?
The Expandables
>>220525891
>>220524839Michelle YeohWtf is up with the constant sucking up to this bitch? At least chose Ming-Na Wen if you want a hot Asian granny in the movie.
>>220524233They've been talking about this since 2014, it's never happening because no one wants to see that
>>220524233>what if x movie but all femaleHoly shit hollywood is a fucking cess pool
>>220525891peak female physique
>>220524233Gina as the main antagonist or not watching
>>220525891damn, how much did he pay for that experience?
>y2k era tension The fuck is that supposed to mean
Go back in time and get Tiana Alexandra.
>>220527955Michelle Yeoh aka Michelle Khan is a fucking legend, regardless of whatever Netflix slop she appears in now. Anyone who even gives a single shit about martial arts movies respects her
>>220525809He's married to Rachael Weisz and has never come out as anything other than straight. He just played a couple of gay characters.
Yay
>>220524233They already made one.
>>220524803The girls who I teach Muay Thai to could kick their asses.
>>220526668She's lost all her mass and her ass. If she got on the gear and ate so she could get huge I'm there.
>>220526715>manlet>chad
>>220527955ignorant pleb
>>220527442I thought I remember someone made one like this.
>>220524233I'd only consider watching it if the cast is all grannies.
>>220524233I would prefer The Asspendabelles
>>220524233Again? Still, to answer the question, Grace Currey and Virginia Gardner. In bikinis. The whole film.
>>220524233>all female
>>220524233>Late 90s>Y2k geopolitical uncertainty It was literally the greatest time to be alive, what the fuck are they talking about? It could even be described as a utopia
>In a world where it's 1999Huh?
>>220532458>>220532417Bros, we're going home!
>>220524233>Who do you want to see in this movieIt to flop!
POGGERS
>>220524233>ALL FEMALE CAST ACTION MOVIEAll old and busted female cast.
>>220524233I don't.
>>220524233Who in the fuck would they cast? I mean, the whole point of the original Expendables is that the film is made up of classic action hero actors. Are we really gonna have:Sigourney Weaver (Aliens)Linda Hamilton (Terminator)Charlize Theron (Aeon Flux)Uma Thurman (Kill Bill)Rey (Star Wars)Who in the fuck would want to see that?
>>220525891>Women are powerful
>>220524233Zero chance I'll watch it unless there's nude scenes. Make it r-rated and aligned to sensuality and I'll give it a chance
Melissa McCarthyRosie O'DonnellRoseanne BarrLindsay HollisterLeslie JonesRebel WilsonChrissy MetzThe Expandables
>>220524233i dont belive it but Exepndabelles is a pretty dope name
>>220533403>Salma Hayek>Sofia Vergara>Sydney Sweeney>Halle Berry>Christina Hendricksontell me you arent watching
>>220533490>Im putting together a team
Rachel Zegler, Jenna Ortega, Zendaya, Lisa from BLACKPINK, Anya Taylor Joy and McKenna Grace.
>>220528718>Anyone who even gives a single shit about martial arts movies respects herBut I don't give a shit about martial arts and therefore also not about Yeoh
>>220524233They've been talking about this since the first one came out.
>Y2K tensionlol, lmao even.
>>220524233Black Lagoon did it decades ago
>>220524233Return of 90s Baywatch?
>>220533824wait until you find about about Blue Lagoon
>>220524233>Take male franchise and put women in itOf course, the usual modus operandi
>>220526715What the fuck is up with those tattoos?
>>220533824black lagoon has male characters
>>220526715>I wish I could see Ellen Page topless
>>220524425You know what? It's been over a decade, the gimmick's run dry at this point. It doesn't even have any shock value anymore.It's gonna be terrible, it's just meant ti spark controversy, yadda yadda yadda, who cares, moving on.
>>220524233>Y2K-era tension and geopolitical uncertaintywut
>Lynda CarterInclude a line about her replacement being so garbage they had to pull her out of retirement.
>>220525891giwtwm
>>220533584sounds like a problem with your taste then
>>220524233As long as most of them are sexy then yeah. Charlie's Angels like.
>>220524233Good luck with that.
>>220525659>we want to make the oldboy hallway fight scene but with worse choreography and there are lots of cuts
>>220524613yes each one more fucking awesome than the nextthe train sequence still gives me chills
>>220525891oh no hahah what a predictment this fella has found himself into
We need some power rangers girls it would be nice.
>>220524233Meiko Kaji. She still looks good for 80.
>>220524613nah seems cashgrabs back them, they look cashgrabs now.
>>220533290sauce?
Sigourney Weaver was supposed to be in the original movie when it was getting off the ground but it never happened. Since she's doing action slop now she would probably do it.Her Michelle Yeoh, Lucy Lawless, Gina Caro, Ronda Rousey and some others they could make a film with that.
>>220524233who the fuck greenlights movies for no one?
>this film is set in the late 1990s during the height of Y2K-era tensions and geopolitical uncertainity picked up
>>220524233Angelina jolie from the 90s
The problem with a movie like this is that a lot of millennial and zoomer actresses don't do their own stunts.
>>220524233I can't think of any 80s-90s female action stars that compare to Arnold, Sly, Dolph, Willis, Van Damme, etc. Seems like a poor idea for a movie. There's even less so today. I mean, fucking Jason Statham was supposed to be "the new guy" in the first Expendables movie wasn't he?Is Cynthia Rothrock, Linda Hamilton and Sigourney Weaver gonna run around with Ronda Rousey and shoot terrorists?
>>220530797 Come try it.
>>220524233will be fun if real
>>220528332>David Dukes
>>220524233I would cast the following>Sarah Michelle Gellar>Olivia Munn>Mackenzie Foy>Gina Carano>Rhea Ripley>Gwendoline Christie>Gal Gadot>Kathryn Winnick
>>220524233Nobody. They wouldn't pull off even Charlie's Angels if they'd want it.
>>220533490Why Sweeney with that list, and wtf is Christina Hendrickson?
>>220524233so fucking stupid. It'd be a miracle if this made $100 profit. just LOOOL
>>220525891>NOOO! DON'T WRAP YOUR LONG LEGS ALL AROUND MY BODY, BEAUTIFUL TALL BLONDE AMAZON GODDESS!!! NOOO!!!!
>>220524613First one was a novelty, the rest are cashgrabs.
>>220537889 I truly think women have the potential for better action scenes than men due to a wider range of movement
>>220524233Sarah Michelle Gellar Lucy LawlessJessica BielKate BeckinsaleRuby RoseGina CaranoMilla JovovichJennifer LawrenceSigourney Weaver and Linda Hamilton in non-action roles as homage I guess.Can't really think of any other women who regularly do their own stunts that aren't too old.
More like Expendawalls.
>>220524640Isn't she a raging alcoholic?
>y2k tensionyeah i remember thatthat was tense
This movie is literally jewiish money laundering. Some producer has been pushing this for years and promised a massive pay day even iif the movie bombs and will get it. This is how Avi Arad makes his money and I wouldn't be shocked if he was a producer on this
>>220538547Y2K is a terrific example of media incompetence and desire to fear monger and they keep getting away with it.
>>220524233Linda Hamilton, Sigourney Weaver and Jamie Lee Curtis come to mind
You know why this will be unwatchable? Not because of the female cast. Because it will be way too serious and dark. The Expendables had camp and light hearted moments and moments where the characters messed up and joked around. These female action movies don't do that. They will all be super serious fighters top of their game never mess up perfect at everything and no one wants to see that shit.
>>220538139Think Ruby Rose can't do stunts anymore
>>220524233Cynthia Rothrock comes to my mind when it comes to 80's and 90's b-action movie stars.
>>220524233I just DONT want a sleuth of old bogged women
That K-Pop movie printed money. Did they learn nothing from that? They saw that movie and said "you know what, lets make an action movie with 60 year old hags" that's what people want
>>220537979wow. ridiculous
>>220524233Hunter Schaefer
>>220533290Niceeee.
>>220537990So brave and powerful.
>>220538965>They will all be super serious fighters top of their game never mess up perfect at everything and no one wants to see that shit.And if they do try inserting humor, it'll just come off awkward and unnatural. Can't wait to see clips of this honestly.
>>220524233>The Expandables
>>220525891You can tell he's not even trying. Why would he?
>>220528312Post 9/11 I guess.
>>220534045its Stallone just making a movie about hot chicks
>>220528312>>220539368>you post with actual retarded zoomieshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2000_problem
>>220524233Unfortunately this movie was already made with the best possible cast 12 years ago.There's just no female action stars in 2026, that Amy Johnson chick is a stunt person, China hasn't even produced a decent Kung fu chick since Li Bingbing
>>220539506There's no point limiting this to established female action stars. Putting middle-aged or older women in this is pointless too. You can't just straight swap the approach of a male version for the female one. Male sensibilities don't work that way. And i hope they're not delusional enough to think women will turn out for this.
>expendabellesThey literally could had named a mercenary outfit in any other way to not show off that they are riding the old dick.Is it really that hard, or is marketing this retarded?>Iron Angels>Disposables>Femmefatales>Iron maidensShit, they don't even have to reference that they are women, you cab literally name your PMC whatever the fuck you want.Expendabelles is a pretty retarded name, and the only thing that tells me is that everyone in the OG team died of old age, somehow the ladies are still alive, and decided to start hiring women only because professional male mercenaries gives them the ick.
>>220539705It is a terrible name, but I think they think connecting to the male films will help the box office more than trying to be original, as in just an all female action flick out of nowhere.
It's an outfit run by former military but the assets (:) are recruited among orphans, homeless, lifer criminals and trained up.
>>220539705Expendabelles is perfect for this cheesy franchise
>>220539702It's for dudes who still beat off to chicks in action movies like me, not repressed geeks who are intimidated by can't.But for 1to1 castingCharlize Theron as Stallone Kate Beckensale as StrathamLi Bingbing as Jet LiHalle Berry as ArnoldAaron Johnson or Callem Turner as Megan FoxMargot Robbie as Terry CrewsRhea Ripley as Steve AustinOlga Kurylenko as DolphSigourney Weaver as Mickie Rourke.
>>220524233copious pat buttram
>>220539702>And i hope they're not delusional enough
>>220524233sounds boring as shit. there aren't even action female stars. there's no girl svatzernegger, no girl stallone.... goofy
>>220540103>The Hags
>>220524445>Who the hell is green lightning these projects?some idiot. Who do you think runs things?
>>220524233When is Hollywood going to realize that women aren't into action films? It's like trying to make a romance or beauty contest film tailored to men—most men just aren't interested. This entire mindset that women and men are interchangeable and that they have to be similar, equal, and share the same interests is simply not based on observable reality.Men and women are different. And that's fine. Trying to make a female Expendables movie is like hearing someone say they should create a male fashion doll named Tyrone for men.
>>220524678Kek. Underrated post.
>>220540230The mission is to cast an all female Expendables. I could easily replace Charlize with Bree Larsen, Kate with Daisy Ridley and Li with Pom Klementieff but that wouldn't be true to the spirit of the Expendables.
>>220540318>This entire mindset that women and men are interchangeable and that they have to be similar, equal, and share the same interests is simply not based on observable reality.Same with races. That's maybe the most serious problem with lefties. Their fundamental ideology is based on imaginary claims.
Sandra Bullock Megan Fox Sydney Sweeney Sofia Vergara Rosa SalazarKate Hudson Halsey
why was it so easy in the 80s and 90s for writers to make well loved badass women like sarah connor and ellen ripley and now they just suck at it?
>>220540385That's not "being true to the spirit". That's a straight up 1:1 copy. A massive bomb waiting to hit with the names attached too. Funny thing is they'd probably hire you over me anyway.
Midriffs, navel piercings and whale tails is all I need to book a ticket.
That Mexican chick they put in that Marvel movie and never even taught her how to punch convincingly.Don't teach her for this movie either, it's funny as fuck to watch her do this like her 'girl punch' could do any damage, let alone break the universe:https://youtu.be/AAyF9P2LRuw?t=350Looks fucking ridiculous, and right at the climax of the film lol.
>another news cycle where they tell us not to watch it and then call us sexist for not seeing it.
>>220539705Lawyers of the rockband would come after them if they called it Iron Maidens.
>>220527933backflip from the 3rd guy was kino though, are these actual stuntmen?
>>220524839prime Jessica Alba and prime Biel should be on that list.And Michelle Rodriguez.
>>220524875kek
>>220524233I feel like this would've worked a long time ago when the few iconic female action stars were younger. Like mid 00s or something. Sigourney Weaver, Linda Hamilton, Michelle Yeoh. Like when these old merc guys come out of retirement for their last adventure is much more believable for men than it is for women. Like Linda Hamilton in Terminator Dark Fate was kind of silly because she's just getting too old.
>>220524233They did that already.
>>220524233>Who do you want to see in this movie?I want girl on girl violence. Pit them against Gaddafi's harem of female guards.
>>220540544>MGK has put his cock inside all of themThis could be part of the storyline. Hmmmm
>>220524233>Who do you want to see in this movie?Big titties and fat asses, why else would I watch an all female action movie?
>>220524233I haven’t seen Ellen Page in years maybe she’ll be down to be part of this
All I want from an "all female cast action movie" is for ALL the cast to be women from the random mooks who get beat up/mown down to the endboss lead goon who gets into a drawn out fist fight with the main lead, just have women beat the shit out of other women.I don't even want it purely for fanservice purposes I just don't think I can sit through another Black Widow knockoff scene or their ''''''grounded'''' Atomic Blonde counterparts.
Women punching hoes
>>220541824>All I want from an "all female cast action movie" is for ALL the cast to be womenNo chance. 99% of the baddies will be straight white males, though they may throw a couple nonwhites in an attempt at subtlety. >just have women beat the shit out of other women.That could be genuinely entertaining, done by the right filmmakers. Basically no chance of that either lol.
It always falls flat when they try to do the "women can be as badass and capable in combat as men". And it's a pretty weak idea if it's just the same shit but with women.If they want to do something with a bunch of women, celebrating their previous roles and genre, showing them as capable and badass, they should make it about various Final Girls.Have them all meet up to defeat some ultimate evil and defeat a bunch of cultists/ghosts/demons/whatever by using their knowledge of slasher/horror films.You have a lot of girls to choose from and you could pull in the older ones too for a scene or two.
>>220540127
>>220526715
My Name didn't flee from showing that women are too weak to directly and fairly fight men. Never seen such takes from hollywood action movies with women fighters.
More clam juice
>>220524233>Female>ExpendableUnless they're Chinese or Indian I don't buy it.
>>220524613The first movie is literally why Scott Pilgrim vs the World bombed on its opening weekend.
>>220526715>chad.jpgHe's LITERALLY playing Achilles in The Odyssey, so yes he is a Chad akin to Brad Pitt in Troy (2004).
Emilia
>>220526936Curious how they try these all-female action movies but they're still directed by a man.
>>220526715Moooods this man just posted naked woman tits on a blue board mooooods
>>220525891Nice outlaw star reference
>>220532485I remember how there were "bikini competitions" for regular girls at a local nightclub (not a strip club) I used to go to even circa 2006. It's crazy how quickly things change. They'd even have "foam parties" where they shot foam out of cannons at everybody and so you could just go around easily groping girls all night because the foam was everywhere.
>>220524613I watched the first 3. No regrets whatsoever. They clearly had fun shooting them and they know their audience. 4 looked starved of star power. Just compare it's cast to this! The only glaring hole in the franchise is not being able to land Seagal as a villain for a movie.
>>220524875lel
>>220534734Making Gal Gadot take pictures next to Lynda Carter HAD to be some sort of humiliation ritual holy fuck lmaooLynda mogs her so hard it's crazyYou just know she was silently seething about it the entire ride home kek i love it
