How to accurately describe the "look" of modern cinema?
>>220535808outsourced to india
I don't get the point in these huge over the top action sequences where nothing on the screen is real, watching Buster Keaton fall off a roof is 100x more interesting because something is actually happening, it doesn't need CGI planes to be cool
>>220535808Slop and/or soulless
>>220535808Netflixization of cinema
Slop
>>220535808looks like AI slop
>>220535808Anti-cinematic, which is to say it looks like a fucking vlog shot on digital.
>>220535808slop
>>220535931can you stop being racist? it hurts my feelings ;__;
>>220535951you will NEVER take our racism from us
limitless. i'm not going to pretend Ray Harryhausen dinosaurs looked fantastic and 3D models always look bad.we're in a golden age, people don't even call them "special" effects any more. it's just like a film having an original score. it's better to have these options you morans.
>>220535973well, okay. but i have a lot going on in my life right now. it'd be one less thing to worry about.but it's your choice, i just want you to consider it.
>>220535808Too many wide angle lenses, too much depth of field, the same dull color grading and terrible CGI. An example would be that this scene would have a piss filter because it's a desert and the background would a blurry mess with only the foreground characters being in focus.
>>220535808Wonder if films overall would have been better if CGI was just used to clean up practical special effects so they looked better on screen instead of just replacing them all together
>>220535975Its so arbitrary though, people used to use engineering, sculpture work, perspective tricks etc etc (actual filmmaking) to get what they wanted. People would know its not real, but it would look convincing enough and it was fun to try and guess how they might've made it. With CGI its obvious what's happening and there's no mystery to it at all
Indian.
>>220536029That's how CGI used to be used in the earlier days, but that was also due to the limitations of CGI. Studios were frothing at the mouth to replace the cost of physical sets and props when CGI started to come around and it's very likely the same story for AI now.
>>220535984IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MUCH YOU GOT GOING ON IN YOUR LIFE RIGHT NOW
>>220536029what was that Ryan Gosling film where the VFX team had a demo reel of the effects shots on their Vimeo?it was just this. painting stuff out/in, effects that COULD have been done other ways but it was all pretty seamless.
>>220535808It's the "blended' look.
>>220535808That looks like a screenshot of just cause
Low saturation, no grain, overly clean and sterile image, obsession with close-up shots, natural lighting over artificialIn short: fucking crap
filmed under mud
>>220535808Bollywood
>>220535951You should report them for racism outside of /b/. Not because racism is bad but because it's funny when to come back crying about getting banned
