[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Anyone else prefer 1 over 2?
>>
>>220552387
1 is superior because it has Stormin Norman and Kirsten's nipples
>>
yeah, I love origin stories
>>
>>220552387
I prefer 3 over 1 and 2
>>
>>220552387
I prefer 2 over 1 for Ursula. I can't help it. Spider-Man may behind on rent, but she's lived rent free in my head for decades.
>>
File: 1748675303039726.webm (2.91 MB, 1100x900)
2.91 MB
2.91 MB WEBM
>>
1 has better pacing but 2 has the coolest action of basically any capeshit movie. Train fight is the GOAT.
>>
>>220552387
The only correct way to watch them is the complete trilogy back to back
>>
>>220555223
Those are two big reasons.
>>
Kirsten Dunst being cast as MJ was a mistake. Can't fucking believe it. You pick the best Spider-Man and then the worst MJ. Why, god.

And for the record, Zendaya is a worse MJ, but that's just stating the obvious. We need to focus on the real issue, which is that the only good Spider-Man movie has a terrible MJ.
>>
>>220556410
Who would have made a better MJ in 1?
>>
>>220555223
Based
>>
>>220552387
Whoever sold Raimi the coke he snorted whil
e making Spiderman 3 should be on death row.
>>
>>220559012
Could the Wachowski brothers have made a better Spiderman movie than latter Raimi?
>>
>>220559012
Spider Man 3 is pure kino you dumb plebeian
>>
>>220559030
No.
I don't know how they pulled off the first matrix, maybe it was because they had budgetary restrictions and the so the crew had to get more creative, but that was the last good movie they made.
I always thought that lady who claimed they stole her idea was a liar. Hearing her talk I still think she's crazy, but I wouldn't be surprised if they did rip it off from someone in the same way I'm convinced M Night Shyamalan murdered the real writer of Sixth Sense and Unbreakable.
>>
>>220557718
Jaime King

>>220559159
Resurrections was incredible too though. I think their vision of a Spider-Man movie would be awesome.
>>
>>220555223
>>220556384
That's from the 2nd one thoughbeit
>>
Why did they make MJ a bitch in the sequels?
>>
>>220559202
>Resurrections was incredible too though
No, it was fucking terrible.
>>
>>220552387
yes, and i have been arguing this on here for years. 1 is a far tighter movie, zero fat at all. most effects are practical and look good, the dynamic between peter, MJ and harry feels natural and real and dafoe is far scarier than molina (though he is great as ock). 2 is too long and meanders too much with threads that go nowhere - aunt may's money troubles, peter reading poetry only for MJ to throw it in his face, etc. not to mention outright stupid shit like ock throwing a car at peter because he wanted to talk to him, then watching peter dodge said car without even looking and not concluding that the guy has superhuman abilities. the most compelling storyline in 2 is harry's spiral over norman's death, and even that was ruined in 3
>>
File: matrix1.jpg (466 KB, 1069x1922)
466 KB JPG
>>220560311
reloaded and revolutions are both fantastic, and the matrix is one of the greatest sci-fi stories ever told. i will post the screencaps
1/2
>>
>>220559467
realism
>>
File: matrix2.jpg (196 KB, 1080x628)
196 KB JPG
>>220560543
>>
>>220560460
Dude, stop reading my mind.
For me, lines like "punch me i bleed" and
"i always imagined you getting married on top of a hill"
"to who?"
"you hadn't decided yet"
automatically prevent 2 from surpassing 1.
>>
>>220560561
Screen caps that summarize the movie don't change the fact that the sequels weren't very good.
>>
>>220560460
>most effects are practical and look good
Lol no, the effects were garbage, the CGI Spiderman looked like ass.
>>
>>220560831
the only bad CGI shot i can think of is when he rescues MJ from the parade and his head/neck are totally stiff and unmoving in the action shot
>>
>>220561123
Every swinging shot looked like a 2d cartoon ragdoll. You're probably a millennial or zoomer, so I understand you don't know what practical effects look like. What they should have done is rented an auditorium or astrodome for a few days and paid a gymnast to swing around in spidey jammys on trapezes, then CGI the buildings AROUND the real spiderman, not vice-versa. Then you would have had real world physics in the shots. It was so laughably garbage after LOTR's triumph in CIG.
>>
anyone else prefer peedoor parker over nu-spiderman poodoor shitales
>>
>>220561450
bravo, nolan
>>
You guys are spying on me. I just finished 1.
>>
>>220559159
>M Night Shyamalan murdered the real writer of Sixth Sense and Unbreakable.
Redpill me on this theory?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.