>I say...
>>220564340HEYEAAAYEAAYEAAAAAHEYEAAAYEAA
How should he have responded?
>>220565406>MILLIONS OF PEACHES >PEACHES FOR ME>MILLIONS OF PEACHES>PEACHES FOR FREE
>>220565406>Haha, yeah...
>>220564340>We get some women, get fucked up, so drunk it stops being fun, then we vomit and get kicked out the peachtree dance before it even starts, rape the women...I say rape the women while blind drunk outside the peachtree dance!
>>220565406>lemme suck your dick bro
>"Plainview, your brother's dead. Condolences. I knew him. We were close."
>>220566153>Oh damn. Anyway, here's have my business. It's what he would have wanted.
This whole thread feels like some sort of fucking schizo acid trip, can someone please explain to me what the fuck is going in here, what is the context?!?!?!?!?
>>220566293haha, yeah
>>220566153I’ve always kind of wondered, do you think people in the 1800s actually talked like this or was it just the way they wrote and thus everyone thinks language back then was stilled and formal because the only thing we have to go on is the written language?
>>220564340I'm movin' to the country, gonna eat me a lot of peaches.
>>220566355>do you think people in the 1800s actually talked like thisWe have no way of knowing what anyone sounded like prior to audio/video recordings.
>>220566545There's an entire field of linguistics dedicated to figuring this out.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hqQpziIETo
>>220565350/tv/ zoomgroids have no idea what this is
>>220566545As >>220566624 said, this isn't entirely true. There are a lot of hints from the way people wrote about certain things, along with poetry (telling us what words should rhyme) that lets us know what dialect was like.A good example is Latin. You have the formal Latin language and then you have vulgar Latin which reflected how people actually spoke to each other.>>220566355The evidence that does exist, between early voice recordings and informal text, suggests that people used to speak in a more 'proper' way.Slang has always existed but educated people in particular would talk more poetically to showcase their higher status.It was quite eye-opening to read court transcripts from 300 years ago which demonstrated how criminals spoke. Even there, they would use complicated sentence structure.(instead "I went to bed", something like "to mine bedchambers I thought forthright")
>>220565540this might work
>>220564340You're fucked up anon. You got serious mental issues.
>>220565406mmmm bop a dibby dop dop dooo wopa doo yop bop mmmm bopa dibby dop dop dooooouhhh yeahhhh
