Feels like there’s no more zombie movies or shows anymore.
>>220581875Zombies are undead.
Zombies haven't been cool since the early 2010's
Zombies are retarded, one winter would annihilate them all >what about places with no winterTheir muscles deterioriate and they would be all neutralized within a year just by themselves>b-but zombies are magicalThen why are they presented in scenarios and settings that want to emulate real life drama so badly? Shit fucking genre
zombies are cool
man i just flowyeah jiggy jarjar dooall these dead people walkin' round me's gotta go
>>220581875There's an upcoming one by the director of Train to Busan. It's called Colony
I don't really like a genre that hinges on repurposing human beings into mindless antagonistic creatures fit only for target practice
>>220581875The shit got overdone and killed everyones interest in them. It also got a stigma around it for being related to bad franchises that fell off. Like the walking dead which dragged on for years past anyone having and interest
>>220581875Walking dead (the show) killed zombies. After they gained mainstream popularity everybody started shitting out zombie content until it became a big ol stinkin pile of oversaturated horse piss. And yet in all that content, very few people realized what made a zombie movie so great in the first place: the fucking intial outbreak. You don't need to overthink it, you don't need to explain why it happened, or show society trying to rebuild, or waste time with bullshit human drama, or have humans be the real villains, etc.. Just show people getting caught off guard by a horde of undead cannibals ripping thru a town leaving blood and gore in their wake. It only needs to be one night or so, cuz anything longer than that the zombies would get their shit pushed in. I'm trans btw
>>220581875>zombie apocalypse>ermmm actually the other survivor humans were the real threat all alongSo tired of this trope.
>>220581875We just had two 28 years later flicks come out.
I liked 28 Days / Weeks Later. Other than that I don't care
>>220581875Yes, but that's because most Zombie movies get it wrong. In fact the time, when a mainstream director / team of writers could have gotten the Zombie Apocalypse genre right has passed. They fundamentally didn't get it, but now with the woke mind virus having spread so far, it's impossible for them to get it right.Zombie movies used to be spiritually hopeful fiction for young Millennial men like myself. To be free of the modern world, the social prison, to have the freedom and power to shape your own destiny. Zombies were just a prop to make that happen in the backstory. They aren't all that important to the story. What matters is that men are unburdened by all of the bullshit of the modern world and be real men again.
out: zombies, vampires, werewolvesin: ghouls, goblins
>>220581875It comes and goes in waves >Night of the Living Dead ‘68 to Night of the Living Dead ‘90 (with Brain Dead as a little holdover in ‘92)>Resident Evil 1 ‘96 to The Walking Dead TV show falling out of favor.
>>220583271Yeah, but they’re even less zombies then they were in 28 Days/Weeks.
>>220581875Dead zombies are cringe, unless the setting is magical/fantastical
>>220581875Depends on how it works. Some are reanimated corpses, some are viruses or other diseases that kill the person and then reanimate them, and some just hijack a living persons body or warp their mind to be hyper violent but still "alive"
genre got milked dry and won't recover for awhileit might never
Is there anything original you can do with zombies without subverting them into something completely different?
>>220583802I remember reading the walking dead comics and they started off great back in the early 00s era. But then as it progressed robert cuckman started to introduce more and more DEI shit into it. Which is crazy to think that the identity politics of our world somehow spilled over into a zombie apocalypse. A world that collapsed about 10 years before the rise of wokism. He literally had to check every box: gays, fats, muslims, smart heroic blacks, badass female latinx warriors/leaders, disables, more gays, indians, a muslim cucking a white, all the villains being white men, there may have been a midget or 2 idk, more blacks, etc... I don't even mind having some of those things in a story, but the way he does it is so fuckin obviously pandering. He's trying to please a demographic who most likely never even bought a single one of his comics.
slow zombies are zzz
>>220584764Orginal? Probably not, and I actually think people trying to be original is what killed the genre. The thing that made it work was the eerie slow-walking corpses (some of whom were your loved ones) grotesquely moaning as they scratch and claw their way into your home to devour you.
>>220581901ba dumm tss
>>220582170Each time TWD came out with a new season I was surprised every time. >Didn't they already cancel this?
>>220584764I've had this idea where zombies were a mind-virus that manifested when people got to a critical mass. Get enough people together and they'd become ravening hordes trying to rip apart anything they can get their hands on, let one get separated from the horde and their individuality would start to resurface.
>>220585644It's the only thing left keeping the lights on at AMC networks. Over the years no other show of theirs got anywhere close to that same level of success so now they're stuck with that dead horse they keep beating.
>>220582170Ok I get it makes sense but why won't this happen to fucking capeshit?
>>220581875>Feels like there’s no more zombie movies or shows anymoreThank god. The 2000's and 2010's got completely saturated with derivative zombie drivel
>>220584764Initial outbreak/breakdown of society which nobody wants to do because you're faced with the massive narrative contrivance of dumb slow moving corpses overwhelming the military
>>220581910Videogames will keep them alive forever because they're easy to program
it needs to disappear for about another 5-10 years and then put out something that has romero style zombies and takes place right near the start of the outbreak and actually be good and successful and then you'll get your piles of zombie content slop again
>>220586034It is happening. Superheroes have been on a downhill slide since EndGame. They just haven't been replaced with the next big thing yet.
>>220581948>one winter would annihilatePretty sure one summer would rot them away.
If they aren't spooky corpses raised to unlife by a big tiddy necromancer I shan't be watching.
>>220583802>Zombie movies used to be spiritually hopeful fiction for young Millennial men like myself. To be free of the modern world, the social prison, to have the freedom and power to shape your own destinyAnd being able to do mass shooting with zero consequence.
>>220586148oh boy let me guess the real monsters are other people
>>220584764People return to normal after a few days so the survivors need to figure out to not kill the zombies while escaping them.
>>220586148they really need to understand that the outbreak is the most interesting and fun part of zombies. no one gives a fuck about whatever TWD has morphed into
I need cute big tit zombie gf
>>220586100just have half of the population insisting that zombies arent real and getting bit on purpose to own the libs, political gridlock and indecisiveness because it becomes an instant culture war issue somehow. outbreak worsens past the point of no return quickly
>>220581875>>220581910it comes in cycles. they were in in the late 70s-early 80s and then were out in the 90s and then in in the early 2000s.
There was 28 years later and it's sequel the bone temple. I liked it.
Zombies is boomertier uncslop now cuh now we watch people have weird smiles, now dat spooky lil cuhliogne!
>>220587622They will say that's unrealistic and would never happen. If you point out things in reality showing it did happen, you'll just be called names while they yell and plug their ears not listening.
>>220584764>>220586100Outbreak - People fight to survive, make camps, hoarde supplies, kill relatives, no communications or salvationBut wait, we found a cure! We have to stop people killing zombiesUnbreak - Military rush to gather survivors and administer vaccines to zombies before rowdy gangs and people who lost hope kill zombies or themselves.
>>220581875The Walking Dead killed the genre.
>>220583271>>220583291>>220587694A proper non-slop 28 Hours Later prequel would be TRVE KINO
Are there any movies about rednecks hunting zombies?
>>220581875We Bury the Dead did it well. They're still technically alive but their brains are scrambled.
I got so burned out on zombies, but I'm ready to return to them. What's the best zombie kino? Dawn of the Dead?I like traditional slow zombie masses, not this fast running rage virus 28 days later bullshit.
>>220586100That's because everyone thinks too big. In Night Of The Living Dead, armed people easily dispatch the zombies, but the movie focuses on a group of unarmed people trapped in a house and it's fucking great. Zombie movies should take place during the initial outbreak and should be small enough in scale that it's believable people could get caught off guard in an isolated or less than ideal situation and have to fight for survival until help arrives. That's the true key to great zombie kino.
>>220591476Night of the Living Dead
>>220591527I discovered "Children Shouldn't Play with Dead Things" (1972) a couple of years back, and actually liked it quite a bit. To summarize: it's about a very Manson family-esque theater troupe who go to an island off the coast of Miami to perform a satanic ritual in the cemetery there, and things happen. To my knowledge, it's credited as the second major modern zombie movie after Night of the Living Dead, and it's also kind of a proto-Evil Dead, because the zombies are a supernatural product of an incantation from a satanic grimoire. The horror stuff is really only in the last 20 minutes or so too. Most of it is a black comedy where the characters trade genuinely witty barbs with each other. It's co-written and directed by Bob Clark, the guy who directed Black Christmas, Porky's and A Christmas Story. If you have a fair tolerance level for cheesy early-70s wardrobe and slightly hokey (but still effectively creepy) zombie makeup, there's a fun movie to be had in there. Though it may have also helped that I was on mushrooms the first time I saw it.
>>220583802>Zombie movies used to be spiritually hopeful fiction for young Millennial men like myself.wat. The big zombie movies are extremely cynical movies from the 70s and 80s.
They need to make a genderbent version of Warm Bodies
>>220591527Highschool of the Dead.
If i do a zombie web series, ill credit this thread for any ideas i steal
>>220583291Off topic. This thread is about zombie movies.
>>220581875the thing is if you blood-let a zombie or else starve/dehydrate it, then how does it retain motor function? You have to obey the laws of the universe.
>>220581948The normal flow of traffic would kill all the zombies. People overestimate their ability to break through a car window and attack a motorist.
>>220595303If we're getting texhnical here, then no zombie should be capable of movement at all after Rigor mortis sets in.
>>220595250Those are zombie movies>b-but they're not dead!Doesn't matter, they're still zombie movies.
>>220595351>zombie movies>not dead>still zombie moviesNo.
>>220586185They still haven't tried a serious rendition of The Mask yet, or a Live action Yu-Gi-Oh! movie where they totally rape the IP.
>>220581875Too much exposure caused people to not want to see them.
>>220585427That Princess character was so awful,
>>220581875as long as each generation has its edgelords, there will always be a new take on this embarrassingly gay theme
>>220595303>You have to obey the laws of the universeNo, you don't. The whole point of zombies for most of the genre is that they are supernatural. Impossibly, the dead started walking and the chaos caused society to crumble. It was only decades in that they finally decided to make "realistic" zombies and it turned to shit.
>>220591710He's talking about the late 00's zombie boom, which went in a totally different direction than the original boom.
>>220581910>Zombies haven't been cool since the early 2010'sMake that the 90s. Zombies stopped being interesting when they just became "muh infected humans". Blame Resident Evil and 28 years later. All the zombie content in the 2000s was straight cringe.
>>220591609While a comedy, Shaun of the Dead basically did this. The tension comes from it being a small group of unarmed doofuses who have no idea what the bigger picture is, the Zombies are instantly defeated once the military shows up.
>>220597142you're a retarded faggot nigger
>>220581980shoeshine
>>220583802>Zombie movies used to be spiritually hopeful fiction for young Millennial men like myself. I visibly cringed at this entire post. Culture war faggots are as retarded as the woketards at the other side. Same shit, different pile
>>220597229You don't know what words mean.You can't think properly.You are goycattle.
>>220597229he wasn't talking about culture wars you braindead faggot, why the fuck does everything have to be about politics with you peopleshut the FUCK up
>>220582480>the fucking intial outbreakThey tried that with Fear of the walking dead, and that show shat it's pants by season 3.
>>220597142It was fine up to the mid-00s. I kind of consider "Land of the Dead" to be the end of it. '96-'05 was the height of the second wave, then there was the decline when Romero was putting out his indie garbage, and then The Last of Us/The Walking Dead turning the whole thing essentially into a grandma-friendly soap opera is when it had jumped the shark.
I can't believe nobody has done a real world war Z series that actually follows the book. It would be kino.
I don't get the appeal of showing the intial outbreak. Every story is just the characters looking for a loved one or EVAC/FEMA camp between mental breakdowns and running away from zombies in a city.
>>220581875I watched the Daryl Dixon Walking Dead spin off. it was ok. but it clearly is way too much a show about people and less about zombies.>INB4 that's what the walking dead was always aboutnah, this is WAY to focused on the melodrama. we need a new Zombies show. Make it 5 seasons. start it off normal. everyday life is a boring Monday. release the zombies. make people try and survive. give there a rising action of finding a cure. make difficult sacrifices. then finish the show by finding the cure. all this Walking Dead milking shit has gone on long enough. someone can come in and just make a 3-5 season show about zombies with a good ending so the walking dead fans been blue balled with no meaningful resolution can have a show.
>>220591527>not this fast running rage virus 28 days later bullshit.an italian flick from the 80s did it before, donny straight up ripped it off
>>220592820The first episode was cool, but then it turned into dork wish fulfillment/fanservice dreck, and immediately fell off a cliff.
The only interesting part of zombie stories is that first couple weeks when the world is falling apart. People used to modern convenience suddenly without power and clean water, with hostile creatures everywhere. Nobody cares about long term shit when we have to go back to ~1800s living with no cars or gas or hot pockets. That shit is boring.
>>220599805I think the World War Z book handled it best, where the US government basically gathered up all the most essential personnel and retreated west of the Rockies, and all of the settlements and enclaves that you see emerge in zombie media that goes months or even years into the future keep the hordes occupied and distracted from trying to follow the government westward. They even have designations for different situations like "Last Man on Earth" situations, settlements that are strategically advantageous so they keep in contact and even airdrop supplies and personnel as needed to keep them going, and the hostile Negan-type enclaves that they have to send in special forces to take out as they start retaking the continent.
I watched Shaun of the Dead last night because of this thread, one of my favourite films and the best zombie film made after 2000
just watched thisit was soooo fucking bad, jesus, its just a foid movie about girl power zombies dont even matter and show up few times, if you cut them and replaced them with covid, or aids, the plot wouldnt change one bithusband of this chick cheated on her and left her and died in next town over, now she need to find his body for "closure", hell you could set it in normal world and have her travel from city to next town and it would be exactly the same movie
The zombie genre is eternal, but the corners of the map have been filled in and you either need someone with a great new idea or someone really talented to do the same old story again in order for there to be another generational hit. The problem with the latter is that these auteur types don't like walking in others' footsteps, but they absolutely could make a good standard zombie movie if they wanted to.Something really interesting that needs a good adaptation is World War Z with humanity's centuries-old history of near-misses with outbreaks where they were small scale and fizzled out before they became noticed by the world or where covered up by the government, long before the proper global pandemic happened. One of them was in the '80s where a contaminated blood transfusion in a hospital turned a patient and chaos erupted while they tried to figure out what was going and what to do. Another was in the 1600s where a ship was found drifting at sea full of zombies. The Roanoke Colony was also implied to be a casualty of an outbreak. They were short blurbs that were never fully delved into, but an anthology of these could be GOLD in the right hands, probably even better than the main story.
>>220581948Voodoo zombies are magical. Infected ones aren't. The slow ones are eh compared to the rapid fast ones. Even if the latter are decomposing, they still have sheer numbers
>>220597163and it's probably no coincidence that it's the best zombie since Romero.
>>220584764yes, stop making dogshit zombie epidemic movies and instead make supernatural voodoo zombies that are nothing like Romero zombies.
>>220581875Zombies stopped being interesting when they turned into infected rabid animals rather than walking corpses.
>>220600502>hell you could set it in normal world and have her travel from city to next town and it would be exactly the same movieNo it fucking couldn't. None of the things that happen in the movie could have happened in a world where everyone in New Zealand didn't all simultaneously die.
>>220581875???https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJPu1spHqfk
>>220581875it takes about 15 vaxx boosters to reach this level.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0MqctXOuVo&ra=m
>>220598911Probably the most squandered potential of any book adaptation
>>220581875Would you?
>>220581875The Crossed adaptation is coming, so expect a lot of copycats that think they can make a zombie movie while cheaping out on makeup and cgi
>>220584764I feel like a dead space adaptation has potential
>>220602002retarded take, you can put a crazy guy into any road trip movie about "self discovery", it was done a milion times beforeand again, set it in 2021 covid, travel banned, she breaks the curfew and finds he died, the endwhat do the zombies add to the movie? the baby shit is just retarded, unresolved and goes nowhre, but other than that what do we get outside of 2 fight scenes?
>>220584764Something like Diablo would be cool. Fantasy mixed with zombies hasn't been done too often other than maybe Game of Thrones. A necromancer could an interesting villain in a film
>>220597182you'll get a funeral if you don't wise up and call me
>>220591672Sounds right up my alley. Thanks for the recommendation.
>>220602899If you want to change the premise you have to get rid of all the >clearing millions of dead bodies from their housesshit that's like a third of the movieYou have no rational basis for >soldier driven mad by grief tries to persuade her to pretend to be his wifeWhich is another big chunk of the movie>what do the zombies add to the movie?The fucking stakes, for oneMultiple spooky scenes like in the hotel or with the zombie stripperThe recurring story of the zombies regaining their humanity that pops up again and again in the movieThis isn't like Downsizing where you can replace>Matt Damon gets shrunk but his wife doesn'twith>Matt Damon loses everything in a divorce and moves to FloridaAnd the rest of the movie can almost scene for scene continue identically. You would have to change everything about the fabric of the movie to make We Bury The Dead work without the premise of everyone in New Zealand dying and some of them coming back as zombies. There's almost no scenes that could stay the same.
Would highly recommend Dead Set for anyone who hasn't seen it yet. It was a British mini series from 2008 and it is wonderful.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFOF_fOdFEghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsG_CWLsGXUhttps://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5ze300https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6tqlos
>>220581948>one winter would annihilate them allNot realy, they would just be in dormancy.>Their muscles deterioriate and they would be all neutralized within a year just by themselvesNot necessarily, it depends on the details of their biology.>Then why are they presented in scenarios and settings that want to emulate real life drama so badly?Rather then being magical the idea is that they funtion in ways we cannot comprehend with our current understanding of science and that in part plays a role in their creepiness factor.>>220586203No because zombies aren't regular corpses and they don't funtion like regular corpses.
>>220584764Have a cure already exist and some people risking their lives to capture zombies to treat them while other people don't care and still gun them down. The drugs to cure them are also scarce which creates black market shenanigans or people trying to hoard them for their own family and friends.
>>220603743>a cure for death
>>220584764MadS brought something new to the table with its one-take, moment by moment of the initial outbreak styleNew Life did the same by burying the lede so you don't know it's a zombie flick until about 10 minutes from the endI think it's hard to find originality in the plot, you have to have an original approach. Do something new with the stuff that already exists rather than trying to invent new stuff.
>>220603506>shit that's like a third of the movieyeah, and one where literally fucking nothing happensentire first 30% seems like a desperate attempt to pad run time >Which is another big chunk of the movieand not related to the zombies, its so fucking shit, why its even in the movie? who cares>The recurring story of the zombies regaining their humanity that pops up again and again in the moviethe movie cant decide if zombies get more smart or more agressive and animalistic, so it goes for bothstill its not untill last third where you really realize how pointless the zombies were, its just 2 people partying, buring a dead man, and drama bondingat that point the movie dosnt even pretend zombies have any relevence to this foid slop
>>220585926AMC has become the undeadthey keep trying these big bombastic shows hoping for another walking dead, and then canceling it after 8 episodes
>>220603687>Not realy, they would just be in dormancy.Cold weather has the bad habit of freezing liquids. Pour liquid in a stone crack and when it freezes it can break the stone. Same happens to the flesh, brains and bones of zombies when the old blackened blood freezes inside their veins.
>>220603906who was world beyond made for? look at these goobers. what was AMC thinking??
>>220581948What's your opinion on the plant based zombies such as in The Last of Us and The Girl with all the Gifts? I feel like these would have the highest success rate because they are basically nature telling us to fuck off. Zombie spores being airborne would be catastrophic on the human population. These zombies are also hybrid plants so they get nutrients from the sun and water too. Thoughts?
>>220581875making them an allegory for social injustices killed it.
>>220603920>Pour liquid in a stone crack and when it freezes it can break the stone.Enfesis on can, it would be an unreliable way of getting zombies killed.
>>220603965Zombies are always a social allegory in good zombie movies, zoom zoom.
>>220581875the genres in hibernation right now because it was extremely overexposed in the 2010s because of the success of the walking dead itll.come back eventually
>>220603939I'd take Invasion of the Body Snatchers or Day of the Triffids over either of those any day.
Zombies in most movies are boring. It's nuts to me that videogames have far more interesting use cases at times with way more varied designs, and sometimes even animal zombies or monsters and chimeras.
>>220603931I liked it
>>220603931>what was AMC thinking??YASS QWEEN
>>220581948>Then why are they presented in scenarios and settings that want to emulate real life drama so badly? Shit fucking genreGod forbid I want to make my setting grounded whilst also dealing with an existential threat of undead people who can't freeze or deteriorate, as that would negate any tension or problem solving. I do not understand why everyone fails at this one aspect when it comes to zombie settings. They've simply made the rule (retroactively or not is irrelevant) that zombies will not deteriorate from bacteria or other natural occurrences, yet every moron likes to point out this one aspect because apparently "zombies are hecking real and must abide by real world logic!!".No they don't. What if their lack of decay is something that's part of the mystery? What if it really is supernatural? Would that take your enjoyment out of an otherwise grounded story?Such a ridiculous criticism tbqhnigga
>>220604474why would you tell lies on the internet like that?
>>220604621>Would that take your enjoyment out of an otherwise grounded story?I dosen't take away from their enjoyment of the story but their fantasy of surviving a zombie apocalypse.
>>220604772it had an oddball charm and a cute girl
>>220604839while i disagree with your terrible opinion, i do like the idea of an alita type sci-fi zombie setting.. zombies in space
>>220604162Right but I'm talking in terms of lethality. I feel like the wrath of nature type zombies could actually topple civilization.
>>220604130you wish, millenialboomer, you faggots ruined movies for the white man
>>220581948This. This. This.The whole pop culture idea of dead bodies reanimating for some reason dosen't exclude them from physical science. When it gets below thirty two degrees Fahrenheit, liquid will begin to freeze. Freezing causes cellular damage like it does to a freezer-burnt steak or extreme frostbite. Once the cellular damage has occurred, it's permanent. So, a walking dead organism would merely be a temporary problem. Not to mention loss of motor function, blood pressure, neural activity, etc. It's a cheap concept for a spoopy monster. A cool monster idea, but it's been carried to extremes.
>>220605401>dosen't exclude them from physical scienceWhy not?
>>220605429Because they're made of atoms.
>>220605401You're making a lot of speculations on zombie biology.
>>220605456prove it
>>220603663It's wild this is so unknown on /tv/. I've tried recommending it before and anons just refuse. They thing "mini series" and "foreign" so it must be bad. But it's better than most american zombie flicks kek.
>>220604081Good morning Ranjesh, enjoy your stay on the board
>>220605510I disagree. A reanimated cadaver would be subject to the same cellular and chemical behavior as a living human. >Cellular function>Organ function >The five senses Dead things would still require integument of muscles and organ function to move around. If the tendons in your foot decomposed, you couldn't walk. If you were embalmed after death, you could not function biologically.
>>220605643>A reanimated cadaver would be subject to the same cellular and chemical behavior as a living human.By it's nature it could not be subject to the same cellular and chemical behavior as a living human.>Dead things would still require integument of muscles and organ function to move around.Muscles and nerves yes, organs (with the exeption of some parts of the brain) no.
>>220605741The Last of Us treated this phenomenon best. An infectious fungus that dosen't kill the host organism, but changes it suit its dissemination and survival. A dead body will gradually loose function.
>>220605819I don't think it's a problem if zombies funtion that defies our understanding of the world, i think it's a feature.
>>220581948realismfags get the rope
>>220605899In that case, it's a purely supernatural creature. It might be able to fly and poop gold coins. It's completely contrary to everything in nature.
>>220583291>>220583271Those are not zombies. Thats a Rage virus
>>220605949Who's the name of this Not Hitchcock guy?
>>220605593oh well, their loss
>>220605978Not nessecarily, the idea is simply that they function in ways that we humans can not understand.
>>220605978>alien counter-entropy virus delivered via comet that crashes to earth and pollutes local corpses and living alike
>>220606088I can accept the possibility of strange things existing.>Bigfoot, ayyas, and other creatures These things all conform to physical science as humans understand it. A zombie would be on the same level as a ghost, a completely supernatural thing that cannot be understood because it defies everything in existence. If the unknown is an argument you wish to advocate for, then I can't help you.
There are still like three different Walking Dead spinoffs on the air.
>>220606212I thought it was a man-made satellite that crashed in that kino. The radiation reanimated dead bodies, not a 'reverse entropy' virus.
>>220603663Yeah I never watched it at the time it came out because I expected it to be dogshit, but it's genuinely one of the best zombie films/shows ever mad.
>>220605643>A reanimated cadaver would be subject to the same cellular and chemical behavior as a living human.Why?
>>220606344*made
>>220606243You can accept the possibility of strange things existing but only if it conform to physical science as humans understand it. This is a flaw on your part because humans don't have a compleate understanding physical science.
>>220606354How else might it maintain the chemical processes needed for basic biological function? Am I the only anon here that understands biology and physical science?!
>>220606426But it's not functioning biogically. It's dead.
>>220606408True. But I do know that things made of flesh and blood on Earth cannot move around once cellular decay has rotted their muscles away. Skeletons cannot walk without magic.
>>220606454... Yet it moves and eats and sees through rotting eyes. That's physically impossible. You speak of fantasy.
>>220606535>medieval horror about a necromancer summoning corpses during the black plague
>>220606485You could have a fungus do that or maybe a massive colony of bugs (speaking speculatively).
>>220606535>the thing that is definitely 100% happening within the logic and universe of the piece of media is physically impossible by a real life standard, and yet it is definitely still happening in that universe, and yet it MUST therefore be subject to the same laws of physics and biological processes as real life, despite not doing so, almost definitively, just by existing
>>220606212The guy on the right is so pathetic. Didn't even get one single zombie kill before going out like a chump.
>>220606699MOVIES MUST OBEY REAL LIFE REEEEEE!