[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1767061944043648.jpg (93 KB, 1000x281)
93 KB JPG
Who decided that we should have less screen state in the name of cinematography, and that you will be happy?
>>
>>220585442
You're supposed to tell the projectionist which aspect ratio you want before the movie starts, retard. Do you go to the bar and order "a beer" as well?
>>
Think about it logistically for like three seconds.
>>
File: DOA open matte.webm (3.73 MB, 1920x1080)
3.73 MB
3.73 MB WEBM
>>220585475
I've thunked about it. Now what?
>>
File: new_delhic_park.jpg (159 KB, 1280x720)
159 KB JPG
>>
>>220585442
>Let's narrow down the picture so we lose a good third of what is actually filmed
I actually don't know and it's fucking stupid.
>>
File: 35mm_formats-jpeg.jpg (103 KB, 900x748)
103 KB JPG
>>220585442
Because people wanted to shoot widescreen movies replicating the true cinemascope movies from the past while not using anamorphic lenses.

It also allowed movies to be cropped for 4:3 tvs and not losing as much image as with the real cinemascope.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.