>mainstream TV shows are now more pornographic than soft porn
>>220587543yet nudity and "fan service" in animations,western or not,are a HUGE no-no.....hypocrisy at its finest
>>220587543why does it always sound like your wet fantasies? You "complain" about something non existing because you just want to jerk off publicly to your inner heart's desires. Sex and nudity is basically non existent in modern tv yet you think about it all the time. You talk in the same way about pedophilia legalization, while in real life we were never further from it. It's very revealing
Anyone else feel like TV "softcore" is legitimately more sexual and disturbing than actual porn nowadays?
>>220588022depends what kind. It can be hardcore edited to softcore or just softcore. The latter is super hot because there's no real penetration. They're just grinding their genitals in front of camera crew
>>220588022depends how attuned you arehigh production porn has to be as vanilla as possible for maximum appeal and gross, where in TV it's always someones fetish. Odds are the latter will always hit harder ableit to fewer people
