If it is not what it seems people will get angry, we need Cassie/Sydney to get what she deserves.
>>220588765QRD is this a scene from trailers that hasnt appeared in season 3 yet? i dont watch this show
>>220588834Yeah, that was in the first episodes when cassie started to create content for onlyfans but was very bizarre. After that her "friend" Maddy started promoting her and now she is like a rising star in media.
>>220588924thanks, but i meant OP's picrel. i just save all the videos of this whore i can. heres another one
>>220589007Yeah that scene hasn't occurred yet. Some said that is was a rape scene, that her "friend" will finally sell or give her to the gang that owns the stripper club but it's not clear.
>>220588765nah,it breaks the immersion.Sydney is physically too strong to get raped.
>>220588765Levinson was obviously secretly chudpilled from the start but he at least disguised his disdain for western degeneracy in S1 and 2. He's laying it on too thick now.
>>220589653So what do you think will be the end of the Cassie's plot?
>>220589007poor cassieshe fucked a fag
>>220590196Fart video content
>>220589159It was pretty funny seeing how ripped she is in comparison to all of the other girls in the episode where she wears that cheetah print bodysuit. Guessing she has a lot of muscle mass from that boxing movie she did.
>>220588765Oh she gets it alright
>>220590196I'm guessing Maddie sells her into degrading prostitution. Nate is already crippled now. Something worse will happen to Jules. Rue will get away with it because she's the protagonist.That trad Christian family in episode 1 was so on the nose it was embarrassing.
>>220590308She naturally and easily builds muscle. I think she's too thin right now but if she gets back closer to her boxing movie size she's extremely strong for an actress. In interviews she seemed turned on by putting on weight and gaining strength for the movie and talked about her boobs and butt growing. Problem is of course some people called her fat and her insecurities seemed to lead down the cardio bunny path, at least temporarily.
>>220588765what do you say bros, can she pull it out?
>>220588765Haven’t watched any of this shit besides clips of Sydney getting her big milky tits out, but if there ends up being an ass tah ass tier scene I shall bother with watching the entirety of this slop
>>220590967Christina Hendricks as the mumSydney as the glasses Daugther.Kino of the Century Can’t name a good titty monster Brunette right now Make Tom Holland as the cucked shota or something
>>220590545Sydney has no insecurities though.
She gets Weinsteined but doesn’t get the fame she wanted from it so she gets fucked for nothing
>>220590484I thought this show glorified degeneracy? Why is every character getting shit on? I’ve never seen this show like most anons on here
>>220591045retard, sydney is the greatest star of current and future generation.
>>220591045I love scenes that involve the actress forcefully getting fucked doggy style. It’s kino
>>220591061It does the reddit nihilist thing where it winks at you. I.E. where it shows the degeneracy, and then does quip about how it’s actually bad, have your cake and eat it.Like it willl show a triple gangbang swap with nubile horny teenagers and thier teachers for 15 minutes, and then after you have cum, Will have The Moral Authority walk in and say, “hey actully guys that’s bad” but you’ve already partaken in the degeneracy
>>220588765She secretly married the surgeon guy, Jules is raping her
>>220589073>>220590484i would laugh so hard if her story ends with her being sold off as a fuckpig. HBO would never have the balls
>>220591031>Can’t name a good titty monster Brunette right nowKat Dennings
>>220590484>sells her into degrading prostitutionSo she'd become Sydney Sweeney? Poetry
>>220591084I think he means the character, not Sydney.
>>220591191Dude I think it would be great if they just keep it up and double down. Like end of this season its a rape, next season its her getting trafficked in the back of a van
>>220591356same i dont watch this show. i also dont like the idea of it and what it glorifies to its young audience so i have no problem at all with cassie's life and all the other characters taking hard plunges like that. my expectation is that the scene in the trailer is just added for shock value or edited like they do for trailers and most likely its something really tame like her just trying a butt plug for the first time or something
>>220591388Some people on the other Euphoria thread are saying that Levinson is mocking degeneracy. I don't really see it. Seems like Levinson and HBO are glorifying degeneracy. But then I shouldn't talk since I watch porn. But I at least know that porn should be kept separate from mainstream stuff while HBO seems to meld them together like when they did the Game of Thrones series.
>>220591509Seems like glorifying to me. I truly dont think it's that deep to mock heh
>>220591509>LevinsonIf you don't know whether his all goyim show is pro degeneracy than you're ngmi
>>220590484> Maddie sells her into degrading prostitution.As opposed to nondegrading uplifting sucking dick for petty cash?
>>220591356Yeah, it would be great all through season 4 showing different ways of abusing and raping Cassie. The audience would be immense. Chuds for jerking off and women that hate her would love it.
>>220591388Gross. Why is she doing this? Dignity is worth more than a paycheck.
>>220588765>Cassie breaks contract >Maddy legally gets to sell her ass to BLACKED.com>cue scene
>>220591509>$700 for a fart in jar>eww no you do it no one will notice the difference >sure okWouldn't call this glorifying more lampooning if anything
>>220588765>I'm going to black Sydney SweenyWe know Sam, we just don't care.
>>220590429Go to bed Sukdeep
>>220591000Don't. You've basically seen the whole thing anyway.
>>220592155how about a bbc gangbang
>>220592171Don't. Care. If you want to make porn, make porn. It's not like you can write dialogue or anything anyway. >I've come to clean the poolis about your level.
>>220590484No way troon gets a bad ending compared to sydney
>>220592228ok a bbc gangbang and a bukake
>>220592251Ask me how I know your mother didn't hug you as a child.
>>220592348pissbang DAP bukake
>>220592402>The only way I know how to communicate any more is by naming porn genresHow many drugs are you on right now? Serious question. I want to know how spectacular your public meltdown is going to be.
>>220592437found a newfag
>>220592437legalporno is kino and I'm tired of pretending otherwise
>>220592494All porno is legal. Except for the stuff that isn't.
>>220591388>same i dont watch this show.why are you in the thread then retard?
I find it interesting that people who liked the show are really hating this season. I think the degradation and depravity are on point. We all grew up with easy access to porn. Pornography and prostitution are trivial things nowadays. The show just shows it in a not so glamorous way.
>>220591388That scene was actually kino tho. The backstory is that Cassie (sydney sweeney) has a sex tape out that Nate (Jacob Ellordi, the villain of the show) has on his phone and shows the McKay who genuinely likes Cassie just to fuck with him. McKay, who's got his own set of sexual hangups tries to go full mascdom roughfuck pornmode, which Cassie doesn't like, and they share a human moment as they both realize a truth about the other's vulnerability. The broader point is that lewd selfies are the currency of millenial romance, that young relationships have to pass through a "selfie phase" to get to genuine intimacy, and that young women end up paying the price for this when the relationship sours in the form of "revenge porn."The voice over of Rue (zendaya) actually says "save your judgement, girls didn't make the system, they're just stuck in it."
>>220590967Classic
>>220588834>>220591191Not to get all /pol/ but I feel like the sex trade is glorified more than ever in mainstream media. OnlyFans convinced women that making porn was like such a vibe. It's insane, you give women the freedom to be engineers and lawyers and they choose to be prostitutes.
>>220591509Season 1 was a completely different show. It really was about the stuggles young women have with sexuality in a hyper-sexualized culture. This is told by Rue using three characters:Jules - the tranny and Rue's love interest - learning to navigate in a world where the rules are different for her than they are for her peers. Cassie - "the school slut" trying to navigate relationships with fragile young men. Kat - the fat chick, who finds validation online first as an erotic fanfic author, and then through paypig losers paying for humiliation. Season 2 jumps the shark and season 3 is just full mask off misogynistic exploitation. It's very easy to see why the red carpet premier was such a shitshow. I don't think anyone involved in this clusterfuck doesn't regret signing up for season 3.
>>220592727Zamn
>>220592727>girls didnt make the systemExcept they did, if all women didnt send nudes, it wouldnt happen, they feel the need to do it so they can compete with the girls who do it as well
>>220591061When people talk about how America is somehow both puritan and degenerate, this is what they mean. America is absolutely fascinated by degenerate behavior but still ultimately feels it is evil and must be punished eventually. Essentially, everyone wants a chance to be bad in their lives.
>>220592066And then a properly scene of anal sex just to close the season at its peak. Sydney would get an Emmy for so realistic performance...
I’m still mad there was no diaper
>>220590967>i-it's fine if these muscular pretty playboys who have already said they are dying to fuck us massage us, right down to inserting fingers, this definitely won't lead to sexhow do you read this slop with any immersion
>>220591509i mean every sex scene on the show is disgusting and depressing.
>>220590196She loses to my cock and gets pregnant.
>>220592833It's so not that and it's so much worse. The problem is dating apps, particularly the ones owned by Match.com (tinder, grindr, okcupid, hinge, a couple of others). They changed the algorithm to stop making relationships and to instead make money. Guys only see this from one angle, you might get one or two notifications a week with a professionally made profile, or you can pay for premium and get two or three times that, and in fact most apps don't let you get anywhere at all unless you pay. From the girls perspective you're getting HUNDREDS of notifications a day. Almost always from premium users using the "pay to instantly communicate with girl" feature. I recently got desperate and reopened OKCupid, and within a minute, 60 fucking seconds, of me clicking finish on my profile I had three indian guys "intro"ing me, which is the paid feature where they just get to text me without me doing anything. It took me about 30 minutes to delete my account again. Because the thing is is that the girls on the app are the product, the men on the app are the customer. It is incredibly unlikely that you will find an actual partner on a dating app for either gender, but the workload to maybe find someone is so fucking imbalanced between the genders, for guys opening the app once a day and swiping for 20 minutes, maybe sending a message or two that probably won't get a response, for girls a full time fucking job sorting through the mountain of paid-to-pervs to maybe find a guy she actually clicks with. So inevitably the girls are coming to the conclusion "I'm exhausted, I've got nothing to show for it, but this app has made thousands of dollars from my work. Why aren't I getting paid for this?" And the onlyfans comes along and says "you can just do what you do on a dating app and make a little bit of money for doing it."Sell your feet pics to pervs, get enough money for a night out with the girls.
>>220591191Sydney is the one in charge though.
>>220592911They missed the chance to make her use more costumes like schoolgirl, nurse, secretary, etc
>>220592866If most women don't send nudes then the ones that do get the best guys, everyone else gets to make do. It's a race to the bottom. And no, girls didn't make the system. The dating apps, the social media platforms, the phones themselves, all made by men. You're expecting girls, at the age of 16, who have been taught nothing except how to be pretty their whole lives, to have mastered consciencious consumerism in late stage capitalism, when the average boomer with a masters degree can't even do that. They're human, they're imperfect, and they're lonely. They're doing their best, in a system that raised them to be easily exploited.
>>220592866NTA and probably not as woke as him but you could make a similar argument for, I dunno, guys who act like bad boys to impress girls which inspires other guys to do the same. The dating market works by supply and demand. If 99/100 women don't put out, the one woman who does gets all the attention. I do think women need to be aware of the role they play in perpetuating these systems in society (and to be a bit more based, acknowledge that feminism helped create the sexual revolution that got us in this mess) but they are ultimately still victims of a system that is bigger than them.
>>220592981You could have said OnlyFans is easy money and saved yourself some paragraphs. I don't agree with the connection to the dating app issue, at least I haven't seen any evidence for it. Maybe it's a factor but mostly it just sounds like an excuse. And you're wrong, guys are absolutely aware that women get massive amounts of attention and a decent amount of guys are aware that women find thay overwhelming, it's just that from the perspective of a starving person, someone with too much food to pick their favorite just isn't someone you feel particularly sympathetic with.
>>220593060Then you're not looking. This is a really good video that explains the civilization ending crisis that western governments are ignoring in a neutral and apolitical way. Very much worth watching. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDcKMjDOeuc
>>220593020>You're expecting people to be responsible for their own actionsYes actually. This is why nothing gets better btw cause people like you would rather spend 10 minutes writing out a list of reasons why the masses have no power and are just victims of a handful of rich people. You have to learn to give people more than just "hate the elites"
>>220593020>late stage capitalismfaggot
>>220592833You have terminal brainrot if you think taking pictures of yourself in your own home is the same as the drug addicted runaways being pimped by the mafia of yesteryear
>>220593091THEY ARE 16 YEAR OLD GIRLS. You are asking more than most fully grown adults with professional degrees can do. They don't even have the right to vote and you're expecting them to reform the absolute clusterfuck that is modern dating, opposed by trillion dollar corporations that make money exploiting them, with literally no instruction on how to do it, in a political environment that would rather debate trannies in the bathroom for the ten millionth time than actually fix a problem.
Women enjoy being whores when they know Chad is watching, even if it means showing off to millions of undesirables to get the few Chads to look at them.
Where can I watch a supercut of Sweeney getting her fat tits out? That's literally the only element of this show I give a shit about.
isn't it just a repeat of hunter's motel scene from the first season?
>>220593136>expecting them to reformNo I'm expecting them to just stop doing something. 16 year olds aren't 6 year olds.
>>220593198No. Not even close. Not even the same genre.
>>220593230The girls who don't do it btw, aren't better off, they just get nothing at all and khhvs until after high school and maybe forever. The game isn't do or don't give lewds, the game is make sure the guy is a serious prospect before you give lewds and to use lewds as a reward for passing the tests of seriousness. And the only way to learn how to play that game is trial and error. There's no textbook on this stuff and they don't teach it in schools. Parents have got no fucking clue, they met their partners at singles mixers back when people could still afford to go out, and it wasn't illegal for a man to approach a woman IRL. So they're learning from their peers who are just as clueless as they are. Give lewds, recieve validation, dopamine hit, repeat. And the only thing that I have EVER seen push back against that in any way was Euphoria season 1.
>>220591156>jews now blackmail their audienceHoly fucking KEK
>>220593079All right well I've watched that video now and I don't think OnlyFans was even mentioned. Mostly it was about dating apps ruining the dating market and creating a loneliness crisis which is not something I was ever disputing. The closest thing I could see was the "women are the products men are the consumers" line you used earlier. The issues aren't entirely separate obviously because both involve markets where men must and will pay money for access to women, but I still don't see evidence that the dating app crisis is the driving force behind more women going into sex work. The more fundamental explanation is simply supply and demand. Women see an opportunity for easy money so they take it.
>>220593127Luckily I don't think that and wasn't saying that.
>>220593298>The game isn't do or don't give lewds, the game is make sure the guy is a serious prospect before you give lewds and to use lewds as a reward for passing the tests of seriousness.You're cooked lolNo teenage guy is ever going to be serious, overwhelming majority of teenage romances don't work out and a lot of those end ugly, there is no testing the waters, it's like testing the waters with heroin or crack
>>220593333>The issues aren't entirely separate obviously because both involve markets where men must and will pay money for access to womenYeah that and the part about the mismatch in work using modern dating apps. So, and I'm basically contemplating this myself at the moment, I can use dating apps where I will be exploited by a giant corporation to drain money from men's wallets in exchange for a highly unlikely prospect of a relationship, and the giant corporation keeps all the money. OR I can use onlyfans, which is going to be the exact same thing, but the giant corporations gives some of the money to me. Girls do wind up dating their simps on onlyfans. It's not common, but neither is finding a partner on a dating app post-covid. We are all just dealing with that loneliness in a system that wants to exploit it, not cure it. And this is why Euphoria season 3 is just such garbage, because where season 1 got too close to reality for most people to be comfortable with, season 3 is just completely divorced from it.
>>220593409Yeah but the teenage girls don't know that. And this isn't just a teenager thing btw, you don't know the effect you're capable of having on women. Unless you got married at 19 we ALL get dickmatized sooner or later. In the meantime the inevitable ugly end to the teenage romance carries with it a consequence for the girls that it doesn't carry for the boys, in the form of "revenge porn" where the boy, nursing a broken heart and looking to get back at the person who hurt him, uploads the girls lewds to the internet to be enjoyed by an army of pedophiles on websites that make bank from hosting it. That's cassie's story. That's how she became "the school slut."The moral of the story you're trying to teach is "don't trust guys, especially when they seem nice."And I will bet money you've had a chip on your shoulder about the way girls treat "nice guys" for a while now huh?
>>220593411>So, and I'm basically contemplating this myself at the moment, I can use dating apps where I will be exploited by a giant corporation to drain money from men's wallets in exchange for a highly unlikely prospect of a relationship, and the giant corporation keeps all the money. OR I can use onlyfansI am not doubting that this is the rationale that >you personally follow, and it is logical. I just do not think this is why most women who go into modern style sex work do what they do. The natural response to the woman's side of the dating app issue is "I can't find the right guy here this sucks". It is NOT to think "wow this corporation is profiting off of these men, I want my share!". That second reaction requires women to focus on the man's side of the issue AND the wider corporate exploitation before their own immediate needs, which is just implausible to me. Again, I think women are choosing this because they can and because it is less work than being an engineer, which is a damn shame because women have never had the opportunity they have today. Even the argument that women make the connection between men paying to see them on Tinder and on OnlyFans is just my argument with extra steps.
What zodiac sign is Cassie?
>>220593298>they just get nothing at all and khhvs until after high school and maybe forever.I don't think this is true. Not for an attractive girl anyway. There will always be guys willing to wait. The more complete explanation is that people like attention and the girls who are busy getting attention from guys are higher up on the food chain. Ignoring that urge for attention and holding out for a guy who doesn't demand nude pictures is too much for most girls.
Can someone explain to me why Cassie is extremely unhinged?
>>220593564>I think women are choosing this because they can and because it is less work than being an engineerA bit unrelated, but that's odd seeing this in the US, because 3rdies will strive to be an engineer because its their only way out of poverty. Engineering, doctor etc. In the US you see beautiful women and instead of capitalizing on that PLUS getting a worthwile degree they sit on their beauty and sell it. Maybe thirdies are too ugly to sell it, but it's a shame. I dont understand the difference because its vast. When they move over here, they find support in their communities and usually stay in them, even if they integrate they dont leave that support behind vs the ones that break without it and end up 3rdie hoes who think its a way to 'liberation' because they couldn't hack the maths or the pressure of an actual degree, losing their only hope for independence and thus entering the cycle you're talking about. This system ruins both of us for profits and its fucking abysmal
>>220591156Sometimes when I am in public I will see a girl dressed scantily and I will glare at them angrily and maybe even shake my head but I'm really just staring at their tits and ass. Works better the older you get (and the younger they are).Anyways, this show sounds like the film equivalent to that.
>>220593564So you've actually touched on a bunch of really interesting points there. What you're ignoring about the dating app problem is the work-mismatch. I'm telling you that for women it is a FULL TIME JOB. Actual, exhausting, brain work. Guys obviously are never upfront about who the really are in the first 30 minutes of conversation, it's the carefully curated version of them that they only use for dating sites. And that's learned behaviour too. I'm actually happy when I'm able to red flag a guy pretty quickly because he's being honest about what he wants and I'm able to assess that it's not me. But then those guys get really fucking mad when I point out that there's no prospect of this going anywhere and I rather leave it here, and so they learn quickly to not be honest about what they really want which doesn't actually improve their prospects, it just means more time and effort for me to find the red flag, that still there, they haven't changed who they are, they're just hiding it now. And I can tell that you're mostly a pretty sensible, sensitive, and thoughtful guy, MOST GUYS on dating sites are not you. Most of them are literally just pervs who want me to chat to them while they jerk off to my pics. As soon as they cum they close the app and they leave. And that's a common experience, remember you're outnumbered on the internet like 5:1 by indians. And indians absolutely do use white guy profile pics to get girls to talk to them on dating apps. (cont)
What is the mood and tone of this show and what is the subtext?
>>220593564>>220593768 (cont)As for this>I think women are choosing this because they can and because it is less work than being an engineerThis is where I think a trans perspective is really insightful. We kinda fixed the political problems of gender inequality, but gender socialization didn't really catch up to that. Girls are not socially rewarded for taking an interest in engineering, girls are socially rewarded for dressing well and wearing the right makeup and having pretty hair. And that is a cold bucket of water poured over the heads of late transitioners btw. I've seen it in these threads in the last couple of days - makes my dick hard = girl, makes my stomach churn = perverted man in a dress (this is called lookism). A genuine diagnosis of gender incongruence, even a brain scan that proves it, means nothing. Gender is entirely based on the male gaze. On the other side of that boys are PUNISHED for not being career minded. Even tho the deck is increasingly stacked against them, the idea of a quiet life with a family, perfectly acceptedable of even encouraged for girls, is treated as at best being a loser, at worst some form of perversion akin to trannyism. More than that boys are punished for not being hypersexual. If you're not a horndog you're somehow less of a man. Wanting genuine connection, which sooooo many of you do, is seen as faggy, or even a sign of mental illness. These problems are so fucking deep in society, and the only way we're actually communicating about them is this retarded gender war which we're all losing.
>>220593136>You are asking more than most fully grown adults with professional degrees can do.Yeah, that's life in the jungle, baby, it ain't fair. I mean, what, you want a paternalistic fascist society protecting people from their own worst impulses? Yeah, so do I, but nobody else does so they can eat it and get culled.
>>220593638There's no food chain sweetheart. This alpha shit is complete fiction, and the guys getting laid on dating apps are not the guys you think they are. Fuckboys just make it easy. What girls are really looking for is a guy just for them. Attractive girls feel the pressure even more. Beauty isn't genetic, despite what you all seem to think. Good genes can definitely give you a leg up but any girl can be hot with enough money and effort. Hunter Shafer is hot as fuck and she's literally got a Y-chromosome. I used to feel really bad about myself because I don't have blue eyes, until guys started complimenting me on my pretty brown eyes.
>>220593802What I really want is for everyone to stop spouting political bullshit because they want their "side" to "win" the gender war and just be honest about the fact that we're ALL getting fucked over by this. Dating apps and social media have been an unmitigated disaster for society. NOBODY is happy with the current situation, but we all feel powerless to do anything about it. Because individually we can't do anything about it. It has to be a cooperative effort accross the gender divide, the very divide that is being exacerbated by the problems gender cooperation is needed to solve. Love is actually unironically the answer. Jesus was, as always, right.
>>220593768>>220593790Regarding the work difference, this is based on my lazy AI search: "Tinder users spend an average of 1.5 hours (90 minutes) daily on the app, with men logging in more frequently (approx. 11 times a day) and women often spending more time per session. While some studies suggest men spend slightly more time (85 mins/day) than women (79 mins/day)" - from The Independent.But okay whatever let's talk about the principles rather than quibbling over the facts. You're saying women have to sift through all these clowns, I have some small criticisms of that. You're saying most of the guys want to jerk off to nudes and then leave. I do not believe you, sorry I just don't. Guys want to meet, they want to talk, flirt and have sex. Are lots of them shallow assholes? Sure but AT THE VERY LEAST I am sure they want more than just talking and exchanging pictures.With that in mind, even if the guys you meet aren't good enough, I mean I just don't think the average guy is that bad. I struggle to have sympathy for this when men are struggling to find ANYTHING at all. I know it's not a competition, but still. But okay let's say shit really is that bad, you can't find a non-coomer guy on Tinder and you're spending hours of work on it. I can't help but ask why the kind of work you're doing on Tinder is comparable to OnlyFans in the first place? Trying to find out if a guy is worth a damn is one thing. Why do you need to send nudes to all the guys you're matching? You chat, find out about each other's lives, you meet. He demands nudes or lewd role play? You ditch him. And do not give me that "if I don't others will" argument because we've established that women are in serious demand on dating apps.>Girls are not socially rewarded for taking an interest in engineering, girls are socially rewarded for dressing wellSure yeah but I can't help but feel like path of least resistance plays a part too.
>>220588834Why are there no HD webms of that baseball catcher part at the beginning?
>>220593834Popularity and social status is a real thing. People wanting validation is a real thing. Girls getting social validation by getting attention from attractive men is a real thing.>Fuckboys just make it easy.Genuinely curious what you mean by this.
>>220594147>Guys want to meet, they want to talk, flirt and have sex. Are lots of them shallow assholes? Sure but AT THE VERY LEAST I am sure they want more than just talking and exchanging pictures.And that's where the algorithm reveals it's evil in full. Matching me with a guy like that takes two people off the app. Matching me with an endless procession of perverts not only keeps me on the app until I can't take it any more, while keeping them paying. The averages really aren't going to be meaningful here. The statistic that I found most alarming was that guys have to swipe right 45,000 times to get a second date. The inverse of that is that guys have to swipe right on me 45,000 times for me to get one. And this is where the work comes in. I have to actually go through those 45,000 guys to actually find the one who's going to get a second date out of me. >why the kind of work you're doing on Tinder is comparable to OnlyFans in the first place?Onlyfans isn't about sending nudes, this is another thing season 3 gets wrong. Onlyfans is about exclusivity. It's not A camwhore, it's YOUR camwhore. She knows your name, she knows what you like, she likes giving it to you (or is at least good at pretending she does). From my perspective, same game different name. It's still about getting to know the guy and trying to figure out that your compatible, figuring out what he wants and deciding whether or not you want to give it to him. In that respect onlyfans is better just because it's honest. Guys aren't hiding what they want from me, they're paying for it. Everyone knows why they're there, there's no need for pretense. >Why do you need to send nudes to all the guys you're matching?Originally, and this is the whole "it's a learning curve" thing, because they asked and I'm not ashamed of my body. >path of least resistance plays a part too.What's the difference? It's still monkey press button recieve banana.
>>220594194>Popularity and social status is a real thing.That's stuff only matters inside manside. Girls have their own game which is way more complicated and the stakes are higher. But do you really care how many followers on social media the girl you liked in high school had? Or did you care that she was nice to you and wasn't like all those other girls? >Genuinely curious what you mean by this.I mean, I get horny, sometimes I'm not interested in searching for a boyfriend, I just just need a cock in me. Fuckboys are clean, can host, know what they're doing, are available right now, and make the whole process simple. I don't think those guys are happy, but I do appreciate them existing when I need them (I can't take care of myself like you can).
>>220593020>women are lonelybro it's 4chan, stop simping. shes not gonna see you post that here.
>>220594295>The inverse of that is that guys have to swipe right on me 45,000 times for me to get one. And this is where the work comes in. I have to actually go through those 45,000 guys to actually find the one who's going to get a second date out of me.Fair enough that does sound shit.>From my perspective, same game different name. It's still about getting to know the guy and trying to figure out that your compatibleI don't get how you can see OnlyFans as this. From the outset, your relationship is always going to be unnatural because it is explicitly monetarily transactional. Yeah OF girls date their simps sometimes but it's rare. It just seems like a terrible path to dating, if dating is your goal. A more profitable use of your time sure, but that is why I think it's just money that drives women into that business rather than female loneliness.>because they asked and I'm not ashamed of my body.Just seems like a terrible way to appease a guy before you know he values you.>What's the difference?I'm talking about path of least resistance towards financial stability rather than social validation.>>220594348(yeah)>But do you really care how many followers on social media the girl you liked in high school had? Or did you care that she was nice to you and wasn't like all those other girls?I'm not sure what point you're making here but high school I would have cared. Like I would have cared who had the most expensive shoes. Things change in value as you age and that's reflected in the people who get put at the top.>I mean, I get hornyOkay so you presumably you go for guys who are superficially attractive, no? How are the guys here not the guys I think they are?
>>220594392Who? Sydney Sweeney?I like men.
>>220594486>Just seems like a terrible way to appease a guy before you know he values you.Thanks captain hindsight! I'm so glad you're here to tell me what I learned the hard way years ago. >It just seems like a terrible path to dating, if dating is your goal.My point is they're ALL terrible. Dating IRL just doesn't happen any more, which means the only option is silicon valley. So I'm GOING to get exploited one way or the other, and so are the guys, I'm just going to be way more aware of it. So the only real question is, do I want to a cut of the profits? And you've got to admit that asking me to say no to that on moral grounds is a big ask. >financial stabilityLol. Okay now we're in the realm of complete fantasy. I'm perfectly aware that what I can actually make from onlyfans is like $100 a month. > Like I would have cared who had the most expensive shoes. Umm... that's weird. Why do you even know how much women's shoes cost?Are you a foot guy by chance? I don't get it, but as far as kinks go I think that's definitely in the fine category.>Okay so you presumably you go for guys who are superficially attractive, no?No. I told you the criteria. Honestly if a guy is too "classically hot" that's kind of a turn off for me when I'm looking for a fuckboy because I'm worried about being judged. Cards on the table tho, I definitely judge you on your dick. Shave your pubes.
>>220594586>So the only real question is, do I want to a cut of the profits? Well except all the other questions about whether women are actually having as hard of a time as you're making out and like I said I'm skeptical. I have explained and given evidence for why. But the main question I guess is "is all site like OnlyFans just as good for meeting guys as a dating app" and I'm sorry but you aren't gonna convince me of that.>I'm perfectly aware that what I can actually make from onlyfans is like $100 a month.Depends on who it is I guess.>Why do you even know how much women's shoes cost?Was talking about guy's shoes. When you're a teenager you care a lot about the clothes people wear. You didn't answer my question, what is your point in asking me about the high school girl's followers?>clean, can host, know what they're doing, are available right now, and make the whole process simpleAll of these things seem to either apply to most guys or are unknowable until you meet. I'm trying to understand what you mean by "and the guys getting laid on dating apps are not the guys you think they are".
>>220594715>Well except all the other questions about whether women are actually having as hard of a time as you're making out and like I said I'm skeptical.Everyone is doing it tough these days. The cost of living is fucking insane. That said it is FUCKING CRAZY EXPENSIVE living as a girl. You have no fucking idea. When you're judged on your appearance, not on the skills you bring to the table, it get really fucking dear. To have great hair is about $2500 a year (all prices in Australian), even wearing just basic retail makeup (which totally shows) is about $3000 a year. Fake lashes (which I so want) is about $40 a month. Eyebrows are $40 a month. Nails are $40 a month. And clothes, I managed to be really smart, but if I'd paid retail my modestly good wardrobe is worth tens of thousands. And I can't live on junk any more. Nonono, that will ruin my skin and make me fat, and health food is twice the price for half as much. >Depends on who it is I guess.Yeah I'm normal, not a celebrity youtuber or an 18 year old who's been promoting her inevitable onlyfans debut since she was 12. Normal women can't make a living off onlyfans. >Was talking about guy's shoes. That's back to guys judging guys. I'm talking about the GIRLS you were interested in. Did you care about their place in the girl heirarchy? Or did you just care that they were nice to YOU? Because it's the exact same from the other direction. Girls neither know nor care who the alpha is. >All of these things seem to either apply to most guys or are unknowable until you meet.Nah it's not. Most guys don't take care of themselves and don't groom themselves properly for a start. Also so few single guys can host last minute. Having a clean apartment with no roommates isn't that common. But it's the "know what they're doing", "right now" and "make it simple" thing that really seperates the fuckboys from the regular guys. You want a relationship, fuckboys are just a competent dick and are happy with that
>>220594896>I'm talking about the GIRLS you were interested in. Did you care about their place in the girl heirarchy?Ah, I see. I never made a claim about men being attracted to women based on status. I said social status exists, which it does. Even if I don't care about which girl has the nicest shoes, the girls in the social circle do. Honestly, yes I do remember the popular girl at my school and honestly was she was hotter to me because of her popularity. It wasn't the only thing that mattered to me (nor am I suggesting status is the only thing that matters to women) and the girl I liked most was not the most popular girl, but it was a factor. Anyway regardless of how men sexually select, there's no reason to assume women behave the same. Women are attracted to guys who are respected more than guys who are ridiculed.>But it's the "know what they're doing", "right now" and "make it simple" thing that really seperates the fuckboys from the regular guys. I mean, still, lots of guys are available right now, lots of guys would be happy with no strings attached sex. Which leaves "know what they're doing", and you can't know that until you've been with them. If you find a guy who is useful, fair enough but to find him in the first place you have to have *some* criteria, that's why I doubt that the stereotypical stuff about fuckboys doesn't come into the equation.Anyway that's me for the night, peace.
>>220595038>there's no reason to assume women behave the same. Women are attracted to guys who are respected more than guys who are ridiculed.I'm telling you that's not even REMOTELY true. This andrew tate shit is fucking poison. What girl wants more than anything is for a guy to be THEIRS. Exclusivity, it's what we all want. I personally prefer gamers. I like the culture, I like the attitude, I like the sense of humour that comes along with it, and I like when I'm included. I can't get that from a jock. But gamers have unfortunately been a little bit traumatized by the gender war over the last few years. And for some reason they're blaming me for that even tho I totally didn't do it and was on their side the whole time. And ngl that really fucking hurts. That one more than anything is the fml of my life. >I mean, still, lots of guys are available right now, lots of guys would be happy with no strings attached sex.I notice you're saying "a lot of guys" you're not saying you. And I think that's the way "a lot of guys" see it. The reality is most single guys are living in share houses or with their parents. Most guys need to negotiate a time at some point in the future for the hookup. And as for the knows what they're doing thing, I don't know how I can tell, but I can tell, mostly because they so easily satisfy the other criteria, and it's very fucking clear they never sleep with the same girl twice.
What the fuck are you babbling about
>>220592841Probably best if it was set during college and not high school. Also, I just ask Deepseek A.I. to give me thorough summaries and analysis of the shows episode and not even of every episode.>>220592954Yeah, I talked with Google A.I. and Euphoria relies on shock and spectacle and good cinematography. Watched a YouTube video where some female writer criticized the writing. Euphoria has no good writing.>>220591679>>220591560>>220592133He(Levinson) is probably just a shit writer. Although I really shouldn't say much either since I haven't written much either.>>220588765Was talking to Google A.I. and Deepseek A.I. earlier and it seems that the criminal loqnshark guy is mutilating Nate and Now Cassie is going to extreme lengths to raise money and pay off the loanshark debt. This scene probably happens later in the show to establish that Naz, the criminal loanshark, is also a rapist, I guess. That is what I am thinking.
>>220595482Gender politics as it related to the contrast between season 1 and season 3 of HBO's Euphoria written by Sam Levinson who is Jewish.
>>220595607Sam Levinson is a republican and Christian you seething leftist troon.
>>220595712OMG what lies are you trying to tell now?
Are people really paying for feet pics that much or is it a meme? I seems like every woman believes she could be making thousands by doing that now. And most say it's not porn because it's just a pic that cuts off below ankle. How many perverts with enough spare money are there?
>>220593020>muh lonely 16 year old girls need endless understandinglol. Women/troons say will shit like this, then out of the other corner of their mouths shit all over "incels" who have been lonely and desperate for companionship for far longer than a couple years.
>>220591061it's crazy that you have an opinion on the show that is wrong and then this guy >>220591156"corrects" it with an even worse opinion and then this guy >>220593311 is like "haha totally i agree with you bro !!!" meanwhile all of you are wrong about the show and haven't watched it, but now everyone has a new opinion about it based on this exchange simply because this is the correct opinion to have here. Kinda reminds me of another place
>>220596360I don't do that and I'm mad about it too. Everyone deserves love.
>>220591061>>220591156>>220593311Guys, this guy >>220596591 just called you tumblr.
>>220588834The lens they use to film everything now looks like fucking dogshit. I watch b movies on laserdisk that look better. Also this is disgusting pedo shit.
>>220592874tell me more about american life, abdul
>>220592833Every normie complains about it and the media rallies against it all the time, the porn industry is getting censored, people getting deplatformed or debanked and being forced to operate in a grey area. Not sure why people keep repeating this popular narrative that its so acceptable and easy to do. Or why they repeat the talking points about how bad sex work, porn and prostitution is, the same talking points peddled by those who keep on ruining society.
>>220597349Well i'm right and here's my argument: if the show glorifies degeneracy how come none of the characters involved in it are happy or satisfied or seen as some cool role models by the audience? The only one that kind fits this is Maddy but what she's doing is pretty tame. What those anons are saying is the same as saying Breaking Bad glorified meth addiction or drug dealing. Fucking retarded
>>220597514I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just laughing at and lamenting that /tv/ has become nu-tumblr.
>>220597563i know, i was just backing up my shit. Pointless anyway, these anons only see what they wanna see
>>220593411A false dichotomy, pretending you're forced to do one or the other.Are you also pretending being a porn amateur improves loneliness? You're talking broad strokes, so obviously you're not going to pretend an outlier in one is proof but not in the other. Being this sentence I'm not going to bother addressing how much easier it is for women to get a positive reaction by just talking to a guy. The following is a preemptive response to any attack the messenger efforts. I'm married, late 30s, 2 kids and I had a very successful dating history in my youth.
Will they do our boy Nate dirty, or will he get a redemption in the final episodes?
>>220593790>Girls are not socially rewarded for taking an interest in engineering,You're a moron. STEM it's absolutely flush with women only opportunities and everyone bends over backwards to facilitate them. It was talked about constantly in my I.T. degree scholarship>How do we get more women applicants? And in corporate, exec bonuses literally have a metric of how close to gender parity there is in their staff. There's no point humouring any other assertions.
>>220591509>The medium is the messageHolds true even if it's not intended, I used to not believe it, but there is a truth to it. The whole "don't imagine a big red button" well the brain will imagine it, it doesn't really interpret the "don't" and the there's the trite cliche of "he who stares into the abyss" blah blah blah, but these things are actually true, the brain can be plastically conditioned
>>220592981look dating apps are shit and all but you paint a far more dire picture of them for non paying customers than is the reality.Even I, an ugly as fuck overweight weirdo, who has a dogshit profile, still gets 3-5 matches a week without paying anything, it really isn't that bad.and honestly I don't want to put in that much effort into actually talking to that many women so its fine anyway.I don't understand why anyone would pay for more matches unless they are trying to set shit up all day constantly, which is crazy.
Notice how hollywood stopped pairing white girls with black guys because they wanted to piss off white guys but discovered that white nationalists jerk off to that stuff
>>220598072your bait post means nothing. post proof or stfu
>>220598027>not SOCIALLY rewardedyour STEM pushing unis mean nothing if the girls get no social bonuses. They'd rather profit from being a cumdumpster than a smart chick because we all know you wouldnt give a rat's ass if she was in STEM
>>220599160Totally unhinged the motives you project onto other people.
>>220599176post proof of what?that most people can find a partner and not be schizophrenic weirdos on the internet?most people still meet in person and still get introduced to each other via friends.There is no great dating apocalypse, simply the terms used to describe it have changed and people don't describe themselves as in a relationship unless they are in a serious long term relationship, people don't even consider what was once dating, as in going on dates with someone and not being in a relationship, dating anymore, and describe it differently, with dating being "more serious".dating apps are shit, I don't deny that or disagree with it, so few matches you get convert into anything meaningful and a shitty way to get to know people.but women aren't going into porn because they literally cannot find someone.Many of the women who go into porn and who become escorts/hookers/prostitutes/sex workers are often in long term relationships. It's done for financial reasons.Stop being a terminally online schizo and actually go interact with people in the real world.
>>220588765Euphoria is woke trash
