[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How come only The Force Awakens is the most profitable? I liked Rogue One and Solo more. I'm gonna see Mando on Friday tho.
>>
>>220595180
it was the first one after like 2 decades innit
>>
>>220595180
Post the originals and prequels adjusted for inflation so I can laugh at you, OP. None of these films were profitable. Remind me how much did Disney pay for Star Wars? AHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>220595180
>movie starring white male
>flops

Someone should look into this.
>>
>>220595241
It's easy

Beloved character played by charismatic actor. Seeing a trailer of 'Solo' would make anyone's dick go limp
>>
>>220595229
Disney made back the money they paid for Lucasfilm through merchandise (based on the 6 films) yet none from the films THEY made...

That Lucas stuff still sells they should feel grateful
>>
They still had good will, or at least less bad will then
>>
>>220595354
bro no one bought the merch
>>
Solo is the best movie out of all of these, it's a blast
>>
>>220595532
Are you retarded? I said merchandise based on the 6 LUCAS FILMS, that still sells.
>>
It's time to admit Star Wars is another franchise with just one good movie
>>
>>220595180
the irony is that solo is the best out of all of those
best thing since RotJ (faint praise, but also RotJ kinda sucks, so not that faint)
>>
>>220595612
>the irony is that solo is the best out of all of those

you're legitimately insane
>>
>>220595600
And thats return of the jedi
>>
>>220595180
it's almost as if people realised nu wars was garbage as a function of time
>>
>>220595633
It's just a bluff because he knows nobody actually watched it
>>
>>220596059
Lol
>>
>>220595180
People had faith they would make things good, Last Jedi abandoned all hope left. Plus these films thrive on repeated viewers and that became fewer and fewer people who began noticing.
>>
File: 1778199935982352.jpg (2.13 MB, 1920x9802)
2.13 MB JPG
>>220595180
I think you're purposely being obtuse, the force awakens had the benefit of nostalgia and a decade's long rehab process by Filoni with the animated Clone Wars series rebuilding trust with the fanbase that was eagerly awaiting more star wars media, only for Jew Jew Abrams and Rian Johnson to crater the franchise worse than George did with the Prequels
Solo was an extreme casualty of how badly The Last Jedi was received, even though it was the most star wars like movie, other than the ugly nepo hire they got to play han which looked nothing like harrison ford, which spielberg got from a jew birthday party he went to
>>
The thing where fanboys flat out make up box office numbers for the sake of argument is really cool.

The Rise of Skywalker did not take 950 million dollars to make and market.
>>
>>220595180
Reminder all nu wars is faggot shit
>>
>>220595180
TFA's hype was unreal.
>>
File: 1668711629297716.jpg (32 KB, 379x383)
32 KB JPG
>>220595229
>>220595354
Still baffles me that people look at these numbers as if it means anything when Lucas told everyone on camera the real money is in the toys.

Disney only cares about if a movie's toys sell, that's why a movie like Frozen is valuable, kids buy the dolls.

Also why Phasma was in Last Jedi after dying off screen in Force Awakens. The only toy that was selling was the silver stormtrooper so disney wanted it in the next movie again.
>>
>>220597641
There's also the fact that Solo's budget balooned up to the stratosphere after they switched directors. It would probably not have been a hit regardless, but it would've lost far less money if that wasn't a factor.
>>
>>220595180
>How come only The Force Awakens is the most profitable?
It was the return of Star Wars since 2005. Of course it was going to make big bucks.

>I liked Rogue One and Solo more. I'm gonna see Mando on Friday tho.
Solo "flopped" because everyone disliked Last Jedi and didn't want to see another Star Wars so soon.
>>
>>220595180
>oh shit new star wars let's go
>oh never mind that was dogshit
>how's the next one- oh it's even worse
>fuck this gay shit
That's why.
>>
>>220595241
>hey, remember that character you liked?
>here's a prequel where we show him as a lame fag
>also a bunch of stupid origin shit you didn't care about like "why is his last name solo? why does the falcon have that wedge in the front? how come the kessel run is measured in distance instead of time?" and so on
>>
>>220597848
The premise of the movie is solid as is a lot of the casting choices, if someone could go through with an AI Generator and switch out the nepo hire han with a younger version of harrison ford or anyone that has a similar hairline or fix the hairline on the nepo hire the movie would be extremely watchable
>>
>>220595180
Force awakens was a sequel that people had been waiting for 32 years.
Then they realized that shit sucked and stopped going to see the rest.
>>
>>220595638
I see the vision behind the ewoks but still think it should have been wookies. Except nobody would be dumb enough to put their all important shield generator on a planet full of wookies without purging them all first. But that anon was wrong empire is also a good movie



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.