this movie suckswhy was it so hyped?
Popular kids book now adapted to moobie. That's literally it
come with me and you'll sneed
>>220988567im embarrassed for you
>>220988567Because of the wild whimsical world it is based in. Feels totally normal but you never know what could really happen.
>>220989634>nooo you have to love the candy commercial
>>220988567Haven't seen it, but I assume it's one of those movies you have watch as a kid to enjoy, like The Goonies.
>>220989814What candy is it a commercial for anon?
>>220988567it's from unc monoculture times, all of that shit sucks
>>220989845retardhttps://www.candystore.com/collections/wonka-candy
>>220989906Wonka wasn’t a candy util long after the movie came out, Faggot McNigger.
>>220988567It's really not. Have we really reached this level of contrarianism? Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is bad? Really? Is Back to the Future gonna be bad next? Bounce on a dildo you faggot. I bet you like the Johnny Depp version>>220989906>>220989814The chocolate bar was released after the movie was unexpectedly a huge hit, dumbass.
>>220989906retard
>>220989845>Quaker Oats created Wonka Bars. The 1971 movie was funded largely by Quaker Oats for the intention of promoting the soon-to-be-released Wonka Bars.[1] However, Quaker Oats chose not to market the bars,[1] instead selling the brand to their manufacturer Sunline.
>>220989940Can’t believe I’m catching strays for liking both versions. Now if you’re a fan of the Timothy Shalamay one, you’re not even human.
>>220988567It was released following a long wave of shitty film. The 70s were actually full of cheap garbage filmmaking and the few gems we got were at the latter end of it. None of these were really aimed (well) at children either. A quality live action family film hadn’t really been done yet unless you wanted two flavors of Dick Van Dyke.Also the actual visuals were dope. The intro is still the most delicious looking shit on the planet.>>220989752>this man would 100% have a clearly labeled forbidden door just to temp a kid into a forever maze they would need to be rescued from
>Dahl disowned the film and was "infuriated" by the plot deviations and considered the music to be "saccharine, sappy and sentimental".[16][11] He was also disappointed because the film "placed too much emphasis on Willy Wonka and not enough on Charlie" and because Wilder was cast as Wonka instead of Spike Milligan.[11][16] In 1996, Dahl's second wife, Felicity, commented on her husband's objections toward film adaptations of his works, saying, "They always want to change a book's storyline. What makes Hollywood think children want the endings changed for a film, when they accept it in a book?"[83]
