Which one of them made you feel lonelier?
>>2212350942049 is better in everyway
Doesn't matter when one is shitty CGI slop.
>>221235134I like 2049 better overall but I think Tears in the Rain is the better ending and my favorite movie ending really. Although 2049 ending is also top tier.
>>221235094The original Blade Runner was much more bleak, but then that's mostly owing to the fact its protagonist is an alcoholic rapist whereas K in the sequel is just a well-meaning incel
>>221235094I never was in love with BR, but the Villememe flick is a pos with no value
original is surely better2049 is kind of bad outside of the 'interlinked' scenes and GIANT NAKED BILLBOARD™
>>221235279Tears in rain is a great monologue but it's redundant. The real ending, the climax that 2049 lacks in every way, is Batty's meeting with God (Tyrell) which is suspiciously absent from 2049 despite it recycling every other theme and concept from the source material.As much as I enjoyed the Goose, I can't get over how pointless K was as a character. They made the movie with no original story or addition in mind so they just made Blade Runner: It Happened: Again and based on the extended media and marketing push I think they actually thought this was going to be a media franchise, and I can't see past that secondhand embarrassment.2049 would be gold if it didn't have "Blade Runner" slapped on it and was a work inspired by it, rather than an outright sequel. It's like trying to make Macbeth 2 and bringing the titular character back as a force ghost to speak to Malcolm.I say good because even still, it's not great. The issue with Wallace disappearing from the story and overemphasis on Deckard make it a solid 6/10. Lots of atmosphere, no real substance, and the quality of the cinematography is like whiplash throughout.
>>221236702You didn't even understand it if you thinknit's redundant. You're just over here huffing your own farts.
>>221236739K is just an amalgam of Deckard and Batty. His themes have nothing original to them, except the lore of how he obtained his memories. That's redundant.It might've been interesting, or at least more efficient, to have a compound protagonist IF the fucking film wasn't three hours long, and if Deckard himself wasn't in the goddamn movie.
