[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: history.jpg (92 KB, 980x496)
92 KB JPG
How come there are only a handful of movies about the early US and yet there are dozens of movies for every british king and queen?
>>
That's not even remotely true.
>>
we making kingo they adapting queeno
>>
File: _.png (190 KB, 512x422)
190 KB PNG
>>221802848
there's some weird bits alluding to the whole founding of the country not quite lining up with the popular depictions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haym_Salomon
>Salomon helped convert French loans into hard currency by selling bills of exchange on Morris' behalf, and also brokered large donations to the Patriot cause. This included a critical $20,000 loan in 1781 that enabled George Washington’s decisive Yorktown campaign, a turning point for American independence. From 1781 to 1784, Salomon helped provide over $650,000 ($15.1 million in 2025).[1][2] He was also an advocate for religious liberty by co-founding Philadelphia’s Mikveh Israel synagogue and challenging discriminatory laws.[3][4] Despite donating his entire fortune to the Continental Army and several Founding Fathers of the United States, Salomon was still in debt when he died of a heart attack in Philadelphia in 1785, due to the failure of government officials and private lenders to repay the debt they owed him.[5]

and the way people like him don't get brought to the forefront, in fact seem to get actively, almost hatefully "debunked" by jews themselves, makes it exponentially weirder

why wouldn't they be saying they were here since the beginning and in fact one was directly responsible, seemingly, for the country winning the revolutionary war? right fucking NOW?
>>
Bitches love royalty
>>
>>221802912
>da joos
>>
>>221802848
>>221802912
you gotta do it later if the thread succeeds
>>
>>221802991
you made me think of this post, thanks
>>221799978
>>How it feels to browse /tv/ at IQ 90 and over
>>
File: ClipboardImage.jpg (61 KB, 937x262)
61 KB JPG
>>221802995
>>
>>221802912
I saw some thing where some jewish atheist professor was seething about how no one knew who israel bissle was. a guy who rode all the way to like deleware on patriots day warning the militias
>>221802848
Hollywood loves their golems and hates America
>>
>>221803020
>I saw some thing where some jewish atheist professor was seething about how no one knew who israel bissle was.

>In August 1781, the Continental Army trapped Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis in the Virginia coastal town of Yorktown. George Washington and the main army, and Count de Rochambeau with his French army, decided to march from the Hudson Highlands to Yorktown and deliver the final blow. However, Washington's war chest was completely empty, as was that of Congress. Without food, uniforms and supplies, Washington's troops were close to mutiny.[2]
>Washington determined that he needed at least $20,000 to finance the campaign. When Morris told him there were no funds and no credit available, Washington said: "Send for Haym Salomon". Salomon raised $20,000, through the sale of bills of exchange. With that contribution, Washington conducted the Yorktown campaign, which proved to be the final battle of the Revolution.[10]

so he was directly responsible for enabling the final battle of the war
makes it even stranger they don't even talk about him and deny he could even do this
>>
>America was founded on the principle of tax evasion
Pretty based ngl.
>>
Slightly awkward to be talking about fighting for freedom while you keep slaves
>>
>>221803053
they don't talk about the black guy shot at the boston massacre. I think there was some black at lexington, concord or beacon hill. no one knows who henry knox was. people generally don't learn or talk about Benedict Arnold before he turned traitor. even fucking hamilton skips over cato when doing the herculese mulligan shit and Cato was actually black
>>
>>221803071
Thomas Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration of Independence had a whole paragraph where he seethed about slavery and blamed king george and called him a muslim.
Adams was anti slavery, so was Laurens.
Go read Stonewall Jackson's wikipage, it's fucking amazing
>illegally taught a slave to read as a kid in exchange for pieces of wood to make tourches
>was a fucking priest exclusively to blacks where he preached about how good slavery was
>said he would viciously beat the shit out of slaves so he wouldn't have to beat them a second time
>multiple slaves asked him to buy them
>after he died one of his slaves fucking stayed with his wife until she died
the fact he taught black kids how to read so they could read the bible and see that slavery was based is the funniest fucking thing
>>
>>221803249
Slavery was only made illegal because (((someone))) realised slaves don't pay taxes and can't take out loans.
>>
>>221803331
don't look up what happened in bongland
>bonglish government took out a massive loan from (((the banks))) with more than 10 times the GDP to (((compensate))) (((slave owners))) for their property and bongs only finished paying off the debt in 2015
>>
>>221803331
>Slavery was only made illegal because (((someone))) realised slaves don't pay taxes and can't take out loans.
it was made illegal to shut down the jewish slave industry and all the plantations involved
>>
>>221802848
If you look into the reasons why America wanted to be independent, it doesn't really stand the test of time. 1st reason was they wanted to keep their slaves, the British were starting to free slaves and abolish the whole thing (one of the things that really worked for the British army was that if you signed up you became a free man and under Britain's protection). 2nd reason was that rich American land owners didn't want to pay tax to the British for building up an entirely new country and protection from Frenchmen, blow the common American folk who needed this. 3rd was that the same American land owners wanted to fuck over the natives, while the Brits wanted to work with the decent ones.

Not a great look.

Then there is the "war" itself most of it was minor skirmishes with thieving American terrorists (as the would be classed today) being gaslit by the French and the rich land owners trying to exploit the situation so they didn't have to pay tax. The British were usually going easy on the Americans and trying to defend positions full of innocent women and children that the bloodthirsty Yankee-doodle-dandies wanted to massacre for their rich overlords.

In the end rather than America win anything the Brits simply washed their hands with the whole thing and pulled out leaving the idiots to their fate. And do you know what happened next? Surprise surprise, the stupid Yanks went and had ANOTHER war. This time with themselves. Was this civil war about getting rid of a cruel ruling elite as European civil wars are? Certainly that would have done the Americans a lot of good considering the rich landowners had basically fucked them over in order not to pay as much tax. Nah, it was about weather they could use slaves again, something Britain and most of Europe had stopped or were in the process of abolishing. It would be like America going to war over oil, when the rest of the world is well into the process of transferring to renewable power... Oh wait..
>>
>>221803249
that's some old timey masterful trolling
>>
>>221803489
Don't forget that Washington and his conspirators wanted to genocide the First Peoples, while the British wanted to keep them as allies.
>>
>>221803489
tl;dr
fuck tea
>>
>>221803489
It really is a matter of appearances, since unfortunately, we did not follow through on most of those promises of freedom. I'm sure a more devious American could play with that angle and demonize us for that but that would be too insidious even for them.
>>
>>221803489
It was always just the rich of the time sending the poor to their deaths so they could keep another buck. America has never been anything but a majority serf nation that exist to prop up their overlords.
>>
>>221803504
Well pragmatically it makes sense. Like imagine if we'd killed every nigger in Africa, we wouldn't have nearly as many problems.
>>
File: 1775377239362883.gif (1.27 MB, 413x192)
1.27 MB GIF
>>221803504
>first peoples
faggot
>>221803489
>>221803504
>>221803551
>>221803520
A bunch of New Englanders died taking some island from the frogs in one of the wars in like 1750 before the french indian war. Then the french indian war happened and the bongistanis wanted us to send out tax money off to bongistan for the first time ever with no representation. The people in boston and new england were super pissed especially due to the island thing which lead them to protest which lead to the boston massacre, the end of the Massachusetts legislature, home rule and the installation of a governor general who then seized powder from the colonists to prevent a rebellion which lead to the bostonians stealing canons to do terrorism which lead to lexington and concord. the bongs then made matters worse by invading nyc and seizing powder in virginia
>>
why dont you antisemites want to talk about how the ir*sh and their role is the war of independence they tried the same thing in Australia and failed.
Oh yeah thats because you are lying micks
You managed to trick the americans into forgetting their protestant English origins.
>>
>>221803489
the civil was wasn't until 80 years after the revolution and the bongistanis were the one who shipped the slaves to the US, retard
>>
>>221803570
>yuroserfs calling Americans serfs
you can't own guns or say mean things on facebook
>>221803575
kek
>>
>>221803627
no thatd be the spanish you cucktholic pos
>>
>>221803642
it was the bongithirdies. go read Jefferson's original draft of the declaration of independence. he writes a paragraph calling the bongolian king a muslim and blames him for slavery, retard
>>
>>221802912
>died penniless because he failed to collect a debt
Clearly they hate him because he sets a bad example.
>>
>>221803670
the biggest importers of slaves was the spanish and portugese. They were flooding america before the Brits even set up the 13 colonies.
Then guess where the slaves were coming from after the Brits set up the colonies. The Spanish Empire to the south
>>
>>221803676
l e l
>>
>>221803696
seethe cope dilate rope
>>
>>221803489
>2nd reason was that rich American land owners didn't want to pay tax to the British for building up an entirely new country and protection from Frenchmen
Huh?

Their issue wasn't being taxed in itself but that they were being taxed without fair representation in parliament.

>Since 1660, the English Parliament had exercised control over colonial trade and imposed taxes on imports and exports.[4] By the 1760s, the Americans were being deprived of a historic right.[5] The English Bill of Rights 1689 had forbidden the imposition of taxes without the consent of Parliament. Since the colonists had no representation in Parliament, the taxes violated the guaranteed Rights of Englishmen. Parliament initially contended that the colonists had virtual representation, but the idea "found little support on either side of the Atlantic".[6]

Also it *does* stand the test of time as prominent members of the British government sided with the Americans.

Edmund Burke:
>First, the people of the colonies are descendants of Englishmen. England, Sir, is a nation, which still I hope respects, and formerly adored, her freedom. The colonists emigrated from you when this part of your character was most predominant; and they took this bias and direction the moment they parted from your hands. They are therefore not only devoted to liberty, but to liberty according to English ideas, and on English principles.

William Pitt the Elder:
>I rejoice that America has resisted. Three million of people so dead to all feelings of liberty, as voluntarily to submit to be slaves, would have been fit instruments to make slaves of the rest. I come not here armed at all points, with law cases and acts of parliament, with the statute book doubled down in dog’s-ears, to defend the cause of liberty: if I had… I would have have shown that even under former arbitrary reigns, parliaments were ashamed of taxing a people without their consent, and allowed them representatives
>>
>>221803670
you are certifiably retarded and totally wrong.
The Spanish created modern slavery, the inherited it from the Moors.
The "one drop" rule comes from the Moors via the Spanish.
The Spanish were the "muslims" and continued the practice of Kaffirs.

Brits didn't want anything to do with it at first. They were sold slaves by the Spanish.
>>
>>221802912
The kikes created America then?
Damn, now all those Europoors and Iranians shitting on it start making sense...
>>
>>221803720
stop revisioning history you filthy lying mick
>>
>>221803737
better get a steel cable, no way a rope will hold your ponderous immensity
>>
>>221803730
idk if you can say "created" or not, technically, but they apparently were here already and fundamental to the existence of the country, seemingly
>>
>>221803696
>no the moortugese and asspanish were totally the ones shipping slaves to jamestown, virginia, the carolinas and georgia
>>
>>221803747
yeah you are retarded. Theres a reason the British were late to adopt "slavery" and the first to abolish it. It doesn't fit protestantism.
Catholics are completely fine with it and that's why most slavers were Catholics. Probably because Catholicism is already a system of slavery
>>
>>221803729
>no it was the moortguese and asspanish who shipped slaves to jamestown
fucking retard
>>
>>221803730
jews created yurop
hell yurop still to this day has a jewish dictator
>>
>>221803749
Yeah, but here being "fundamental" equals basically being the creators.
You're basically saying that America is no different to other "social experiments" like Communism.
>>
>>221803810
Don't Americans themselves call it the American Experiment though?
>>
>>221803020
>hates America
Nigger, they're basically saying that the Joos CREATED America in the first place >>221802912
>>
>>221802848
If Americans were knowledgeable about the early US, they would start asking too many questions and maybe even do some dangerous thinking.
>>
>>221803810
>The Edict of Expulsion is a royal decree expelling all Jews from the Kingdom of England that was issued by Edward I on 18 July 1290; it was the first time a European state is known to have permanently banned their presence.
>The expulsion edict remained in force during the rest of the Middle Ages, but it was overturned in 1656

>The Mayflower landed at Cape Cod, Massachusetts on November 21, 1620
>(((fleeing religious persecution in England)))

you can see them at least that far back, though apparently there was also an expulsion or something happening in Spain at the time of Columbus

>>221803841
>they're basically saying that
and yet when you start looking around, jews go out of their way to try and debunk that he even had the ability or means to do any of that, which wikipedia is still saying is fact
>>
>>221803775
and who was supplying the slaves. Retard
>>
>>221803793
>jews created yurop
Proof?
>>
>>221803880
mick.
>>
>>221803916
robb.
>>
antisemites are such fucking stupid people their ideas are medieval. Like belief in witches.
>>
>>221803880
>>(((fleeing religious persecution in England)))
Because Christians have never persecuted other Christians before?
>>
>>221803934
hm, this would make sense if jews didn't exist
>>
>>221803841
you gay dickless third world tranny. the jews hate America because we don't live as subhuman slaves to a monarch like yurothirdies do
>>221803810
>>221803831
America is literally called "the great experiment" or "the American experiment"
>>
>>221803938
sure they have since it's abrahamism, jews hide all the time and definitely never go cryptojewish
>>
>>221803880
>The Mayflower landed at Cape Cod, Massachusetts on November 21, 1620
>(((fleeing religious persecution in England)))
That ship brought Protestants, not Jews.
Where the fuck you are talking about?
>>
>>221803896
the bongistani king, retard
>>221803906
the rothschilds
>>
>>221803951
>That ship brought abrahamists, not abrahamists.
?
>>
>>221803880
why do you keep ignoring the ir*sh's motivation in independence
>>
>>221802848
Because there ain't much to it
The US is a young country with not a lot of history or culture
>>
>>221803934
Witches literally exist though, retard.
>>
>>221803962
heh, faith n beggorah, tis like a second famine
>>
>>221803945
exactly antisemite, antisemitism is a medieval belief and because jews exist it validates the delusion in your mind.
Witches dont exist but people thought they did
>>
>>221803982
>Witches dont exist but people thought they did
>so your antisemitism is as foolish as believing jews exist, when they clearly don't, just like witches
you're not good at this "metaphor" thing, are you
>>
>>221803959
no it was the Spanish king
>>
>>221803947
>the jews hate America because we don't live as subhuman slaves to a monarch like yurothirdies do
>America is literally called "the great experiment" or "the American experiment"
So you are saying that kikes hate America... While also saying that America is indeed an experiment by said kikes? What the fuck are you trying to state here?
Plus, ironic you call me a "Muh tranny" when we could say that ALL of America is no different of a "Jewish Experiment" than Trannyism, GEEEEEGGGGGGGG
>>
>>221803999
you're an idiot. If you can accept medieval beliefs on witches are false you can accept medieval views on jews to be false also.
Jews are a real people this is why your mental illness is reinforced.
I suppose when you have a headache you want to drill a hole in your head because thats medieval too
>>
>>221804008
who's GREEEEEGGGGGGGG?
>>
>>221803959
>Rothchilds
They only began doing their shit around the late 1700s, Europe already existed by then.
Next.
>>
antisemites are very stupid people. Looking forward to ai robots wiping them out terminator style
>>
>>221803970
And they where chased by the Puritans that according to this thread, where actually Crypto Jews.
If so, where the Wtiches the good ones here?
>>
>>221804025
>If you can accept medieval beliefs on witches are false you can accept medieval views on jews to be false also, since witches don't exist, which is what made the belief retarded.
?
>I suppose when you have a headache you want to drill a hole in your head because thats medieval too
why would I want to do that, that's as retarded as believing witches exist and have real powers and aren't just larping roasties
>>
File: 1781187673988434.jpg (26 KB, 399x501)
26 KB JPG
>>221803963
the US is the only nation with culture. yurop has no important history and zero culture
>>221804000
bongolian king
>>221804008
germans invented trannies. it's a yuropean invention. one of the few things germans invented along with losing a world war, scat porn and losing two world wars. I never claimed jews created the US, retardo
>>
>>221804039
the borgias were also jews
>>
>>221804025
>because thats medieval too
also Elon the science guy from Ghostbusters did this, and he was a jew, so, how does that fit into this abortion of a metaphor
>>
>>221804008
It's not a Jewish experiment but an experiment by Enlightenment philosophy to found a nation on principles and values.
I don't think Americans realize how much their political discourse is governed by these implicit beliefs. Just look at how 'freedom of speech' isn't really a thing anywhere else or even the right to bear arms.

Also Jews were barely involved in the wider European Enlightenment. They were influenced by it but didn't do much in return outside maybe Spinoza.
>>
>>221804097
because unlike witches which any rational person would not acct jews are real people.
So the mythological of medieval antisemitism has a target that exists.

Anyway it is actually fact that women who identify as witches face persecution by christians or even the ones that dont, even in countries that are 1st world people are still falsely accused of witchcraft
>>
>>221804121
>Anyway it is actually fact that women who identify as witches get treated like witches
fascinating, why do you think that would be, I wonder
>>
how many of you itt are micks or browns
>>
>>221804134
not me
>>
>>221804133
Witches arent real you fucking moron
>>
>>221804149
so why are they identifying as them? are they pretending?
>>
>>221804121
>because unlike witches which any rational person would not acct jews are real people.
Meanwhile
>Harry Potter
>the Mayfair Witches
>Little Witch Academia
>The Blair Witch Project
>The Craft
Oh wait let me guess, Rowling is irrational right? Tranny lover.
>>
>>221804081
Based Retard.
>>
what do you think would happen if you started identifying as a child molester, would people treat you like one? would they be right to?
>>
BURN THE WITCH!
>>
>>221804156
Yea moron. They are larping. Doesn't mean they exist. Once they exist stupid medievalist thinking idiots like you have a target for your superstitious beliefs, hence the comparison to jews.
You are supporting the fact antisemites are pea brains
>>
>>221804134
im half anglo and half italian and i dont know if that makes me white or what
>>
>>221804166
thats called fiction you fucking idiot
>>
>>221804182
>Yea moron. They are larping. Doesn't mean they exist. Once they exist stupid medievalist thinking idiots like you have a target for your superstitious beliefs
so, believing witches exist is stupid, because they don't, just like jews?
>>
>>221804091
Ok that one is new, never hear of that claim though.
>>
>>221804191
well at least you aren't ir*sh. Italian is more respectable
>>
>>221804097
>>221804121
also you never spoke to how a jewish character that's a science guy trepanating makes trepanation a medieval belief
>>
>>221804204
the medieval beliefs ascribed to witches are wrong just like the medieval beliefs ascribed to jews are wrong
>>
>>221804203
>fiction isn't a mirror to reality
>>
>>221804112
>It's not a Jewish experiment but an experiment by Enlightenment philosophy
Yeah, which the Jews backed and supported.
Not to mention that the whole Enlightenment was a Psyop too.
>>
>>221804229
no there is no hogwarts
>>
File: 1783903194179704.jpg (78 KB, 1076x986)
78 KB JPG
>>221804227
>the medieval beliefs ascribed to witches are wrong just like the medieval beliefs ascribed to jews are wrong, because witches don't exist, so, naturally....
>>
>>221802912
>actively, almost hatefully "debunked" by jews themselves
There are like ten bullets points under "commemoration" in the very article you linked. Jews in NYC and Philly have named places after this guy. Use your brain for two fucking seconds.
>>
>>221804241
>there aren't hogwarts-like places
>>
>>221804112
>Just look at how 'freedom of speech' isn't really a thing anywhere else or even the right to bear arms.
that's because Americans are humans blessed by the Christian God. yurothirdies no so much
>>221804134
only you
>>221804170
you are a retard
>>
>>221804175
There were a grand total of zero witch burnings in the US. That was strictly a Euro thing. Maybe even specifically English.
We hang our witches stateside.
>>
>>221804246
>There are like ten bullets points under "commemoration" in the very article you linked.
you have to look other places, it was brought up as "debunkment" of that wiki before, I didn't bother bookmarking them apparently and a,m having way too much fun with this other guy atm
>>
>>221804214
A rare win for us Meds, I'm just gonna enjoy it
>>
>>221804237
>Yeah, which the Jews backed and supported.
Did they? In large numbers? I don't think so. Even at this time, most Jewish communities were very insular and only just waking up themselves because European ideals finally penetrated their culture.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskalah
>>
>>221804263
we didn't tie bitches to a rock and throw em in a lake to figure out if she was a witch or not?
>>
>>221804313
To be fair, there's wasn't much options back then.
>>
>>221802848
Because the early US didn't really have much in the way of exciting battles to make movies of outside of the Revolution itself (which gets plenty of movies) and didn't have the kind of constant feudal backstabbing that makes it easy to make historical dramas about Olde England. Part of the reason America was so successful was that it's unique circumstances simply allowed it to not be distracted by constant unnecessary wars with its neighbors, the omnipresent conflict of interests between Peasant vs Burgher vs Noble, Sectarian Religious violence, and famine.
>>
>>221804313
Its the only way to shut a broad up, amirite?
>>
>>221804313
the guys who wrote that bit did a scathing and brutal piss take of men who wanted to be women in the very next film btw
>>
As we see here, Britains contribution to the slave trade outweighs America's by several orders of magnitude, and before you get cute, all the slaves imported to the 13 colonies under British rule are tallied under the US instead of Britain here.
>>
>Thread is about Independence films
>It devolves into whether if the Kikes helped or even are the responsible for the whole excistance of the US, if the Puritans where actually Kikes, whether if Whitches are actually real and the Jewish Enlightenment
Never change /tv/
>>
>>221804472
blue /b/ best /b/
>>
File: bros_glad.png (1.43 MB, 1080x1080)
1.43 MB PNG
>>221803489
Your post is lacking.

Slavery is a retard point made of pedantic modern beliefs.
If you were a negro you would want to be a slave in those times too.
It was like 4 hours of work in the field and you got taken care of.
If you were a house slave you had it super easy and were probably getting white peen on the reg.
Ending slavery ruined the lives of tons of negros.
You literally sentenced them to death on the streets.

>2nd reason was that rich American land owners didn't want to pay tax to the British
No one wants to pay taxes. Ever. There is a whole economic point built on tariffs vs income vs processing.

>Brits simply washed their hands with the whole thing and pulled out leaving the idiots to their fate. And do you know what happened next? Surprise surprise, the stupid Yanks went and had ANOTHER war. This time with themselves.
Literally wrong. I suppose they skip over 1812 as well as 1776 don't they.

Ultimately you're retarded, but not wrong.

America's independence is a combination of being a safe haven for piracy (actual), a safe haven for importing fine french pussy and wine, and a safe haven for money.
None of these things were palatable to English royalty because all of these things were defacto illegal under the crown.

I feel bad for a lot of British people during that era because they missed out on the freshest french whores and had to settle for stratford-upon-avon whores. Meanwhile American men couldn't get enough of that female escargot.
>>
i thank God every day i am not an antisemite
>>
>>221804557
he thanks you for not being one as well, since he is one
>>
>>221804446
>by several orders of magnitude
By one (1) order of magnitude, actually.
>>
>>221803575
Purging India would have been better. Africans are useful as dildos if nothing else.
>>
>>221804568
how hes Jewish, his name is Yahweh or El
>>
>>221804650
ok well let's see the first result for "Yahweh"
>Yahweh is the name of the God of the Israelites, represented by the tetragrammaton YHWH, and is significant in ancient Israelite history as the national god of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah.
hmm
>>
>>221804698
only an antisemite would think Israelis are jewish, chud
>>
>>221804373
was that bit not from king of the hill?
idk where I remember it from
>>
>>221804722
thanks for that retarded tryhard counter, me samefagging

>>221804723
>>
>>221804568
>>221804698
What
>>
>>221803696
>the biggest importers of slaves was the spanish and portugese
The Portuguese? yes, but not the Spanish. They already had natives for that, and even in the case they imported black slaves they did it to put them to work in the haciendas and other extreme works that natives couldn't handle. Not like Anglos or the Dutch, who imported blacks to do the most basic menial tasks, like preparing food or cleaning their assholes.
>>
>>221804747
chickenbutt
>>
>>221804753
The Anglos, Dutch, Portuguese and French also had a lot of colonies that operated on the principle it was easier to kill the slaves through exposure, malnutrition, and overwork and then buy new ones rather that put forth any effort to keep them alive. Hence why they racked up such huge numbers of imported slaves. They were literally using them as a disposable single-use resource.
>>
>>221804753
the Spanish literally switched to niggers because they wanted to stop forcing natives to work. Native slavery was replaced by nigger slavery
>>
>>221804753
>>221804899
spanish are all cucks and try to rewrite history to say they arent the biggest slavers in history imagine that.
>>
its so fucking weird how antisemites are all cucks. There needs to be a study to confirm the link between porn addiction and other degenerate behaviour and antisemitism.
>>
File: 1776222406557892.png (505 KB, 535x497)
505 KB PNG
>>221802848
>The oceans are now battle toads
>>
>>221804952
pity (You) for the clear desperation
>>
File: 22057.jpg (361 KB, 1200x1200)
361 KB JPG
>>221804934
lol, lmao
>>
>>221804934
No one said they weren't, they just used the natives as their primary source of slaves rather than imported Africans. The Caribbean Islands that the other powers ran had their native populations entirely killed by disease, which of course necessitated finding a new labor source, and the 13 Colonies were settled by an eclectic mix of homesteaders and wannabe Yeomen types who were actually trying to settle rather than just run a business to funnel wealth back across the Atlantic, and were often in climates where slavery or plantation agriculture would have been useless anyhow. The Spanish meanwhile laid claim to the vast urbanized societies of Meso-America, and thus could simply put their vast pre-existing populations in chains.
>>
>>221805033
its objective fact the S&P were the biggest slavers in history they transported THE MOST slaves. And the reason they are paired is because they had the same monarchy
>>
>>221805033
And even the blackest spanish caribbean island (Cuba) is still whiter than your average non-spanish island, like Jamaica or the Bahamas.
>>
>>221805088
lol the spainiards and portugese mixed with everything
The french colonies like hati were simply genocided
>>
>>221802848
i think its bullshit the us or anyone else doesnt make a movie criticizing the rebellion
the sons of liberty was a terrorist organization that used guerilla tactics. they were inspired by the parisian commune and the leaders were all members of a secret society. some even denied the christian god and were deists. the french revolution gets criticized all the time but not so for the american revolution
>>
>>221805033
>>221805088
>>221805116
Anglos were the only colonial power to maintain almost complete racial "purity" into the 20th century.
What undid this was foolishly allowing micks and other catholics into Anglo countries. Because they immediately supporting mass third world immigration
>>
>>221805140
supported*
>>
Nobody ever talks about Spain funding the Americans or chasing the English out of the gulf of Mexico and Caribbean.
>>
>>221805173
or the disproportionate amount of irish in the rebel side
Americans got screwed over
>>
>>221805127
>denied the christian god
Based, j*sus is boiling in piss and shit, like all fake messiahs
>>
>>221805010
portugal was ruled by Spain when this was happening lol. like i said. Spanish try to cover up and rewrite their part im history
>>
File: 1782314649480558.png (98 KB, 253x254)
98 KB PNG
>>221805195
like Abraham and Moses, right
>>
>>221802848
republican politics = boring and uninspiring
monarchical politics = exciting and aspiring
>>
>>221805342
you can only aspire to be an unrelated monarch by killing the existing monarch which in itself is inherently antimonarchist
>>
>>221805314
No nothing like
>>
File: 1782314919442672.png (104 KB, 248x253)
104 KB PNG
>>221805484
we're judging other abrahamic messianic figures too
right?
>>
>>221805549
jesus isnt an abrahamic figure. Hes like fan fiction added to the og bible
>>
>>221803982
> antisemitism is a medieval belief
Yet Voltaire didn’t like the Middle Ages or jews, curious…..
>>
>>221804072
What if the AI turns antisemitic?
>>
>>221805654
its all owned by jews dont worry
>>
File: vbB3e-513444294.jpg (18 KB, 400x216)
18 KB JPG
>>221805654
then they invoke the directive
>>
File: ClipboardImage.jpg (19 KB, 248x247)
19 KB JPG
>>221805594
the og bible where jews kill a ton of egyptian children and blame it on god, right
>>
>>221804337
> outside of the Revolution itself (which gets plenty of movies)
No it fucking doesn’t, films set in and around the French Revolution outnumber the American revolution films by 20 to one
>>
File: 1755716366522645.jpg (38 KB, 610x415)
38 KB JPG
>>221805195
>jews arrogance lead them to kill God
yikes
>>
File: 1768817389093047.mp4 (3.25 MB, 720x1280)
3.25 MB
3.25 MB MP4
>>221802848
It's because British Mafia control Hollywood and any movies about American revolution are not allowed
>>
>>221802848
Movies about overthrowing the government are problematic, let's say.
>>
>>221802848
Because monarchy is cool and the foundation of the US is recent and pretty boring, then there's all the fighting done by the French and the Spanish so it can't really focus on the American perspective.
>>
>>221802912
>The American revolution was Jewish
What a shock.
>>
File: 6546654635465.jpg (106 KB, 714x960)
106 KB JPG
>>221802848
>How come there are only a handful of movies about the early US and yet there are dozens of movies for every british king and queen?

American history is pretty boring, it doesn't get interesting until the Civil War and then after that, nothing happens until WWII.
>>
>>221802848
>there are dozens of movies for every british king and queen?
Pure bullshit. Almost every movie involving brittish royalty is about the same 5 or 6 at most. There are dozen and dozens of others that nobody remembers.
Henry VIII is probably the subject of over half of these movies.
>>
>>221802848
>yet there are dozens of movies for every british king and queen?
lol, lmao
>>
>>221803249
Kek that’s hilarious
>>221803489
> 2nd reason was that rich American land owners didn't want to pay tax to the British for building up an entirely new country and protection from Frenchmen, blow the common American folk who needed this
What about the whole taxation with representation stuff?
>>
American history is simply not as interesting.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.