[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


will we ever reach 4k gaming?
>>
remind me again why graphics need to be pushed past ps4 or even ps3 levels (without the piss filter)
>>
Low res looks better and plays better. There's no reason to use high res yet.
>>
>>681494142
I will soon celeberate 10 years of ownership of my first 4k screen but /v/ niggas will still say it's too early for 4k
>>
>>681496163
Not our fault you want to ruin videogames by diverting performance from visuals and gameplay to more pixels. Ai upscale looks nice enough anyway.
>>
File: 1698664076353806.png (173 KB, 800x387)
173 KB
173 KB PNG
>>681496465
>Ai upscale looks nice enough
>>
>>681494142
4k? Maybe next gen we'll finally reach the coveted 1080p/60fps standard across all games produced
>>
>>681494142
480p is pure soul the human eye cannot percieve more than 240p 15 fps per eye anyway



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.