Why does Valve get shit for "not maintaining" their games when most publishers out there offer, at best, a year of patches after a game's release?
If you're not going to maintain your games it should be illegal to continue to sell them. You shouldn't be allowed to buy Fallout 3 on Steam unless it works out of the box.
Other devs forget about their games after 5 minutes
>>683683480Agreed, but you just know those slimy rats like Zenimax execs have a loose definition of "works"
Because they consistently fish for whalesIf you want to peddle faggot pixels you should have the decency to do more than milk the workshoppers
>>683683421Because it's expected from devs to not shit up their game before leaving.
>>683683421because their games kept playerbases while other devs just made a new one and expected everyone to move over and I guess other games fans didn't stick around for that long
Because other devs at least make new games too
