[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1688497710869.png (96 KB, 640x104)
96 KB
96 KB PNG
Should Devs listen to the Fans?
or
Should Fans listen to the Devs?

Who really controls the game?
>>
devs should never listen to the fanatics
>>
>>683777057
Inept devs should listen to fans(but they never do)
Competent devs should only listen sometimes
>>
Devs should listen to me, and only me.
>>
>>683777057
>Should Devs listen to the Fans?
Sometimes, but if the games are already bad then the fans have shit taste by definition, so probably not.
>Should Fans listen to Devs?
Abso-fucking-lutely not. All they'll be listening to is PR copium.
>Who really controls the game?
Consultants and shareholders unfortunately.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.