[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2449.jpg (25 KB, 220x317)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
ITT: Mediocre, Okay or even bad series that have one entry that’s a masterpiece
>>
>>683777151
You're starting you're OP by implying that SH2 is that much better than 1 and 3?
>>
File: _-Devil-May-Cry-PS2-_.jpg (16 KB, 226x320)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
>>
File: Dino_Crisis_2.jpg (23 KB, 316x316)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>
>>683777151
Silent Hill 1 is better by a wide margin.
>>
>>683778529
Good morning saaaar
>>
File: Eileen shaving.webm (3.88 MB, 1920x1080)
3.88 MB
3.88 MB WEBM
Eileen shaving
>>
File: 1704298808750921.jpg (626 KB, 640x960)
626 KB
626 KB JPG
>>
Metal Gear Solid, unironically
>>
File: nurse726.jpg (376 KB, 2067x2160)
376 KB
376 KB JPG
>>683777151
The remake will be even better
>>
>>683777151
1 and 3 are better
>>683779775
shit series for edgy kids
>>683779836
1 is better
>>683780206
1 is better
>>683780228
fuck off, first one is the best tho
>>
File: 1478457779670.png (1.25 MB, 1416x1200)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB PNG
>>683779856
This

SH1 is actually good, SH2 is dogshit
>>
File: file.jpg (3.95 MB, 5406x9085)
3.95 MB
3.95 MB JPG
Here are a list of mastsrpieces
>>
>>683780751
lmao
>>
>Itt people hating on SH2 because it's popular and widely regarded as one of the best PlayStation 2 games made. So very tiresome and played out.
>>
>>683778529
>>683779856
>>683780431
1, 2 and 3 are mechanically the same however, 1 and 3s story is just cult shenanigans that plays out like a pulp comic while’s 2 is a psychological thriller that delves into the traumas of ordinary people who are broken and were called to silent hill to resolve their issues or be destroyed. The enemies in 1 and 3 by the devs own admission only have some symbolic meaning and some have no meaning at all and only exists just cause. Every enemy in 2 has a connection to James subconscious. 2 has a gut wrenching heart breaking final twist that is still talked about to this day while 1 and 3 again doesn’t rise above the level of a typical pulp comic. Yes 1 and 3 have deeper meanings dealing with birth motherhood and rebirth but 2s subconscious trauma drama is superior in every way. What’s sad is 3 was originally meant to be like 2 in that it dealt with ordinary people who were broken being called to silent hill but fan request for storyline resolvement and corporate meddling forced them to make a direct sequel. The devs even mentioned that 3s storyline was originally going to be even darker than 2s. I’m not saying 1 and 3 are bad, they’re fine in their own right and even fun but 2 is just leagues beyond it’s not even funny and then the rest of the series is completely inconsequential. When you have these 3 games whose mechanics, music and atmosphere are more or less the same only the story really sets any apart and 2s is the obvious winner.
>>
>>683777151
I only played 1 but it was really good.
>>
>>683777151
any game can be a masterpiece if you believe so.
>>
>>
>>683783786
You're not allowed to actually think your opinion through, you must be a contrarian like the rest of /v/
>>
File: faggot.png (98 KB, 258x233)
98 KB
98 KB PNG
>>683780751
>bloodborne
>>
>>683787361
Let me guess.
You're a glorious PC master race who can't afford a PS and now you're saying it's not even a good game because you didn't play it.
>>
>>683777151
1 was more groundbreaking



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.