>Complaining that a 30 year old game is getting a modern remake because it had a remake on the 3DS over 15 years ago >Complaining that it’s 64 when Adventure, Assault, Command, and Zero were all met with “Why isn’t it just 64”>Complaining that they went with realistic designs to mimic the puppets we’ve had for 30 yearsFuck all of you, you don’t deserve this game
>>738362063>you don’t deserve this gameCorrect, we deserve so much better.
>>738362063Good, because I don't fucking want it
So sick of this stupid reverse psychology bullshit marketing tactic. Corposhills need to stop feeling so entitled to my money.
I cannot complain about anything here, because Adventure sucked, Assault was mediocre, Zero was a gem that faded into obscurity, and now we finally get a pristine modern reimagining of 64.It's telling that those complaining about this being the 3 rendition of this game do not even own a Wii U and Zero.
I'm fucking hyped.
Only fags are complaining, I love it.
>>738362063>you don’t deserve this gameYou don't deserve my money, so we're even.
Yeah, I don't want it you faggot, you can keep it.
>>738362208>>738362314>>738362341bots
>>738362409eric
>>738362208>Assault was mediocre, Zero was a gemIt's a school night, Patch. Go to bed.
>>738362407Damn.
zero was just 64 what the fuck are you talking aboutkill yourself
>>738362063>muh puppetsThis is the most astroturfed shit.
>>738362196>makes me never wanna touch the gamesthat's a pretty bad marketing tactic
>>738362063>>Complaining that it’s 64 when Adventure, Assault, Command, and Zero were all met with “Why isn’t it just 64”We want an ITERATIVE sequel that BUILDS upon the foundations of 64, not the same fucking game reheated and microwaved for us again, stupid fuckhead.No, Assault, Command and Zero are all gimmicky Tanabe genre-altering trash and also not at all what we asked for.
>>738362063>$50 for a literal game designed by A Man that Nintendo Hired
>>738362063Why couldn't they just make a new game like 64 that is not a literal remake. Thats why those others failed, people want StarFox 64 2.
64 again is so boring, and the character designs are hideous. The environments look good and the multiplayer sounds fun, but I don’t foresee myself getting this. And unless OoT is an ALBW style “remake”, that shit can fuck off too
>>738362448Assault is very mediocre, I'm sorry you have bad taste and were filtered by fucking GYRO AIM, a feature that is now standard.
>>738362517Zero pulled timey whimey in the first level and pivoted into a new game. It was what inspired Nomura to make FF7 Remake.
>>738362531In what way? I think its retraded that the game seems to be adding very little to the core experience, and even i recognize the fact that they now look closer to the puppets.(i wish they were closer)
>>738362572The amount of precision you get in Zero out classes the others in orders of magnitude. You do not in fact what iteration, you're just retarded is all.
>>738362517>Forced gamepad segments>All the non-arwing/landmaster missions >You go to Corneria Yeah I guess it was Star Fox 64 if you’ve never played Star Fox 64
>A RETVRN TO FORM
the fact that people call zero a remake still is astounding
>>738362674
Eric and the Snoy tranny pedophiles have been working over time since this was announced lmao. It’s $50, has multiple offline modes and an online mode. Please keep crying, it’s not going to make Saros’s sales any better
>>738362674Because Star Fox 64 is a 30 year old game and updating it while acting as a reboot allows for a new generation to experience it and shows Nintendo has an engine to to build off of for future entries.
>>738362828I wish they just recreated the puppets and did all live action cutscenes and the in game portraits were too.
>>738362819The vehicle missions were lifted wholesale from Starfox 2, another gem.
>>738362848>we wanted starfox 64 2>we got starfox 64 -1
>>738362063>1:1 remake of an N64 game everyone has played with NINTENDOOOOOOO HIRE THIS MAN UE5 slop graphics >Tendies somehow defend it Lmfao
>>738362063>>Complaining that a 30 year old game is getting a modern remake because it had a remake on the 3DS over 15 years agoAnd on the Wii U 10 years ago. The three most recent StarFox games are remakes of a game that was already a remake of the original game.StarFox(StarFox 2)StarFox 64StarFox AdventuresStarFox AssaultStarFox CommandStarFox 64 3DStarFox ZeroStarFoxThere are nine StarFox games and FIVE of them are the same fucking game. Kill yourself.
>>738362063I'm just glad they're not making him look and act like he does in the Mario movie.
Imma be deadass the only good Starfox game was the SNES one
>>738362978Not really Nintendo’s fault that Star Fox “fans” don’t support the games that aren’t remakes? Seriously keep crying about muh evil ‘Tendo, do you think that’ll help your situation? Or do you just cry for the sake of it?
>>738362978>Zero is a 64 remakeThere’s no way people actually believe this
>>738362063Lets guess who's behind the game.I'm thinking Bamco singapore, but dreading an EPD team.
Nintendo should collab with bamco again and have the ace combat devs do a star fox game
>>738363149that would be the equivalent of Star Fox Adventures a dialed in soulless perfectly playable mistake
>>738363051That one should get a remake. Im hoping thats a secret you unlock in this, even if its just reusing assets.
>>738363149The games are completely different, they should keep them separate.
>>738362063To be fair star fox fans are in their 40s and played all those games already. They can't understand the concept of remaking games for a new generation.
>>738362828>Looks nothing like the models and no implied amputated legs
This remake should just add all the shit that was in both star fox zero AND the 3DS game. Otherwise there's no value for this game at all and your better off emulating star fox 2 and 64 for free.
>>738362950cope more fag, making OP out to be a truther with that>you don’t deserve this game
>>738363352Why cant they just play the old ones in a collection of some sort?
>>738363397>Miyamoto himself has already confirmed they were never supposed to be amputated and that he thinks it’s weird people thought that
>>738363495Because this game is meant to be a new starting point with a fleshed out story, it’s why they ended the direct with the new prologue
I'm surprised Nintendo didn't get the memo when they tried "It's just 64" twice already and failed miserably
>>738362063>$60>beat the game in 1 hour>money stolen>inb4 replayability boomers
>>738362886Oh shut up you faggot lmao. The game has been rereleased multiple times on every Nintendo console, and is even free to play right now on the switch. It’s not 1990s, kids are aware of any semi-significant game series. This is literally a 1:1 remake level wise (I’ve played the original enough to recognize the designs) with the writing rewritten to be autistic slop. The prologue cutscene they showed was terrible and if that’s their highlight Jesus Christ. The character designs also seem forced to make the AR shit work which is just kek>>738363087The other options are a Zelda clone, a game that edges you with actual Star fox gameplay and cucks you with shittier ratchet and clank gameplay, a ds game, and a game that went unreleased for 20 years. Do you faggots even care about the slop you shitpost abt
>>738362886>Because Star Fox 64 is a 30 year old gameSo why would zoomers and alphas play this 30-year-old game when Nintendo's barely given anyone any reason to care or get attached to the IP between then and now? They're just going to dismiss it as "unc slop" or whatever the newest slang is and go back to Roblox, and it'll flop again like the last two 64 rehashes.Star Fox has probably been the single worst-handled IP in all of gaming. They are fucking killing this series more and more each time they slop out another remake of the same game.
>>738363096It's a remake/reimagining/reboot of the original game, with aspects from StarFox 2 added in, in the same way that StarFox 64 was a remake/reimagining of StarFox. So yes, it fucking counts, you pedantic cunt.
>>738362063>>738350335You’d almost expect Universal to interpret Fox the the remake way and Nintendo make him like that anime intro. Not the other way around. Everyone’s fatter just like I’m fatter since 1997.>pic related, Falcos Mom
>>738363724>An N64 game has been playable so they should never update it to modern standards
>>738362063>Adventure, Assault, Command, and Zero were all met with “Why isn’t it just 64”nobody said this
>>738363096The best part is it was more of a new game than this shit is. I can’t believe they are charging $60 for level designs from the late 90s
>>738363764>”I’m a furry”No one cares what you think
>>738362886This is all I have to hope for. I want Star Fox 2/Command remaster.
>>738363771They updated it to modern standards in 2013, and in 2015. Maybe they could come up with new level designs and reuse the story if you really want to argue your autistic viewpoint about imaginary children as if the majority of people who buy this game aren’t gonna be NEET virgins like you. Typical pedo always obsessed with muh kids
>retarded plushie fucker furries crying about the artstyleAside from Falco which looks a bit off, everyone else looks great, especially Peppy and Wolf.Furniggers that want to fuck plushies can burn in hell.
>>738362063>"Over 15 years ago, what the fuck is he talking about">"Star Fox 64 just got a new pristine port just last yea--">mfw realizing tendies don't get to play StarshipDamn, sucks for you to suck, anon. I guess enjoy looking forward to paying $80 for the worse experience.
>>738363892>Modern standards>3DS, a handheld that didn’t even have a joystick>Wii U, the weakest console of its generation that was a completely different game
>>738363905>looks greatNigga this shit looks like concord
>>738363973It’s 50 dollars anon
>>738362063>being a battered little tendie cuck who continues to pay $80 for slopFuck you, you deserve this game.
Why does>I already have this gameshort-circuit shills for this game so bad
>>738362063After the slew of bullshit since 64, it is refreshing to just get a modern remake of 64, which is still widely considered the best game in the series.But it also says a lot that the brightest spot in the series since 64, is a rehash of 64.
A Star Fox 2 remake with user generated planet would’ve been so cool. It also would’ve been risky and taken a lot of R&D money to make. Remaking 64 just makes more sense. >>738363831Guess I would taste some Krystal or Faye milkies.
>>738363984>3ds stick doesn’t fit my definition of a joystick so not modern goy!>star fox zero? Stupid goyim, that game actually added new parts to the game instead of regurgitating the same game that was remade just two years prior. That’s not modernizing the game! Modernizing is when you make the characters look and talk gay while recycling level designs from 1997 because you’re creatively bankrupt!Kill yourself
>>738363984Also, pt2, the switch 2 is the weakest console of the generation like the Wii U, you retard.
>There are people who legitimately believe this is a 1:1 remake of SF64https://youtu.be/X2SOUEJwYJ8?si=-kZqxAsJUgcub_mg
>>738363096So many shitposter keep saying this without knowing anything. I'm surprised they didn't say star fox adventure was a remake of 64
>>738364115>Anon thinks a modern version of Star Fox 64 is a 3DS remake>Anon admits Zero is not a remake and then doubles down on it being a remake
I almost closed the video when I realized this is literally a 1:1 StarFox 64 remake, but on the other hand they are actually addressing and expanding the story.This looks like the first movie game from Nintendo. Hopefully they keep building the lore fron there
>>738364210What was wrong with this game again? It looks far better than this “new” one
>>738362063I saw zero innovation in the game play. Boost , Brake, Barrel roll and somersault..... thats it? FUCK I hate nintendo.
>>738364549The gamepad controls ranged from shit to okay.
>>738362886That's retarded. A standard sequel or mors inventive reboot wouldn't exclude new players.
>>738364549Fuck those gyrocopter sections
>>738362063Ten years ago someone would make fun about this looking like a demo someone made on unreal engine
>>738362063>What if we made Star Fox 64 again but with the HIRE THAT MAN artstyle
Star Slop
>>738364241Whether it's a remake of the SNES game or the N64 game is irrelevant. It's either a remake of a game that has already been remade, or it's a remake of a remake. The end result is the same either fucking way.
>>738364827Are you drunk anon?
>>738362063I’m not complaining it looks cool
>>738364841Falco is as scary as any horror movie villain.
>>738364776They’re fleshing out the story, they can’t do that by saying play the N64 version
Shut the fuck up. This is how Miyamoto envisioned Star Fox to look like if it weren't by n64 limitations.
>>738365054Miyamoto needs to retire already
>>738364991>fleshing out the storyWho the fuck cares?
>>738365089I do
>>738362063Looks fucking awful. Why did they go for this stupid, gringo movie wannabe realistic instead of stylized? Zootopia, Bad Guys style
>>738364549The game mandated that you keep looking down at the Gamepad for precise aiming
>>738362063Nintendo could put out anything and /v/ will hate it. If they REALLY hate it with fervor like they did with Bananza? That's when you know you have a 10/10 on your hands. Time will tell once this game releases.
>>738365108Why does that preclude new level designs?
>>738365054Maybe it's for the best he had those limitations then
>>738364841>good art but realisticYou don't know what "hire this man" really means.
>>738363026No, instead he looks and acts like a taxidermied animal. The game looks worse than the 64 version. I'm really surprised to see Nintendo push the unncessary photorealism meme of all developers, assuming this is actually in-house. It looks like AI slop.
I'm supposed to jerk off to this?
>>738365272You don't know what "good art" really means, and neither does Nintendo anymore apparently. This is the worst the cast has ever looked.
>>738362063Unfortunately, I like the new art style.But it should be a brand new game over fucking 64 again.That James extra story better be as long as the main game to somewhat justify it
>>738364841>Everyone looks tired but slippy still looks like a fagSeems about right
>>738365054This is how Stable Diffusion envisioned Star Fox to look like when whoever they outsourced this to typed in "Star Fox if he real".
>>738362063>Complaining about people complaining that the original game got remade 4 times in the span of 30 years
I wonder how many people have played the Star Fox franchise. This is going to be my first go, and the new one looks like a great starting point
>>738365054Just goes to show once again that Miyamoto is a soulless bugman who's ruined more games than he's made. See also, the Mario mandate.
Slippy: It's awful!Falco: It's terrible!
>>738365520
FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST MAKE A NEW GAME
>>738364841Looking good.
>>738365674Sorry, still don't hate it
>>738365674>Katt after years of cocaine addiction
>>738365717
>>738365512Furnigger art isn't good art. kill yourself, faggot.I bet you want them to look overly expressive and cartoony like the shitty fox from the mario movie did.
>>738364841it looks great in motion. If they'd gone cartoony ppl would be saying its for kidsthe problem is its just a reskinning of a thirty year old game. I'm not going back
poor furfags man, look at what was taken from them with that falco redesign
>>738362745Hilarious if true.
>>738365805
I can’t stop laughing
>>738365827The way he's looked in the Smash games or Assault would have been way better. Or they could have iterated on the art style from Command or Zero. This just looks like uncanny valley shit and has zero appeal or charm.
>>738365879
>>738365674She looks like a fuckin stray that's been subsisting on worms and puddle water
>>738363528miyamoto also thinks is weird that people like f-zero, what's your point
>takes beloved furry franchise that's been surviving a two decade drought on porn>proceed to make the characters unfuckable
>>738365965>we're closing in on them falco
Why is modern dialogue always cringey? When I listen to the voice acting from the old games they always ooze with soul
>>738365979Absolutely based Nintendo
>>738362063I would've liked Star Fox 64 2. Why didn't they ever keep this style of gameplay and expand it instead of doing weird shit?
>>738366021Millennials don't have souls or creativity. The daycare generation.
>>738365879This post just made me like nu fox
>>738366021they are embarrassed of the source material, think is bellow them and should totally be making 8 figures working on some retarded netflix production.In a way they know this is the best their career will ever be.
Why don't they remake Adventure? It's the most loved by westerners and not based on outdated 90s arcade mechanics, it also has a female furry bait and is therefore ideal for the new generations
>>738366021>>738366074>>738366074>>738366108t. never played the original
>>7383657033/4 improvement
>>738362063>>738362063>>738362063I know you’re shitting on thr new one but which of the oficial Starfox 64 should I play?64? 3D? Or zero
>>738366114Don't summon Krystal in this art style.
>>738362063Anon, you can (100%) beat SF64 in less than 4 hours. And do a regular playthrough in about 1 hour. It doesn't make a lot of sense to use that game for a big budget full price remake. This is a series that needed to be reinvented. Fans have said over and over again that they don't want just another remake of this game.
>>738365879looks nothing like him, this is closer to rango which was supposed to be a freaking comedy.But i know people will ignore this and keep posting regardless for the next months.
>>738366105It's the reason why I ended up liking the designs too so I kind of see the vision
>>738366114>Why don't they remake Adventure? It's the most loved by westernersBWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>738362208>Assault was mediocre, Zero was a gemunfathomable truth nuke
>>738366043yeah"we've added three additional new routes through the lylat system" would be an instabuy. I can't play the same thing again, I just don't want to
At least these designs are ugly enough that people won't draw porn of it. It's not going to fuck up R34 galleries like BoTW did with its grotesque Gerudo outfit.
>>738366021I wonder if it’s because there were more restrictions. They had less space for the lines, so the lines had to count.
>>738366162Just play 64 first, they're all short so playing them all won't be a problem
>>738366143The original game had goof dialogue. It was appropriate. It was memorable, charming, and compelling.This remake is slop. The 3DS remake fucked up by redoing the audio, but at least the writing was left intact.
>>738364432Why are you using the term "movie game" like it's a good thing? Like holy crap, the idea that people are actually excited for more cutscenes is baffling. Sony movies have been a disaster for this medium.
Videogames are starting to regress
>>738366162>>7383662793DIt’s literally stock 64 but better, 64 is old at this pointZero is a reimaging so it doesn’t count
"I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda...."
>>738366286How would you know?
>>738366143>nooo the original is badpoint fucking proven.
>>738366162Zero is a completely different game
>>738366354"Uh, you guys want anything?"
>>738366354Kek
>>738366401if you say so miyamoto
>>738366331Anon, Starfox 64 3D is the exact same game but with much worse voice delivery
>>738366395You never liked Star Fox, so why do you care?
>>738366458WaitWhat do you mean
>>738366162Orignal. 3D has updated visuals but downgraded audio. Zero is still a different game, just the same setting after a reset button was hit on the timeline.Zero's gyrocopter segments leave a lot to be desired but the rest of the game is fine.>>738366356I've been playing 64 for over two decades. I played the 3DS version but dropped it because the circle pad was shit for controlling the arwing.This latest remake did not keep the original dialogue script intact, and replaced it with dialogue that is poorly written in comparison.>>738366496They redid the entire audio. The music is bad, the voices are bad.
>>738366496https://youtu.be/DwU5qqeyBRs?si=6IxmicmLbHUohl7T Horriblehttps://youtu.be/6oC0SW8i6k8?si=tCNZVQJmc82QtCxd kino
>>738366494you are right i don't like it, i fucking LOVE it.
>>738366354he's literally me...
>>738366448>Anon never played the game he’s complaining aboutTypical /v/
>>738362572This anon perfectly nails it on the head. It's the same reason why I don't like any remakes or remasters. It's why SMRPG and Paper Mario were also subpar. They just shat out remakes and remasters with lower quality. SMRPG was particularly bad about this, because they didn't even build upon it. They didn't fix any of the latent issues or balance problems. They couldn't even be bothered to add in a hard mode. Like the most they did was add 1 or 2 gimmick bosses. Kinda like what Paper Mario TTYD did. It's just laziness. You unironically see more creativity from romhacks.
Something is going on at Nintendo. You can't blame it on DEI like you always do on western vidya simce Japanese people are all the same.
>>738362063There are more Star Fox remakes than there are original games. The series has never been more dead than it is right now
>>738366354
>>738366354I read it in Big Smokes voice and it kinda fits Nu-Fox.
>>738366198It is. The entire generation of those years has only fond memories of Adventure, especially those who were never a die-hard Nintendo fan. For the last 20 years they only made games similar to the 64 or remakes of the 64, yet it never sold anything significant and met with disasters like Zero. It's time to bet on another horse, classic mechanics don't sell and aren't liked that much.
Why do they always franchises with animals to have hyper realism? Lion King tried doing this and it was much worse. Mario would unironically be more interesting with a different art style, not fucking Starfox.
>>738366697>64 3DS>A remake of a then 17 year old game on a handheld>Zero>a completely different game with the same level names
>>738366557>I've been playing 64 for over two decades. I played the 3DS version but blah blah blahI'll ask again in a way that a mouth breather will understand. How would you know the remake is bad?
I agree with this furfagThey need slightly bigger eyes, more angular ,cartoony eyes a subtle change that improves the design
You can tell they are trying to copy Star Wars dialogue style like the rebel battle of the death star in episode iv.
>>738366697the fact that they're doing it on the switch 2 means it's more alive than it's ever been. it's basically set up to succeed this time. and if we bitch enough, they'll change the artstyle.
>>738366805That's literally just what Star Fox is you fucking tourist
>>738362698I'll take a mediocre, but original Star Fox game over another 64 remake.
>>738366816>Change the art style The game comes out next month
>focus, F
Shitposting aside, they did mention two Star Fox games in the leak that, so far, has been on point. Though they did said it's the "adventure" and this one is the "classic" one so anyone wanting 64 2 is fucked I guess.Also, even more remakes so /v/ will be unusable by then
>>738366894Hopefully the other one doesn't have this artstyle
>>738366894What else was in the leaks
>>738366859I meant for the next game, oops
>>738366794I WATCHED ITS TRAILER YOU MORON. IT IS SUFFCIIENT ENOUGH FOR ME TO CONCLUDE THAT IT IS A SHIT REMAKE BECAUSE THE AESTHETICS ARE SO SEVERELY ENSHITIFIED. THE ONLY EXCEPTION BEING THE BGM.The new story elements with James could be good, but the rest of the game is still an enshitified remake because the art direction is bad with few exceptions, the dialogue is bad, the voiceovers are bad.I don't need to play the game to know I hate its aesthetics. The gameplay appears to be intact, but I can just play the original, which is my second-favorite N64 game, and I'm very happy with it.
>>738366957
>>738362886>Mario is a 40 year old game we NEED to remake 64 again for a new generation>DUDE Zelda is a 40 year old game we NEED to remake OoT again for a new generation>BRO Pikmin is a 25 year old game we NEED to remake Pikmin 1 again for a new audience>GUYS Pokemon is a 30 year old game we NEED to remake Red and Green again for a new audience>SISTERS Metroid is a 40 year old game we NEED to remake Super Metroid again for a new audience>THERE'S JUST NO OTHER WAY TO GET PEOPLE INTO THIS FRANCHISE. YOU HAVE TO REMAKE THE MOST POPULAR GAME IF TOO MUCH TIME HAS PASSED THERE'S NO OTHER WAY NO DON'T LOOK AT METROID PRIME 4
>>738367093>>738362886>>738362674>Nintendo games are evergreen and stay good forever>but also theyr'e outdated dogshit and we need to fix them by changing them completely via remakesHmmmm.... really does make you think....
Why can't they make new games
This is pathetic idk what this company is doing anymore
>>738366816This is Nintendo. When the fanbase says they don't like something they double down on it and say it's permanent much like Nomura does.
Look. https://vgsales.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Fox#cite_note-sales2-1Nobody gives a shit about classic Star Fox. Now that it's featured in the movie, new generations of people will be able to enjoy spending $60 for an hour of outdated gameplay, be disappointed and never buy anything SF related for the next 20 years.
>>738367065so you are guessing based on how it looks?
>>738364991>flesh out the storyYou mean waste an hour having characters talk about how they have to defeat Andross. How about fleshing out the story with NEW STORIES that EXPAND THE SETTING, maybe ADD NEW CHARACTERS?
>>738367073It better be fucking baseball they’re addingIf it’s American football I’ll personally kill you anon
>>738367093>64 gets rereleased as part of the Mario collection>Everyone complains it's a port and not a remake>OoT>The remake that everyone asks for every direct since the anniversary >Pokemon>The game that had Let's Go release to complaints that it fucked up the battle system with Go shit>Super Metroid>A game that would benefit from a remake
>>738367073>ocarina of time remakeThey wouldn’t And when would they even announce it?
>>738367340Fleshing out the original story could've been done in comics and cartoons. We hear a lot about how unethical Andross is, but nothing concrete besides the fact he likes going to war and "experiment". Seeing characters that were experimented on would've been interesting.
>>738367329NTA but yes that's pretty accurate to tell if a game is bad.>Bananza looked bad, and it WAS bad.>Prime 4 looked bad, and it WAS bad>pokopia, Tomadachi, and Yoshi's new game looked bad, and they're all badSee a pattern?
Why do they keep doing this weird half-realistic look, it's jarring
>>738367479>Having to read a comic or watch a cartoon to understand the story of a game
>>738366816>they're doing it on the switch 2 means it's more alive than it's ever been. it's basically set up to succeed this time.OH NO NO NO NO
>>738367617S-stop….it wasn’t THAT bad….
>>738367578>He's never heard of expanded universes like Star Wars>Hates having more content to enjoy
>>738367678>Expanded universe that is completely irrelevant to the movies >Expanded universe that consists of shit like Luuke>Expanded universe that gets completely tossed out because it interferes with the stories the main series wants to tellWhat you're asking for is official fanfiction
>>738367479So just reiterating that Andross is a bad guy the protagonists need to defeat?Big wow, much flesh Really needed a fifth remake to get all that. Maybe for the 6th remake we can flesh out the story more by including scenes of Fox taking a piss between missions.
>>738366431The Whale vs Chad
>>738366431What's wrong anon, you never saw a fox?
>>738367782Why did you take my suggestion as defending it being fleshed out more in a game?
>>738367773In Star Wars' case, the Rey trilogy is the horrible fanfiction that will be heavily edited and retconned to make it more palatable.
>>738367158Really makes you think that the second group are shills. In general, a good game is good forever.
>>738367509Your schizophrenia, yes
>>738367230there's already been precedent against that. mm2 and totk(in a few respects)
>>738363652>”beat” the game in 1 hour >intentionally misses 90% of content GG
>>738368085If they really wanted to appeal to Zelda fans, they'd ditch the open world cancer and tell secondaries who've only played those to fuck off.
>>738363814It's $50.
>>738368184Right, they still listened to the actual critiques of the first gameHell, they even changed up mario's artstyle from Wonder to be less soulless from NSMB.
>>738363741Then I guess 64 is just a remake of SF1, you fucking clown.
>>738368259>Actual critiquesVast sprawling empty wastelands? Breakable items? Side quests not giving you cool items? Those are actual critiques.
>>738363993You dumb shitposting doubleniggers said that about DK Bananza and Legends Z-A characters, too. Nobody is taking your shit seriously.
>>738365961Made by someone who literally only knows Fox from the Galaxy Movie. Christ, fuck off.
>>738368281Yes, it is. Did you think this was a gotcha or something? I said that in my first post. StarFox64 is a remake of StarFox.
>>738368314we're getting off topic, im not gonna change your mind, you're not gonna change mine. and even i think totk is dogwater compared to botw.Point is, they do listen to critiques, with a relevant example pertaining to artstyle.
>>738368090arcadeslop is an obsolete model in 2026 gramps,you should be able to see all the content of a game (or at least most of it) in your first playthrough
>>738368405Ah, so full on shitposting. One day, you should try playing one or two of the Star Fox games. You might like them, who knows.
>>738368479It is literally a fucking remake of the first game, with elements from the second game added in. Are you retarded or just really bad at trolling?
>>738368432Tell that to Nier Automata.
>>738367509>>Bananza looked bad, and it WAS badIt did neither. It looked pretty good, and ended up being pure kino.
>>738368513Show me Fortuna (no, not misnamed Fichina, Fortuna the dinosaur planet) in SF64. I'll wait.
>>738368545Then why is every thread about it just people spamming cheese pizza of the underage character? Seems like slop to me.Doesn't help that the level design was mindless and the challenge was nonexistent.
>>738365674>Crack
>>738368579>it's not EXACTLY THE SAME so it's COMPLETELY DIFFERENTOh, okay, you're retarded AND bad at trolling.
>>738368674Show me the Space Whales in 64. Show me Aquas or Solar in SF1. These are literally different games, you fucking clown.
>>738363741>Andross is doing the evil again!Woooow, its a remake....Lets just ignore how everything else in Zero is completely different from 64 like the bosses, music, "step on da gas" kite train, going back to corneria, I could go on and on.
>>738368605Literally nothing in your post is true, so there's not a lot to talk about.
>>738368828>>738368858You overly pedantic retards should just kill yourselves. It's the same fucking story, so it's a remake. This is unironically like claiming that the RE remakes aren't remakes because the gameplay is completely redone. Fuck off.
>>738368858Now now, according to >>738368674, if it has a vaguely similar story and one or two planets in common, it's the same game. Command is a remake of Smash 64 because fox, corneria, the great fox and the arwing are in, and the goal is to beat a boss at the end of the gams.
>Anons who never played Zero think it's a remake If you've never suffered through the chicken mech levels your opinion on Star Fox remakes means nothing
>>738368864I'm sorry you can't take criticism.
>>738362063>you don’t deserve this gameCorrect. I really, really did not deserve this game
>>738362063>Complaining that it’s 64 when Adventure, Assault, Command, and Zero were all met with “Why isn’t it just 64”Nobody said this. We said, "why don't you make a proper sequel to starfox 64". And Nintendo is STILL not doing it. Probably because there's nobody left at any oftheir subsidiaries that's even capable of game design.
>>738368920The RE remakes have the same:StoryCharactersCore gameplayWeaponsStagesPlot order for said storyMusicBosses and enemiesTitlesSF64 to SF1 have:The main castParts of the story (notably just the beginning and ending)A couple shared locationsA few music themesCore gameplayArwingsAccording to you, Mega Man 2 is a remake of 1.
>>738362440Jeremy / utc+3
>>738369004I'm sorry you're incapable of making criticism.
>>738362063>Star Fox in the Mario Galaxy>New Star Fox gamegay furry porn enjoyers eating good
>>738363149>>738363241Ace Combat is the spiritual successor of star fox in terms of both gameplay and storytelling and they could do a much better job than nintendo
>>738369151I already did. Guess you can't read? It's the same criticism you make towards snoy movie games. Bit of a hypocrite, ain't ya?
>>738369109>Storynuh uh>Core gameplaynope>Musicmaybe in a mtx pack>Characterspretty different
>>738363771Star Fox 64 is better than modern standards. It's better than any switch game. If you want to sell it again just port it. If you're going to make a new game, make a sequel, not a remake.
>>738362063>Movie pulls in loads of kids who have never played Star Fox>Nintendo remakes the best game of the series for their first exposure instead of making them play garbage similar to Assault or ZeroFucking based
>>738369227>It's the same criticism you make towards snoy movie gamesI have never posted about any of that.I wish you would just announce yourself with a trip, ACfag. Then I wouldn't have to waste my time. Have fun crying about games you don't play. ACVI ended up having a million cutscenes, btw.
>>738366816>and if we bitch enough, they'll change the artstyle.Nintendo will never admit they are wrong, ever.
>make assault>waaaaaaaah it’s not 64 >make command>waaaaaaah it’s not 64 >make adventure>waaaaaaH ITS NOT 64 2>make zero >waaaaaaaaaaaAh it’s not 64 Nintendo can’t win with you retards, you don’t even know what you want
>>738368605There's a strange habit on 4chan that has persisted as long as I've been here where people rarely discuss things they like. Back when /co/ wasn't just sucking their own dicks over being the nicer, gayer part of 4chan, there was an unwritten rule that you never made a thread about Hellboy unless it was a storytime thread. Not because shit-flinging, but because it would die in 20 posts after everyone affirmed that they liked Hellboy and it was a pretty great series. I loved Bananza, it was my GOTY last year, but I didn't feel the need to discuss it after the initial hype died down, because the threads were either people like me who really enjoyed the game, shitposters, or schizos that believe there is a single shitposter that goes in every Nintendo thread.
>>738368920You don't even know why you hate these games you clod. People who, y'know, actually play video games? Don't like how much of a slog the motion controls are for Zero. You think people who enjoy Megaman for the actual game complain about the 10 games with the exact same gameplay and wily doing the evil? Lmao, you tourists are a joke.
>>738369354WE DO. 64 2. MAKE A GAME THAT TAKES STAR FOX 64'S GAMEPLAY AND HAS NEW FUCKING LEVELS, IT'S NOT THAT HARD.
>>738369236>nuh uhI accept your concession.
>>738369354I want a new game that doesn't look like donkey doodoo. Shouldn't be hard.
>>738369346bitch i just had this conversation, hands off. >>738368409
>>738369338>Nintendo fan doesn't blindly shitpost against sony at every opportunitySorry mate. You outed yourself after making 10 years of famitsu threads so you could shitpost against the competition. Now it's coming back to bite you.
>>738369392Assault. Zero. Command
>>738362063>Complaining that it’s 64 when Adventure, Assault, Command, and Zero were all met with “Why isn’t it just 64”no one said that. we said the games weren't good enough. stop trying to rewrite history
>>738369369People say that it's a great game, but again the discussions never show it. It's always metacritic masturbation or jerking off to sales, or complaining about snoys. So it's hard to take anyone's positive opinion on the game seriously. Kinda reminds me of how people blindly worshipped Metroid Prime 4, and called people snoys for even the tiniest of criticisms.
>>738369369Don't bother. He's just shitposting. It's always the same shit>you only post porn!>you call sony games movies!>you make famitsu threads!>you're a hypocrite!>all of these despite none of these happening in this thread at any point!Look at this drivel:>>738369456>>738369227
>>738369574You guys literally love to shitpost about how great nintendo games are because muh metacritic score and muh sales. If the metacritic isn't super high, you default to using sales. If neither is high enough to use as ammo, you default back to the "game journos all hate nintendo" spiel. Seen it a thousand times.
>>738362978>zero is a remake of 64What started this lie and why do so many people believe it?
>>738369210Star Fox is older, but yeah.
why are you guys like this
>>738362978Reboots are not remakes. You've got brainworms.
>>738369774Nintendo rules this board, obv.
>>738369685People who don't actually play these games to get all the medals on Expert mode. People who have 48 minutes in to Zero and SF SNES tops.
>>738369496>assaultWeird third person shooter thing. Had ten total levels of which 4 were actual star fox levels that composed about 10% of the campaign>ZeroLevels and bosses are mostly reused, and also had a horrendous control scheme for no reason. Also they butchered 64's story.>commandIs a series of boring arena fights. The board game shit was actually kind of neat, shame about the mediocre combat and shitty VN writingJust make a fucking rail shooter, with normal fucking controls. Or just rip off ace combat
>>738364210it's basically a reimagining of sf64 which was a reimagining of the snes gameso yeah you can continue to pretend you don't understand something as basic as this
>>738369520Why weren't the games good anon
>>738369823>Or just rip off ace combatjust go play ace combat if you want a ripoff, idk why you guys keep saying this
>>738362063When people say they want more 64, they don't mean literally the same game. I just hope we get a 64-style game with new stuff someday.
>>738369854I thought SF64 was a sequel. No? I never played the SNES version because we were too poor for a SNES when I was a kid.
>>738369854Remember the gyrowing in SF64 and Starfox? I don't, but maybe your schizo dreams showed it to you.
>>738362063>Complaining that a 30 year old game is getting a modern remake because it had a remake on the 3DS over 15 years agostar fox zero for wii u was also a remake, lying shill.and 64 is a remake of the original star fox fo snes.This is such a sad franchise.
>>738369761>mercs turn the tide of a war with their planesThis trope is overused at this point
Starfox Zero was good but was held back because Nintendo was in its "let's make every game have 1 hour of content max" era
>>738369925>was also a remake64 was a time travel plot? We had the gyro wing and chicken walker in it? Why can't I go to Aquas in Zero or Fortuna in 64? How come they're so wildly different in plot, content, and gameplay if Zero is a remake?
>>738362063>you don’t deserve thisI don't want this.
I’m impressed at the amount of posts that believe zero is a remake of 64 and actually pretend they played it. Did you get all your information from a youtube video showing you the first stage or is most of this thread AI bots?Seriously its kind of fucking concerning that this many people are pushing a literal lie.
>>738370002That's literally how long one mission was in Zero. They had to add in saves because you couldn't do one route in the same sitting unless you had no life.
>>738369854>Level is completely different from it's layout to the boss fight>Entire game is built around the gamepad >Has to backtrack to it's a reimagining because he realized he can't call it a remake anymore
>>738369854You are actually retarded. Stop posting before you embarass yourself further, you might kill yourself.
>>738369925You can literally go to youtube and watch any level from the game to see it is not a remake
>fired Rivals artist thinks he can have an opinion
The fucking 20 minute boss for corneria in zero is a ufo thats gonna kill Pepper where you turn into a chicken walker to kill it from the inside.Whereas 64 its just a loud ass alligator in a flagship.
>>738370215>Final Star Wolf battle has the Wolfen literally turn into a wolf>Andross battle is a giant ring where you run around in the chicken walkerWould have been kino without the gamepad controls
>>738370305Sorry folks, nothing in this thread has convinced me that this isn't kino.
>>738365887a true snoutlet, poor guy
>>738369863>Why weren't the games good anonread the reviews, retard. each one had separate problems
>>738370351All you care about is graphics. I at least hope you don't consider "having more cutscenes" to be a positive. That's just snoy pandering right there.
The characters look good. Cope.
>>738370402>Needs reviews to form his opinionWhat was wrong with the game anon, in your own words
What's the gimmick this time?
>>738370658They added more heckin cutscenes to be cinematic like a marvel movie.
>>738370658lore and a james mccloud prologueoh and vtuber shit
>>738366162Just wait for the new one, it's out next month.
>>738370595>adventureshortshitty last bossflying segments were short and easyKrytal barely in the gamepoor mans zelda>assaulthalf baked multiplayer modeshalf baked ground segmentsneeded more time in development but a good prototype for next star fox>commandterrible ploteasy gameplay once you got used to touch control
>>738370305Every time I see him I smile and grin. Meanwhile the people next to me are getting increasingly unhinged and looking like they want to kill and destroy
>>738369369well said, and I have noticed the same thing
>>738369572Yeah, that has more to do with how people have degenerated into fucking retards.>it feels really good to play, like they put a lot of effort into making simple movement enjoyable>the levels are varied and vibrant, making it really easy to sink a lot of time in to see the next area. There are a few stinkers, but they generally did a good job>the soundtrack is excellent, coming from someone that expected to hate the gibberish songs>for all the talk of disrespecting Rare, there was a ton of obvious love for those games>bonus levels that directly reference some of the more famous DKC levels, little shout out easter eggs, and the fact all NPCs are either Diddy-style monkeys or Rare-style things with googly eyes>the game doesn't overstay its welcome, and the postgame actually has some challengeThe biggest gripes I can see with the game is that it's really easy until you get to the endgame challenges, and that they didn't pull back enough on Odyssey's bloated doohicky count. The latter is not as much of a problem as people like to pretend, there weren't any "kick this random rock 50 times" bananas, and the former is just the way things are now. Rentals aren't a thing, and games have a lot more to compete with than they did when I was a kid.tl;dr It's a wonderful experience that isn't challenging in the slightest, but it's the best 3D platformer since Odyssey if you enjoy that sort of thing.
>>738370068What?I used to see how fast I could do certain missions just because they were so short, I remember I could do the space battle where you go inside a big ship in under 30 seconds
>>738370884I just cannot get past the insulting lack of challenge.that sours the entire game. And it's becoming an even bigger problem with every new Nintendo release, with games like Yoshi's new adventure. You can't even die in that game, and there's not even a timer. It might as well just be colored lights flashing on a screen for a few hours.
>>738362063>Complaining that it’s 64 when Adventure, Assault, Command, and Zero were all met with “Why isn’t it just 64”I do not think it is outlandish to want a new starfox game that is just another rail shooter. Like the bar for a new Starfox is so low man, just give us a rail shooter that plays like 64 with a set of brand new levels. instead we get some weird bullshit inbetween releases of Starfox 64, they all sell well and then Nintendo once again makes some weirdo bullshit. it'll happen again too, can't wait for the next game to be a fuckin cart racer or some bullshit.
I always considered SF, 64 and Zero to be the same game, just like a new version. Kinda like Super Castlevania 4 has the same story in it as Castlevania 1. But I think I know where others are coming from as they see Starfox games as “it’s a game where you start on Corneria and go through the Lylat System to defeat Andross” and that’s what it should always be. I just think to be a sequel/prequel and not be labeled a remake you need to have a plot that is literally not the same with the same overall flow.
>>738369279Faggot lmao
TH-THEY'RE JUST TESTING THE MARKET TO REVIVE THE FRANCHISE! JUST LIKE WITH STAR FOX 3DS AND STAR FOX ZERO!!!
>>738370997That's just the way things are now. Either no challenge, or they're bullshit and challenge is the selling point. I am about to turn 35, I am not Nintendo's intended audience. They do not make games with me in mind, I have to accept that and take the wins I'm given, which is a lovingly crafted world that's fun to fuck around in.
>>738369913>I thought SF64 was a sequel. No? I never played the SNES version because we were too poor for a SNES when I was a kid.It's a sequel gameplay-wise, in that it's a new take on the original. Story-wise it's roughly the same plot (get to Venom, stop Andross, etc.), but there are big differences.
>>738371139I'd rather take "they're bullshit and challenge is the selling point.". Unfortunately Nintendo doesn't offer that, so I have to look elsewhere. A "lovingly crafted world" just holds no value, if there's no thrill of challenge.
>>738371191Basically the same way Super Castlevania IV is still a sequel even though it's a retelling of Castlevania 1.
The NCU is going to fucking destroy nintendo
>>738371225Terrible comparison. SCV4 was much more inspired than CV1. Every Star Fox since the original has been completely derivative with not a shred of inspiration to be found. That's why the franchise is in the gutter.
>>738371283They literally shoehorned in this mangy fox over a billion other beloved Nintendo character just to shill their next game. It's despicable. How quickly the NCU just became an ad venue for crap nobody wants.
>>738371224>this ground is too soft>I wish my legs were more brokenI just lost interest in that kind of shit over the years. A hard game that is competently made is a rare find these days, you can keep the kaizo wannabes.
Castlevania IV had an excellent soundtrack.>>738371283Nintendo is too big to fail. They will lose their soul and become ever richer with wealth.>>738370575I will reply to your shitpost with this image.
>>738371370Grounded 2 is perfect. The enemies are fearsome with just a hint of bullshit to keep you on your toes, and only your skill decides whether you're slaughtered like a pig or completely obliterate them.
I'm complaining because Switch 2 needs new games and they're making remakes no one asked for. If it was part of a bigger direct with actually new games no one would care.
>>738365887fantastic mr fox if he was on Ozempic
>>738371225It’s a totally different game still. There are many versions of Castlevania 1 and all of them (there’s like 5 or 6) are unique. Not the case for Star Fox
>>738371409Don't give a fuck about those kinds of games, but it's good that challenging stuff is still being made.
>>738371505That and Monster Hunter are what's keeping me sane these days. I'll never give up the pursuit of challenge. And babyshit like Pragmata can suck my dick.
>>738371408I meant ruin as in quality. No doubt this soulless cinema era will usher in profits beyond anything seen before. But the games are going to be fucking awful
>>738371579Wilds is the most movie shit known to man.
>>738370070>>738370136>>738370136>BRO REMEMBER PLAYING YOSHI IN MARIO 64? NO? YEAH THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT MARIO 64 DS WAS A COMPLETELY NEW GAME
I like the new designs because they don't look like furfag bait.The only things I dislike is Falco's weird hunch and despite my previous statement, Kat should arguably look a little more attractive because she's supposed to be something of a love interest.
Nintendo
Nintendo dropping a 15 minute direct like 6 weeks before release is sus, feels like even them don't believe in it.Miyamoto had so much to say for StarFox zero, but there he's just there smilling at the camera selling the new product. Koizumi clearly only liked the face rig. They are hopefully sendind this game to flop so they can tell investors to shut up when they ask for a "more modern approach" at every meeting
Looks cool, I'm going to have a blast playing
>>738370658It's a snoy cinematic game. They've finally ran out of bullshit.
>>738372245I mean. They clearly want to push it.
>>73836297864 is entirely different from the original. 64 3D is a remake. Okay that's one remake, faggot.
>>738372257Who's the strong screaming black woman? Slippy?
>>738372114Mario 64 DS is literally Mario 64 with new characters. Zero is completely different levels, bosses, and ships.
>>738372340You will find your very unusual idea that Star Fucks Zero was a wholly original game rejected by most sane people, methinks.
>>738362063Top gun Maverick for Millennials.
All these threads made me go back and play SF64 for the first time in years.Playtime 1 hour. That ending with the shot of Great Fox cresting over the horizon is so kino. This game is a 10/10 man.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8sEZTeReLs
>>738372340Mario 64 DS had different levels tooit also had the different control scheme of using the touch screen instead of an analog stick
All this negativity is actually making me want to buy it and fund the new direction. Fuck NDSnoys and nostalgiafags.
>>738372378>Sane peoplehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjvJ65yh-X8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2SOUEJwYJ8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSUW2Rsej7I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLuaKvQJOVk&t=477s
>>738372285>fush it>it's old design merch
I already preordered
>>738372378Zero was a barebone 45 minute experience with forced tablet controls.
>>738372468>Mario 64 DS had different levels tooThe only new levels in DS were the paintings to unlock the other characters. Every returning level is a 1:1 remake, that does not apply to Zero
this will be just as bad as metroid prime 4. nintendo have lost the plot.
>Nintendo finally makes semi-realistic designs for one of their IPs>it's starfoxThis is all legitimately hilarious
I want basically 64 but with more content, improved design and a well thought out post game.
>>738362063>a StarFox 64 remake? Cool, I never played it.>it is just $50/$60? Great!>type Star Fox 64 in howlongtobeat>main story: 2 hours>main+extra: 4 hoursWhat the absolute fuck.
>>738372285>not plush it
>>738372864I mean, what did you expect? On-rail shoot them up or high speed action games are all short. You go through years of development and asset blazing fast.
>>738372864Starfox is a classic on rails shooter. It has more in common with shmups than anything modern. Its a game you are meant to replay over and over again to get the highest scores and explore multiple diverging level paths. StarFox 64 had splitscreen 4 player multiplayer too. Honestly, it may be a very good game for the zoomers, its a shortform video game you replay a bunch.
>>738364841why are they all looking at me like that
Oh no no bros
>>738363905Slippy looks like he's had a burger too much
>>738372657>Every returning level is a 1:1 remakehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZjkPRQqf8Ywrong
>>738365805it's the legs that are too short, otherwise this render looks good
>>738373021those games are short because they followed an arcade model.A modern shooter can last at least 20-30 hours if you offer enough long branching levels with different playstyles and different modes like time attack, boss rush, etc.It doesn't even need roguelite shit. just put all the basics together instead of considering each one should be the gimmic of one game.
>>738372864Back then you would either rent a game or only buy a game once or twice a year so you would just endlessly replay the same game over and over for months
Switch 2 has been a massive flop so far. Bananza was good but there's been literally nothing else worth a damn. If this is their big game for 2026, an unreal engine 3 remake, then it's fucking over.
>>738373104that's actually how sea water should behave
Oh please can we somehow get Krystal in this game. Just imagine the seethe of a Krystal in this artstyle.
>>738373291Over for who?
>>738373380They're making 64 again specifically to erase Krystal from existence
>>738373021I did expect a few hours long game not being that expensive.>You go through years of developmentYears of development produces open world games with hundreds of thousands of miles of content. Games like this are made by 10 man indie develoeprs now and sold for a budget price.
>>738373420They should acknowledge the elephant in the room and make her an elephant
>>738373475You might start something far worse
>>738373354but I don't care how it "should" behave, the lasers and jets reflecting off the water looks fucking awesome
>>738373258Back then Mario 64 had thousand times the content of this.
>>738373509Can't be worse.
I don't knowI think they could try to make a new SF game like the old MW merc game where you have the choice of missions and weaponsBut then it would get too complex for console game and not mention there isn't enough world building to have a game like that.
>>738373675>But then it would get too complex for console gamearmored core games have existed for a while brodak
>>738373541Starfox 64 had reasons for you to replay the levels over and over and stuff to unlock, but it didn't really require you to do it to "complete" the game. It's kind of the same as Mario 64 having only like 15 actual levels but forcing you to replay them over and over to eventually complete the game.
>>738373541more like back then we did not have the internet and guides weren't as accessible so you were often stuck not knowing what to do and just end up fucking around
>>738362063>Fuck all of you, you don’t deserve this gameWe know it's you Harman
>>738373852maybe you didn't have internet bro
>>738373541>Back then Mario 64 had thousand times the content of this.Mario 64 100% speedrun time: 1 hour 35 minutesStar Fox 64 100% speedrun time: 1 hour 17 minutesconclusion: Mario 64 has 23% more content than Star Fox 64
>>738374273That's not fair, Mario 64 is a much longer game but Mario just happens to be the fastest thing alive
>another 64 rehash>after zero proved people are fatigued of 64 and want something new>Miyamoto actually doubles down instead of reading the room>this franchise will continue being cursed by the weight of its own past successes>we will never see this franchise see its true potential I honestly am convinced at this point that Krystalfags were right, and that she didn't kill star fox, but Miyamoto did. Like how are you this fucking out of touch that you will see your own franchise die for another ten more years for a THIRD time, all just becuase you are scared to death to admit you fucked up? This game is set to fail already, except this time, Miyamoto wont be around to 'save' Star Fox come 2036. Like, fucking hell. This has got to be the most retarded thing I have ever seen in gaming in such a long time. I really do feel for the Star Fox fanbase this time. Like they are ull of faggots, but this time the crashout is valid.
>>738362063i don't give a fuck about stairfax either way, where's oot at
>>738374273Objection!No one can perfect speedrun games for the first try.
>>738373937look at mister rich kid over here
>>738363397>random shitter makes up amputated theory>idiots continue to believe it
>>738369210Explain why the ace combat company made the worst star fox game then?
>>738370305I'm so sick and tired of you shit eating doom posters. I like this!
>>738370405>All you care about is graphics.But the gameplay is exactly the same, and we know star fox 64 is fucking great.
playing a gussied-up sf64 at 60fps handheld is enough for me.
>>738372465>Sector Y to Katina to Sector X. Why?>Sector Z at allMachbeth is so much better than Sector Z and Titania
>>738375187I love doing the all sectors route, also the warp zone is kino
>>738370317Zero had cool shit man, its a shame the double screen and constant adjusting the crossbar fuck up everything
>>738372864Anon, I've got news for you...
>>738372864
>>738373104>gonna cry that he's not flying above a mirror anymore
>>738362063Just make a game with Star Fox 2's map but with more planets/locations, add the copilot system, add Afterburner movement/combat, add miyu/fey/krystal/panther, add online multiplayer, add co-op, add Assault inspired ground/tank traversal segments.Stop remaking 64.
>>738372465Always do the asteroid belt with a shitton of bombs, the warp gives you a bunch of free target rainbow asteroids that'll give you 300 hits by the end if you cluster them. Katina can also give you a fuckton of free kills if you delay killing the hatches on the giant mothership
>>738373191Video basically opens with>there only a select few og and ds experts that are so good and playing at such a high level that the differences matter>only top 10 speedrunners are really gonna care about this shitLet's see your position on the leaderboards anon
>>738375384yes, because it looked cool>>738375353>>738375303cartridges were stupidly expensive man, imagine paying ~$150 equivalent 2026 dollars for Doom 64 lol. and I say that as someone who actually likes that game
>>738366663>Like the most they did was add 1 or 2 gimmick bossesthey added 7 post game superbosses actually.
I kinda wish they got these guys to do it if Nintendo was going for the puppet look.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJV_GpNEFwAGenuinely thought these were live-action muppets when the trailer dropped, but they're just HQ models in UE5.
>>738371336>>738371487I think the difference between Star Fox 1 and 64 is as big as Castlevania 1 vs the other versions.
>>738375538>cartridges were stupidly expensive man, imagine paying ~$150 equivalent 2026 dollars for Doom 64 lol. and I say that as someone who actually likes that gameIf we were still using the same kind of cartridges, they wouldn't be on sale for $150. The move to discs dropped the price of new nintendo games by $10 or $20 over 20 years ago. The most you could say is the game would cost $80 in today's market (ignoring the global oil shenanigans).
>>738362063I'd totally buy this if it was on the Switch. I do not own a Switch 2 and don't want to buy one when I have been a late adopter of the Switch.
>>738362063Looks dope. I didn't play the other alleged remakes because I didn't own either console they were on, so I literally don't give a shit that this is a remake of 64. That game is goated and I will play the shit out of this with a massive nostalgia boner. Suck my balls pessimists.
>>738372864There are reasons to replay the game doing different routes.
>>738375469so your argument is that you didn't even skim through the video to see the differences that prove your claim is wrongokay, go be retarded somewhere else dude
>>738372864Games never needed to be more than 10 hours long
>>738376990I played both, it's basically the same game with extras. Cry harder.
It looks so fucking fugly. The fact that there are apologists for these visuals is downright baffling. Not even just the character designs, everything (environments, interface, etc) looks unappealing.
>>738362128>starfox fans>deserving anything
>>738370172why wouldnt he? He's a consumer just like everyone else.
>they could've just combined 64 together with Adventure, added in elements from the Rogue Squadron series and the seemless travel from No Man's Sky and had a major hit on their hands>they just made a shitty "UE5" remake with a couple neat features
>One of his arguments is that the characters are not fuckableNow we know why he got fired from his job of concept artist. Such a porn addicted faggot.
I liked Assault a lot actually.
>>738370305KINOLUDOAURA
>>738362063>and Zero>met with “Why isn’t it just 64”FUCKING RETARDPAID SHILL FAKEFAN
>>738373104You want gay-tracing in StarFox? Planar Reflections only work in low-poly games
>>738378756>Planar Reflections only work in low-poly gamesprove it
>>738378323sorry but all those games you listed are dogshitgo on, cry at me faggot
>>738378779https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/planar-reflections-in-unreal-engine#planarreflectionperformance&kitedemo
>>738364241With just some exceptions Zero has the same damn stages as 64. With the same branching paths. With the same branching path conditions. And the same bosses. Yeah they spruced it up with some original content. And the control are obviously very different. But acting like it's a ridiculous claim to say that it's a Starfox 64 remake is just ridiculous. Starfox Zero is way overhated by the way. But it is a Starfox 64 remake. Or reboot if it makes you feel better. Either way, it is extremely closely mapped onto Starfox 64.
>>738378814why would I cry at someone objectively wrong instead of just call you retarded and move on?retard
>>738378910>unreal engineAh, now I get it...
>>73836443264 was the first movie game you retard
>>738375303Based, I could buy cheaper games with more content on the PS1
>>738378541I dread to know what other games you like.
>make same game 4 timesWhy
>>738362128fippy bippyFuck OP. Fuck modern kiketendo and the garbage they're producing.
>>738379474it's safe and it takes less workNintendo can be risk averse with some thingsStar Fox is a short game held up by replayablity and maybe a lot of nostalgia but they clearly want to do SOMETHING with itso they're just doing 64 againbut now it has cutscenes and extra difficulty levels and some other bullshit so the game maybe isn't 2 hours long on a basic playthroughso when little Timmy puts the game down after the first run because "I beat the game. that's it" it's maybe a little longer than normal
TAKE FOX'S MODEL FOR THE FIRST STEP
>>738362063Love it
>>738362448Assault was so bad it turned nintendo off from making big budget sequels again.
>>738362572>We want an ITERATIVE sequel that BUILDS upon the foundations of 64, not the same fucking game reheated and microwaved for us again, stupid fuckhead.If you truly believe that then but the new game more than once. Only way to get that is if the game does well.
>>738366842May as well just stop being a star fox fan then.
>>738367073STOP WITH THE FUCKING REMAKESI JUST WANT NEW GAMES
>pilots have their footprint on their arwing>James has a much smaller paw print next to his for young Foxcute
>>738362063>>738362063They did this on purpose… no way they can fuck up this badly. Sloptendo fucks another franchise in the ass.
>>738367451they announced starfox like a month before releasing it. So I would assume they would announce it in august with a sep/oct/nov release date
>>738378368yiff in hell, furfaggots.The vaguely creepy pseudo-realistic character design is better than soft round Dreamworks animalfucker shit.
>>738378990I bet you used to hate on Unity in 2016
>>738372465
>>738373567>he doesn't remember Elephant Peach/Daisy
>>738362063shan't be buying shitch 2
>>738370884I love Bananza and this is one of the better summaries I’ve read on this site. Thanks, anon.If it gets a sequel, I hope they add just a little more challenge (maybe more to the level of the post-game, but just a little) and underwater stages.
>>738364035its $50 thoughbeit
>>738362063It looks great unlike those slop panzer dragoon remakes
>>738362063it's ok when nintendo does it
$50 for a game that can be beaten in 1 hour is still kinda pricey. $40 was the sweet spot here, and it's $33~ in yen so $40 was the right price.
>>738365674i like this because it makes furries mald
>Metroid 2 remake leads to Metroid Dread>Zelda: Link's Awakening remake leads to Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom>Famicom Detective Club remake leads to EmioIf this does well this will be the new groundwork for the series continuity moving forward (I think) so starting off with a re imagining of the series most prolific game makes sense even if its getting stagnant retelling the games story numerous times
>>738364841the only one that looks bad is peppy
>>738365961NINTENDO
>>738373354Rule of cool is far more important.
>>738364841Honestly the designs are starting to grow on me, Star Wolf's in particular are PEAK
>>738372864That time obviously doesn't include medaling every level in both normal and expert modes. If you're not interested in maximizing score, don't play arcade style rail shooters.
I truly don’t get the hate for the visuals Star Fox has changed art styles almost every single iteration While the new models look a little uncanny, they’re ultimately still recognizable and I’m sure seeing more of them in action will acclimate people The gameplay is what matters most and if it’s just “64 + extras,” I’ll be happy >b-but too many 64 remakesThey knocked it out of the parkIt’s like DodonpachiThey made 2 sequels to DOJ, but people still unanimously prefer DOJ and DOJ is the one that got the 10/10 M2 port
>>738383670>I truly don’t get the hate for the visualsThe characters are all ugly as fuck. Just look at Katt.
>>738383717Nah they're fine>Please look at my cherrypicked example and admit they're ALL Bad!Nah
>>738383857They are all bad, though. Katt is just the most stark example. Everything else about the graphics and visuals are great, I think the vehicles and environments and everything else are fantastic. The characters are a disgusting eyesore, though, and it creates a huge blemish on the game.
Miyu and Fay whenthey should have snuck them in this game and pretended they were part of the continuity the whole time
>>738384092Sounds like a matter of personal opinión.Let's agree to disagree.
>>738373291Bananza was trash. Pokopia and Air Ride have been the only good games on it.
>>738384158Do you really want to see what these artists would do to Miyu and Fay?
>>738362063Character design aside, the game looks great
>>7383620633ds was a remaster.
>>738383667>if you did not autistically max out the game despite maxing out always means miserable repetition then you didn't play the game
>>738383384They only make these games once a decade though.
>>738371129Star Fox 4/64
>>738362063>to mimic the puppets then why give them stubby digitigrade legs? It's not mimicking the puppets it's a complete redesign. Melee design mogs the hell out of this shit.
>>738385094>Melee design mo-ACKKill yourself stinky
>>738384521If you don't at least unlock expert mode then you didn't complete "Main+Sides." Plus, the game takes more than 2 hours to beat the first time because you'll inevitably get game overs PLUS you have to play through it AT LEAST 3 times to see every level. The time they're presenting is not accurate.
>>738383670>I truly don’t get the hate for the visuals In no previous design did Fox have realistic digitigrade legs. And in this they're not even proportional so it looks really terrible.
>>738364549Almost all of the alternative routes were just short boss arenas instead of full stages. Gyrocopter levels were boring as fuck.
>>738362828I like the old puppet style, tired of anime or Disney style anthropomorphic designs
>>738385667Gyrocopter stages were interesting in that they were more exploratory than a conventional on-rails stage. The variety added by them was interesting, but the change in pace and focus might be undrrstandably frustrating to some. I enjoyed them however as a part of the broader balance of different vehicles and stage types. Shame the rover didn't get a chance to be a part of the rotation
>>738362896From a Star Control fan to a Star Fox fan; No, you don't.
>>738385442>heel of the sole is up on his ankleThey're not even fucking trying, man. They didn't give him special fox boots, they just made normal boots and stretched them around his animal limbs. What the fuck?
>>738385442
>>738384537Only because they never succeed.
the "switch 2 has no games" crowd has been really silent since this was announced
>>738362063i have demake fatigue, simple as. How hard can it be to come up with a new idea for your video game with actual new shit in it, instead of just lazily copypasting already existing ones ad nauseum?
>>738388538Better to have no games than a shitty normie hyper realistic slop remake.
I think it looks all right. I haven't touched anything Nintendo since gamecube but I don't mind the look of this.Not enough to get me to buy a switch though. Release it on PC and I'll buy it though
>>738389751>Nintendo releasing their games on anything elseLol, lmao even
>>738362063>you don’t deserve this gameThat's okay i've already played it :)
>>738371086Zero is not “the same game” having some similarities in stages, the same villain, and a completely different plot does not make it into the same game
>>738390350It is the same plot, retard.
>>738376990Like you skimmed through starfox zero to claim the complete fucking lie its the exact same levels as 64? Kill yourself you inbred subhuman hypocrite
>>738362063Sonic 06 Eggman ass designs
>>738390431Its actually not.
Got all medals on expert years ago. I have no reason to play this.
