[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vg/ - Video Game Generals


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 3 Convair Model 200.jpg (72 KB, 800x335)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
Paper shit - Edition

Previous thread: >>521043714

>Official site:
warthunder.com/

>Fan created content:
live.warthunder.com/

>Wiki with info on tech trees, weapon systems and game mechanics:
wiki.warthunder.com/Main_Page

>Old, better wiki:
old-wiki.warthunder.com/Main_Page

>Old forums archive:
pastebin.com/EyMhsLAJ

>Guides to Air and Ground battles + MEC:
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=742852313
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hgHbWlSjefFhCqOUeGpoKQntdQDPG32X7XQo9EqDF00
old-forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/438251-strategic-tips-for-ground-battle-maps-36-maps-90-videos-as-of-28august2020

>Guides on missiles, radars, radar warning receivers:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Weghk_2DpfA
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tQ6JzPWEFU
youtu.be/DOGazUgUdsQ
youtu.be/wAtTS8xSYEc

>Guides on how to evade missiles and survive top tier:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsmGiyODPuM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUJJ94NwH_g
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CAN_Mo2d74
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbKcAdLoWDk
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYfNbDZw5J8

>Guided weapons statistics:
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SsOpw9LAKOs0V5FBnv1VqAlu3OssmX7DJaaVAUREw78

>What tanks have thermals and their generations:
thunderview.net/thermals/

>Someone sending you runes?:
translate.yandex.com/ocr

Reminder:
>arcade

Thread theme: https://youtu.be/H2LQMElLoLs?si=CnDoBd1fOdX2gigc
>>
File: halloween crapan.jpg (309 KB, 1199x799)
309 KB
309 KB JPG
i just peepee poopoo my pants...
>>
>/wtg/ - War Thunder Genera
>>
File: F-15 CFT.png (316 KB, 445x636)
316 KB
316 KB PNG
>>
Please stop typing kekaroo, it's very cringe
>>
>>521281136
i now only see that ghibli version from the thumbnail now, god help me.
honestly though i prefer seeing that one since at this point this image is just a giant shitpost and contributes nothing so either way it works, i suppose.
>>
File: 038625.jpg (465 KB, 1200x913)
465 KB
465 KB JPG
catch my vikhr…
>>
File: зображення.jpg (197 KB, 1024x1024)
197 KB
197 KB JPG
>low tier russia
>>
>зoбpaжeння
>>
what about it
>>
File: wtg.png (331 KB, 990x990)
331 KB
331 KB PNG
>>521043714
>>
>>521282695
>team game thing
>based tranny planes
where's nigger on this image? we're really racist it should almost be as big as game
>>
>>521282695
>troon spaa
>>
>>521282695
>fun general
>>
>>521282695
>tranny planes
>play tank
TANK. GAME.
>>
File: 75qfcdephof41.png (749 KB, 777x495)
749 KB
749 KB PNG
>>
>>521283047
>>521283308
troon spaa and trang planes. the message is clear. naval
>>
File: 1740060159086746.jpg (167 KB, 1565x1104)
167 KB
167 KB JPG
>>
File: shot 2025.04.11 04.24.47.jpg (1.81 MB, 1638x1482)
1.81 MB
1.81 MB JPG
Is the 2B any fun?
>>
File: yellow menace of top tier.png (675 KB, 3130x2918)
675 KB
675 KB PNG
>>
File: file.png (740 KB, 1565x1104)
740 KB
740 KB PNG
>>521283990
fixed
>>
this is completely not worth it even at this discount isn't it? looks fuckawful.
>>
File: TFW Top Down.webm (2.84 MB, 1280x720)
2.84 MB
2.84 MB WEBM
>>521284167
Rarely
>>
>>521284167
I always used it exclusively. Over-cover kills are just too satisfying.
>>
>>521286938
depends on how good you are at ranging shots and knowing where to overpressure
>>
>>521286894
unfortunately, Top Gun 2 was good so I cant hate the F/A-18
>>
>>521288234
so it's shit, got it.
>>
>current: Mirage IIIC
>new grind tom: F-8E(FN) (258,737/260k) 2 left to get out rank 7 kino
5 jets left till rafale
>>
>>521291098
so 260K per rank 7 jet and 400K per rank 8 jet
>520K + 1,230M = 1,730M RP
>100K+ a day = ~17 days left
>or max 200K a day = 8.5 days left
fuck im nearly there
>>
>>521291098
Keep at it, I enjoy seeing your progress, reminds me of the days where I could get through a tree in a couple of weeks.
>>
>versus ussr
>low tier
>anytime you kill a stalinium tank you just get strafed by 20 yak9s
>top tier
>get bombed by 20 SUs
why even play any other country?
>>
>>521292068
thanks, i was just getting a little better in gaining rp's i need in less than 2-3 hours per day
>>
>>521282394
based beyond belief
>>
>>521292572
skill issue. I mog rusissies on the regular
>>
File: file.png (59 KB, 301x274)
59 KB
59 KB PNG
I'm sure this will be an easy way to make money and it certainly won't activate the hard mode convicted rapist matchmaker. It doesn't pay all that well either, it's biggest advantage is making me play the good money printer line up for at least 10 games
>>
File: Tig.jpg (97 KB, 1000x1000)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>all those upgrades and still no upgraded engines
Why? There are like a billion F-5 modernization programs and none of them feature new engines
>>
>>521297913
Probably isn’t much new that fits in there, which would mean an airframe redesign. New electronics is a lot simpler in comparison
>>
File: kettenjesus.jpg (161 KB, 1350x1000)
161 KB
161 KB JPG
>>521297332
I just did one of those and only missed it once even had 6 boosters running after getting like 30 of them from the boxes
the real cock torture starts when you activate the golden wagers, I still have 15 commander ones sitting around
>>
File: file.png (50 KB, 783x141)
50 KB
50 KB PNG
>enemy says "don't spawn" in chat
>I win the game 10 seconds later
I love chink hours, thank you for the win bonus.
>>
>>521298853
>the real cock torture starts when you activate the golden wagers
I'm not doing that ever again, I'd get into day trading if I wanted to die from stress.
>>
>>521297913
new engines are too expensive of an upgrade for a cope fighter like the F-5
>>
>>521297332
It's 5 kills in GRB.
Play a stacked line up like BR 4.0 Russia and you will get 5 kills by accident.
The only problem with that wager is having to play GRB.
>>
why the fuck is every wall in this game made out of industrial glue?
>>
>>521301909
I don't play boring BRs.
>>
File: mfw.png (470 KB, 860x395)
470 KB
470 KB PNG
>>
File: 1713774344224610.png (1 MB, 960x720)
1 MB
1 MB PNG
>>521283383
>>
>>521297332
i just did that an hour ago
it was fine the first couple matches then instantly i started going 0-4 (or 4-0? all deaths) and the one match i did actually do good in, everyone kept stealing my kills
>>
File: 45645754.jpg (83 KB, 610x346)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
when?
>>
reminder to join Nigger 508 if you actually want 20k lmao
>>
>join trannysquad #2 but with extra chinks to pad it out
No thanks
>>
I have enough vehicles now, time to move on
>>
File: 1744196024355549.jpg (88 KB, 1024x683)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
>>521281136
>>521281494
uhoh ( ω )
pantsu shittod
>>
>>521297913
There's no space for a new engine without major redesign, same thing happened to the Gripen
>>
>want to grind SL in my F2G
>activate boosters
>matchmaking takes it's sweet time to match me with 15% WR retards
thanks.
>>
>>521291098
You didn't get the m2k-s4? Has less CMs than the s5 but still pretty good with the missiles it has.
>>
File: Marceau.jpg (283 KB, 2029x1272)
283 KB
283 KB JPG
It's Friday /wtg/
>>
File: jones.jpg (5 KB, 223x226)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>521316268
>nothing but sparks the whole match
>not even enough damage to get assists
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>
>>521316463
it’s fantastic at 12.3
>>
>6.0
>constant 7.0 uptiers against jets you can't even touch played by fags who keep avoiding you
fun.
>>
All BI players should get their fucking balls surgically removed with a hammer
sovgroids suffer
>>
>pissrael meteor event is over exam time
THANK you gaydjin
>>
File: 1618059140906.jpg (185 KB, 612x600)
185 KB
185 KB JPG
I HATE MISSILES I HATE MISSILES I HATE AIRSPAWN """"""""""""ATTACKERS"""""""""""" THAT ARE JUST FUCKING FIGHTERS WITH AN IMMENSE CRUTCH FOR TURBO SHITTERS I HATE FIDDIES IN JETS I HATE SOVGROIDS I HATE GERMUTTS
>>
>>521318601
>fags who keep avoiding you
skill issue. im playing chess while youre playing checkers
>flies into ground while dogfighting you
>>
>>521320359
play spaa
>>
>>521320550
playing ARB
>>
>>521320651
right now i just sharply inhaled in a manner similar to a mechanic who is about to charge you two and a half thousand dollars when you only came in to get your air conditioning fixed
just wanted you to know that
anyway good luck with your missile hell
hope u have fun vro
>>
https://warthunder.com/en/news/9464-special-celebrating-international-day-of-human-space-flight-with-a-decal-en
>https://warthunder.com/en/news/9464-special-celebrating-international-day-of-human-space-flight-with-a-decal-en
https://warthunder.com/en/news/9464-special-celebrating-international-day-of-human-space-flight-with-a-decal-en
>https://warthunder.com/en/news/9464-special-celebrating-international-day-of-human-space-flight-with-a-decal-en
>>
Game is just pure slop now, try adding some good new maps or new fun limited time modes
>>
>a bug that caused players to be awarded with research points and silver lions after participating in battles has been fixed
>>
>>521321764
It's no wonder why they never fix volumetric now, it gives the biggest advantages to Russian WWII shitboxes and their blackhole armor
>>
>>521322648
>good new maps
When was the last time they made one of those would you say?
>>
>>521321764
We should stop celebrating the space race.
When aliens come and ask "How did humans first get to space?", we will have to say "On a rocket designed as an intercontinental missile to carry thermonuclear warheads to our enemies. In a capsule designed for photographic spy missions because we wanted to know how many intercontinental missiles our enemies were building at the same time. But we really are peaceful now. Please trust us, fellow peaceful space travelers."
>>
>>521309384
Why did Japan get napkin tanks to fill up the WW2 part of their tech tree but France didn't?
>>
>>521323771
Would be absolute kino to fight a war against someone who is not human, zero remorse or human rights, total earth supremacy
>>
should I F-14B?
>>
>>521322648
I just want EC ARB
>>
>>521323541
Seversk-13
>>
>>521303757
when will this be added?
>>
Is there any point in the time where russian planes are better than mutt?
maybe mig-15 era? or yak3/9?
>>
>>521324378
If they've come here then they're more than likely going to kick the shit out of us in a war.
>>
>>521325080
All eras if you're talking about the run of the mill America player.
>>
>>521324378
Bro if there is a species that can cross the inconceivable vastness of space it's either going to be a civie colonization effort that doesn't know we're here or a war party that will erase us.
>>
Christ, why did they never give t he MiG15 a G-Suit. Its like playing "Lost Control" simulator.
>>
>>521324378
I do not wish to fight wars against extraterrestrial beings or dissect their bodies in any secret laboratories. Neither do I wish to have sexual intercourse with the females of their species. I do not object to earth being conquered and am willing to point out any "earth supremacists" to the occupying security forces.
>>
>>521325114
>>521325251
Sorry but we have enough nukes to blow any alien fleet to kingdom come, space niggers would get btfo
>>
>>521326584
We already have the tech to intercept that shit right now. Aliens are going to destroy them before they even leave the atmosphere proper.
>>
There is nothing out there.
>>
>>521326714
Just spam them, we got an entire planet of resources, they got some rinky dink space ships and fancy alien lasers
>>
Why are some Sabre pilots such pussies, flying a MiG15 (non-BIS) vs a F-86F-2 Sabre and every time I turn in on him the raging cunt just beelines straight for his airfield. Give up chasing him when the defense missiles start flying and return to try and shoot someone else on his team. As soon as I get near one of his teammates, lo and behold the raging cunt returns and starts spraying his cannons all over the place. So I turn back in on him, and what do you know it, the cunt beelines for the airfield again. What type of twat plays like that?
Surely the F-86F-2 outperforms the MiG15 in most areas except for instantaneous turn performance? Roll, Speed, Energy retention all favour it do they not?
>>
If the Sabre is an American plane, why is it called Sabre and not Saber?
>>
>>521328932
copyright issues with fate IIRC
>>
>>521328932
Maybe the divergence of Sabre and Saber only became literary standard later.
>>
Whats better

F-2 Sabre
F-2 panzer IV
F-2 Bf109
>>
>>521329448
sasuga type moon
>>
>>521330471
Saber obviously. Planes > Tanks.
>>
>>521330596
There is no plane called Saber.
>>
>>521331207
source?
>>
>>521331207
>he doesn’t know
Sometimes it’s nice to live in Nevada
>>
File: WARTHUNDER X-28C.jpg (366 KB, 2213x1240)
366 KB
366 KB JPG
>>521331207
Whats it like to be WRONG?
>>
File: Saber.jpg (749 KB, 718x1200)
749 KB
749 KB JPG
>>521331207
>Saber
the cutest princess
>>
>>521332150
you mean king
>>
>>521332150
for me it's this saber (male)
>>
>>521331725
What's the BR?
>>
File: Saber volleyball.jpg (1.55 MB, 2391x2764)
1.55 MB
1.55 MB JPG
>>521332341
A king I would follow, to whatever end.
>>
>>521332581
Where's that from?
>>
>>521333620
samurai remnant
>>
>>521332150
sex
>>
>>521332648
11.3
>>
>>521324406
No
>>
File: file.png (13 KB, 595x79)
13 KB
13 KB PNG
Do the needful.
>>
sneedful
>>
>uhmm yeah so this light tank sucks against other tanks of the same time period so we will make it face stuff 30 years older
>>
>>521336863
Proably better that way, later stuff has more thin skinned light shit it can blow up.
>>
>>521336825
Join LowIQ
>>
>>521336863
Yes and?
>>
>>521337371
>>521337534
Light tanks are supposed to be vulnerable. Time travelers rulling certain tiers just make the game more dumb.
>>
Is this an upgrade over the regular MiG15 or no?
>>
>>521337882
Yes. It has a G-Suit, thus it's useable.
>>
>>521337882
It has a significantly stronger engine, what do you think?
>>
>>521337721
No such thing happens in the game
>>
>>521338039
>BMP-3, 2S38, BMD-4, PT-76-57 don't exist in game
>>
>>521337882
It's better but you will be facing considerably stronger planes. Also it doesn't fix the planes main issues which are bad roll speed and bad guns
>>
>>521338978
MiG-15 guns aren't bad learn to aim retard
>>
>>521339119
They are not very good when shooting at high speed targets
>>
>>521339474
get right up their arse and they work just fine.
>>
>>521337438
I'm already in...
>>
>>521339474
Try the Mk 108 and you will never complain about the 2x23/1x37 anymore
>>
>>521338978
Just out of curiosity, what would you say is the best plane of that BR?
>>
>>521341235
f-86-25 and mig-15bis. The bis is just not as oppressive in downtiers and has a lot more issues uptiers
>>
>>521307593
Only with a destroy 10 units wager do I get fucking assists with the soviet 122.
>>
>>521342789
Its why I've never used my Golden Battles wagers, I just know as soon as I turn that shit on, I'm going to be in a well of suffering for the next 10 games.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-b51C82-UE
>some guy used minecraft voxel logic to turn cheap video cameras into optical sensors that can detect stealth aircraft
I'm sure there are countermeasures for this like decoys but the fact that it works at all means that "stealth" fighters are pretty much cooked.
>>
>>521338978
Nigger are you implying it's somehow bad? It's beyond fucking broken at 8.3 and should've never went down from 8.7. No plane is optimal in uptiers but it doesn't see anything it can't at least defend against indefinitely with its insane energy generation. Abysmal dogshit like the F9F-8 or the F-84F wishes it was half as good as the MiG-15bis. Hell, there are planes 0.3 BR HIGHER that are incomparably worse than it like the A-4B, the FJ-4B or (to a lesser extent) the Yak-23 and Yak-30D.
>>
File: 1730020600128655.jpg (71 KB, 1126x962)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
>sav
>full down tier
man I feel so bad about those poor guys
>>
>>521344287
>flies further away
>>
>don't think my enemies deserve to kill me
>go back to the airfield and J out
lmao
>>
>>521344287
What a great system that I'm sure won't have any issues at night, or in clouds, or in shitty weather, or anywhere but perfectly clear skies.
>>
>>521344287
now shoot him down
>>
>>521345293
Thats not the point, the point is a cheap mesh detection network, that can work even if the rest of your AD network is non functional.
>>
>>521341235
Mig-15Bis Ish
>>
How will this affect the current and future Leopard 2s in WT?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwUzZV6OayU
>>
it won't, not war thunder
>>
>>521345219
Poor visibility works both ways, aircraft like to be able to see their targets. And it's a big problem for jets when simple cameras can track them.
>>
File: JS79848543-3474023783.jpg (27 KB, 615x461)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
nigga still thinks we're daylight bombing like its 1943
>>
>>521345493
Ok, so now that you can track it, how are you supposed to destroy?
>>
>>521347127
We need to return to tradition. Abandon multi-role tri-service shit. Bring back one aircraft for each type of mission and bring them in light, medium, heavy and super heavy variants.
>>
>>521347187
Fire on it, obviously, loft your missiles into its general area, hope they can track it when they get closer. Either way the RWR on the plane will be going off like mad, so it will be forced to turn cold and perhaps turn a sub-optimal facing towards your radars, as well as light their afterburners and provide a better IR track.
Not everything has to provide direct means to a kill, even knowing where the plane is and what heading its on can be useful.
>>
>>521347127
This shit being on the TV every evening when I was doing my homework was a big part of my formative years. Shit was so kino.
>>
>>521331725
Damn, warthunder needs fun planes like that.
>>
No, It doesn't.
>>
>>521348227
fpbp
>>
>maybe 30km detection range under very ideal conditions
>high chance of confusing it with anything else
Fun backyard project but it'd be retarded to think it has any real purpose.
>>
>>521347978
You were in school back in 91? What are you doing in my zoomer game old man?
>>
>matchmaker takes a minute after using a booster
It's gonna be one of those huh
>>
>>521344421
No but Mig-15 is better for its br
>>
File: M1A2.webm (1.71 MB, 1280x720)
1.71 MB
1.71 MB WEBM
Has Gaijin acknowledged how fucking shit the current implementation of tank thermal sights is?
>>
>>521348830
Yeah, I like tanks and planes, what else am I gonna play? World of Tanks?
>>
>>521349668
Arma 3 modded
>>
>>521348413
Thats not the kind of attitude that earns you millions in DARPA research contracts.
>>
>>521349734
Way too janky and unoptimized. Want to have a draw distance above 2 km? Kiss your FPS goodbye fucker. Not to mention a lot of stuff, especially about A2A combat, is grossly simplified.
>>
>>521349734
the arma series is primarily focused on infantry combat, the vehicle combat is completely dogshit, mught as well be wot because the tanks have (invisible) healthbars and will explode after being hit by 3 tank shells even if those shells did literally nothing to the internal modules or crew
>>
Finally done with that Early German jet shite. Gave up on them all in the end and went back to the Ta152. He162 seemed the best of them all, decent guns, fast enough so long as you don't let it get slow, can perma WEP at 105-106% depending on map.
>>
>>521350154
He 162 is a pure BnZ. But if you turn against better props its basically suicide because it can't accelerate.
Ho 229 has good guns and turns a lot but it's overtiered.
Me 262 overall sucks and should be 6.7 max.
>>
File: 1662255985520736.png (9 KB, 1000x200)
9 KB
9 KB PNG
>>521350154
>He162 seemed the best of them all
>>
>F-5TH still missing 2 missile pylons
>>
>>521352147
What? It's not that bad.
>>
>>521352359
Wait 2+ years for them to realize that upgrades of vehicles already in the game don't suddenly lose very basic and important features.
Source: multiple years of the Q-5L not having flares despite being a much more modern variant of the plane than any other in the game. Did I mention it STILL doesn't have any A2A missiles?
>>
>>521351152
>Ho 229 has good guns and turns a lot
Its shite. No yaw. its a massive struggle to get your guns anywhere near the target. Sure you can loop around them all day long, but fuck you if you need any lateral aim correction. Its even worse in ground attack because the lack of yaw there really really fucks it, you just have to spray in the general area of your target and hope some of your shots hit. Its also utterly dire as soon as any part of your wing is red of black, so basically the entire place, as it cuts your speed near in half.
Terrible terrible plane. It would have been better if they put bombs in it instead of the Arado and put the cannons from the Ho229 in the Arado instead.

I fucking hate that plane.
>>
>>521352147
>no it's just hawker harrier using more than 90% throttle
>>
>>521352765
I don't think it's THAT bad, but it faces some of the problems of the Me 262, which is facing +7.7 planes.
>>
229 is like delta wing, it turns a lot, but only once or twice before it burns all the energy
>>
>>521352147
>It's just a soviet BI using 30% throttle
>>
B-47 Stratojet when
B-36 Peacemaker when
B-57 Canberra when
B-52 Stratofortress when
XB-70 Valkyrie when
YA-9 when
>>
File: martin-xb-51-color.jpg (326 KB, 1200x699)
326 KB
326 KB JPG
>>521355212

For me it's the XB-51.
>>
File: 1716929848075297.jpg (657 KB, 1920x1080)
657 KB
657 KB JPG
>>521355212
>B-57 Canberra when
11 years ago.
>>
File: b58.jpg (334 KB, 1200x872)
334 KB
334 KB JPG
>>521355802
For me it's the original hustler... what a stupid fucking name.
>>
Is it worth carrying a pair of rocketpacks on the MiG15 Bis to use as impromptu flares?
>>
>>521355802
Mate, someones put your engines in the wrong place.
>>
>have not played in a month
>still in WARTG
>>
>>521356229
Kino plane, just you and the gang off to nuke the commies back to the stone age.
>>
>>521357265
Wait, how did their ejection seats work with those roofs?
>>
>>521357558
Ejection seats?
>>
LUL
>>
>3 kills
>7 assists
Real Destroy 10 Units hours
>>
>>521356793
No
>>
File: alt f4.jpg (42 KB, 450x247)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>Red Desert
>European Province
>Fulda
>Any Conquest map
>>
Fulda my beloved
>>
>>521357558
Same way literally every system works?
>>
File: Untitled.png (3.58 MB, 1920x1182)
3.58 MB
3.58 MB PNG
Why the hell is this thing worth 6000+ GE
>>
>>521356793
You're better off just turning, the rockets will only drag you down at 8.3 where the only real missile threat are the 38s in 9.3 battles.
>>
>>521360690
Somewhat hindered by there being a big ass metal canopy in the way anon.
>>
>>521286894
kekd
>>
Is there an easy way to snag the last one of this?
>>
>>521361684
as apposed to the big ass glass canopy in the way for normal planes?
>>
>>521361495
Should've done the needful, it was free.
>>
>>521361890
Forgot image.
>>
>>521362123
plexiglass canopys have explosive cutaways, that big ass metal thing clearly doesnt.
>>
>>521362161
play 4.0 botes afterhours and you'll wind up being 2v2 against chinks/bots. super easy.
>>
>>521323771
Shut the fuck up, nerd. The aliens will learn that it is man who has dominion over this universe.
>>
>ITP M1 still op
>>
>>521323541
advance to the rhine
>>
File: file.png (2.17 MB, 1284x1269)
2.17 MB
2.17 MB PNG
F-18 MEGADETH when?
>>
>>521364130
This wouldn't be able to take off.
>>
>>521363219
Did an alien probe your anus?
>>
>>521364130
Least excessive payload in Ace Combat
>>
>>521364525
Assuming they were on Earth, it wouldn't be a stretch to assume they did in fact probe Uranus and all other planets in the Solar system.
>>
>>521364130
The stabilizers have hardpoints with dumb bombs kek
>>
>>521362161
I get those all the time while playing ARB
>>
it's up!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVZU6i8qme0
>>
procure advertisement rights
>>
>finally get something decent
>it's a boring ass smug pirate icon
>>
Purchase commercial webspace
>>
Why ground niggas get to have cool fighter pilot profile pic >:( fuck you man
>>
im in a SU-27 and am fighting a F-14. He gets a Fox-2 off and i fly behind terrain to break lock. i evade the missile, i fire my R-27ER in a head on and kill him. ">fucking russian bias" he puts in chat. check his profile and he is a serial Germany main. Why are they like this?
>>
File: 1722989599008506.jpg (21 KB, 188x157)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
fuckin hate it at 11.0

missile slinging CM-using pieces of shit
>>
Gaijin needs to do a fast and furious themed event for the next April Fool's. You got the tank from 6 and the planes from 8 and 9.
>>
File: dd.png (56 KB, 449x187)
56 KB
56 KB PNG
>>521368251
forgot picrel
>>
>>521364130
Gonna be so much drag on that that its gonna be flying in reverse.
>>
I had a dream in which Anton told me they added a lot of self propelled artillery to work as tank destroyers because missile carriers are useless on almost all maps.
Is this true?
>>
>Driving King Tiger 10.5cm
>Shoot T44-100 in turret to clutch the match, stop him decapping
>Commander dies. Thats it. Nothing else.
>Drives round the side of me and one taps me in return.
Done a double take to see if I was using APCR or som shit by accident, but nope, regular ass PzGr.Rot APCBC with explosive filler. I was so rustled I forgot to check the shot after the battle to see how the fuck that even happened.
>>
AMX-50 Foch? based.
>>
>>521369580
deserved for playing papershit
>>
>>521369580
fantasy tank, fantasy experience
>>
>>521368607
just wait until we get
>M37
>M
>M7
>M52
>M55
>M107
>M108
>M110
>Grille
>Wespe
>Abbot
>Deacon
>Bishop
>Sexton
and thats just from the top of my head
and to make things worse, a lot of them can be shoehorned into half a dozen trees (or more)
>>
File: 1722488095899335.jpg (40 KB, 540x622)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
What gets better ground matchmaking: 9.0 or 8.7?
>>
>>521371005
>be gay
>worry about matchmaking because sweet little baby can't emotionally handle being uptiered in a video game.
>>
>>521371005
They get uptiered roughly the same amount.
But 9.0 can usually deal with 10.0 a little bit better than 8.7 can deal with 9.7. I suppose it depends on what nation you're playing, really.
>>
File: IMG_1376-1.jpg (417 KB, 1616x1148)
417 KB
417 KB JPG
>>521369661
>>521369979
Paper/Fantasy stuff is fun, stop being autistic and boring. Be easier to balance if all the stats are made up too.
>>
File: heinkel-lerche-lark_2.jpg (40 KB, 512x384)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>521371565
>>521369661
>>521369979
Besides that I want my Hitler UFO.
>>
File: HAF1JA13.jpg (152 KB, 1200x1520)
152 KB
152 KB JPG
>>521371817
>>
>>521371565

Paper is one thing, but a 105mm Tiger II was never considered.
Same reason i shit on Panther II, it was never intended to mount a 88.
>>
File: 120893011_p0.png (2.07 MB, 2808x4192)
2.07 MB
2.07 MB PNG
>>521371817
The Ruhrstahl X-4 is acceptable for War Thunder but the Heinkel Lerche is pure napkinwaffe.
>>
how rare are the coelian, panther II, and kt 105 nowadays?
>>
File: sw8wybt0kqz51.jpg (28 KB, 640x413)
28 KB
28 KB JPG
>>521371817
>>521372998
To be fair, the Germans do kinda need something between their overBRed late war jets and their MiG15-Bis
>>
>>521371565
Me 328 as a Me264 modification that allows you to lunch it from a plane like that hydroplane on USS Mississippi would be cool mechanic
>>
File: peak Germany.jpg (102 KB, 2089x231)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
>>521372664
I use them both in my 7.0 lineup. Its kino.
>>
>>521373298
>>
File: 89396932_p0.jpg (208 KB, 819x1225)
208 KB
208 KB JPG
>>521373245
Nobody played the Coelian even when it was obtainable, it's just an overtiered Ostwind.
>>
>>521373873
Would that rudder create downforce?
>>
>>521373245
Doubt they're all that rare, any older player will have them.
>>
>>521373245
pretty rare I would imagine considering most people started playing after 2021
>>
>>521374337
People played it because it was enclosed and isn't open-top. Nobody likes to play it now because they swiped the HVAP away from it that used to have like 137mm of pen and made it a viable light tank alternative.
>>
>>521371817
>>521371565
true but we need massively more papershit in everyone's trees then.
>>
File: hh.png (47 KB, 690x85)
47 KB
47 KB PNG
>>521373245
Probably rarer than Maus.
>>
spaded the Su-27, it was surprisingly fun
>>
>>521378038
Probably because most opinions you heard on it were from the first year of its existence when it had a dogshit unplayable artificially gimped FM of its awful T-10 prototype. It's solid nowadays.
>>
>artificially gimped FM
may we see it?
>>
>>521378420
the FM buff made a small difference it was never bad
>>
>>521378659
You can't, it's been ungimped.
>>
>>521379254
Cope, the plane was unusably bad before and hopelessly jobbed to everything, the buff wasn't small in the slightest since it now beats everything but the F-15A, EFT and Rafale if you play to its strengths.
>>
>>521379760
it was never unusably bad this is such nonsense cope
you barely played it in the first place kommyhuct
>>
>le boogeyman out of nowhere
>>
>>521378038
How did you handle games before you got more missiles? It feels like pain before you get R-27ER
>>
File: 1713025165906304.gif (1.12 MB, 395x386)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB GIF
Kirishima
>356mm ordinary SAP: 68kg equivalent
>356mm common type 0: 31kg equivalent and its a tier 2 research
wut?
>>
>country makes shit aircraft
>said shit aircraft is properly represented in game
>a-artificially gimped!
>>
>>521380215
difference in pen? SAP tends to be much higher HE load but less pen.
>>
>>521380215
>SAP vs AP
Count yourself lucky you even have SAP since the Japs didn't actually use it.
>>
>>521380434
SAP has a shit ton more pen, its just weird that the more useless HE shell is a higher tier research than the SAP
>>
>>521380215
besides not knowing why that garbage shell even existed I'm pretty sure a lot of modules on some vehicles, and especially ships, only exist to make the grind more bearable. Useless modifications existing means the other ones are cheaper.
>>
>>521380125
pretty much just stay on the flanks of the map and let ADHD brains get distracted in the swarm in the middle and kill them while they aren't paying attention
>>
HELP ME! I CANNOT STOP PLAYING FRANCE!
THE ONION, IT CALLS TO ME!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3BHyOhVXmE
>>
File: l'oignon.jpg (139 KB, 1024x1536)
139 KB
139 KB JPG
>>521382510
très basé
>>
>frogniggers
>>
>>521381092
or are made pointless by antons constant fiddling and overhauling of mechanics
auxiliary and AA upgrades are mostly pointless after they 'solved' the ai gunner trick, and iirc the HE rework made the (already dubiously effective) shrapnel protection mod useless

>>521380636
i guess the idea is that the SAP shell isnt strong enough for capital ships, but too punchy for thin-skinned targets
ergo you need to grind the HE and the AP shell to have a shell for every occasion
but id wager the SAP shell is just fine for most things that dont require a lot of pen, 14" holes are nothing to sneeze at, even if it overpens
>>
>>521382045
You just end with 0 kills or 1v9
>>
>>521382805
>t.austrian dog who didn't get to partake in the fried onions
>>
>>521383146
> iirc the HE rework made the (already dubiously effective) shrapnel protection mod useless
Wait, shouldn't shrapnel protection be more important with HE works these days?
>>
>>521383457
onions are fucking disgusting
>>
>>521383598
HE currently has never been more impotent than ever
>>
>>521383968
Wasn't it supposed to completely fuck hull compartments with the last patch, or did they completely walk back on that?
>>
>>521383598
should be, yes
but i never had the feeling it did anything in the first place, and im pretty sure it didnt get buffed when they unfucked everybody's HE
at least, i dont remember there being mention of it at the time

its entirely possible the new damage mechanics (god forbid we go without an overhaul every year or so) changed things again, but i havent played alot since the Strasbourg event ended
>>
File: countermeasures.png (681 KB, 919x698)
681 KB
681 KB PNG
Ok Frenches, riddle me this. Why do you put a countermeasure box only on one side of the centerline, and not both for double the stuff?
>>
>>521384053
you mean the
>ship will start losing buoyancy once two or more compartment turns black
mechanic? never seen it work ever. destroyers just get uncrewed before sections turn black cruisers and above don't seem to suffer from it
>>
File: 1744325024092094.jpg (48 KB, 456x475)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>1 enemy remaining
>camps the airfield
>all ai targets killed
>3000 tickets remaining
>14 minutes remaining
Why was the ticket system changed? Now it is impossible to end games with airfield campers in them. Before you could just kill ground targets and be done with the match. Now you need to waste 15 MINUTES because some faggot is afraid of leaving the spawn
>>
File: disgusted cat.gif (1.98 MB, 300x344)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB GIF
>>521383753
fried onions are godly
>>
File: kill yourself 9.jpg (30 KB, 666x375)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>521383753
>>
I'd like to penetrate Andou's LFP with my 120mm CUM BLAST munitions, if you catch my drift.
>>
>>521383753
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m56BUVvT5s4
learn to cook
>>
File: 1733043186387015.jpg (175 KB, 1122x989)
175 KB
175 KB JPG
>>521383753
>>
>>521383753
TRVKE
NVKE
>>
>>521384790
why would complain about it, you just get a fuckton more rp for doing nothing
>>
So if someone launches an R-73 at you from about 2km you're just cooked right?
>>
>>521384343
It's kinda ridiculous that there's so many essential changes and so little explaination even people that have some naval trees ground out don't really know what the fuck is going on.

>>521384654
So they completely declawed it. Can't say I mind that, it sounded stupid.
>>
>>521385073
>learn to cook
>posts grug tier "place food on fire" recipe
I like townsends, but that one isn't really much of an example of "learning to cook".

>>521385719
If it's in rear aspect, yes, pretty much. Same with Magic IIs and that new chink missile on the J-11B.
>>
>>521344287
DoD drones made a response https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRfh331wTCs
>>
>queue as 4.7
>get put into a 6.3 match somehow
i dont have anything thats 5.3 in my lineup and neither does my squadmate
>>
>>521377058
I have no issues with that, give me all the wacky zany shit.
>>
Why are obnoxiously undertiered discount versions of higher BR tanks allowed to exist in the game? I do not care X and Y doesn't have thermals or have a shitty engine they shouldn't be under the regular model's base BR
>>
>>521386519
name your lineups then? or post them?
>>
>>521386519
https://youtu.be/HXsU53Veupw
>>
File: file.png (160 KB, 617x841)
160 KB
160 KB PNG
>[SEAD] Vietnam
[SEAD] Vietnam
>[SEAD] Vietnam
[SEAD] Vietnam
>[SEAD] Vietnam
[SEAD] Vietnam
>>
>>521386841
Is there a new event coming up thats gonna use those?
>>
>>521386841
SEAD shouldn't be its own gamemode, it should be incorporated into EC and used there alongside other objectives. I can only hope it'll remain this way for the duration of the test only.
>>
>>521386841
>no F-8
>>
>>521386841
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RmQTYLD398
>>
wtf is this lock shit? I have to paypig to get those?
>>
>>521386205
Is the opinion of that guy worth anything or is it complete garbage like >99% of youtube based "analysis"?
>>
>>521387737
yes
>>
>>521286938
It's pretty useless, but it's fun making everyone hear the
>PFEEEEEEEWWWW PFEEEEEEEWWWW PFEEEEEEEEW PFEEEEEEEW
sound
>>
>>521387737
of course. Only DRG offers free battlepasses
>>
>>521386519
Someone forgot to turn off RB/AB BR in tech tree.
>>
>>521387273
Seems trivial to implement it into EC once they figure out how the mechanics work and can be balanced.
>>
>>521387796
Former Marine and now a MIC enthusiast. Task&Purpose and Justin Taylor are the official dod shills on yt.
>>
>>521386841
>SEAD
Does that mean anti radiation missiles?
>>
>>521388254
Yes.
>>
>>521388048
>Former Marine
That doesn't sound like a useful qualfication for this at all.
>MIC enthusiast
That sounds like a disqualifier for impartial analysis.
>Task&Purpose and Justin Taylor are the official dod shills on yt.
That doesn't give much hope either.

>>521388254
What else would it mean? Flying around and dropping chaff courtains or switching a jamming pod on doesn't exactly sound like it would make fun gameplay.
>>
>>521385727
i dont know what it is with naval because they put a lot of time and effort in adding ships, reworking mechanics and whatnot, but completely ignore any feedback or complaints (or straight up lie)
>you want decompression?
>heres a bunch of dreads shitting up cruiser/dd BRs but you still face krokhorsts and shartstadts
>bots are really worth as much as players! confirmed with devs!
>next patch raises reward for killing bots to that of players
>big threads on the AB aiming system and new damage mechanics
>0 response from gaijin other than HK trying figure out how it works because gaijin doesnt explain anything whatsoever
>>
File: 129093812_p0.jpg (3.46 MB, 1488x2454)
3.46 MB
3.46 MB JPG
>>521385073
Eat onions fresh, roast apples.
>>
>>521388254
why would someone bomb irradiated areas?
>>
>>521388605
to spread the radiation around
>>
>>521339119
>>521338978
The guns aren't bad. It just has a significantly higher skill floor than an american plane with 6 gorillion rounds of ammo.
>>
File: 1731313232956852.jpg (615 KB, 1510x1521)
615 KB
615 KB JPG
>>521388254
That means more one more argument to add MiG-25 to the game.
>>
Are there any up to date m50 sights?
>>
File: file.png (72 KB, 1172x409)
72 KB
72 KB PNG
Words can not describe how much I hate tasks like this. 4 games, 25 or so kills in and I stil haven't gotten it, "easy" task my fucking ass.
>>
File: images.jpg (10 KB, 259x194)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>521388254
God I would love the sheer amount of impotent rage that adding ARM's to the game would cause the tankers to emit.
>>
>>521379857
>be missile bus Su-27
>have terrible BVR performance due to its dogshit radar that has 8 seconds of delay before it rescans the target
>has terrible brawling performance due to low countermeasure count and a flight model that loses to everything in a sustained fight
>has the infamous 27ER...in the age when multipathing was 100m and the meta was to be a grippen that vaguely "stays low" with a 9M loadout while periodic flares stay on 24/7
>It wasn't that bad back then guys.
Nigger.
>>
>>521390021
....play with a squaddie anon. They go in a light tank, you go in whatever. They light shit up for you. Done.
>>
>>521390021
go air
go naval
go cado
>>
>>521380258
>country makes aircraft
>gaijin used the wrong documents and models the plane after its weaker prototype and with the wrong oswald efficiency
>it's shit in game
>gaijin eventually fixes the mistakes
>it's fine now
Constant and sharp
>>
>>521390105
>expecting good faith arguments from a buckbroken schizo
ngmi
>>
>>521390021
>need this task
>none of the mouthbreathing fucks marks targets

>need assist task
>all of your shots do fuck all of kills directly

>need repair task
>all friendlies repair before you get there or die instantly
it's always like this it's fucking rigged
>>
>>521390561
Amerika was saffering back then because it was the grippen that was the best plane in the game and the F-16 was only basically the same but without the infinite flares.
>>
>>521390105
it was always at least decent, stop sooking you victim complex faggot crybaby
>>
>>521386635
>>521387998
no it was 100% 4.7 on both sides
ive played this game for over 6000 hours and would notice such a mistake, we were both flabbergasted lol
>>
>>521390081
Most ground only players don't play SPAA. The retards you see seething about CAS on the forums and reddit usually don't even have one in their lineup.
>>
did they nerf fiddies? They dont fucking do shit even with solid bursts on target.
>>
>>521390081
That's fine. I don't play in that br range anyway.
>>
>>521391071
You're overlooking something or getting some of the BRs wrong.
>>
>tfw annihilating germutts and usamutts in the AMX-30(1972)
TOTAL
FRENCH
SUPERIORITY
>>
>>521390961
Its only silver lining was that it had a metric shit ton of missile hardpoints. This gave it a lot of potential to soak up kills since the average player is utterly dogshit. It consistently lost to everything in 1v1 dogfights between experienced pilots, and its weaknesses basically killed simulator battles since nobody would fucking queue for redfor due to how imbalanced the matchmaker was and how dependent that redfor teams were for the fence sitting nations to add some turncoat NATO planes to the red team.
>>
>>521391071
name your lineups then & game mode.
>>
have rusmonkeys stopped crying once since the F-14A? Even when they get a decently competitive jet like the Su-30SM they still cry
>>
File: cuckstal.png (10 KB, 815x85)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
the absolute state of cuckstal
>>
File: 1736382383409622.png (20 KB, 309x94)
20 KB
20 KB PNG
truly the elite of the elite
>>
>>521391779
The 27 and 27SM were fine: once gaijin fixed all of the flightmodel and avionics errors that the russian players were legitimately complaining about.
>>
File: 2k.png (8 KB, 808x82)
8 KB
8 KB PNG
>>521392158
nah, this one tho
>>
>>521392353
but why would you buy vehicles you don't intend to play
>>
>>521392296
the Su-30SM is great but I still see little misha and vanya chimping about how bad pidarashia is
>>
>>521391942
>>521392158
>>521392353
where do you find these
>2000
are there even that many in the game
>>
>>521392664
steam achievements
>>
File: robbed.png (97 KB, 811x299)
97 KB
97 KB PNG
yeah I'm thinking the achievements don't count for past performance
>>
>>521392710
guess not a lot of people play through steam then
i know i dont
>>
>>521392663
They're not wrong. I've played both USA and USSR and things are much easier in the american birds. You're just plane worse on red team until you get your hands on at least the post-buff 27SM. Honorable mention to the Yak-141 and its whopping total of 4 missiles.
>>
>>521392296
They were fine against their peers, not the planes that one-upped everything in the game at that point (mainly the EFT and Rafale, the F-15E was actually somewhat balanced against them since it had the upper hand in BVR but was way more manageable after the merge). Although that's hardly a problem on the Flankers' part, everyone was oppressed by those two (three if you count BVR).
>>521392663
Stop making shit up. What people (occasionally) complain about are the R-77s and their still unmodelled drag, which isn't even that big of a problem since no sane person grinded the USSR to do BVR, not the Su-30SM itself. I've seen way more posts of people rejoicing about getting an answer to yurotriangles than the supposedly "frequent" crying you're crying about.
>>
>>521393205
the eurofighter still nigger rapes the Su-30SM because Russia couldn’t make competitive engines until like literally 2020
>>
when are they going to fix the drag on the MICAs tho? 10km range is way too low....
>>
>need to grind SL
>grab my trusty (free talismanned) PBJ1H
>perferct match where I BTFO a base, rape ground targets including tanks, get a kill assist on a fighter all match
>17k SL
they're fucking with me
how 2 grind monies then
>>
>>521393441
>the eurofighter still nigger rapes the Su-30SM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJFFjCbJYuY
>>
>>521392961
They're Steam achievements so they bloody well should.
>>
>>521393578
>PBJ-1J
>unstoppable wager
>boosters
>antimech
>>
>>521393609
>MUH 1V1 GIMMICK DOGFIGHTS!!!
you don’t play top tier, clearly
>>
>>521394665
And you don't play Sim where 1v1s happen all the time, clearly.
>>
>>521393205
>They were fine against their peers
You could do ok if you knew what you were doing. Especially if we're considering the pre-nerf mig-23. But if we compare the average grind today of someone doing something like:
>mig-23ML to research low ranks and unlock Yak-141 to club wallet warriors and grind out the flankers
to
>F-4S to research low ranks and unlock the AV-8B Plus to club wallet warriors and grind out the F-15s
Then things are significantly easier for the blue team.

Things could still be worse. They could be fucking Germany and get fucking nothing but the shitnado or Su-22 prior to the F-4 ICE and eurofighter, but USA is still ezmode.
>>
File: boomboomto900.webm (2.95 MB, 1280x720)
2.95 MB
2.95 MB WEBM
>>521393757
I think the problem is that gaijin doesn't track shit until they decide to track it, I highly doubt I've spent less then 1% of my total gameplay time in matches
especially, when I have a video celebrating my 1000th AGM kill on the Etendard IVM ALONE
god knows how many AGMs and PGMs i've dropped since 2021
>>
>>521394738
nobody plays sim
>>
Aced the Turms III, that was fun
>>
File: 1721945596073647.jpg (84 KB, 1326x1018)
84 KB
84 KB JPG
Smoke screen and 4.1s reload for the CV90120 soon
>>
File: AGM.png (13 KB, 858x106)
13 KB
13 KB PNG
>>521394853
I mean, really? I've been CASnigging for four years since my 1000nd
>>
hopefully never
>>
>spend all your time worrying about numbers
>not just playing what you enjoy
>>
>>521394853
>900 ground kill
whoops, just trust me bro, I got the remaining 100 in like a week or three ok?
>>
>>521394665
kek he posts that video every time someone calls the 30sm dogshit
>>
>>521357558
they used an escape pod
>>
>>521356229
Why are the engines in pods? The Hustler always reminded me of those really late war german napkin bomber designs where they just strapped more and turbofan pods to wings and fuselage, which makes sense if you have about two weeks to design a plane but not really otherwise.
>>
>>521395047
>smoke screen
I wonder why gaijin still hasn't fixed the thermals "bug" that lets you see through it
>>
File: 1677398265980939.webm (2.74 MB, 1138x640)
2.74 MB
2.74 MB WEBM
>>521395323
I want my validation by Valva god damn it
I didn't hover over the battlefield dropping hot loads on dumb SPAGGOTs for nothing
>>
>>521393578
If you have top tier USA planes, you can spam the F-15E with a ground attack loadout.
>take ground attack loadout with twenty GBU-39s, six mavericks, and thermal pod
>activate the not-thunderer wager. One of the wagers has "Thunderer" as one of its win conditions. The actual "Thunderer" wager stops accepting planes at rank 7 for god knows what reason. I think gaijin simply forgot to update it when they added rank 8.
>fly within 30km of the frontline while praying clouds don't get in the way
>drop a GBU-39 on every target that you can before the incoming Fox-3s force you to notch.
>activate antimech order since now you at least have successfully gotten off ~8-12 GBU-39s
>drop the rest of your GBU-39s
>find the moving tank column
>drop mavericks on them from ~9km out.
>You still have ~4 SPAMRAAMs. Go have fun and try to kill some players I guess
The individual payout per mission isn't that great compared to something like a big naval match, so SL boosters aren't that effective. However the matches are fast. I've gotten ~110k SL for 5 minute matches where I have 40 seconds of activity time.

I'm surprised I don't see more americans do this.
>>
>>521395515
>video showcasing plane 1 performing well against other plane 2 when both are piloted by experienced pilots... le invalid and bad and doesn't prove plane 1 is good
>>
>>521395849
Not a bug, that's how ESS works.
>>
>>521395812
>Why are the engines in pods? T
I don't know, but I assume that it's easier to replace or perform maintenance on the engines that way.
>>
>>521395849
>I wonder why gaijin still hasn't fixed the thermals "bug" that lets you see through it
That's not a bug. There's different types of smoke and not all of them obscure thermals.
>>
>>521394853
Yeah but it's a Steam achievement and you have 7k playtime on Steam. It does work on my machine.
>>
File: 9mac2.jpg (19 KB, 278x292)
19 KB
19 KB JPG
>>521395849
>I have never seen through an thermal optic sight before -the post
>>
>>521396309
I've been playing this game for 13 years through steam
none of these achievements were there when I started
>>
>>521395972
>>521396294
understandable, I will dig into it
>>521396313
have you done that mr war veteran?
>>
>>521396493
Sure, but they work for me.
>>
File: 236390_20250411161938_1.png (108 KB, 1138x889)
108 KB
108 KB PNG
:)
>>
>>521395904
yeah I dont have anything at that BR and I have zero idea how the fuck to do -or know, really- anything about high tier with advances missiles and such.
>>
File: ukrainian t64 thermals.webm (3.19 MB, 1280x720)
3.19 MB
3.19 MB WEBM
>>521395849
>>
Isn't ESS just diesel sprayed into the hottest part of the exhaust manifold?
>>
>>521393757
>>521396309
they only added the achievements within the last year or two and they only started counting progress from 0 after the achievements were added
>>
>>521395956
its a fat fuck plane that isnt very fast, but has a good radar and lots of good missiles and tvc is a meme for 1v1s
if you gave the su27sm r-77-1 it would outclass it
>>
>>521397030
Not exactly, there's separate turbine thing. But yeah it's just vaporized mistifed fuel.
>>
File: shot 2025.04.11 16.24.09.jpg (615 KB, 2560x1440)
615 KB
615 KB JPG
>>521389258
??
>>
File: boink.webm (3.78 MB, 1280x720)
3.78 MB
3.78 MB WEBM
I like how the tank shook a bit

btw are you supposed to aim center mass when u can vs lots of ww2 stuff in these very high pen solid shot french/brit shits so you can try to 1hit with the spall?
>>
File: 1739510540699936.jpg (29 KB, 588x392)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>need close support spaa
>take ifv and bolt a radar on it
>>
Why are the AirSim Battles stats so much skewed towards US and Israel, compared to the RB stats where they're some of the lowest WR rates?
>>
>>521397738
Literally how most SPAA are played already.
>>
>>521396549
yes
back in 2011, during my mandatory conscription service, I watched over a mechanized infantry assault performed by BMP-2s.
While the field was blanked in white smoke from both the diesel based ESS and smoke canisters launched by the BMPs, I could still see every thermal spot with minimal obstruction, ESS has the least amouth of effect while the canisters caused some obstruction since they were some 200-300m in front of the assault.
and this was 14 years ago, I have no doubt that modern day thermals could see past that shit with ease,
>>
>>521397889
>those germutt and shitalian WRs
Holy FUCKING skill issue. Imagine doing this bad with the second-best plane in the game after the Rafale.
>>
>>521397889
because retard/bots dont play sim
>>
>>521397030
i know ships used to do it by fiddling with the air/fuel mixture to (effectively) roll coal
>>
>>521397889
US ARB is full of bots and turdworlders
US ASB is where the real players go
>>
File: 1735040786700944.jpg (49 KB, 728x485)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
I wonder how active thermal camouflage would work in the game very poorly for balance purposes))))))))))
>>
>diesel can roll coal on cyclists and teslas
>gaysoline can't
diesel wins
>>
>>521398448
>tone down brightness of vehicle when viewed through thermal sights
call it a day, get back to finetuning the prompts for AI generated pfps
>>
>>521377058
I want the Montana personally. Maybe the Super Yamato too, but I’m not sure that’d be all that super with six guns and probably a 1.5rpm if we’re being generous.
>>
File: 1719186557888743.jpg (43 KB, 800x501)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>>521398685
I guess making the tank transparent on thermals would be too hard to code
>>
>>521399134
clueless why is this car driving across a warzone
>>
>>521383598
Right now it’s ammo wetting that’s important since a fire in your barbette will sometimes destroy the entire ship before you can start firefighting. It’ll also pop shell rooms very quickly even if they aren’t in the barbette, which now have an explosion scaling with the total filler equivalent of all shells in the module. So stock grinds are ass and you should only bring half ammo on all ships with only a handful of HE.
>>
>>521399134
I can imagine this being the most obnoxious niggerwagon in night battles
>>
>>521399134
>disguising an IFV as a car
yeah, because that totally would never be shot at...
>>
>>521397889
I don't know what's up with the eurofighters shitting the bed in that image. Aside from that it's a mix of superior NATO avionics, mixed matchmaking in air RB, and the propensity of the average amerimutt player in air RB to be a basebombing retard.

In sim battles there are no nametags helping with situational awareness, and NATO completely fucking mogs redfor in the radar and RWR department until basically 14.0. NATO being easymode is completely fucking true all the way up until finally the Su-30 breaks the combo. USA is always on the blueteam and enjoys the NATO advantage. A handful of minor NATO nations are fence sitters that get occasionally placed on the red team and consequently get their winrate dragged down because of that. So basically nobody queued up for redfor which led to complete nato dominance with near perfect win rates for nations that are guaranteed to be on bluefor since the blue team would have both the tech advantage and the numbers advantage in the match.

In air RB the average mutt is a base bomber. They fully laden their planes with bombs whenever they can. Not the precision smart bombs that they can drop on targets from half a map away. Not even CCRP drops from higher altitudes/longer distances. They rush to the bases like lemmings to perform point blank CCIP drops. They do this because they REFUSE to risk a teammate kill the base first. So they take the most suicidal approach where their only real defense against fox3s is to pray that their RWR is beeping because the fox3 is aimed at a teammate and not themselves. Since teams are of equal size in air RB, nations are mixed in air RB, and USA players are most likely to be basebombing niggers, then the team with the most americans is the team that is most likely to be full of useless basebombing niggers and consequently is the team most likely to lose.
>>
File: NIGG.jpg (279 KB, 1920x1067)
279 KB
279 KB JPG
>>521399134
I mean how about we get proper thermals first, that are not just color filter.
>>
>>521399134
I'm pretty sure that disguising your military assets as civilian ones violates some kind of accord.
>>
>>521399134
>how are you doing fellow cars?)))))
>>
>>521400069
russia does that all the time so it's fine
>>
>>521397171
Arguing that the Su-30SM is better than the EFT in BVR (aka what ARB mostly consists of, admittedly) is a fool's errand when it has the T/W ratio it does and like 3/4 the range against maneuvering targets with its missiles, however, consider this: you can make just about anything at the very least not die against just about anything else in BVR by playing it right (notching, recommitting at the right time, keeping pressure, etc), but there's simply no way to make a brick win against a UFO in WVR. In other words, the difference between a "good" and a "bad" plane in BVR is 60% WR vs 40%, but 99% vs 1% in WVR. THAT's why WVR is so important when comparing planes: it's simply where the differences between them are the most pronounced and the most relevant to the outcome, and its why I value the Su-30SM's WVR performance more than the EFT's BVR performance .
>>
File: GBU-39_drop.webm (3.79 MB, 960x540)
3.79 MB
3.79 MB WEBM
>>521396905
There's definitely a learning curve where you have to map controls for all of the sensors and learn how to interpret the warnings and take appropriate defensive action against the missile hell. But the GPS guided GBU-39s are piss easy to use against stationary targets once you get within the maximum range of your thermal pod (30km). Literally a point-and-click adventure. The only extra step that I forgot to mention was that you need to be below mach 1 as a requirement for making the drops. For planes at altitude and near mach 1, the range of these glide bombs vastly eclipses the 30km range that is the maximum that the pod has for designating target points.
>>
>>521400457
Su-30SM has 1 gimmick in wvr but generally loses
>>
>>521399884
Its not even like its over a small amount of fights either!
>>
File: ripvk.webm (3.49 MB, 1280x720)
3.49 MB
3.49 MB WEBM
noo don't do it
>>
File: 1715128239486849.webm (798 KB, 662x720)
798 KB
798 KB WEBM
>in game: ammunition detonated
>look at the hit in the analysis
>it didn't happen
>>
>playing game
>having no problems
>suddenly framerate drops to about 20
huh?
>>
>>521399134
>Why is of car in middle of field?
>shoot it
>>
>>521401908
In naval recently I’ve had several ships detonate before my shells visually reached them. Then in other games they will never detonate even on perfectly aimed salvos. No way they rig it to put you on hot and cold streaks though, they’ve certainly never admitted to doing shit like that before
>>
>CV90 disguises itself as a civilian on thermals
>russians shoot at it anyways
>>
>>521397430
you gotta remember the layout of crew members and hit the most important/most of them at once
>>521400757
It's just too much to learn and gunfighting > missile slinging any day anyway. I just have zero fun whatsoever whenever missiles are involved.
>>
>>521402938
idk if any shot would have 1hit him there, maybe in the lfp?
>>
>>521403035
UFP from the closest angle of the hull to the center of the turret.
T34s have tight compartments so it's pretty easy to get a 1 shot turret kill with solid shit
>>
>>521402913
I don't think there is a single first or second world military that would see a random civilian car on thermals and not assume "This is a bomb or some shit, double tap it to make sure".
>>
>>521402938
>>521403035
>>521403258
oh the t-34 mbi thought u were quoting this lmao >>521401882

solid shot at least french is more powerful than i thought though, 1hits happen pretty regularly anyways u can't do magic cuopola shots to vaporize the whole tank tho but still
>>
File: 6jo- 463QheiluSs.webm (3.87 MB, 720x732)
3.87 MB
3.87 MB WEBM
>>521321764
/sfg/ chads ww@?
>>
>>521397430
>btw are you supposed to aim center mass when u can vs lots of ww2 stuff in these very high pen solid shot french/brit shits so you can try to 1hit with the spall?
No. You're supposed to shoot so that you will 100% kill their gunner and/or destroy their gun breach if you pen. You can take your time killing the rest of the crew while they're busy seething at their crew slowly changing seats or attempting a repair.

Sometimes you can make exceptions for tanks with extremely memorable and easy to destroy ammo racks, like side profile attacks against king tiger ready racks.
>>
>>521403348
oh for the VK I dont think you can from that angle
>>
>>521402913
media cry war crime
>>
>>521400457
I honestly think that the T/W ratio problem is a bigger problem for close range combat for the Su-30. Thrust vectoring can let you do some silly turns, but fundamentally it's very similar to what the harrier and yak-141 could do via VIFFing. It's almost a gimmick trick like the stationary VTOL planes being untargettable by PD radar. A trick that catches people by surprise if they're not expecting it, but isn't very meta. Most of the crazy TVC clips end with the flanker crashing into a hill. It just doesn't have the T/W to quickly recover from the cost of burning all of that energy.

In contrast, while it lacks the T/W ratio to give ideal launch conditions for its fox3s, it has the advantage in terms of sheer quantity of missiles. You can more than afford to take shots that probably won't hit. A lot of players are dogshit, so you get a surprising number of long range hits. It's almost like the meme 70km phoenix launches. They shouldn't hit fighters at that range, but you can farm retards all day like that. Even against the competent opponents, they still need to respect the missile. A long range 77-1 can force a competent opponent into a defensive posture that makes them more vulnerable to follow up 77-1's and 27ETs.

The Su-30 also has a neat bag of tricks for the 2nd-spawn situation where survivors RTB to resupply with only ~2-4 stragglers on each team. The 27ER is almost unique in that it is one of the only missiles where you can manually reacquire a lock after launch. This makes it hard to notch since if the opponent dares to leave the notch you can simply reacquire target again. Alternatively you can safely shoot an ER at an opponent that is furballing a teammate since you can easily kill the lock if it goes for the teammate or tard wrangle it onto the correct target. 27ETs are great for killing runway campers, and the kh38ML is another option for runway campers if you are a supreme memelord.
>>
File: lettyeye.webm (35 KB, 244x270)
35 KB
35 KB WEBM
>>521401908
i miss fishtank s1
vehicle for this feel?
>>
I will need this feel described in detail first, please.
>>
File: 1727065319500111.jpg (57 KB, 1024x576)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>521402504
>time leading up to the event
>great games, constantly first place on the leaderboard, beating everyone with just the bolzano
>event start
>use boosters to get more SL
>all of a sudden every match is a battlecruiser match
>just a bad time
>>
>>521404678
independent eye movement
>>
>>521404797
https://wiki.warthunder.com/unit/uk_a1e1_independent
>>
File: hell_invasion.webm (3.12 MB, 888x474)
3.12 MB
3.12 MB WEBM
vehicle for this feel? are those harriers or just "generic fiction jet"
>>
>>521404797
A1AE1 Independent.
>>
File: file.jpg (647 KB, 1280x720)
647 KB
647 KB JPG
Is the Strasbourg worth getting? Does the extra armor make any significant difference compared to the Dunkirk?
>>
>>521405110
Is it a tank? Then the answer is, no.
>>
File: NPC_wojak_meme.png (17 KB, 200x198)
17 KB
17 KB PNG
>R-27ER hits an enemy with pure inertial tracking after they fly behind a mountain
>>
>>521404997
those are just harriers
>>
>>521405110
Not really no to both.
>>
>>521405110
It's alright
No, lmao
>>
>>521404691
Insane how hard the game sucks when the matchmaker decides to fuck you. Coastal can be fun, until it decides to uptier you into 4.x destroyers every match with a Douglas spawning opposite every match. Same thing with destroyers getting fed to heavy and now battle cruisers. Though when you get the rare full downtier in something like a Knox it’s a bit retarded after the HE fuse change. I’d say it should go up but with the mess they’ve made of 5.x this update I think it’s more other stuff needs to go down, but can’t because of coastal. They really just make shit worse every time they touch something.
>>
File: quad turret.png (851 KB, 930x648)
851 KB
851 KB PNG
>>521405110
their most interesting feature seems to be that the forward magazine can detonate in its entirety without sinking the ship
and if you make it to a cap to rearm, your reloads/repairs/rearming seem to cancel eachother out as you're slowly pummeled to death with only the superfiring turret returning fire
cant say ive really noticed the difference in terms of survivability, but 1-2 inches here and there is nice (i guess)
whether thats worth 45 snailbucks to you i cant tell, its not an efficient grinder and other than Mog/EB/Col(LG in a pinch) the tree isnt really worth investing in unless you're a francophile
Dunkerque is nice, but no real match for her usual opponents, and the future (Rich and Jean, one of them probably an event reward because fuck you) isnt gonna be great either unless anton decides France is gonna be (one of) the first trees to get a proper 1940s battleship
and even then its just a matter of time before the bigger boats will eclipse them
>>
File: 1445270107743.webm (368 KB, 640x480)
368 KB
368 KB WEBM
YF-23 and MiG 1.44 when?
>>
>>521369580
First time? Overpenetrations happen, shoot the breach.
>>
>>521406267
they also boosted coastal AI aiming by too much
>>
>>521383753
alien detected
>>
File: file.jpg (1.3 MB, 2613x2413)
1.3 MB
1.3 MB JPG
>>521406729
I wanted to grind out the Naval tree in hopes that post war refit Jean will be added at some point

I'm guessing the Richelieu class won't have the best guns or armor compared to the Bismark or South Dakota class?
>>
>>521391323
Yeah it's shit currently. 20mm are king(not you 151).
>>
>>521406729
The concern for the Richelieus will probably be the terrible wartime reload. The protective scheme is very good, but the wartime reloads were pretty abysmal. Similar situation with the Littorios.
>>
>>521406267
>>521406958
aiming isn't the right word but after this update the time from
>visual detection
to
>firing
is now practically zero
>>
>>521407338
Belt is 13”@15 with a 2” turtleback, good turret and barbette protection. South Dakota probably edges it out a little but shell rooms are an artificial Achilles heel currently so those being in the barbette is a weakness. Bismarck beats it on armor. The guns will have good performance but very possible a terrible reload. South Dakota will probably have a 2rpm, but could possibly go 2.5 if they accept Iowa’s firing clock since they claim to discount elevation time in loading and the mounts were materially nearly identical in loading arrangements. Bismarck probably gets at least Bayern’s 2.3, but possibly up to 3 if the wherb out and only care about shell supply rate.
>>
>>521406267
>years of hypercompression because speedboats really need 4 whole BRs and its literally impossible to up the max BR for bluewaters
>you want decompression???? fuck you, battleships now start at 6.0 (makes 0 difference as cruisers just machine gun them and you still see 7.0s on the regular)
>you see! big ships very hard to do right ((((((

>>521407437
rof is king ))))
did you know Sovetsky Soyuz could fire more than 2.5 rounds per minute!
>>
>>521408180
It was very nice how after changing ballistic calculations so almost every gun has worse pen at range Kron actually gained several inches at 10-15km and now exceeds the performance of most 14” guns. Certainly realistic, the best ships in the world if only they’d been built
>>
Swedish navy when? I want battleships with copestal spawns
>>
File: 236390_20250411180941_1.png (847 KB, 1390x969)
847 KB
847 KB PNG
XAXAXAXA
>>
>>521409637
wow nice job dude :)
>>
>>521404997
>don't even try to disguise the analogy that sandnigs are actual literal demons and USA is the supremely good guy for killing them
Supremely based, Netflix.
>>
File: monkler.png (961 KB, 736x907)
961 KB
961 KB PNG
>>521410417
still i think you're supposed to sympathize with them, but that scene is so awesome, they even use nukes
https://youtu.be/e-W0UWttWEw

humans invading hell or something similar is a really super underitilized setting, and when it is they're portrayed as mega bad guys like here or in avatar, thats why i loved quake 4 as a kid, its finally the humans invading an alien planet
>>
>>521409621
destroyer spawns at best, but its more likely you'll be lumped with the cruisers

>>521409573
>didnt even finish the prototype for the gun
)))))))
>>
>>521411643
Yeah well, you're supposed to sympathize with the alien cat furries in Avatar but most sane people are rooting for the humans by the end in that movie too.
>>
Really trying my best to enjoy 7.7 France...but fuck me if you don't get the most idiotic teams somehow. You'll be sitting there with 5 or 6 kills under your belt, go to check the scoreboard if you die or see how the nuke is coming along....and discover that half your team already doesn't exist. And it happens CONSTANTLY.
>>
now you know how the bonepartists felt when they attempted to conquer russia
>>
>>521328521
No, in a 1- or 2-circke fight on the deck, MiG-15 will win if the pilot knows what he's doing. Sabre has a far better roll rate, but can't outclimb you. Sounds like your Sabre pilot knew exactly what he was doing.
>>
Which ship is the best to make SL right now? is it still the Moffet?
>>
>>521281136
when
>>
>>521411643
>>521404997
>>521410417
>Goy, feel sympathy for the LITERAL HELL DEMONS
No.
>>
Scweden should've been a subtree in Germany
>>
you're responding to the lowiq troon btw
>>
File: moeshit.webm (2.92 MB, 720x480)
2.92 MB
2.92 MB WEBM
>>521415503
Yeah. We call it storytelling.
>>
Holy shit, the change from aim-9b to magic 1 is just not fair for the other team kek
>>
>>521416567
Wait until you see magic 2.
>>
>>521416194
>dragon slop
Ruined the webm
>>
>>521415084
I rate Knox higher. Better br for br
>>
>>521386841
so its really just gonna be an event like the WW1 shit? Ill take it but for chrissakes when are we getting more interesting additions to random battles? Cordon off half the map for some easy to defeat SAM activity and leave the gun AA for airfields (no invisible proxy fuse shit neither)
>>
File: 1728765196765393.png (613 KB, 676x877)
613 KB
613 KB PNG
>>521415503
I support our (human, i'm not american) troops' hell crusade
>>
>>521417354
Thanks, Ill give that boat a go, looks like I already have the wilkinson and Cowell as well so it would make a 4.7 lineup
>>
>>521416194
>CHADgon GOLD
Made the webm perfect.
>>
>>521415084
Knox clears
>>
>>521420237
The HE is very good against other destroyers now. SAP isn’t great against cruisers after ballistic changes, though on the 5”/54 that might not be the case. But at br Knox feels stronger than I think it’s ever been, though uptiers are also much harsher
>>
File: lmao.jpg (9 KB, 239x211)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>521415084
>>521417354
>>521420421
>even considering botes
>>
File: 1727405037903853.png (488 KB, 513x465)
488 KB
488 KB PNG
>>
>>521411643
Lmao, reminds me of fucking Salvation Wars.
>>
>kh38mt proven to not exist
how will ruspigs cope? what position will gajin take?
>>
File: 1726909541847972.jpg (58 KB, 544x549)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>still ZERO ap ammunition for germany tier 3 destroyers
>>
>>521423697
>proven to not exist
how do you prove a negative?
>>
>>521420918
I got Knox for free in the warbonds shop, just free SL for me. However, I do prefer to play Sim if I'm going to farm SL and RP
>>
File: H-21 w 105mm M2a2.jpg (150 KB, 800x999)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
>>521420918
I got them already from crates and wanna make a buttload of SL, if that means playing boats I might as well use them
>>
File: 20250331_211620.jpg (114 KB, 960x540)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
Too silly for the battlefield
>>
Why does my missile launch itself when I press Space? It didn't do that 3 years ago, I never asked for it to do that, my keybind isn't set to it, so why does it do that?
>>
File: saukopfen.png (209 KB, 1168x534)
209 KB
209 KB PNG
>>521372664
we've been over this
>a 105mm Tiger II was never considered.
it was napkin sketched but swiftly dismissed for use with an unmodified turret because there wasn't practical operating room for the breech and two loaders plus every other potential issue to do with kludging a new gun without an existing production line into a strained tank production line, so making the design physically viable means Gaijin acquiring further dokumentation or coming up with some extremely well-reasoned "they were definitely going to do this by all circumstantial evidence and/or claims of intent" speculative modeling, with numbers like armor cast thickness pegged to the most immediate equivalent so they're as close to factually irrefutable as possible while also leaning on the balance of existing vehicles.

>Panther II... was never intended to mount a 88.
indeed, but late remodels of the mainline Panther and by extension the succeeding E-50 were, overcoming the above issue primarily by means of an extended mantlet housing (which might've been likewise applied if the 105mm gun was reconsidered) with additional considerations to expand the turret ring and to modify the breech and/or shell casing dimensions and to add some kind of handling bustle, and the Panther II limped onward as a technical exploration for a potential Panther successor, almost definitely bleeding into the E-series.

Thus this is an issue of them being lazy and making a single frankentank instead of a separate Panther II with its two primary turret options of the ausf G and the Turm schmale-blende, a Panther F 88 and perhaps a Panther F 75 with an autoloader, and an E-50 projection from just sticking the F 88 turret with possible additional modifications onto a Panther II hull with the front plate sloped back to 60 degrees. The right thing to do was to remove one tank and add something like four more, but Gaijin is lazy and it's easier to copypaste M40 something Bundesloppa.
>>
>>521423697
but it does exist? I'm surprised they didn't add the one with the active radar seeker as well
>>
They should have made the panther 2 in this game the one panther with the really long 75mm since it was more of a real thing than the panther with an 88
>>
>>521426460
>"so this steppe warfare is taking place at really long ranges, the KWK 42 L/60 might not be enough in the future. can you make an L/100?" t. Uncle Adolf
>UUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, best we can do right now is an L/70 and then we'll definitely look into it
>"sehr gut, heil me"
it was a brainfart turned brief technical evaluation in which they concluded there was no way the metallurgy or barrel harmonics wouldn't fuck it and either told Hitler that directly which he must have then accepted or they talked around the issue until they were able to never mention it again. The only possible use is to physically joust enemy tanks to death if barrel physics were to be added.
>>
pay up paypigs! OOOOOINK
>>
hehe...sex number...
>>
>>521397889
>american pilots are the best in the game
powerful
>>
>>521427421
>if barrel physics were to be added.
Give now. I want to swordfight with red enemies.
>>
>>521429774
Lorraine 155 vs long schlong panther
>>
>>521397889
existing comments notwithstanding
>mid WW2 anglo-american winrates on
60+ year old Good War fetishizing boomers with established skills and expensive setups clubbing and patting themselves on the back for not speaking German

>early USSR, chink winrates
cheating mandariniggers using external tools to spoof mouseaim without mouseaim, dabbing on boomers at early stages where avionics and advanced maneuvering aren't in play

>axis, french, swede winrates
non-boomer non-cheaters dipping their toes into the mode without much or any setup being eaten alive by said hyperadvantaged boomers and cheating yellow niggers

source: I don't play any Sim, it was revealed to me in a dream
>>
File: italy suffers.jpg (54 KB, 1080x788)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>521428609
Wake me up when the VRCC is back
>>
>>521430869
I mean its kind of genius, the instructor doesnt touch anything but player input and the flight model is the same in rb and sim, so third party instructor for sim ends up working just fine and its impossible to detect
>>
>teammate crashes into me
>crew locked
>>
File: armpips.png (1.02 MB, 1000x1500)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB PNG
join LowIQ squad
>>
File: hhh (38).jpg (446 KB, 2102x1182)
446 KB
446 KB JPG
>>521429774
>>521430831
imagine going full bore and slamming your barrel against a building wall, rendering it useless until you repair it.
>>
>>521427421
>if barrel physics were to be added
Kellys heroes moment
https://youtu.be/T1eFePf6mWM?t=50
>>
>>521435637
I just can't even imagine how much worse it'd be for the Soviets and some bongoloid 17lbers, front turret gun overhangs as long as the tank and all. Would be seeing even more reverse drivers in no time I'm sure
>>
File: 1723835895929285.jpg (36 KB, 774x461)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
I feel like the F/A-18C Late should be faster
>>
>>521438702
You can only go so fast with a plane that has straight wings
>>
File: 121032747_p0.png (3.55 MB, 2000x2948)
3.55 MB
3.55 MB PNG
>>521434061
Do chuubas ever play War Thunder?
>>
File: 1744088558024570.jpg (920 KB, 2252x1800)
920 KB
920 KB JPG
>>521430869
>>
>>521435357
Imagine touching tips with your bro before battle for good luck (no homo).
>>
File: 1732935208862384.jpg (80 KB, 600x600)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>521397889
Im not autistic enough to get a set up for sim nor interested in it, but I do know US pilots shit the bed really fucking bad in AirRB, despite having the best planes.
>>
File: nicegame.png (901 KB, 1920x1001)
901 KB
901 KB PNG
>current: Mirage IIIC
>new grind tom: Mirage 5BA (241,694/260k) last jet to get out rank 7 kino (+ bonus ace)
4 jets left till rafale
>>
>>521280939
Just unlocked the yak-9k, my friend has been abusing this for a month, doing well even when bringing it to 8.7 games, convince me not to talisman it
>>
>>521446082
You would be giving money to Anton.
>>
>>521446082
Tier is too low, better spend that money on a premium plane, I hear the Su-11 goes for low prices these days and there's a sale coming soon.
>>
>>521446512
Too late, antons given me some of his precious golden eagles to spend on his vehicles
>>521446914
Fair, tho I should have my squadron research set to a Russian jet, so late air should be set
>>
File: OIG1 (2).jpg (165 KB, 1024x1024)
165 KB
165 KB JPG
>>
>>521450515
Truth nuke, visualized
>>
>>521450515
'uth 'uke
>>
File: 1734395611610511.png (977 KB, 1075x846)
977 KB
977 KB PNG
>>521450515
>>
File: 1701671108727306.png (289 KB, 612x433)
289 KB
289 KB PNG
>>521450515
An image truly is worth a thousand words
>>
File: 1715556559100967.png (413 KB, 486x350)
413 KB
413 KB PNG
>>521450515
The MVTHER of all TRVTHNVKES.
>>
>>521450515
What BR?
>>
File: 5478563453.jpg (224 KB, 2279x872)
224 KB
224 KB JPG
>>
>all minutes apart
not even ukrainian whores are this sloppy
>>
>>521451538
It replaces the 2S38, no refunds
>>
>>521451627
I fucking hated that everyone on the entente side would just camp on that one single hill and never bother to even try to take caps unless you had the odd garford or chammond that would actually try to push an objective but usually would fail to hold it because the rest of the team was doing fuck all stroking each other off on nigger hill by A.
>>
>>521451967
It really just boiled down to the A7V just being a monster compared to everything else. The firing arc alone made it much better than the competition, but then the German 57mm had way more HE filler, way more crew and placement inside the vehicle, much harder to ammo rack. The only downside to it being how tall it was. You could just take the A7V in the open and even if you were caught off guard you could still aim your gun properly and even angle. The moment you take the Chamond in the open you were either killed immediately or your ability to turn was disabled and you cant aim with like 10 degrees of gun traverse. The Mark V was pretty tanky for what it was, but having to select the guns was awkward and the Germans had the better version with the German 57mm on top of the A7V. The best bet was to just thin the A7V numbers and hope the German side quit or ran out of SP before getting caps.
>>
>>521452236
>hohols are le BAD
holy reddit
>>
Of course you would know that
>>
File: 1740385266148374.jpg (49 KB, 500x500)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>521450515
ox cart trvke
>>
>>521397889
its because every american airplane has fuckoff bombloads especially pgms like mass sdbs out the wazoo making it incredibly easy to quickly roll up all the objectives and win the match. all the a-10s are incredibly popular and all of them are perfectly suited for the type of cashit ground objectives in asb. f-15e's can zip in, dump 24 sdbs at fuckoff ranges and rtb before anyone can intercept them if they also have any amount of cap in the way (they usually do because blufor is popular)
>>
Literally what is even the point of armor on tanks in this game when every tank that isn't lobbing HE shells can one-shot you? The only ones that feel like their armor makes a difference are heavy tanks, and a lot of them are dogshit.
>>
>>521368251
>>521368493
its also the last profile picture made without AI
>>
File: 1723277858219848.jpg (116 KB, 1200x839)
116 KB
116 KB JPG
Grippy my beloved. Best looking plane ever
>>
>>521439754
there are a couple low view indies
>>
I unlocked my first dozer blade and now I keep scoring 16th (0 deaths).
>>
I want to like J-7E but its actually a struggle bus to grind with
sure its probably the best FM plane in the entire match
and the 4 of the best rear aspect missiles but everyone else already has all-aspect or Radar missiles
you rarely ever get to dog fight in ARB matches
>>
>>521414692
Lmao are you in lowiq?
>>
>>521455072
>Su-15 but with a delta
>Good looking
>>
>>521455072
I think the Gripen looks awesome but I think the most aesthetic plane ever made is the Su-37. I'm sure the fact that Ace Combat 4 was what started my interest in military aviation when I was 8 is purely a coincidence.
>>
>>521458539
based
>>
>>521458604
I know there are other Su-s that have essentially the same fuselage but that livery is pure sex.
>>
>climb
>dive on someone outside of view range
>from behind
>moment my missile starts spooling
>they suddenly ((((know))))) and start pre flaring
how do these people """""know""""" every time?
>>
>planes are so based and sex... maybe I should play some snore blunder!
>leave after 1 match
>>
>play tanks
>have fun
>play another 10 games

>play planeslop
>win one game
>dont want to play anymore
>>
>>521458539
fulcrum mogs the flanker in aesthetics
>>
>>521458539
>SSBBW
>Aesthetic
Okay Chubby Chaser.
MiG-29 is peak aesthetics for people without african admixture.
>>
>NEEKKERI SATAANA
what did they mean by that???
>>
File: 20250412020112.png (3.78 MB, 1920x1080)
3.78 MB
3.78 MB PNG
ANTOOOOOOOOOON
>>
File: file.png (1.9 MB, 1200x819)
1.9 MB
1.9 MB PNG
>>521461339
only TRVE White Men can appreciate the slim beauty of the mig...
>>
File: 1738249222028647.jpg (170 KB, 1920x1037)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
>>521461935
>posts the poverty cope "upgrade" instead of the actual evolution of the Fulcrum
lole?
>>
>>521461935
>BBC POCCNN
>>
>russian "white" men write BBC on their stuff
checks out
>>
>>521460910
>MiG-29
>>521461339
>>521461935
>>521462091
>it's smaller overall so it isn't fat
It's the worst of both worlds, fat and short.
>>
>>521462819
Fat and Short is the F-16 with conformal tanks.
>>
File: Y13.jpg (46 KB, 1000x563)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>521458539
>when the story spends more time following the life of your Nemesis than you
I should dust off an emulator and replay it.
>>
>>521463226
Once or twice a year I just watch all the cutscenes on youtube. Yellow 13 is one of my favorite characters in any fiction.
>>
>>521428609
Why would you want that? Soviets arent lacking for good planes at that BR.
>>
>>521430869
>cheating mandariniggers using external tools to spoof mouseaim without mouseaim
Tell me more about this external tool.
>>
File: 1743015658698963.png (80 KB, 310x324)
80 KB
80 KB PNG
>>521463226
>>521463540
Also, the fact that Bandai Namco haven't invested resources into remasters of the PS2 trilogy is proof they're retarded and hate money. Especially given how well AC7 sold despite being kind of half baked. I would gladly pay full game price for all three and there are millions who would do the same (almost everyone that bought AC7 just for starters).
>>
>>521464791
Are there really that many people that play ace combat?
I remember trying one of the older PC ones and dropping it after five minutes because there was no manual roll control. Or maybe I'm mixing that up with some other game.
>>
>>521462351
Its not as funny when you know its VVS, or you're not 12.
>>
>>521465101
Autistically repeating extremely bad jokes is thread culture.
>>
>>521464874
Looked it up and AC7 just hit 6mil units sold a couple months ago
>>
File: yup.png (185 KB, 296x300)
185 KB
185 KB PNG
>>521464874
>>521465469
You might have had it on the wrong control scheme. I forget what they call it but I think it's like "arcade" controls which may even be the default in some of them if I'm not mistaken. It leans much heavier into the arcade flight experience but it definitely has manual roll controls. I wouldn't blame you for dropping it if it didn't. Ace Combat is basically a Japanese attempt at emulating the Top Gun feel and experience (imagine a flight sim getting the Call of Duty treatment) combined with Star Wars OT. There is the equivalent of the "trench run to destroy a super weapon scene" at the end of every game. It actually came full circle with the release of Top Gun: Maverick because the mission they're training for and building up the entire movie is literally your average late game Ace Combat mission and they also collaborated on a pretty dope DLC pack like 3 years after the game came out. It's my favorite gaming franchise alongside Hitman and I can't recommend it highly enough if you like planes and don't hate anime.
>>
File: colbert1472.jpg (985 KB, 1594x881)
985 KB
985 KB JPG
It's Saturday /wtg/
>>
>>521465804
Thanks, now I need to rewatch the new Top Gun, and need to rewatch the old Top Gun before I can watch the new one.
>>
>>521464470
the source is that I made it the fuck up (on the grounds of its extremely plausible existence)
>>
>>521465804
Maybe I'll give it a shot when I have some time, a Skies Unknown key is only five bucks or so. If the control scheme isn't infuriating I can see myself enjoying it.
>>
File: old-pepe.jpg (10 KB, 226x223)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>521466180
Which would by nice, but my upper back hurts really badly. I think I'll just lay on some hard surface and listen to an audiobook all day.
>>
>>521466658
I mean they had hacks that could guide MCLOS A2A missiles automatically, recreating mouseaim sounds extremely easy in comparison.
>>
>>521466748
Definitely a game you want to play on controller even with the expert controls. The overall narrative in 7 is kind of weak compared to the rest of the series but the gameplay and characters make up for it. It's also gorgeous to look at.
>>
>>521467179
Huh, OK, that kinda sucks. I think I still have a PS3 controller somewhere, so I suppose that would work.
>>
>>521467179
>Definitely a game you want to play on controller even with the expert controls.
I played 7 and then 4, 5, 0 and 3 on mouse and keyboard. You can get by with a controller but as expected, aiming the guns is nigh-impossible. The millisecond you switch to K&M your guns turn from a gimmick to one of your most reliable weapons.
>>
File: submarino-surcouf.jpg (102 KB, 713x346)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
>>521466180
>Saturday
SURCOUF SATURDAY!
>>
File: 1727538663244795.jpg (3.15 MB, 3840x2160)
3.15 MB
3.15 MB JPG
>>521467435
Based. When?
>>
>>521467310
Maybe I'll try kbm sometime. I never felt like I had a problem with guns on controller though. I played Project Wingman (also highly recommend) on controller too and the guns are insanely good in that game. I think the guns in AC7 just kind of suck in general. Maybe it had to do with balancing the multiplayer mode.
>>
File: 1714839762907252.jpg (633 KB, 1959x1486)
633 KB
633 KB JPG
>>521467435
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorelei:_The_Witch_of_the_Pacific_Ocean
>>
>>521467616
>I played Project Wingman (also highly recommend) on controller too and the guns are insanely good in that game.
Bruh just why? It literally has WT's mouse aim and combined with the AoA delimiter it's fucking great. I can't imagine willingly using a controller over this.
>>
>>521467686
My parents bought me maybe one or two games a year when I was a kid so I have probably thousands of hours between AC4, 5, Zero, and 6. That was before I switched to PC. My preference is 99% habit and muscle memory. Like I said I'd consider trying it out but that's a hard habit to break. I don't play much air in WT either for what it's worth.
>>
>>521467435
>>521467523
>>521467680
Imagine how awesome it would be to use that in NavalRB, just surface beside the enemy BC's that are full on focused in their aiming sights and blast then right in their ammo-racks.
>>
>>521466180
>Saturday
I wanted to grind my German tanks up from 7.7, unfortunately all the weekend shitters are online and I near uninstalled the game after my last match of getting spawncamped.
>>
>>521468203
What are you grinding? I recently played the PzH 2000 for the first time in a while because I got a SPG kills task and I forgot how busted it was. You're consistently fighting interwar heavies with 10+ second reloads and low velocity shells compared to your LRF and 5 second autoloader. Also, 8.0 Germany is a nasty lineup so keep grinding homie.
>>
Wheres good on this map? I'm never all that sure where to go on it, and any time I die its due to being shot in the side.
>>
>>521469134
If you have a fast enough vehicle the A rush is generally a good option. Otherwise it's kind of an urban brawler map that rewards caution. (In my personal experience)
>>
File: SimBattleStats.png (131 KB, 1882x582)
131 KB
131 KB PNG
>>521397889
Actual ASB player here. No one here is actually giving the real explanation.
>There's no matchmaking for Enduring Confrontation
>there are caps on how many players can be on one side
>Most players play American
>Countries like Japan and Italy are outnumbered in 75% of matches
>Typical player count is 9vs5 or 5vs3 in USA's favor
>In EC, base bombing does significantly more ticket damage than player kills (though it's the opposite for battle score and events)
>Have had games where I go 20:1 in the Ariete or Jap Sabre and still lose the game

>picrel
My KDR in the Ariete and Jap Sabre is 5.0, but my winrate is below 50% in both. My KDR in the American Sabre and Crusader is 3.0, but I've got a 100% winrate in the Crusader and 60% in the Sabre. The team with more bombers usually wins the match.
Oink.
>>
>>521467310
>You can get by with a controller but as expected, aiming the guns is nigh-impossible
The gun in 7 is fucked, I'll give you that. But gun fighting in the PS2 trilogy was just as natural as everything else after an hour or so of practice.
>>
>>521468124
sounds cool, but you're much better off firing a spread of torpedoes
you'd have to get there first, which is gonna take a while at 10kts or whatever and with gaijins preference for maps filled with islands and cliffs you're in for quite a dull underwater journey
once you're in range you better hope anton has decided to reduce the time it took to ready the guns so you dont have to sit for a few minutes after surfacing
regardless of whether thats the case you better start praying your target doesnt have a well trained auxiliary/AA crew to pick you off/alert him to your presence
should you have managed all the above without dying, you realize that even at point blank range most capital ships will shrug off french 203mm fired into their belt
>>
File: Ariete.jpg (21 KB, 740x141)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>521397889
>>521469706
Forgot to add that I think Israel gets paired with USA in all matchups, so they're just benefiting from all the American zombers. The amount of people flying Israel is probably even lower than Italy or Japan.
>>
I guess we finally reach the peak of top tier air?
well maybe once F-2 then F-22 get here
after that its all F-35 slops from there
>>
>>521470532
I don't give a rat's ass how good or bad the F-35 is IRL but it WILL suck ass in this game and there will be exactly 0 reason to play it over the F-22A. The stealth meme doesn't matter at the in-game distances against contemporary PESA/AESA radars, and besides the avionics, it's fucking horrible in terms of both loadouts (6 A2A missiles max of which 2 are AIM-9s so you're looking at 4 ARHs at the most) and flight performance (0 shits were given about it during development, it's a missile bus through and through).
That aside, yes, every line in every tree is between 1 and 2 planes away from the very top contenders.
>>
File: 1733300323534572.jpg (300 KB, 1820x1366)
300 KB
300 KB JPG
Give Thad-84-3 Oplot
>>
when can we get this in the tech tree
>>
I'm holding off playing Japan tree until Thai sub tree come out
>>
>>521468460
Its too frustrating, I decided to just take advantage of it and work on my froggos instead.
>>
File: 1717338599523566.jpg (241 KB, 1170x963)
241 KB
241 KB JPG
>>
>>521469706
>>521470083
Thanks anon, you're really not painting a ringing endorsement for me to ever get a Sim setup up and running here though if its just continually a one sided stomp!
>>
How can anyone play ground? Don't you get bored? The grind after about tier 4 is fucking insane and just gets even worse.
>>
Got all my R2Y2's sorted, I really liked their guns - they slap things super hard, its like having the German Mk108's but not shit and slow.
>>
>>521471459
it's fun
>>
>>521471459
But I enjoy playing ground anon? I dont play for the sole purpose of grinding, I play to have a laugh and wreck some shit.
>>
why are mudsuckers like this?
>>
>>521471120
considering the state of the F-5T, this thing will be gimped as fuck
>>
File: Average Ground Experience.jpg (895 KB, 2500x1657)
895 KB
895 KB JPG
>>521471935
We enjoy the mud.
>>
>>521471574
>its like having the German Mk108's but not shit and slow.
that's called an MK103, or for like a single event 110 an MK101
>>
>>521472028
its ok they are holding out for the premium Super Tigris
>>
>>521472028
F-5T is just missing some dogshit irccmless missiles.
The F-16 OCU is an abortion.
>>
>>521471431
>if its just continually a one sided stomp!
I usually don't care which side wins the match or the RP bonus for winning. I'm clearly most interested in PvP, and that is where ASB shines. I can stomp about 80% of the players without blinking an eye, but when I run into a guy on the other team who knows what he's doing, then it becomes a game of us trying to keep the other off our attackers. I've had some fun and exciting dogfights, and for me, that is what the game is about. I also play Il-2 and DCS, but I think that WT's ASB is the most fun of the three.
>>
>>521472028
I wish F-5T can carry 4 missiles instead of 2
sure HMD is nice but I still rather have 2 extra missiles
>>
>>521468124
>surface
>get immediately swiss-cheesed by AI
>>
>>521468124
>surface next to a ship with more AI guns than you have crew
>>
>>521473129
Whats wrong with the OCU
>>
Whats the 8.0 French lineup? Char, AMX30, DF105, AMX50/Lorainne/Surbaisse, something like that?
>>
>>521475035
it shouldn't have HMD
it shouldn't have AMRAAMs because it can't guide them
it should have additional CMs
They basically added the e(MLU) without G mavs and other guided stuff (and IRIS-T but we don't have them yet) and called it OCU
>>
>>521473534
>sure HMD is nice
On planes without HOBS and/or IRCCM missiles and a very limited supply of missiles, HMD is as good as worthless. The value of a single missile is way too high to sling them willy nilly when you only have 2-4 of them yet they're also trivial to flare, which together dictates that you MUST cherry pick the absolute most optimal launches well in advance, meaning you have no need for what HMD offers - quick and dirty target acquisition.
>>
>>521475505
I guess the OCU is literally AJ
I dont know why they dont just rename the AJ to OCU
then add MLU or something instead
>>
>>521475697
don't get it either (other than tree padding)
It serves no purpose at 13.7 since japs already have the J(M) and the Gripen (which came the same update as the OCU)
>>
I don't think I'm going to see a sadder sight today than the three He-162's in the last match desperately trying to ground pound pillboxes and medium tanks.
>>
File: 1722720479437408.png (55 KB, 209x196)
55 KB
55 KB PNG
Is this a normal occurrence on middle eastern roads?
>>
File: 1744461468841124m.jpg (86 KB, 1024x685)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
I wish this was a portrait ngl
>>
>>521481829
yep
>>
>>521471345
F16 has one pilot though
>>
File: IMG_20250412_171040_630.jpg (90 KB, 1280x721)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>
>>521471574
Is one of the ry2y objectively better than the rest? I heard one has it's engine moved, idk which tho.
I mostly play ground
>>
>>521482458
Is that actually the chopper pilot who crashed in NY? I bet pol are loving that.
>>
Whats the best American early jets? Correct to start with F2H-2?
>>
>>521484857
F-86-25 if everything else feels shit
>>
>>521482965
V2 and V3 have less drag but are otherwise functionally identical, V3 turns a little better at speed, but I cant notice it. V1 has those dopey wing nacelles that seem to be a bullet magnet and cut your thrust in half as soon as they get clipped.
V3 has the stupid piggy nose like you get on a MiG, V2 has the wingroot air intakes like on some early American jets, and therefore looks coolest.
>>
The T20 is surprisingly goated in uptiers. I'm taking it up in my 6.7 lineup and you're able to outmaneuver basically all enemy mediums (including the T34) and with the stab and low profile you can catch niggers off guard.
it's insane how massively more mobile it is than the M4A3E8 despite being only very slightly lighter with the same engine. I'm sure it's a coincidence.
>>
How much better AAM3 is compared to AIM-210?
>>
File: wtff.gif (1.23 MB, 297x312)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB GIF
>>521486050
are you high?
>>
>>521486050
better off-rail maneuverability, slightly higher G load
that's it
>>
File: file.png (20 KB, 222x70)
20 KB
20 KB PNG
Why?
>>
>>521486610
Yeah, I was wondering that myself a minute ago, thought I was misremembering shit or something.
>>
>>521486316
Thanks
>>
>>521486610
>>521486801
>>
>>521486610
yuri gaygay
>>
>>521487024
>>521488107
>could have added some throwaway shit mode where you just press a button and a rocket goes up into space
>change button
>>
>>521486316
Assuming he was asking about AAM-3 vs AIM-9M (because why would you compare a short-range IR missile to a medium-range ARH missile), the former also has a bit less drag and thus a bit more range.
>>
>>521489479
>>could have added some throwaway shit mode where you just press a button and a rocket goes up into space
There's a background event in the default hangar where Gagarin's rocket lifts off into space.
>>
>>521489697
I did not see that.
>>
>>521489529
No. I was asking about aam4 vs aim120
>>
Should you still use the API-T belts for the American 50 cals or has that changed over the years?
>>
>>521491738
i use pure tracers
>>
>>521491738
No, as always you go for explosive rounds wherever possible (so on cannons or crapanese/swegroid HMGs) and API rounds where not (so on HMGs and rifle-caliber MGs).
>>
File: wtoutput2.webm (1.67 MB, 1920x804)
1.67 MB
1.67 MB WEBM
bonk
>>
>>521493247
that was a child
>>
File: wtoutput.webm (3.07 MB, 1920x804)
3.07 MB
3.07 MB WEBM
>>521493292
I'll kill his brother too
>>
is there any good reason why i shouldnt bottom out every tank that has hydropneumatic suspension as soon as i spawn and go low rider mode?
>>
>>521492968
What about I over AP-I?
>>
>>521493668
Not really, the Russian tanks all manage it by default.
>>
>>521493668
You can only adjust hydropneumatic suspension when stationary so you'll be late to your favorite camping spots.
>>521493783
Absolutely no reason to take it. Against unarmored targets, API works just as well, but introduce even the slightest bit of protection (just metal sheets that don't even count as armor in the X-ray is enough) and I becomes buttfuck useless.
>>
>>521352765
i only play arcade and i am very fond of that plane
(i played "realistic" mode a few times but... its just slower arcade IN MY OPINION/EXPERIENCE)

so maybe try that plane in AB sometime. you have to use it at the appropriate point in most missions. it's probably not a great first plane for many reasons, but among them is that you have the me262. its has a lower BR (so you can bring it with no penalty) and you can use it to quickly go to the ground. The 5.7 me262 is almost a guaranteed First Strike plane. This draws better planes low (most things are better than it, haha). Yes, your shitty me262 will die eventually, but then you creep in with the Dorito later and its over. Everything of lower BR will die to a spaded Ho229 if youre good, its just such a sick plane (at the same BR, i would fear the yak-17 though!). Its very similar to the me-163B, so maybe try that out for a bit in Arcade to get the feel for the play (extremely close kills like <.3km since youre a super out-turner and are almost immediately behind anyone who approaches you)

Just dont bring it as ur first plane, as its slow and an obvious target, and once its dead ur sad and mad about it

i love it, its a noob terrorizer and annihilator

>t. AB player
>>
I've recently started playing again and I convinced some of my friends to play as well.
Is the "Set target for squad" thingy really the only option for spotting/marking enemies for your friends?
>>
File: file.png (84 KB, 355x178)
84 KB
84 KB PNG
>To Battle!
>>
>>521495684
pretty much
other than tracers and pinging ofc
>>
>>521495684
I use it by my lonesome all the time. It's really handy for pinpointing the locations I'm looking at on the minimap and invaluable for indirect firing when your sight is positioned too low to give you a clear LoS but your ballistics allow you to lob the shells over the hill.
>>
https://youtu.be/o99yPa4Wsss
>>
>>521496462
they go from full blossom to bare in a week. one fucking week!
>>
>>521496462
based!
>>
Is the F/A-18E going to be an upgrade or a downgrade to the F/A-18C in terms of flight performance? I've heard some really conflicting opinions on the matter.
>>
File: 1735162858781174.png (315 KB, 1250x1250)
315 KB
315 KB PNG
>>521496462
SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP.
SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP.
SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP.
SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP. SHUT THE FUCK UP.
>>
>japtranny slop
Erm... No thanks!
>>
Is Skyflash SUPERTEMP worth using the Tornado over Phantom (uses Skyflash (DF))?
>>
>>521498397
later this year
we will get the F-2 and then we will shut up
>>
>>521499259
supertemp is the DF but with more a load extra thrust
just a straight upgrade
>>
>>521496462
>F-2
lol
lmao even
Here's another sloppy-paste tree instead))))))
>>
File: F-2 drip.png (3.01 MB, 2085x1077)
3.01 MB
3.01 MB PNG
>>521498397
No.
It will be overtiered dogshit and I will like it.
>>
>>521499259
Super has a sustainer so it has longer reach and pull over longer distances. DF is still better at knife fight distances.
>>
File: 1719858583248474.webm (1.47 MB, 640x472)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB WEBM
>>521498202
Going by pilot impressions IRL its gonna be heavier and more draggy in terms of flight performance. Radar, armament and the rest of avionics are different story.
>>
>>521499919
>and then we will shut up
>things that will never happen
>>
>>521500819
So the MiG-29SMT to the F/A-18C's MiG-29 (9-13) except the baseline is way better so the downgrade won't be quite as horrific?
>>
>>521501024
Yeah lets hope the missiles and AESA gonna carry that plane because that airframe is 25% percent larger than legacy hornet and it can only go 1.6 mach
>>
File: 1725063279723603.jpg (183 KB, 994x613)
183 KB
183 KB JPG
What is the most aesthetic Cold War tank, and why is it the 120mm gun combat tank M103
>>
>>521501859
wikipedia isnt a good way to judge plane performance, it will probably be a comparable jump from F-15C to F-15E rather than the mig29's like >>521501024 said
obviously with the caveat of the original f18 being a 12.3 airframe instead of a 13.0 one
>>
>>521502202
Original F/A-18 airframe is a 12.7 airframe at the very lowest, that it was moved down to 12.3 for some fucking reason doesn't make it not utterly retarded and undeserved.
>>
File: file.png (193 KB, 528x250)
193 KB
193 KB PNG
>>
>>521502459
yea compression or whatever but the planes still sit at the br's they sit at
its not like gaijew is ever going to decompress anyway
>>
>>521502987
Even without decompression it deserves no lower than 12.7. It's utterly skullfucking the entire matchmaker around it besides full uptiers (where it's still very capable).
>>
>>521502202
Super Hornet isn't gonna be faster like F-15E is to F15C tho. F/A-18E/F is gonna have worse flight performance.
>>
File: 101802251_p0.jpg (1.36 MB, 4000x3200)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB JPG
>>521501915
It needs to put on a skirt if it wants to be aesthetic. The Centurion and Challengers are way better looking because they have side skirts.
>>
>>521504056
Nah, I like my tanks lewd.
>>
File: amx-13-105 (11ZVE).jpg (1.03 MB, 3000x2181)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB JPG
>>521501915
>>
Really not getting what all the fuss about the P-51-H is, the cannon Corsair is just miles better than it? Ive spaded them both now and I'd far rather fly the Corsair every time.
>>
>want to extend my conscription and enter the exam for some gibs
>all the leos are taken and i'll most likely be assigned to an m48

not like this bro's
>>
>>521504518
Go above 4k
>>
File: hot.jpg (210 KB, 1280x854)
210 KB
210 KB JPG
>>521504056
for me, it's skirtless
>>
>>521503385
why wouldnt it be faster? it has much more powerful engines
>>
>>521504518
>i NEED le overwhelming armament))))))))))))))))))))) to do anything because I'm too shit to outplay the enemy and get any amount of time on target
Holy skill issue.
>>
>>521504640
>Go above 4k
No? You're only up there for like a minute and then everyone dives to the deck anyway. What are you gonna do, sit up there on your own playing with your dink?
>>521504806
Nothing wrong with overwhelming armament if it means that anything that hits just disintegrates the enemy plane. Do you also use all AP rounds as well just so you can show how "skilled" you are?
>>
>>521504806
you're only saying this because of a crippling case of mutt derangement syndrome
>>
>>521505123
Now you can spend the whole 25 minutes above 6k and the enemy can't end the game
>>
I exclusive use ball rounds for extra skill
>>
>>521504752
I need this as a modification immediately
>>
File: 75812674_p0.jpg (1.31 MB, 1585x2000)
1.31 MB
1.31 MB JPG
>>521504752
That clearly has a miniskirt, anon
>>
>>521505123
>Do you also use all AP rounds as well just so you can show how "skilled" you are?
No, I simply play the plane variants that have the best flight performance for their BRs and deal with the minor inconvenience that are worse guns.
>>
>>521505330
You mean as a new vehicle?)))
>here's your totally new TKX (P) (Early) Xir)))))))))))))))
>>
File: file.png (3.19 MB, 1971x933)
3.19 MB
3.19 MB PNG
really nice tank
>>
File: fa18.jpg (41 KB, 550x538)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>521504782
It would be faster with more powerful engines if the airframe stay the same but Super Hornet (E/F model) is bigger in every dimension wings have dogtooth on the leading edge to attach flow for longer at high AoA and square intakes are bigger (more draggy) to accommodate bigger engine air requirements every thing adds up
>>
>>521505590
They're not the same BR, the P51-H is 6.3 the F4U-4B is 5.7, and so cannot get dragged into ever early jet match on the planet.
>>
why do the muttoids get P-40s at 2.7?
>>
probably the same reason russoids tree is filled with ufo's
>>
>>521506553
Chinks, French and Soviets get them also wdym?
>>
>>521505789
it used to be better before br changes
>>
>>521506776
trvke
>>
>>521506829
it's blatantly undertiered alongside the corsair
>>
>>521507010
So what? So are Yak-3's.
>>
>>521506863
I just finished spading it.
my k/d for all my abrams is like 2 to 1 lmao and winrate is like 38%
haven't bought the clickbait yet. Maybe I'll wait for a sale
>>
>>521508136
*2 deaths to 1 kill
>>
>>521508136
How on earth do you put up with the teams?
>>
>>521507010
If you think p-40 at 2.7 is undertiered what about 2.3 yak-1 that rapes everything that moves?
>>
>>521508634
chemicals
>>
Damn this thing loves to flop about when you land it.
>>
File: shot 2025.04.12 11.20.32.jpg (499 KB, 1920x1080)
499 KB
499 KB JPG
didn't expect the mauler to be so funny in air battles
>>
Is there a reason why SB2C-5's are so unbelievably handheld in this game?
>>
>>521509763
Imagine using cannons, dont you know only elite players use MG's only to show off their pure skill?
>>
>>521510013
it's more fun to launch massive wing deleting sharts than pissing through the RNG hose that is MG fire
>>
0:01 of activity time...
>>
File: file.jpg (315 KB, 1200x823)
315 KB
315 KB JPG
>6x 20mm cannons
>can only climb at 10m/s
>more powerful than a P-47
>weighs less than a P-47
>somehow slower and less maneuverable
what BR for the XF8B?
>>
File: 1732682455622700.jpg (36 KB, 662x666)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>bug report of a vehicle missing armor thickness
>gaijin: i sleep
>bug report of a shitstain on the loader's pants not being of the proper color
>gaijin: real shit
>>
>>521511070
B-17/B-29 Vertical stab on a fighter... SEXO
>>
>7.0
>full downtier
>can't find any red niggers to kill
>find out a single Obj. 268 has locked down the entire enemy team
I don't know why I stopped grinding out Russian TDs, the 268 is retardedly strong
>>
File: 1732525404921743.png (747 KB, 1164x567)
747 KB
747 KB PNG
what's your favorite set of guns that you wish you could put on every other plane
>>
>>521513164
Has to be a toss-up between the GSh-30-6 and the GAU-12/U. Both have excellent volume of fire but it's hard to choose between the former's nuke rounds and the latter's demented muzzle velocity and energy retention. If I HAVE to be somewhat reasonable and pick something less unwieldy, then either the GSh-30-2 or the 25 mm ADEN (basically younger cousins of the above).
>>
>>521514354
Swedish 13mm for props and m61 for supersonics
>>
>>521511473
>Type 10 steering still bugged
>pneumatic suspension at lowest position still bugging into the ground
>Type 10 still slow
>Type 90 wrong sight magnification
>F-5T 4 missile capability (acknowledged and passed)
>...
>Type 10 has wrong track model
>instantly fixed next update
>>
>>521513164
the octuple 7.92mm on the GI
>>
>>521514610
is there something im missing about swedish 13m?? they seem painfully average
>>
>>521515196
HE shells
>>
>>521515196
Nuke (for the caliber) HE rounds. And unlike similar rounds used by Japanese HMGs, the belts are full of them.
>>
File: 8d0781ad4f24443b.jpg (81 KB, 500x500)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>521513164
Vulcan ofc
>>
>>521513164
why not just take the quad FMC T-160s from the f-86f-2?
4*1500 rpm instead of 2x1700rpm with otherwise identical performance
>>
File: 1739108180755009.png (148 KB, 727x458)
148 KB
148 KB PNG
>in test range dicking around with the Swedish marketplace F-5 that has that big Anti-Ship missile
>try dropping it too close to the water
>it crashes into the water, makes like a dozen explosion sounds
>keeps traveling underwater like a torpedo
>then suddenly jumps out and continues flying towards the ship and still hits it
>>
>>521517575
I like the ~10 seconds of trigger time of the M39A2s, the ones you're talking about can only fire for 4.6 seconds
>>
Why is it that my t-34 gets one shot from the front so often but when I'm shooting at t-34s from the front and side I get ricochets?
>>
>>521517690
Well Eurofighters used to be able to fly below ground
>>
>>521517942
bad opinion
>>
is anyone able to get nvidia photo mode 'super resolution' to work? it used to be called nvidia ansel and would let you scale up screenshot resolutions
yes i know the game isnt open, when i open it the resolution slider disappears completely and only lets me select filters
>>
>>521515196
20mm minengeschoss shell damage but with .50 cal ammo counts
>>
Have any of you bought one of those """lego"""" tank kits from aliexpress?
>>
I avoid chinkshit in all its forms.
>>
>>521483238
no that one had a tranny pilot
>>
is it me or is France 8.0 kind of good now?
>>
>>521519384
you probably ate like 5 over just the last year alone
>>
>>521520494
No. It's unlikely.
>>
I'm relapsing hard.
Is the F86F-35 worth getting if you've already got sabre experience and need to grind America?
>>
File: 1729357038658534.jpg (72 KB, 634x422)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
Swedish Abrams soon
>>
>>521523846
that abrams belongs to the earth
>>
>>521522554
No. It's just sabre
>>
File: new bread.gif (810 KB, 245x140)
810 KB
810 KB GIF
>>521524052
>>521524052
>>521524052
>>521524052
>>
File: lowiq.png (220 KB, 601x338)
220 KB
220 KB PNG
>>521434061
>>
buy an ad
>>
>>521506553
why do japoids get Ki-43s at 2.7?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.