>Is on-modelKneel
>>56731383He's so badass, bros.... I love him
>>56731383>>Is on-modelNope this is
>>56731383>Is running instead of slugishly walking like a Bear with no armsoff model.
>>56731383Sorry I dont kneel to gays
>>56731416To be fair there’s a person sitting on his fucking head of all things instead of his back, so he can’t really go full-sprint like that.
>>56731383>getting so BTFO you need to make a whole new thread to cry onNever forgetti
>>56731404>proportions are the sameboth are on model. New poses don't make something off model somehow>>56731416>proportions are the sameboth are on model. New movements don't make something off model somehow>>56731566Hi yawnie, still waiting for a reason how the thing can't walk.
>>56731635>this mindbrokenSorry to disappoint but yawnfag can suck my scrotum. And so can you, mr. sealfag.
>>56731635>>proportions are the sameThe one i posted is skinnier
>He's replying in three different threads Lmao
>>56731712>no rebuttal>>56731717I agree, my bad. That doesn't really change its walking ability though. If anything it makes the fanart less cable, but it's clearly still able, so all the more so the original should be able to the exact same way.
>>56731796I accept your concession AND your seething, lmao
>>56731745>checked it>it's fucking true
>>56731816I actually posted an argument but I'm conceeding? It's you who are conceeding because you fail to engage on the discussion.
>>56731833Your argument quite literally boils down to "nuh-uh". Thankfully, it's so retarded that you can't appeal to majority on this.
>>56731929>Your argument quite literally boils down to "nuh-uh"No it doesn't. Look at it here>>56731796I acknowledged the it was off model, but not in a way that affects its movements. Making that discussion is an actually nuanced statement. You're just pretending I said "nuh uh" or its equivalents because you seemingly can't provide responses.
