Look at me, I’m Anon! I think the rejected cut-content is still canon!
>>56753604It's no use mocking them OP, /vp/edos are so braindead that you could get GameFreak themselves to confirm that what was leaked is not canon and they still wouldn't get it because it breaks the dogfucker fantasies
>>56753635I still hold onto the belief that perhaps, maybe, they still have one functioning brain cell left that’s not yet degraded by their crippling porn addiction.
>>56753604You are cute!
>>56753604it's okay you can tell us from which thread you got BTFO'd
>>56753877>I disagree so I will assume you were proven wrong somewhere elseThe worst cope in the history of coping
>>56753877Please post the thread, if you’re so sure.
>>56753898The fact you instantly got defensive over it means it's true until proven otherwise
>>56753908NTA you goober but puff out that chest
>>56753854then you are a fool
Yep, it's not canon, except the parts backed up by canon.
>>56753995Cut content isn’t validated by remaining content. It’s cut for a reason.
>>56753604Call itCope or sneed, call it
>>56753877This, share your pain OP, we are here for you
>>56754309But it wasn't cut. They just didn't go in-depth in the details because they make a kid's series, they still said exactly what they'd wanted to.
>>56754330It's nice to see a mother and her son work out their differences... ;)
>>56753604Some of it ended up in SM/SWSH dex entries, so it’s debatable if it was even “cut” or just shelved the way a lot of Tajiri’s lore was.
>>56754449What in, "humans USED to marry Pokemon" do you retards not understand? It means that they no longer do in the modern Pokemon world. Jesus fucking christ, even Chris Chan would have understood that>>56754330Once again, this is a kid looking at old family photos, the mother is the little girl because it's a pic when she was younger and the grandpa is the adult. Try harder zoophile
>>56754449So I guess Froslass can also take human form.>Latias>Arceus>Froslass>ZoroarkLike 3/4 of these are only women. It seems taking human form to marry a person is something only female pokemon do, and only on occasion.
>>56753635Okay, I'll accept that it's not canon.If you accept that this makes the intent of the Diamond/Pearl folklore about marrying your own Pokemon clear.Ultimately, yes, it's not canon, but this clears up the intentions behind things like that, the Let's Go water stone joke and the Machamp. There is no plausible deniability at this point for them.(On an aside, all of the creation myths were really fucking cool and I like them a lot. Arceus beating these non-Pokemon giants? How do you even define what isn't a Pokemon in the Pokemon universe?)
>>56753604I'd fuck this Anon's brains out.
>>56754330Call it?
>>56754672Pokemon, those derived from the works of Arceus.Not pokemon, created by the chaos of her hatching.Humans thusly are not pokemon, for Arceus didn't create them.
It wasn't even fucking cut nor rejected, it's a story bible... Do none of you fuckers know what a story bible is?
>>56754639>moving the goalpost cuz he got proven wrongClassic
>>56754708It WAS cut, and it WAS rejected, because these materials aren't in the games or promotional material and were never meant to be released to the public.
>>56754639And they still have relations with them tofday. I'd suggest playing the games, but I know you're just one the regular retard bastards mad her headcanon isn't actual canon, so I'll just layugfgh at the mad little retard seething over the lore bible of the series backing /vp/ majority demographic with blow-ins, twitards and normalfags rage harder.
>>56754704I mean that one is really interesting, because Aus finds... what, 10 thousand humans when they first arrive? It kind of reinvigorates the whole Gen 1 lore about Pokemon being a relatively new thing on Earth.>>56754723>aren't in the games>or promotional material>never meant to be released to the publicI guess the Fallout Bible is also cut and rejected... Oh wait, it is a large document which collects stories and terms, used as a narrative tool to help story writers figure out how to make the story of a given Fallout game.Huh, it's almost like this was done before Gen 4's completion to help flesh out the world behind the scenes so the story writers of future games allude to it. It can be ignored loosely.Absolute fucking retards on this board, I swear to god.
>>56754723>it's cut as long as you don't play the games>>56753995>>56754449>>56754748>Picrel: Bonus website lore
>>56754748It was a guy in a costume >>56753995>folk lore = historyholy shit you people are dumb
>>56754752>I guess the Fallout Bible is also cut and rejected...The Fallout Bible was written by Chris Avellone and published by him on Black Isle's webpage. That is an official release, meant to be seen by fans.This isn't even remotely the same thing.
>>56754723>>56754762>Bonus thirsty anime girl evidence
>>56754723>>56754787>bonus thirsty anime girl evidence exhibit #2
>>56754449>But it wasn't cutIt was cut and the lore of PLA and DPPt have massive plot holes
>>56754797Appreciating someone muscles doesn't mean you want to fuck them you brain damaged incel>>56754787Non-canon movie
>>56754784>meant to be seen by fansOkay, so what about every other game franchise that has one? Bethesda doesn't keep them, but other far more competent devs, like Square Enix, have them. Are they all not canon, despite influencing the likes of Final Fantasy?
>>56754777Different event shit-for-brains. Also ignoring the fact the women didn't KNOW he was a bloke in a 'camp suit and were thirsting over his arse regardless. It's why he gave you "Attract" after all.If you played the games, you'd have known that. Instead you proved you have shit-for-brains AND a seething need to ignore reality.
>>56753635fpbp!
>>56754834Oh no the movie is definitely canon.
>>56754851>women didn't know the talking machamp was a guyIf they are that fucking dumb they might just be a pokefucker like you
>>56754831Nah, it's all there. You just don't want to accept canon, as canon accepts poképhilia.>>56754834And yet the two girls we saw go barmy over pokémon muscles DON'T go doe-eyed for byuff humans, else lana would walk around with her tongue out any time kiawe showed up on-screen.Except the part where they outright confirmed Latias kissed Ash. But as I said, you have a desperate need to believe your opinion is canon, instead of accepting you got brainwashed by a kiddy series created by a race of peoples that had two nukes dropped on them.
>>56754851Once again, admiring someone muscles doesn't mean you want to fuck them. Not that a porn addicted retard like you would know
>>56754837If they're not officially released they're not part of the canon, no.This is like arguing that Fortress is canon to Ivalice despite being scrapped, or that Versus XIII is canon to Final Fantasy, or -god forbid-, Kingdom Hearts despite, again, being scrapped.
>>56754890Lana likes the male swimmers.
>>56754878Wow, almost as if that's ot seen as weird, strange, abnormal or bad in their universe, huh? That they openly lust over a pokémon AND in front of a child who may not understand what the fuck's going on (which is why they slipped it past your kiddy arse so long son).
>Zoophiles still trying to argue that their pokephilia fantasies is canonKek, you fags are beyond pathetic, why don't you go fuck a real girl instead of wanting to bang magical animals?
>>56754890>A pokemon liking a human means pokemon sex is canonMore logical leaps from a retard
>>56754894And once again, when it's only buff, burly pokémon that draws that reaction, it's hard to argue its anything pure. Especially when both girls are portrayed swooning and/or acting in an infatuated manner the likes of which I've personally only seen from elvis or beatles fangirls from the old tapes.Don't forget, they hire furfags to draw cardart too.
>>56754930>they hire furfags to draw cardartThey also hire megaman porn artists to draw the trainer cards all that tells us is that they dont do background checks
>>56754896This is a fucking ridiculous argument. You had to add a specific clause to invalidate all other bibles because I had a point. The problem is that in the process of doing this, you didn't think about the scenario of them releasing the bible officially years later. In that case, they'd become canon to you... even when the entirety of the bible could've been ignored by every future game. This is a ridiculous position to have.We're done here, I'm not continuing this fucking shit.
>>56754913>>56754449Pokémon are akin to yokai son. Wholesale lifted from Japanese myth in cases (there's a version of the Yuki-Onna story tell;s of how the YO spares the life of her husband after he speaks of meeting the YO that night, out of respect for the lives of her children or because she has come to love him). Small wonder Game Freak and the franchise at large treats them as yokai and not mindless animals which is how the US wants them to be portrayed.
>>56754962Thats all assumptions and only a few pokemon are based on yokai
>>56753604>Look at me, I'm OP! I'm upset that GF even considered pokefucking in the first place!I know you're hurting, but pandora's box has already been opened, and no amount of seething will ever change people's minds or return things to the way they were.I don't expect you to listen, but I still must say to you, "It's over. Let it go". There are better feeling thoughts for you to chase.
>>56754449>>56753995The implication is there was a point in time where Pokemon and humans were closer genetically, hence it wouldn't have been as big a deal as now, when they're clearly distinct from one another.
>>56754947>this newThey banhammer any cunt that tries to charge a continuous timed stipend on anything featuring their characters anon. They know rightly who does what, which is why they hire them to draw certain card arts.
>>56754762None of this is canon
>>56754968>one employee is GF as a whole >reddit spacingparroting is an admission of defeat
>>56754956>You had to add a specific clause to invalidate all other bibles because I had a point.One was officially released and the others are not. How is this a hard concept to grasp? Only things officially released are canon. That's what CANON means. You're wringing hands over an asinine position trying to argue that leaks of ideas thrown around and never used are somehow now official. It might as well be elaborate fanfiction given who released it (the leaker, not Game Freak).
>>56754975What are you talking about retard I doubt the execs know each and every retard they hire to do card art for free instead of paying an actual studio
>>56754967Only a few actual 'mons, yes. But the race/species of pokémon, the shrinking creatures that have elemental powers are very much "notEarth's Yokai", made real with equal intelligence and sapience as humans; they have a common shared language, understood by all, are able to form complex thoughts and sentences, are emotionally literate and basically are as far removed form any creature on our earth except for humans as possible.That's why the creators saw nothing wrong with writhing worldbuilding myth borrowing liberally from real-world myths with a pokémon veneer and keeping the horny details untouched bar substituting fitting pokémon for the creature of focus.
>>56754989
>>56755023Just because gf took inspiration from a few yokai humanoids doesn't mean they "approve of " or have any from a Human pokemon relationships as canon, the few examples you have listed still dont have any definitive proof this is the case.
>>56754971Humans are not and have never been pokémon, they were always classed as a separate organism. It means humans and pokémon bumped uglies, because that's what the lore bible leaks established happened in its stories of humans marrying pokémon. It was cleaned up for release, but seeing as NoA absolutely butchered the translations, it proves even THEY knew what the implications of that statement were.Why do puricucks always argue from an angle of bad faith?
>>56755005>officially released>That's what CANON meansNo, that is not at all what canon means. For starters, many games incorporate non-canonical things. Resident Evil 2's secret ending sure is shit is not canon.A better description of canon in videogames is that it is the accepted sequence of lore. It doesn't have to be officially released in the actual material, as seen with the Psychonauts bible which "officially" released, and it can be retconned out of existence, like how the Fallout Bible was over the course of Fallout 3, 4, and 76.
>>56755032Thanks, 2hu and visual novel threads.
>>56755063>A better description of canon in videogames is that it is the accepted sequence of loreAn accepted sequence of lore is determined by the series' creators and not the fans. If TPC says "the leaked material does not represent our final vision for the series and should only be taken as early ideas" then what will you do? Because that's what's happening here.
>>56754834>Non-canon movieHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAltomarw with Bianca-Latias literally shown in the 2nd to last episode of the Ashnime, the ABSOLUTE STATE of non-canon cucks
>>56754987All of it is canon, because it's all appeared in a Game Freak game, a TPC production, under Game Freak's approval or printed on the official website, again under Game Freak's approval. It's even still live today.>https://www.pokemon.jp/special/kairiky_gym/girlstalk/
>>56755057>established happened in its stories of humans marrying pokémonBut this was never established and there is nothing in the games that states this, having a few stories supposedly written by one employee that arent canon have inconsistencys with Pokemon themselves (example: Slakoths dont have ears) that are Just Japanese foketails with insert "X" pokemon makes them anything but canon
>>56755078NTA but having an intelligent pokemon kiss a human as a human (who knows if its sexual in any way and not just a gesture of kindness) isnt a "relationship"
>>56755097Bw2 literally has the player (as actor) fall in love with a smeargle in a movie, and this is released as an *even more popular* ending than the standard good ending to the same movie where the player actor chooses the human wo/man to fall in love with.
>>56755086 >>56755097
>>56755077>[canon] is determined by the series' creatorsYes.>If TPC says [it's not canon]Then it's not canon.>that's what's happening hereAnd my main argument has never been that the bible is canon, YOU started that. My arguments remain that they continue to use these documents to shape how future games build their own stories, and that the reveal of the bibles reveal the internal thought processes of certain jokes and story bits within the games like the "humans and Pokemon used to marry." No one sane would argue that these documents would be canon(especially not the Fallout Bible, which as I stated before, Bethesda does not adhere to,) there's... what, 3 different creation myths stored within, and several copies of the same myths with the subject changed? Hardly an accepted SEQUENCE.
>>56755007Uh-huh. That's why the card art department, who's job it is to be constantly looking for artists worth contracting are the ones who knew who he was leaving the execs free to continue to oversee the brand as a whole.Whole fucking point of delegation, any time I got hired, it was me and the head chef one-on-one with a day's trial in-kitchen or just a day in-kitchen without the interview, as he'd rung around on my CV referees.
>>56755007Holy fucking cope
>>56755097It's no use arguing with them anon, /vp/edos will always deny facts and claim it is canon even if you give them concrete proof that it isn't because it contradicts and messes with their Pokephiliac fantasies. Just let them cope and laugh when they get jailed for going down on their neighbor dog
>>56755125Side content isn't canon
>>56755125>clearly a joke
>>56755125>if eyes meet, sometimes love will blossom as well>But these feelings don't occur just between humans>love...(doesn't) occur just between humansOh no no no no no no
>>56755133>No one sane would argue that these documents would be canonThis is the position either you have been arguing for or I have been arguing against and for some reason you have decided to take issue with.So are you sane?
>>56755048No, the fact they continuously reference pokémon/human relations means they approve of it.But you cunts haven't played the games since coming into your majorities thus think your unenlightened kiddy memories of the thing are the norm, rather than the whole dirty secret to Pokémon's success in pushing the furry companion meme.
>>56755138>card art departmentThere are a lot more important departments in TPC than who does the art
>>56755125Nigger it's a movie, aka not reality. The player is not in love with the Smeargle, he is acting. Stop thinking with your 2 inches pen0r and use the few braincells you have for once in your pathetic life
>>56755145>Side content isn't canon
>>56755161Once again, this is meant to be a joke, what he said was he worried that giving a Water Stone to his human girlfriend will cause her to evolve. You fags really are not trying aren't you?
>>56755130>>56753995>>56754449Seethe, ya brown-minded bastard.
>>56755161People call their dogs "girlfriend" and even then it could be a Joke about his actual girlfriend not an eevee you retarded man child
How many tears do you guys think OP is running though replying to everyone itt
>>56755200Browns love fucking there animals but okay nigger
>Pokephiles still coming out with copes to try and justify their dogfucking tendenciesKek, even if Pokephilia was canon no Pokemon ever would want to have sex with you anyway so why bother trying to justify it?
>>56755158So I decided to go looking and it turns out that I am the one that brought up canon, while trying to express the stupidity of saying that the Fallout bible was the only story bible not cut and rejected. Wow I'm retarded.Apologies.Regardless, the argument remains that they're NOT cut and they're NOT rejected, considering they keep making references to it.
>a bunch of Jokes and scrapped lore means its canonNever gets old
>>56755234We have a one-off trans/crossdressing black belt, and that's paraded around as canon, to the point that everyone is expected to just accept it.How come this gets different treatment, despite the story bible ACTUALLY fucking leaking, proving the intentions?
>>56755194Oh fuck off you disingenuous little cunt. Once is a joke, once-a-game since the mid-2000's (and possibly earlier, Nidoqueen DID grab her tits and jiggle them in Stadium. Same with Jynx swishing her arse in her attack animatuions) is the perfect crime retard kids don't see it, normalfag cunts go "haha" but as the leaks proved, Game Freak and the rest of us with open eyes know what they mean. In all its lurid detail.
>>56755212Or they're having sex with their dogs. I'd actually take a harder look at the man and his dog next time you hear someone say something like that and if it's over knee-height, consider calling the ASPCA. Maybe they think bestiality's still legal in your state like a few of them still.
>>56755260I dont consider a bunch of Jokes made by one off npc's to be canon unless you consider all of the Nintendo power winners names in super mario world to be canon as well >story biblewhat?
>>56754449>I will never have an IRL relationshipok just keep your coping fantasies to /trash/
Everybody in this thread (except me) is retard.
>>56755233Apology accepted. I'll dip out too.Though I wouldn't be surprised if Game Freak completely rejects all this material now and tries to wash their hands of this sort of thing in the future rather than continue to use it after it got leaked. In that case it would truly be cut and rejected.
>>56755264Once again, this is meant to be a joke not meant to be taken seriously. I'm sorry that your monkey brain is unable to comprehend that but thats the truth. Also a single writer is not GameFreak retard because that would imply that every employeed made these stories while they didn't
>>56755301>is retard>except me
>taking jokes seriouslywhen did /vp/ turn into a bunch of leftoids lol
>>56755233>Pretending to be the other anon apologizing to him to justify his pokephilia fantasiesHoly autism, how does it feel knowing that you are more autistic than CWC, kingcobrajfs and Daniel Larson combined?
>>56754449It was removed due to being rejected, therefore, it was cut and is NOT canon. Any further edits in future iterations, such removing Indian Elephants from Raichu’s Pokedex entry, is an acceptable change due to the series’ premise changing from Pokemon existing with IRL animals to an organic world in which Pokemon ARE stand-in for animals.Just accept it. If it’s not in the game, it’s NOT legitimate to use an argument.
>>56755306Good debate anon. I actually liked doing this, despite getting a bit heated. Have a nice day!>>56755296>jokesWhat about the book documenting human and Pokemon marriages then? That's not just a one-off NPC, that's LITERALLY a book meant to tell you the lore of gen 4.>story bibleDo you NOT know what a story bible is? It's a collection of documents describing the world and scenarios that could happen in the world that you'd refer to while making a story. Common practice for story-driven games, basically every company has their own for their games(except Bethesda.) Story bibles are not necessarily canon on its own, but parts of the bibles get canonized by being put in whatever media it's attached to. Additionally, the parts left uncanonized can still explain their thought processes left behind in the gaps.
>>56755219You know, you're really not doing anything to counter the "brown-minded bastard" accusations. Given your knee-jerk reaction to project your failings onto me here. not my fault you can't understand a kiddy game can be made by adults and include adult bonuses.
>>56755326>"Any community that gets its laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe that they're in good company."
>>56755359>Foke lore = historyretard
>>56755300>more projectionI'm sure pretending not to be a paedophile will get you lots of overage pussy too dude.Just don't hang around here when you do get that pussy, if you're not into the pokémon, she'll call the cops on you for your *problematic* interest in little girls.
>>56755307Yeah, that's why it just happens to match up with the lore bible from that era. They made a joke, because the core games were also exploring that topic with their creation myths.
>>56755373>Folklore>loreYeah that's uh... how it fuckin' works? :POkay but seriously, folklore is based in something. It kind of has to spring from somewhere. Care to provide alternative explanations?>>56755335This post is practically indecipherable given I don't know two of these lolcows. Thanks.Also, I'm literally apologizing for the line>Are they all not canon, despite influencing the likes of Final Fantasy?despite my frequent mentions that story bibles AREN'T canon, and that we somehow got into an argument over the canonicity of a bible. What the fuck anon?
>>56755350It wasn't, you drooling bastard, that's from traces of a lost villiage, which establishes a Yuki-Onna pokémon has a Yuki-Onna relationship with a human, then leaves him and spares his life. That she REFUSES to let herself be caught implies she's still "owned" by someone or she herself considers herself still "owned". Which further implies she still loves the man she'd married even after all these years with her children. this shit isn't american, though given they wanted to give pikachu tits, maybe they weren't far off the mark initially.
reminder of the actual CANON that is IN THE GAMES (which furfags don't play):>1. According to FOLKLORE humans and pokémon were once much closer genetically, and thus could marry. Nowadays they are vastly different and it is the equivalent of irl Zoophilia. Just like thousands of years ago your non-homo-sapien ancestors fucked other kinds of non-homo-sapiens, which would be seen as vile behaviour for a current human.>2. Depictions or statements about human-and-pokémon relationships are always presented as jokes, where the humor lies in the absurd situation (which furries fail to see because zoophilia isn't absurd to them at all obviously)if you disagree you out yourself as a permanent virgin who likely has over 95% of his social interactions through the computer and will die alone while coping with things like "3D people are disgusting anyway anime characters are superior" because you hate your innability to be liked by others IRL. The only cure is suicide.
>>56753604Why is this even a thing? If it's not in the games or mentioned it's not fucking canon. I can think of other games where things were cut or rewritten but you never see the fandoms of those games getting uppity about it except maybe as 'I think the cut version could have been cooler'
>>56754672This.
>3. except zoophilia's moral standings are because animals are not intelligent enough to consent, which doesnt apply to pokemon who are often times more intelligent than humans>4. and then everything about it being just about genetics falls apart because of pla's snowrunts, good job anon
>>56755445>except zoophilia's moral standings are because animals are not intelligent enough to consentAlready wrong. Did not read the rest.Reminder: your only cure is suicide.
>>56755434/vp/edos cannot accept that it isn't canon because it breaks their fantasies of them having sex with Pokemon so they try posting random garbage (that they don't even understand like the obvious in game jokes being jokes) as a way to try and justify their "IT'S CANON GUISES !!!!1!!" dogfucker cope
>>56755434They like the cut content because it gives fuel and vindication to their bestiality fantasies and desires.
>>56755452Anon, please explain to me the nuanced moral problems with bestiality(/zoophilia) because the only one I've ever heard is that unable-to-consent argument.
>>56755514Do you even need any more reasons? Or are you incapable of identifying abuse, or do you refuse to accept it as such? Either way, hang yourself from a tree, you’re better off as buzzard food.
>>56755425>furfags don't [HEADCANON]Post hours, 'cause I'm pretty sure I've played longer than your manchild arse has, which is why I'm posting canon evidence from Game Freak games pointing to poképhilia being a thing, as opposed to you cunts squealing "no, it's not canon because the little blind boy in my head tolds me sos".
>>56755456I mean I'd fuck a Pokemon, I don't need GF's permission to do that.
>>56755531>or are you incapable of identifying abuseLet's say we have a human, and they consent to a sexual action. Is that abuse? What if it's a revived neanderthal that is taught up to higher education and is well versed in English? What if it's an incredibly intelligent computer system with access to the whole world and a body it can reshape at will? Would consent from a woman who put herself through genetic engineering to gain wolf ears still be considered abuse if you chose to accept her offer?Abuse makes sense if it's 100% not consensual. You're presenting a case of abuse where I'm not exactly sure the edge begins and ends.
>>56755531>a pokémon will not listen to a trainer it does not respect or trustr>not will it stay with a trainer uunable to handle it appropriatelyBut they can't consent to sex because.... they just can't because i don't want them to be able toSo you either get your kicks from the thought of raping a dumb beast or get sexual kinks off enslaving animals. Either way, the canon doesn't support and outright rejects your mentality.
>the op
>>56755547>he played woke the video game for 1000+ hoursno wonder your so brain broken lmao
seeing furfags shitting themselves is rare, normally it's the lolo/yurifags. This change of pace is quite nice
>>56755577Look if a Pokemon can liquify your insides using their mind I think it'd be safe to say they consented.
>>56755577>>56755606If I have to explain it to you you will never understand. Neck yourself zoophiles.
>>56755606Yeah, that too. We're talking about creatures that are capable of annihilating entire city blocks if they so pleased. It'd be hard NOT to do anything, even as simple as building as a house, without their consent :P
>>56755605Zoofags and furfags are a fair bit different, even if there is an overlap. At least try to make the effort to distinguish them.
>>56755577>Anonymous Retardus: “Hey, little Pokemon, I am going to diddle you now!”>Pokemon: “HONK! SCREECH!”>Anonymous Retardus: “Sweet, that totally meant consent!”I commend your perseverance, even if it’s misplaced in defending your attraction to animals. There’s a difference between seeing fights between two cool monsters, and your case of wanting to rape them.
>56755601>no argument>just more seetheConcession accepted. @Course, hgad you actaully played the games outside beuing 7, you'd have opicked up on this shit earlier, not made yourself look a stupid cunt online, for the world to see.
>>56755606Absolutely, but retards here think they're somehow something they've never been portrayed as.
>>56755644>hgad>beuing >opicked did you cry while typing this
>>56755643Okay, so what about any of these Pokemon? You tellin' me I can't fuck the bronze alien that probably barely qualifies as a Pokemon?
>>56755615Sorry, you will have to because I don't know your headcanon for Tajiri's IP. I know Tajiri's thoughts and by extension Game Freak. But you're a whobie fuck mad on the internet, so why don't you explain it for the people who don't subscribe to whobiefuck.com to keep up with you cunts?
>>56755660If it’s not a human, it’s a Pokemon.If it’s not an adult human, it cannot consent.Need me to spread this a bit more for your smooth little zoo brain?
>>56755664It's the same reason why it's looked down upon to have sex with your students even if all involved are adults. The power dynamic implies they have to consent. It's sad you don't understand social dynamics.
>>56755674>if its not human, it's a pokemonExcept Aus fought giants who were explicitly not Pokemon and not human. even if you consider that as non canon there's also ultra beasts which canonically do not register as Pokemon despite playing by similar rules.And, of course, in ignoring all of this, my point was that telepathic pokemon should be able to cleanly communicate with humans, which was my retort to the whole "HONK! SCREECH!" thing.
>>56755658It's almost 12 anon. I've been on the cans for 4 hours now.Which makes your performance even worse, no coherence, no evidence and resorting to picking typos to ignore the arguments at hand, because you still can't counter canon with feefees. meanwhile, I'm half-cut and handing you your arse, just by pointing out Game Freak's thoughts on this shit, that they spend dev hours, project money and marketing column space JUST to further the idea of poképhilia.
>>56755689Anon these Pokemon canonically do not respect your authority if you do not have the badges to back up said authority.Also, as a teacher, your students tend to not be able to light you on fire, erase all of your memories, invert your internals and externals, nor create a black hole in your living room on a moment's notice.
>>56755707The power dynamic still exists. They have to more or less obey your orders even if they don't agree with them. Plenty of examples of that in canon.
>>56755689>humans can bond with wild pokémon and see themselves as friends rather than partners or owners of the wild pokémonNow what? You telling me I make friends with a primarina to the point she willingly comes onto me during mating season by attempting to serenade me, that's coercion? Even if I've never once raised a ball even in jest towards her? 'Cause otherwise, it just sounds like more spergy headcanon directly contradicting canon.
>>56755720And there's also plenty of examples of Pokemon DISOBEYING trainer orders that thought they were fucking stupid.
>>56755720>they have to>lycanroc midnight, ultra sun>It has no problem ignoring orders it doesn't likeI am curious though, what examples do you have in canon where Pokemon willingly obeyed orders they evidently didn't want to execute?
>thinks responding with cut content is a genius rebuttal-30 points for proving the original post right-10 points for implying ultra beasts are not Pokemon-10 points for using a specific move, that only a few Pokemon know, to void the language barrierYour score’s “D-”. See me after class, and no, you will not be allowed to see the school dog, we all know how much you “love” it.
>>56755720>They have to more or less obey your ordersNo they don't, Ash's Snivy went through 3 trainers as she thought they were scrubs and only joined Ash after he won her respect by outsmarting her. In the games, they do as a game mechanic if they have your OT (even if hilariously overlevelled on another cart) but traded ones and wild-caught outside the badge range don't to prove the player needs to earn their respect, just as every trainer in the universe needs to have the respect of their charges to be able to battle fully alongside them (they even had a pre-schooler trainer in Gen 7 state because he'd borrowed his brother's pokémon, it wouldn't listen to him).
this thread is outrageous
>>56755800>posting the kid set up to reunite with his hot pokémon girlfriend
>>56755550But does the Pokemon wants to fuck (you)? That is the question
>-30 points for proving the original post rightBut it's not cut content, it's a story bible.>-10 for implying ultra beasts are not PokemonOnly a very specialized Pokeball explicitly designed for them can catch one, unlike any of the other Pokemon, so for all intents and purposes, they are not a Pokemon in the traditional sense.>-10 for using a specific moveIt was a thought experiment to see where the edge was, and it's an ability, not a move. Wowzers, I can't believe you're actually THAT retarded to get it wrong twice.>school dogBut how else am I supposed to see you when the only thing I see is a bitch behind that screen?
>>56755809ash is gay for goh doe
>>56755809literally robbed...
