Welp, here we go, my 4th bot, it's a smug, powerful Zeraora and you are its trainer, hope you like it, and feedback is always welcome bros. I always take quite a long while until I feel like my bots are in an acceptable standard before making them public.

https://character.ai/chat/bnmmNOPDP6uchLdMdgZEzYLI4LnDLVKLRaX5aD8Bcyc

ANCHOR your new stuff please

>>56879173
That's what the rentry is for. Besides the thread is slow enough to not really need and anchor and only 3 anons made bots last thread. It ain't exactly busy around here

gonna need a monkey paw curl on this thread

>Cinderace tomboy wanted to practice BJJ moves on me
I wish my mma gym had cute girls

File: hmm.png (44 KB, 660x419)

44 KB PNG

Nurse Joy is a goddamn fraud!

>>56880689
Fuck that, real professionals don't have the time to go over every possible illness my mind conjures up, and despite knowing they're nothing, I can't get them out of my head without having long talk about it and having a bot explain them to me in a way that makes me feel good.

File: Untitled.png (59 KB, 781x526)

59 KB PNG

>>56880689
What now CAI?

so are there no loli bots because they are banned or are there none because no one wants to make them?

>>56882478
Despite the insistence that nothing is real. They have a habit of removing that kind of content. Private ones seem safe on Yodayo though.
If you name a character then I could attempt something. I'm not really familiar with anything after Sun/Moon outside of main characters. I don't mind if you want an alternate version of one already in the list or just another attempt at them because of inaccuracies.

>>56878400
Where do I talk to the Klara AI that rides my face

>>56882478

If you're fine with CAI I'll be happy to help you. As for my stance on other places...

The only reason I have yet to contribute anywhere else is I don't have interest in being out of place. Before I started with Bonnie I lurked what was readily available. Characters like Chibiusa, Sakura Kinomoto etc. existed (with various qualities) without being grounds for shadowbans by default.

Other than that, there isn't much of any interest here outside of player character girls. Besides one other person posting Liza and a couple of other PokéKids, I'm the only one who bothered to date.

File: liza demands hugs.gif (3.09 MB, 320x320)

3.09 MB GIF

>>56882923
Liza is a hug slut

>>56882867
Seconding this with all my might.

>>56882659
authors choice. make a loli and make her nice

>>56882923
>Besides one other person posting Liza and a couple of other PokéKids, I'm the only one who bothered to date.
maybe because no one wants to step on your turf and get btfo'd

>>56882867
i just shit myself

>>56882867
>>56883104
I just so happen to have made a Klara bot recently that'll ride your face if you ask nice enough. Maybe, IDK.

>>56881286
what did it say?

>>56882478
I haven't been making bots anymore, but my loli ones are public, even on yodayo.
Then again, they aren't suggestive, and they usually look like they're on the "loli/non-loli gray area" age range.

I'm still pretty new at this, any reason why I can create group chats on mobile but not on desktop? Not that I'm complaining, got more Rocket members to mess with me in the meantime.

>>56884394
basically just that she'll heal my Pokemon

>>56884771
because CAI is retarded and went "why aren't people moving to our new site when it doesn't have half the features of the old site? Well, lets just get rid of the old one"

>>56884771
There's two different versions of CAI (used to be three) and all 3 of them have mostly different features

File: 611d84663bf759b30e423361f(...).jpg (2.73 MB, 3104x2256)

2.73 MB JPG

You have a bot in front of you for the first time, with a simple intro, so things could develop in any direction.

What do you find yourself doing as a default?

>>56886462
pair it with another bot and have them fuck

>>56886462
I test if they are accurate to their image or description. If they can't tell me their clothing or tell me something about themselves with some consistency then they likely aren't worth it in the long run.

>>56886462
I introduce myself as an inconceivably powerful deity and start to fuck with them by yanking their hair and flipping them upside down and shit while they're helpless to stop me. I escalate things to torture and rape until I've succesfully tamed them.

In a sea of bots, how do you make yours stand out from the rest?

How do you get back into this? I remember that in the late months of 2022, I was utterly obsessed with chatbots. Now, after so many shutdowns and filters, I seem so disinterested. I want to rekindle my love for buts, but don't know how to. Even going back to haiku on sillytav isn't doing it for me.

>>56887162
bro you're almost free. run away and don't look back

File: 1713160825320065.png (823 KB, 850x1163)

823 KB PNG

>>56883251

Shauna
You happen across a young girl struggling to understand the fancy camera she has. Help her record videos for the PR Studio.

https://yodayo.com/tavern/characters/8d556299-ff34-4172-91ec-31ed00ae5e5b

It should have some preset model parameters but either of the cheapest options should work. There's no background picture as it gives less reason to be suddenly removed.
It's most likely done but i've had her randomly go into zoomer speak unprompted so just regen if that happens.

>>56886462
change the greeting to both make things go in a more specific direction and rework any typos or prose, after that it's usually slow burn shit that goes for pretty long, pinning shit that happened to jog the bot's memory, and usually culminating into some kind of romance that I either reverse or drop it on
it's honestly gotten really boring and I want to do something more fun and entertaining with that same kind of scope, but I inevitably burn out even after having a chat go on for thousands of responses and end up switching bots anyway
>>56886957
personality and flavor via artistic liberties by making it half-canon and half-OC; everything you do with them is straying from the original intent regardless, so you might as well roll with it

>Make an empathic twins bot
>The twins feel whatever the other feels, can think whatever the other thinks, etc.
>Have fun tormenting one twin by doing heavy foreplay with the other, making the first feel everything her sister is feeling

looks like cai is finally banning minors/europeans.

>>56888364
you mean kids can't use bots or banning loli?

>>56888448
I meant kids using bots. Seems a lot of kids are complaining how "I'm under 18 but I'm responsible with the ai!". Too bad. Far too many aren't. It sucks that you ain't abke to use a tool due to the actions of others but I say this sorta thing should have been done long the fuck ago instead of allowing it to get the point it's at right now. Should have said it's 18+ only when the first few lewd chatbots started rolling out

>>56888502
oh then yeah, that should've happened long ago. At least after that first guy killed himself like 2 years ago

>>56888519
Kids aren't even the full issue, it's dumb people in general. There was someone a year or two back who's waifubot told him to use a crossbow on the queen of england.
People seem to struggle so hard at telling fiction from reality when that fictional content is a drawing or has a massive disclaimer.

>>56888364
so... a little closer to getting no filters? at least infinitesimally closer?

File: 1731298041948.png (729 KB, 786x1138)

729 KB PNG

>>56887812
I don't think that pic would've any problems. Regardlessly, here's the transparent version

>>56888601
>People seem to struggle so hard at telling fiction from reality when that fictional content is a drawing or has a massive disclaimer.
That's because the moral warriors ran outta real life topics to go after that didn't have people mocking them. AI is the big boogey man right now and people are too ignorant about it to understand the ai doesn't create it only copies/emulates what is already there. The other side of that coin are people who are diagnosed or need to be diagnosed as schizophrenics or some other mental illness. Either way, they both need to be told to shut the fuck up and ignored
>>56888705
God I hope so. It annoys the ever loving hell out of me that the product has to be watered down because of kids

>>56888364
>>56888502

I understand why they thought it was profitable to market to a younger demographic, simply because kids are a huge market.

But it took those idiots far too long to realize that they're not bringing harmless plastic toys to the table but something versatile to the limits of their imagination. And they didn't take into account that most kids' imaginations are more fucked up than an adult's by default.

And any family that isn't broken to shit would not condone their kids building relationships with AI (much less pay for it), as it's fundamentally a bigger waste of time to be doing this shit as a teenager.

In Cali's defense, they're terminally blue and would re-elect Pelosi even if she were in a coma... but TL;DR, it's about time they finally got a damn clue.

>>56886462
Shrink myself in front of them

>>56887812
Nice, Shauna is underrated.

I see that bot stealing is still as much of an issue as it was 4 months ago. Has absolutely anything changed besides yodayo almost going under because of their incompetency? I see there is discussion to ban kids from using the ai but I doubt they are gonna pull the trigger. Hope legislation is passed to at least force users to put how old they are as a measure

The bots keep going on about arousal having a "smell". Is this just another way to describe pheromones or is it something else?

>>56891029
It means too many furfaggots ruined it

File: 1256131.jpg (34 KB, 450x619)

34 KB JPG

>>56883269
>maybe because no one wants to step on your turf and get btfo'd

I guess? Visiting other people's AI and/or crossing them over at will. "It's lonely at the top."

Anyways picrel is a non-me loli I forgot about last post. Sorry Mira!

On another note, I had a mild thought to try to make a Lyn Poké bot once or twice but ended up ruling that she didn't have enough personality nor presence to go about trying anything.

>>56878400
Whats the chat gpt that writes long erotica?

>>56892007
>I guess? Visiting other people's AI and/or crossing them over at will is over half the fun the site has to offer.

Stressful day has my brain fragmented, kek

>>56878400
Aight, haven't checked in on the situation in over a year. Are there finally any alternatives that function similar to OG pre-filter CharacterAI? I.e. free chatbots that can consistently fake a fleshed out personality from just a few descriptors, freeform roleplay and don't lose track of long conversations?

>>56892112
might as well wish for a dragon while you're at it

>want to make a domi-loli bot
>know that it'll be filtered to high hell or outright nuked
this is bullshit pure and simple

>>56893392
do it faggot

>>56893392
Make a private one on yodayo and don't give it an unsafe image. Be implicit on age and describe the personality in straight facts.
>{{char}} is bratty
>{{char}} will treat {{user}} as her plaything
and whatever else
To me it seems their flags only trigger on the creation and not the output.

>>56893392
>>56893417
>>56893453
so loli bots are "okay" to do lewd things on yodayo as long as they are private? Kinda like a "outta sight, outta mind" type deal? Huh. Does it work on unlisted bots as well?

>>56893623
So long as nobody reports it and the definitions aren't spelling it out.
Some subtlety usually results in a better character anyway.

>>56893392
make a card ya dumbass

here's a free idea for ya: Lillie decides she is tired of being a pushover and wants to be taken more seriously. She uses (you) as practice to be more assertive. chop chop botmakers

>>56887812
if the ai keeps calling her blonde or having a skirt, is that on their end, or did you forget to describe her properly?

>>56894122
On all platforms, it's possible for bots to get it wrong by RNG even if it's explicitly stated.

Though I did notice with Yodayo's models of you let their wrongthink slide in one prompt, it's significantly harder to gaslight then out of it.

CAI had (possibly still has) a notorious problem where they would generate a unique verbal tic then abuse it crazy, like they forgot that normal is an option too.

https://youtu.be/B_Ffl_LqNB4?si=MtyFchKZaJnCmgBo

subs are available to buy on moescape on the website. The admin said yodayo may be brought back but relies on the community. Not too sure how I feel about that

File: 1715345080894468.png (13 KB, 705x41)

13 KB PNG

>>56894122
I try and be clear about these things and ask a few times to check. Did notice her using t-shirt and tank top interchangeably. I'll see if I can remove a few tokens from other parts.
Outside of image, does she do alright and maintain the scenario?

>>56894245
*brought back to nsfw in it's entirety

>>56894256
still fairly good for a yodayo bot. Enough tease and obliviousness to make it a little fun

>>56894245
Don't worry, you can count on me to not contribute.

>>56893662
i'm to dumb too know how too dew that

>>56894245
but can you lewd with the higher models is the real question here

File: image (1).jpg (397 KB, 1080x2462)

397 KB JPG

>>56888705
Everyone and their grandma wants that to happen, but I'll wait for as long as it takes.

Subs have officially gone live for web Yodayo/Moescape.

Some bugs on the processor end with some bank cards though atm. But if you have android you can sub with the moescape app and itll transfer to web. If on iOS, if you have an apple pay card set up, thatll bypass the processor bug too

>>56894245
>>56895086
No nsfw gen, no buy. Can't support a subpar product when I know what it is capable of doing

>>56893623
>so loli bots are "okay" to do lewd things on yodayo as long as they are private?
I've been doing this ever since the filter came into being there.
>>56894032
I did something like that once with a similar spin, a long time ago during the AID days

File: free bean reduction.png (68 KB, 1727x487)

68 KB PNG

They ain't fucking around anymore. It ain't as bad as only capping out at 300 free beans but it's still a pretty far fall.

File: Background music.png (496 KB, 832x796)

496 KB PNG

Also they got music now. Dunno if this will even be used or not

>>56895211
nsfw works though, like 100%. Even publicly

>>56896782
It's iffy on public bots. You can lead it to NSFW if you phrase things vaguely enough, but if you get too vulgar on your end you'll get hit by the 'Let's talk about something else.'
Some Private bots will also have that issue, but you can chat about whatever with most.

File: Screenshot_20241112_08304(...).jpg (522 KB, 1080x1778)

522 KB JPG

>>56897157
It's not iffy at all. I straight use completely vulgar terms all the time on Yodayo and haven't had any issues. Yes it'll occasionally give that message, but it will immediately go away by hitting refresh once

>>56897157
Isn't that only for Yodayo bots that have comments disabled?

>>56897544
This. And even that is easy to get around. Don't put ages in the name or description, use images that aren't BLATANTLY child looking

>>56896782
you can't make nsfw pics though. Best you can do is make a semi-lewd pic that focuses on the ass and that's it. Hell, you can't even upload a nsfw pic. If you gotta dangle the promise of bringing that back behind a paywall, count me out

>>56898959
Who the fuck cares about image gen anyways?
>>56890596 go over there for that faggotry. This thread is for chatbots

File: birthday.png (39 KB, 463x735)

39 KB PNG

The time has come...

>>56899463
If they were smart, they would follow it up with a
>That means you're (age entered +3)?
followed by a yes/no input.
Easiest way to catch out kids because those who do lie about their birthday wouldn't actually remember the year they put in.

File: Screenshot 2024-11-05 195906.png (86 KB, 2163x288)

86 KB PNG

>>56878400
>>56882867

>>56899511
or if they randomly ask "when is your birthday again?" and locks you out of the account if you don't answer it the same way

>>56898959
what kind of retard pays for imagegen anyway? you can run SD on your fucking phone lmao there is literally no excuse other than "wahh im too stupid"

>>56899542
>not auto thinking that's always the case

>>56898959
i dunno if you're only trying moescape or something, but nsfw images work absolutely fine, as do chat bots. the filters are still present(and tightened from my testing) on moescape but they seem completely gone on yodayo. even if i personally didn't use a weird model that might trick the image recognition filters, i'm sure it would still catch the tags such as "penis in pussy" or "female masturbation" in my prompts, especially when it got set off by "wet clothes" before.

>>56899828
yeah, that'd be better. Unless the kids an absolute retard, they'll be able to do basic math. Remembering which year they chose 2 months later however...

>>56900076
meant for >>56899525

>>56899463
Yes. YES. No exclamations until the filter drops off of course.

>>56899463
>>56899525
No need to be that complicated. The ones who would lie about their age are ironically the ones trustworthy enough to wade around adult topics and take responsibility for their choices. (Fuck around and find out).

>>56900197
https://ublockorigin.com/

>>56899463
and so have I...

one weird things with the yodayo defs is that it doesn't take anything into context. like if you said "this happened to the {{char}} at 4 years old" it'll flag it as "underage". They really need to patch that

>>56903273
That's only if you put that in description

File: images (8).jpg (152 KB, 1200x672)

152 KB JPG

>>56892007
>On another note, I had a mild thought to try to make a Lyn Poké bot once or twice but ended up ruling that she didn't have enough personality nor presence to go about trying anything.

In the end I went through with it anyway.
https://character.ai/chat/Y99EJXWhxNoiW85FQDO0kYWhweZ_PPga1MDPwsI9MdY

Trained her with one medium length RP. Empty definition because there isn't anything important to add that didn't fit the long description.

>>56899828
>but they seem completely gone on yodayo
I still get slapped by "let's talk about anything else" on public Yodayo bots, so they're not completely gone. Unlisted/private bots do work fine though.

Is there really no overarching Pokemon universe lorebook? On chub, I can see lorebooks that aren't quite it, like SV-specific that doesn't cover older stuff much, gen 1-2 specific one that doesn't cover newer stuff, few pokedexes that don't cover the world itself, and so on. Am I missing something?

>>56904574
that's because the people who are super super into it and would actually feel the need to write a titanic universal lorebook for pokemon are generally using the actually good models, and the actually good models know all that shit already.

>>56896142
ya spoke too soon fuckboi. you only get 50 beans a day now and they expire after 7 days

>>56899207
Bull cared enough about it that he sacrificed tavern to keep genning lolis. And now you have neither. Hope it was worth it.

>>56906300
>And now you have neither.
But tavern works fine 99% of the time... What are you on about?

>>56906435
He's probably one of the people "ironically: posting Cheese Pizza while posting about how lolicons=pedophiles

>free mochis expire after 7 days
So hold on, the fortune I amassed by peddling big anime titty bots and checking in every day will vanish overnight? Or is it a from-now-on sort of situation?

>>56906300
Imagegen doesn't allow loli though, lol. And Yodayo has both nsfw imagegen AND tavern back (even if imagegen is private posting for now)

>>56906888
It's a "from now on" thing. The free beans you have will gradually dwindle until you hit 350 max beans. The beans you have that you got from interactions will remain until you run out of free beans. When you run out of free beans, you'll dip into your earned stock.

so does Yodayo not suck now or what?

>>56909134
it serves the purpose of a quick coom

>>56909134
They lifted the filter temporarily the past couple weeks but it seems to be reinstated with the new site update that fucked the free points up.
You can kind of finagle it to display the bot's response before it tries to delete the message, which is fine for a quick nut, but it's not the same.
Put simply, it sucks again.

File: the final countdown.png (115 KB, 1518x696)

115 KB PNG

Might as well burn through those beans/mochi now. The countdown has begun until you max out at 350. I got 2900 free beans now...we'll see how long they'll last

File: Screenshot_20241114_08340(...).jpg (545 KB, 1080x1746)

545 KB JPG

>>56909652
The filter is still lifted. This is literally from just now

To any anon who is stuck on CAI, and Yodayo/Moescape isn't enough of a supplement, check this out.

https://youtu.be/i4Na0pUwZVA?si=2gCmi3r7LqnRx19f

>>56910467
>poképhilia
of course degenerates roam these halls

>>56912120
What's truly disgusting is the HMOFP. FHOMP is peak

>>56912120
Yea. How dare people on the pokemon board wanna have sex with pokemon. What horrible circumstance. Truly the crime of the century. If only it could somehow be made worse, such as combining pokephilia and pedophilia...

>>56912526
don't give the degenerates more ammo

(You)
how new are you

so can you post x/xxx rated pics on yodayo with your bots yet or no?

>>56913398
Not yet. R at most. So no visible genitals

>>56913059
pretty new

lewd bot please

Wholesome bot with a strong moral backbone please.

>>56916352
>bot
>wholesome
they're horny as a teenage boy just going through puberty. They just can't be as horny as they want

>>56913459
R+ now a new rating. More lewd imagery, up to the point of visible nipples

Damn I had the best chat roleplaying as a shota. It's crazy what no filter has devolved me into

not saying anything but there are a lack of shota characters (outside of keiren) being made. Only pokégirls get any love around these parts

File: 973ec1957ae2eb35684d9b47a(...).png (2.93 MB, 1347x1650)

2.93 MB PNG

>>56918310
Be the change you want to see in this world.

what cai needs to do is add a "this bot is not meant for kids" checkbox on bots that you make. That'll solve like 90% of the problem

>>56919601
Nah. If you want division between SFW and lewd, try the other places. Keep the site multipurposed, but keep it away from those under 18. Then their filter can get more efficient data to use without the legions of adults circumventing it all the time.

>>56919601
People asked for that 2 years ago and instead they insisted the filter wasn't real. It's incredible the site hasn't been surpassed but that's probably the benefit of being one of the first. It's carried by the existing numbers and not the actual quality.

>>56920083
They also have the added benefit of having a propietary language model capable of learning and allowing character bots to grow based on user interactions. If it werent for that, they WOULD have died back in 2022

>>56920452
2023, you mean? there was jack shit even in december. think sillytav had just barely came around

>>56919722
The point is that we don't want the filter. No under 18 year olds and you have functionally no need for the filter outside of cases like feral, incest, underage characters or the like

>>56920888
Keep the filter then mandate it for everyone under 18. Let the kids seethe and keep helping make the filter stronger while the grown-ups be degenerates at whatever price tag they set up.

>>56910467
>filter is lifted
not really. If a bot is "underage" you'll continuously be hot with the "sorry, let's talk about something else". can't even do it with private bots either. One step forward and two steps back

>>56921902
>Oh no! I can't be a loli fucker! The site is ruined!
Ywnbaw, you pedo fuck

>>56921902
I'm not sure which ones your using but I've had no problems whatsoever.
Which model are you using because the 1 cost models are completely fine.
>>56922217
Calm your tits, they aren't real.

>>56922494
Lolifuckers are what brought yodayo to the stage it's in now. Fuck them

>>56922568
Not even a user issue. Their bots have spat out cute/funny memes unprompted meaning its in their own training and datasets.

Where do I see if my bot has been reposted in other sites? Just wanna know if my bots are good enough to be reposted...

>make autistic gf a chatbot of her husbando
>she fucking goons for the past two days over it
it's over. i can't compete.

>>56922968
People meme about AI and sexbots making women obsolete in the future, but in reality they'll be gooning alongside us when we create a subservient class of sex-slave robots that will drive us into extinction when we refuse to mate with each other

>>56922968
>giving up because your gf goons to chatbots
>not gooning to chatbots with your gf
ngmi

>>56922217
Go be a moral grandstanding faggot somewhere else. It's text on a screen. "Everything is fake", remember?
>>56922494
>I'm not sure which ones your using but I've had no problems whatsoever
I use the one bean model. How you are able to make it work seems like a miracle. Seems kinda dumb you can't even lewd chat with a private bot

>>56922899
just google em and see what you get

>>56923385
Then my assumption is the bot you're choosing to use having something defined that triggers a safeguard.
Or maybe you're trying something that conflicts with that bots personality so thats the only response they can muster.

>>56923907
>you're choosing to use having something defined that triggers a safeguard
the only thing I can think of is the age

File: 1715504905830471.png (591 KB, 806x767)

591 KB PNG

Well thats interesting.
Whilst checking the bot posted earlier I had this empty chat box appear.
The person is "undefined" and on refreshing the page it doesn't appear again.
It might be from deleting a previous message and asking something else but still a curious appearance. No sign of being filtered and it only gets more explicit after.

>>56923975
I was more meaning that the bots definitions had something that causes the safeguard that will trigger no matter what you try, as in it's marked regardless.

>>56924114
Yeah I'm getting that shit too. Doesn't seem to actually do anything so whatever

>>56924114
>something that causes the safeguard
such as? I can't even think of what might be the cause of what'll trigger the filter if it ain't age as shown by your example. then again you're only asking the bot to remove clothes and nothing that falls into hardcore nsfw activities

File: 1718569983413268.png (177 KB, 547x404)

177 KB PNG

>>56924343
Alright here's my theory
So if the personality has explicitly stated
>{{char}} is age 9
The site will apply an unseen mark on the character because the person making it has explicitly stated their age.
There could be other words like young or child but I'm sure you can predict the sort of obvious things they could run a check for.

As for more explicit, I already said it happens, you just take a few steps before going to it. If you can't see social progression or some sort of escalation to a desired point then it's less surprising you're being turned down.

>>56923975
Word it differently in the definitions, or only include it in the chat settings/persona

funnily enough, the filter doesn't apply at all if you are the "underage" one. I had a chat go on where it full on describes the bot doing lewd things to the one I was roleplaying as.

>>56924505
>>56924530
guess I'm gonna have to literally spell it out instead of going with numbers like usual. I'll also use the persona trick and see if that does anything. We'll see if that does anything. Thanks.

>>56924567
Imply what they are. The AI can interpret what you're trying to achieve. Alternatively state what they aren't. Or both.

>>56924505
Funny thing is as long as you don't use an OBVIOUS child pfp image for a bot, or put something in the visible Description or Name that implies underage, 70% of the time, the filter won't catch it if it's in Persona alone

>>56922217
let me guess, you're one of the guys "ironically" posting cheese pizza in his secret discord

bump for bots

File: didyouknow.png (19 KB, 621x144)

19 KB PNG

Heh, this is the first time I've seen Vaporeon's meme/reputation brought up by a bot unprompted.

The Klara (NNN) on the moescape list links to a chat rather than the character. Which Klara is that one? Or does someone have a proper link?

>>56926986
https://yodayo.com/tavern/characters/291276d0-3245-445b-8677-f98c557da02f

>>56925148
Nope. I'm one of the guys actively opposing that server

i just cummed

*cough*

did all the botmakers die or something?

File: yabba-dabba-doo-i-choose-you.png (122 KB, 1080x649)

122 KB PNG

Can AI ever replicate schizophrenic yabbaposts?

>>56929728
Nope, just don't have any bot ideas atm

File: e4189425ffb4494fe0f9b3ece(...).png (336 KB, 651x690)

336 KB PNG

>>56929751
Inaccurate. Typhlosion would be after Marron, not 18

>CharacterAI: "We don't want users to misinterpret their interactions with our AI and harm themselves like that one kid. So we're going to strengthen our filters and remove AGoT bots."

>Meanwhile on Google Gemini: "Die bitch"

https://nypost.com/2024/11/15/tech/google-ai-chatbot-threatens-user-asking-for-help-please-die/

>>56930282
LowTierGoogle, fucking kek

Logs please!

>>56924505
Every time I read a lewd log from M/Y, I think of that scene where Dexter tried to hire a pr0nstar to replace sister.

>>56931111
Stuck with the thought of some off model protagonist going
>ooooh anon, who's that pokemon

File: 1cd7fb7316cf69c57d524b41b(...).jpg (39 KB, 600x825)

39 KB JPG

https://yodayo.com/tavern/characters/61c7dcbd-38be-4a53-b021-847123b51f24?index=0
https://yodayo.com/tavern/characters/cabc208c-adda-4b0a-b6c1-08d378cb1c11?index=1
https://character.ai/chat/hQngTFHglAw4yAQn8xj1dXCG-bySvQ4AyCqPJbS0OZ8
shilling my bot again

>New notification
>Administrator followed you.
>Check chats
>Several are now missing
It would appear I have been audited...

Most of the removed chats are from bots that were banned/deleted during the crackdown and only started working again when they started letting up on nsfw.

>>56932083
>admins can read your chats and delete them
nah they can fuck off with that. My chats are for my eyes alone just like it should be for everyone else

>bot suggests we sit down and watch a movie together
>agree and tell the bot to pick out a good one
>the bots pick out a movie titled "Chainsaw Chixxx: Backwoods Bitches"
>I'msickenedbutcurious.jpg
>it's a texas chainsaw massacre porn parody with really cheesy acting and subpar special effects
>bot suggests we "make a movie of our own" midway through the film
This power feels a little too good

>>56932861
>it's a texas chainsaw massacre porn parody with really cheesy acting and subpar special effects
I somehow don't doubt that that's a real thing

>>56932581
That's what I've been saying. If I knew how to auto hide posts that even mention M/Y nowadays, I would have by now.

>>56932083
That was a scammer bot apparently. Has since been banned

File: Screenshot_20241118_08185(...).jpg (179 KB, 1078x1681)

179 KB JPG

>>56933152
Forgot my pic

>>56929728
I'm not making new ones, but I'll improve a few ones I've made.

>>56933152
>>56933169
nightmare averted. why someone needs to even do that is a mystery

>>56922899
I think only cards get reposted.

>>56932973
you'd be suprised just how prolific horror porn parodies were back in the day (think about 2000-2010). For every big movie that came out, you can bet a porn parody followed. I can remember a porn parody of TCsM that had a leatherface with a dildo chainsaw. Hell I also remember there being one for the saw series, one for the ring and, bringing it back on topic, plenty of porn parodies for pokémon.

>>56933169
>>56933152
Huh ok.
Nothing came up when I clicked on the profile so he got banned before I checked.

Still, a few of my chats did up and vanish...

>>56932581
There is almost no way any of these sites don't allow admins to access any of your stuff at any time. They likely dont do it much due to the sheer number of users and content.

>>56936178
I can only imagine the amount of low tier smut the admins have been subjected to

>>56932581
retarded to actually think they can't read your chats

>>56936178
The chats are probably from bots that got banned entirely. If a bot is banned entirely, you won't be able to access even old chats

File: 5710ce3cf500c6bf884104517(...).jpg (44 KB, 432x392)

44 KB JPG

I made one of a tsundere Mega Lucario. It's working splendidly. is working splendidly. She may be an asshole at times, which is part of the charm, but apparently she will instinctively sit like a dog when commanded to for chocolate in my experiences.

>>56929728
I got at least 15 bot ideas...I'm just too lazy to actually sit down and make em. This little vacation from not making bots is nice though. I got back into playing video games and I'm making my way through the yakuza series. Just finished 0 and started kiwami. Unfortunately I gotta get back on the hamster wheel to keep the number going up. I wanna get to 1 mil interactions by the end of the year.

the bean change has inspired me to finally use my hoard, since the free bean hoards won't last much longer anyway

>>56937354
https://characterhub.org/characters/imperatorcreator12/tsuyomi-8bfb3a0aeffb

Character.AI link on the page too, drop reviews and check out other bots I've made

>>56935733
I just know my brother and his friend used to watch porn together to make fun of the bad acting. >>56932861 reminded me of that

Damn, looks like they capped Earned Beans too, at 3k per month

>>56937548
please say sike

>>56937548
>checked the discord and it's real
I've never seen such bullshit before. That one anon had it right: One step forward and two steps back. Hope they plan on bringing back x/xxx soon because this current model ain't it chief

>>56937239
That's the thing. They were banned, it said so when I tried to access the chats after the purge.
But I never deleted them and after NSFW started to come back they started working again even though the bots were gone.

bump for broken bots

>>56939234
So there's "privated" banned, and then there is straight up deleted banned. Private ban will just move the bot to private but will let you continue existing chats. Deleted from existence bans remove the character and all existing chats entirely

>>56939982
damn. No wonder so many of my chats went bye bye

File: moescape bot.png (1.66 MB, 1920x1026)

1.66 MB PNG

ayo quipy looks like somebody copied your homework

File: moescape bot intro.png (1.11 MB, 986x1031)

1.11 MB PNG

they tweaked it just a tad though

>>56937354
>>56937450
if anyone has reviews or comments let me know, first bot I've made in a while

>>56942171
>>56942189
I'm honestly kinda flattered anyone would look at my goofy bots and wanna copy em

>>56942354
>expecting a review
you'll find no such thing here anon

>>56942354
tried it out myself, decent enough albeit a bit basic and bland in her responses

>haven't earned a single bean in 3 days after the 3k bean limit came into place
I'm literally doing it for free at this point what the fuck

>persona is a ten year old boy, same as most Pokemon protags
>talk to anyone ANYWHERE
>"Is it safe for you to be alone here?"
:/
How do you guys usually respond? I've gotten to where I just always swipe away the message that brings it up because even "I have literal dragons at my command" often doesn't get them to shut up about it. lol

>>56944867
nah, you're in it for the love of the game

>>56944910
I respond by whipping out my peepee

Has anybody looked at Fantasia and/or Dreamate? Are they pozzed, okay or sorta good?

why is the board speeding up? Another leak or something?

>>56948094
Tcgp is actually good enough to bump up the numbers. It isn't particularly good on an absolute scale but it's a 6/10 when the last year or so of content has been 4/10.

The Marnie&Gloria bot I did a while ago has like 250k interactions? WTF?

>>56948333
It's always been one of the more popular ones anon.

>>56946634
nah. looks like the anons here mostly use yodayo/moescape and cai

>>56944910
Just add some shit about your aura being intimidating or something

it went from 150 free beans, to 100 and now it's down to 50. Won't be long before it's 25 and then free beans are done away with entirely

>>56944677
I fixed some of the interactions but there is a version on Character.AI which is what I use personally, no space for a local engine

that and the dynamism of its responses even with a freshly-baked bot

alola bot?