Trumbeak bros, how do we recover from this?
>>56907092>May 2024 can you at least wait until the November one comes out to make this thread?
>>56907092just my two centsThe biggest winner here is probably Eternatus. It's not a mon from the latest gen, and it's not a endlessly shilled popular pick.The biggest loser here is not Trumbeak but Quilladin. Sure it's not dead last, but it's from a Starter evolutionary line. Evolving from a starter and being in the bottom 6 is just... a devastating result. Trumbeak is just a rather unmemorable middle-stage from a game with one of the lowest replay values in the series. It's unsurprising and could have easily been somebody else.Also: Silicobra doesn't deserve to be here
>>56907608Do people dislike Chestnaught? Why?
>>56908827It's a really ugly line, which is even more notable when you consider how consistently good looking grass starters areIt's honestly impressive how ugly the chespin line is, it feels like they put effort into making it unappealing
>>56907608Eternatus was/is rising due to Pokemon Go hinting at it
>bottom full of unovamonsyikes
>>56907098they don't post them till the end of the month, but this one is October
A starter managing to be bottom 5 must be peak Pokemom design failure, very impressive
>>56909059Its just because nobody can spell its name
>>56908923Binacle shouldn’t be on that list because it shouldn’t be a pokemon at all.
>>56907092>archaludon>let's take the shitty abomination that is duraludon and make it even uglier!cross gen evos after gen 4 were a mistake
