[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


is ursaring an invasive species?
>>
I dont know but he's really cool!
>>
>>56908403
By definition, yes. Just that particular one, though.
>>
>>56908403
>slap some of that grey shit on ursaring and call it a new pokemon, do it twice!
cross gen evos after gen 4
they really were a mistake
>>
>>56908488
u got bann3d l3l
>>
>>56908403
Remember the leaker that claimed Bloodmoon was a Normal/Steel split evo of Ursaring?
>>
>>56909940
I believed him
>>
>>56908488
You mean gen 2 pokemon were a mistake.
>>
>>56908403
No, it's just one individual, not a species.
>>
>>56910163
gen 2 has the best designs in the series
>>
>>56908403
ursaluna is extinct in modern time so no



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.