[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why haven't the Elite 4 be renamed to the Elite 5 already in Gen 2? Since you always fight 5 people.
It was only ever (intended as) a surprise you had to fight an additional trainer in Gen 1.

>it only refers to the permanent members!
Evidently new champs don't automatically become the champion that actually defends the title at the Elite 4 location, going by examples like Red.
>>
>>57196469
4 is closely associated with death in east Asia. Intimidating big bosses usually come in groups of 4 because of this.
>>
>>57196469
Because the Japanese name (四天王) is a voluntary reference to this
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Heavenly_Kings



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.