One of the very few things I like about SV is the size differences between individuals of the same species, sure it started in Arceus technically - but I like the more realistic sizes of SV. Aside from gendered differences & height, what other differences would be interesting to see in the future? For example, you could have different styled Phantumps/Trevenants depending on the forest, different flowered roselias (like flabebe) different patterned Pokemon, scars, ect (like Arbok & Spinda)
>>57199402>One of the very few things I like about SVThat's too bad, they're good games. Better than DiaPer and BBW/2 for sure.
>>57199416Id be able to stand more of the game if it didn’t look like doggy doo,
I mean stuff like Burmy should have different foliage, but can you imagine how much work that'd be, especially on the amount of Pokemon we do have? It'd be a bit too much, even if it was just select mon. Sizes are one thing since its just a slider, but the rest would need entirely different modeling and rigging. Gender differences should be a bit more pronounced however. Some of them are great, Hippowdon is a fantastic example, but then we have stupid shit like Pikachu and Wobbuffet.
>>57199402there's this one dude who made fanart of like pokemon sicknesses, with steel types being rusty or rock types being eroded, I've always wished that was real in pokemon
>>57199423I think the pikachu thing was inspired by the gen3 sprite.
