Am I considered as a pedo if I'm attracted to pre evolution pokemons?
define "attracted
the term is predo
>>57227930want to breed uwu
>>57227914NoBut maybe not on wanting to be inside their intestines, redheadpika?
>>57227943You’re why I always evolve a mon before sending it to Daycare with a ditto. Vomit inducing, frankly.
>>57227914On twitter and the likes, definitely. But I don't think people here care.
Are you into cubs? Then yes, cub fucker
>>57227914kinda sorta yeah maybe? then again there's the whole female nidoran thing..
Pokemon fans be like >Which childmon has the tightest cunny
>>57227914No
>>57227914You cannot be diagnosed with pedophilia over fiction at all.
>>57231733What? Yes you can.
>>57227914No.Neither Evolution or level is indicative of age.You are a zoophile though.
>>57227914no, you're considered a pedo if you post on /vp/
>>57233577this
>>57227914mudkip is shotacoded
>>57228400That's nonsexual and doesnt count. That's like saying using a submarine is perverted.
If you are attracted to something that is not real. You are attracted to the real world equivalent of that thing. Theres no flaws to this logic. You want to fuck a mudkip? You want to fuck a axolotl.
>>57227914"Pedo" (we really need a new term): someone found guilty in a court of law for the molestation, sexual exploitation, or distribution of illicit materials involving a minorNot pedo: someone who has thoughts of raping children, someone who masturbates to children, someone who masturbates to drawings of fictional characters. You can be a MAP without being a "pedo."Understood OP?
