[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Starting February 1st, 4chan Passes are increasing in price.

One year: $30, Three years: $60


[Advertise on 4chan]


Dare I say… kino
>>
>>57244365
>Dare I say… cinema
There's a movie adaptation?
>>
>>57244365
>Ré
>リ
>>
>>57244365
This is bordering on off topic.
>>
>>57244365
>Fusion fetish faggotry manga

How dare you
>>
File: FusionGogeta4.webm (1.98 MB, 480x360)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB WEBM
https://youtube.com/watch?v=h9DsDPhY9CE&pp=ygUeU3VwZXIgc2FpeWFuIGdvZCBpcyBib3JuIHRoZW1l
>>
>>57247231
It's still Pokémon and while bad, it's not the worst Pokémon media out there.
>>
>>57244365
>Pokemon product
The only Pokemon on the cover is Zekrom and it's just a background element, it even looks like a plane in the distance. Obviously this mangaka doesn't give a shit about Pokemon and just wanted to publish his generic shonen.

How did this thing pass any TPC filter?

<<Even this edgy fan manga better understands that the main element of the franchise is the Pokemon!
>>
>>57248818
It's not Pokemon. It's a generic battle shonen with a Pokemon skin attached. The Pokemon are just power-ups for the humans to transform with.

A Pokemon battle shonen is an idea that hasn't been done yet, and the idea has potential, but Reburst is clearly something that had Pokemon slapped on for brand recognition.
>>
>>57248979
>>57248979
>Festival of Champions
>Edgy
Just because its not for literal children and have some hard (but not gory or even that brutal) violence, doesnt make it edgy.
>>
Holy fuck, this is a blast from the past.
I never read it, but when I saw the pictures when I was 14, I thought it was the coolest shit ever.
>>
>>57249338
I was only two years older but I thought it was extremely stupid.
>>
>>57249391
Everyone did
>>
>>57249237
Don't take it as an insult, I enjoy that story, mainly because of the mix and fanservice of different realities, but I can't find another word to describe works with these elements that feel forced to give it a serious touch, but that achieve the opposite.

For example, without saying names, giving an 11-year-old girl a degree in pharmacology, a teenage policeman dressed as a j-pop idol behaving like a sociopath, I'm sorry but instead of looking deep it becomes a joke.

In this case FoC is a great product, but it fails to give it seriousness in moments that are not necessary, it's like reading one of those fanfics where Goku, Naruto, Sonic, wtr is betrayed by his friends and it becomes dark and silent.

An example with pic related; in context this seems serious, but when you look at the bigger picture, it's just kids in the middle of a legalized cockfight in their world, it's not the destiny of the world, it's just an annual tournament, imagine in our world two 13 year olds in a card or video game tournament having these kinds of live streamed dialogues where the prize is $1000 worth of stuffed animals and toys, it's not epic it's cringe.

Finally, the art is beautiful, and I have no problem with the graphic nature or violence, but the plot fails to measure its own tone.
>>
>>57249449
>Why is this cartoon so exaggerated?
>>
>>57249517
In most battle shonens, the fights are a matter of life or death, so of course the characters take it seriously.

But when you remove the larger than life stakes, suddenly the characters look like losers for taking this shit so seriously
>>
>>57244365
It's okay, I guess.
Not much to do with pokemon though, there's barely any half the time.
>>
>>57249540
>the characters look like losers for taking this shit so seriously
You sound like an insecure faggot and you cannot be older than 24.
>>
>>57249540
>no reasons results in no sense
no shit? Next you'll say apples fall DOWN from the apple tree.
>>
>>57249007
>The Pokemon are just power-ups for the humans to transform with.
hot

>>57249449
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Narm
>>
>>57249449
I think FoC does it correctly and with the right amount. The dramatization of Pokemon battling is to attract the audience, and it's also portrayed like that as a way for the author to illustrate what ambitions look like. It's edgy but not overly done, just enough to make it actually badass.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.